Thursday, July 3, 2025
Subscribe
Home Blog Page 65

Ghost Bites (Adcorp | African Media Entertainment | AYO | Brikor | Crookes Brothers | Dis-Chem | Finbond | Gemfields | Huge | Insimbi | Lewis Group | Nedbank | Trustco)

The Finance Ghost
-
0
Ghost Bites (Adcorp | African Media Entertainment | AYO | Brikor | Crookes Brothers | Dis-Chem | Finbond | Gemfields | Huge | Insimbi | Lewis Group | Nedbank | Trustco)

Get the latest recap of JSE news in the Ghost Wrap podcast, brought to you by Mazars:

Adcorp’s profits are under pressure (JSE: ADR)

This is a perfect example of a group that is swimming upstream

Adcorp has released results for the year ended February 2024 and they reflect difficulties in the business, particularly on the professional services side in both South Africa and Australia.

It feels like blue collar labour solutions still have a place in the market, but professional skills can be attracted in many ways beyond the traditional route of working with recruitment firms like Adcorp. Just think of LinkedIn and how powerful that platform has become in connecting talent with opportunities.

To give you an idea of how tough things have been for Adcorp for several years now, this year is the second consecutive year of revenue growth and this is the first time they’ve achieved this rather basic goal since 2016!

Although revenue from continuing operations was up 7.7%, margins came under pressure and gross profit was down 2%. This led to a decline in operating profit from continuing operations of 21.5%. HEPS from continuing operations fell sharply from 147.8 cents to 83.8 cents, a decline of over 43%.

The strength of the balance sheet means that although HEPS declined, the final dividend is up from 16.1 cents per share to 24.2 cents per share.

Radio assets drive African Media Entertainment forward (JSE: AME)

Algoa FM and OFM both grew EBITDA by 16%

For the year ended March 2024, African Media Entertainment can feel proud of a result that saw revenue move 8% higher and HEPS jump by 63%. That’s the kind of operating leverage that shareholders want to see.

Cash conversion was excellent, with operating profit of R56.9 million and cash from operating activities of R64.9 million. This gave the group the confidence to repurchase R6.9 million worth of shares during the period. In addition to the interim dividend of R1.00 per share, there’s a final dividend of R3.50 per share. This takes the total dividend for the year to R4.50, so the share price of R44.00 is a trailing dividend yield of just over 10%.

Algoa FM and OFM were the highlights of this result, each growing EBITDA by 16% year-on-year. Some of the other assets assets are struggling in a changing media environment, needing to find new ways to generate revenue.

AYO Technology has reduced its losses (JSE: AYO)

But the remaining losses are still substantial

AYO Technology released results for the six months to February 2024. They reflect a modest uptick in revenue (growth of just 0.19%) and a drop in gross margins. Despite this, the impact of cost saving initiatives (including retrenchments) means that the headline loss per share has improved from 79.13 cents to 33.12 cents.

A rather interesting nugget in the numbers is a 22% increase in revenue in the unified communications division, which distributes AV products and gaming equipment for brands like Logitech. They reckon that the hybrid work culture has led to significant investment by companies in virtual meeting hardware.

There are no fewer than three pages of disclosures related to litigation, ranging from various banks through to the South African Clothing and Textile Worker’s Union and Daily Maverick!

Brikor had a much better financial year (JSE: BIK)

The core bricks segment led the way

Brikor has released results for the year ended February 2024. Revenue increased by 12.4% to R350.4 million, with the bricks segment up by 6.8% to R226 million and the coal segment up 24.4% to R124.5 million.

The bricks segment makes the bulk of the profit though, with operating profit up from R15.7 million to R24.5 million. Coal improved from an operating loss of R5.8 million to an operating loss of R0.6 million.

At group level, this small cap saw HEPS come in at 1.3 cents per share, an improvement from a loss of 0.1 cents in the comparable period. The net asset value per share is 13.9 cents.

The share price at R0.16 is therefore higher than where you would expect to see it trading based on these numbers. The mandatory offer by Nikkel Trading that was completed at the start of the year was at a price of R0.17 per share, so the share price appears to still be anchored by that offer.

Crookes Brothers flags much sweeter numbers (JSE: CKS)

Sugar cane and bananas for the win

Primary agriculture group Crookes Brothers gives us a great example of how volatile agriculture actually is. This is firmly a feast-or-famine situation, being the industry from which the term comes from in the first place.

The year ended March 2024 was a feast, with HEPS of 334.50 cents vs. a headline loss of 708.80 cents in the comparable year. Over two years, this means that the group still made a loss. That aside, the improvement came from the sugar cane and banana operations, along with a reduction in fertilizer and other agricultural input costs.

A modest HEPS performance at Dis-Chem (JSE: DCP)

They are going to need to get tighter on costs while expanding the business and making acquisitions

Dis-Chem has a strong business, but they cannot afford to become complacent on costs. For the 12 months to February 2024, a decent revenue result of 11.1% growth couldn’t be translated into a strong HEPS performance.

HEPS as reported was down 1.6%, but that includes the distortion of a major once-off property gain in the base period. If we adjust for that, then HEPS would’ve been up by 3.8%. That’s a positive result but still a concern in terms of margin contraction.

The Dis-Chem announcement goes into great detail on the two halves of the year, showing that the first half in the base period was incredibly strong vs. averages. This is why the full-year numbers look better than the interim numbers did.

Retail revenue was up 9.7%, which is a solid result when you consider that COVID vaccine revenue was still in the base. If you split that out, revenue was up 10.3%. Comparable pharmacy store revenue growth was 6.9%, so they are doing well even without the impact of new stores. Retail total income was up 9.3%, with the margin contraction attributable to increased promotional activity to ensure market share retention. This is something to keep an eye on.

Wholesale revenue increased by 13.3%, including external revenue to independent pharmacies and The Local Choice franchises up by 21.4%. That’s a great top-line result. Total income was up 10.9%, with margins ever so slightly higher if you exclude the property gain from the base.

The concern is in expenses, which grew 10.9% vs. the comparable period. Although they make reference to pressures like load shedding, the biggest area of focus is staff costs that account for 62% of retail expenses excluding depreciation. Staff costs were up 8% for the year, split across 9.7% in the first half and 6.4% in the second half. They will hopefully maintain the better control that was seen in the second half.

Retail expenses were up 11% and wholesale expenses were up 8%.

Brace yourself for the jump in net financing costs, up by 25.6%. If you exclude IFRS 16 leases and interest on new term loans related to warehouse acquisitions, net finance costs were up 94.1% due to pressure on working capital (inventory increased by 12.7%) and higher interest rates. This is an expensive operating environment for retailers.

None of these pressures are slowing Dis-Chem down, with R869 million invested in expansionary capital expenditure vs. only R158 million in replacement expenditure. Of the expansionary capital, R502 million was for a new distribution centre in Gauteng.

Heading into the new financial year, revenue has increased by 11.4% year-on-year for the first three months of trading. Aside from cost control, the focus will be on ongoing expansion in the business and an improvement in working capital ratios. They also have significant ambitions in the digital space in health and in building out an integrated health ecosystem, including with the acquisition of a life insurance business.

The business in question is OneSpark Holdings, which is incorporated in Delaware. Related party deals never seem to be far away at Dis-Chem, with the Saltzman family and a couple of other directors having a financial interest in OneSpark. It’s likely that they acted as venture capital investors in that regard and have grown the business to the point where it makes sense for Dis-Chem to invest. Encouragingly, the investment takes the form of a share subscription of R156 million for a 50% stake, rather than a purchase of shares from those investors. In other words, the capital is flowing into OneSpark. This is much better than giving one of the other investors an exit.

This is proper start-up territory, as OneSpark made a loss for the four months to April of R25.3 million. These types of businesses in the digital space burn capital at an incredible rate. On that note, Dis-Chem has committed to subscribe for preference shares in OneSpark from time to time for R200 million.

PwC was appointed as independent expert and they have opined that the terms of the transaction are fair to Dis-Chem shareholders.

Finally, in a third announcement for the day, the Saltzman family confirmed that a deal has been done with key management of Dis-Chem that will see up to 3.75% of shares in the company change hands. The Saltzman family will vendor finance this at no cost to Dis-Chem. The executives are subject to a 4-year lock-up with incremental vesting over a subsequent 5 years. This is a win for minority shareholders in the group, as management is basically being locked in thanks to the Saltzmans rather than the company needing to put in place an expensive additional share scheme.

Finbond: not quite break-even at HEPS level yet (JSE: FGL)

They are much closer, though

The Finbond share price has had a rollercoaster year. Currently, it’s up 40% over 12 months, but the start date matters a great deal. The share price has bounced between roughly 30 cents and 49 cents a share, currently at 42 cents. Limited liquidity and a wide bid-offer spread is part of why it stays stuck in a range.

The recent interest in the company has come from improved financial performance. Although there’s still no dividend for 2024, the headline loss per share came in at a much lower 0.4 cents vs. 19.1 cents in the comparable period. This was driven by a revenue increase of 22.8%. Profit before tax was actually positive, so the group has made a song and dance about a return to profitability despite there still being a headline loss.

The performance is being driven mainly by the South African business, with the American business taking time to come right. There are good reasons to believe in the momentum in the American operations, particularly as it takes a while for growth in the book to reflect as growth in profits because of the way the accounting works.

Gemfields enjoys resilient pricing for emeralds (JSE: GML)

But these numbers were skewed by unsold lots at this auction being of lower quality

Gemfields has announced results from the May emerald auction, which achieved auction revenue of $35 million. 93% of lots on offer were sold, with a couple of lower quality lots going unsold. Although pricing per carat was even higher than the previous record auction, the company points out that this was skewed by the unsold lots. Pricing was strong in this auction but not as strong as in the previous auction if you take the unsold lots into account.

The next auction is for mixed-quality rubies in June, followed by commercial-quality emeralds in September.

Huge Group sees a modest uptick in NAV (JSE: HUG)

Not sure it matters though, as the market largely ignores the NAV

Investment holding companies tend to trade at significant discounts to NAV. This is for various reasons, including the costs at the centre. In some cases, it’s because the market simply doesn’t believe the NAV.

At Huge Group, the name is a good way to remember the extent of the discount. The NAV as at February 2024 was 964.54 cents and the share price is R2.20, a huge gap indeed.

Just one reason why this might be the case can be found in the note dealing with the fair value of investments held. For example, the preferences shares in subsidiary Huge Connect are valued using a required rate of return of 10.75%. This is lower than the SA 10 year government bond yield!

Nobody is going to take a company seriously when an asset representing more than a third of total holdings on the balance sheet is valued as though it carries lower risk than government debt.

For what it’s worth, the NAV per share of 964.54 cents is 2.2% higher year-on-year.

No dividends have been declared and perhaps more importantly, no shares were repurchased. At this discount to NAV, all that Huge should be doing is trying to recycle capital at the values put forward by management and repurchase shares with the proceeds at a deep discount to that NAV.

Insimbi’s numbers have deteriorated sharply (JSE: ISB)

Higher finance costs and lower EBITDA aren’t a great combo

Insimbi Industrial Holdings reported numbers for the year ended February 2024 and they aren’t great at all. Revenue is down 2%, which is a recipe for serious trouble in a business with tiny operating profit margins. Sure enough, operating profit dropped by 38%, with R15 million of the R77 million decrease being attributable to a non-recurring gain in the prior period.

However you cut it, a 34% decrease in EBITDA at a time of higher interest rates and and an increase in working capital isn’t what shareholders wanted to see. HEPS fell by 54% and the dividend was down 69% for the year, with no final dividend declared.

The company will hope that the global focus on cleaner metals leads to higher copper and aluminium prices, as this is a net positive for the business. They will also need to do what they can to bring debt down, as a business with so much operating leverage really shouldn’t be running financial leverage as well.

At Lewis, credit sales continue to fuel growth (JSE: LEW)

There’s an impressive increase in the dividend

Lewis Group released results for the year ended March 2024. They managed to accelerate in the fourth quarter, taking the full-year merchandise sales growth to 4.7%. Traditional retail grew by 6.9%, but UFO fell by a nasty 12.6%, leading to an impairment of the remaining goodwill in UFO.

This talks to the trend that has underpinned Lewis for years now: credit sales are driving the growth. Credit sales were up 15.8% this period vs. cash sales down 11.8%. Credit sales have achieved a CAGR of 16.9% over the past three years, now accounting for 66.2% of total merchandise sales. This has knock-on benefits for other revenue sources like insurance revenue, which is why group revenue growth of 9.8% is well above the increase in merchandise sales.

It’s natural to worry about the credit quality here, with Lewis pointing out that the quality of the book has improved with satisfactory paying customers at an all-time high of 81.3%. Despite this, the impairment provision as a percentage of debtors has increased due to the macroeconomic outlook.

Although operating profit came in 13.1% higher, a substantial jump in net finance costs blunted the benefit by the time we reach the bottom of the income statement. Headline earnings actually fell by 1.9%, with the share buybacks that Lewis is well-known for helping to turn that into a positive result, with HEPS up by 7.1%.

Along with ongoing share buybacks, Lewis also increased the dividend for the year by 21.1% to 500 cents per share.

The trading outlook isn’t appealing, with Lewis expecting conditions to not improve in the short- to medium-term. Despite this, they continue to invest in the store footprint. When the economy is ugly, the biggest groups can afford to keep investing to win market share at the expense of smaller competitors, positioning them strongly for when the cycle turns positive.

Nedbank’s HEPS is being helped greatly by buybacks (JSE: NED)

The first four months of the year reflect modest growth in the underlying business

Nedbank has released a trading update for the four months ended April 2024. With an expectation of interest rate cuts later this year, the bank is going to need to do more to get expense growth in line with revenue growth.

Headline earnings has only grown by mid-single digits for the four months, with Nedbank Wealth and Nedbank African Regions as the laggards. Thanks to share buybacks, HEPS increased by early double digits.

Although they talk about good expense management in the announcement, the reality is that jaws (the difference between income growth and expense growth) is negative and margins have gone the wrong way, even if that is mainly due to lower than expected growth in net interest income (NII) and non-interest revenue (NIR) rather than runaway expenses. They can’t control income to the same extent that they can control expenses.

For the four months, NII growth was just below mid-single digits. There was slight improvement in net interest margin year-on-year, but we are firmly at the top of the interest rate cycle and the likelihood from here onwards is that interest margin comes under pressure as rates start declining. Margin was already lower for these four months than for FY23. I was surprised to see that banking assets only increased by low-to-mid single digits despite the prevalence of inflation. This suggests a cautious approach in the run-up to elections, particularly by South African corporates. Deposit growth was ahead of advances growth, which also talks to caution and companies sitting on their cash.

Impairments decreased year-on-year and so did the credit loss ratio, but it remains above the through-the-cycle target of 60 basis points to 100 basis points due to pressure in the retail and business banking book.

Moving to NIR, growth was above mid-single digits if you adjust for distortions in the base related to Nedbank Zimbabwe and below mid-single digits if you don’t make that adjustment. The insurance business was the disappointment for the period, while areas like deal closures in CIB and cross-sell to main-banked clients were encouraging.

Associate income related to Nedbank’s 21% stake in Ecobank is expected to be 32% lower year-on-year for the first half of the year. This was due to a non-recurring gain in the base period.

Expense growth was above mid-single digits. Variable costs were slower than expected because of the revenue growth pressure. When viewed against income, jaws came out slightly negative and the cost-to-income ratio increased.

Trustco’s NAV per share is well down year-on-year (JSE: TTO)

But it has moved higher over the past six months

Trustco has released its financials for the six months ended February 2024. As this is an investment holding company, the income statement looks different to what you might be used to seeing. It includes fair value gains and losses on investments. It also included a significant gain on debt settlement in this period.

The net asset value per share as at February 2024 was 128 cents, which is down 20.5% year-on-year. It’s worth highlighting that this is an increase from 117.06 cents that was reported as at August 2023, the end of the last financial year.

The fair value moves were a mixed bag for the portfolio. The micro-finance, commercial banking and education portfolios all lost value, attributed to higher interest rates. The insurance portfolio was also down, with market volatility as a further challenge. On the positive side, the real estate and mining portfolios moved in the right direction.

The discount rates used to value the investments range from 18.03% to 28.68%. Unsurprisingly, the highest rate is used in the mining portfolio where the risk is the highest.

There are a few transactions currently underway at Trustco, including accessing up to $100 million in hybrid capital from Riskowitz Value Fund. Trustco has announced the acquisition of a further 11.35% in Legal Shield. Finally, they are aiming to convert NAD 4.4 billion of debt and “equity liabilities” into equity. The regulatory process is being followed in terms of drafting the circulars etc.

Little Bites:

  • Director dealings:
    • Associates of two different directors of a major subsidiary of RFG Holdings (JSE: RFG) sold shares worth nearly R2.9 million.
    • Here’s a strong signal for you: the company secretary of Altron (JSE: AEL) as well a a director of a major subsidiary have bought shares in the company with a total value of R962k.
    • An associate of a director of Workforce Holdings (JSE: WKF) sold R825k worth of shares to a B-BBEE investment group to improve the B-BBEE shareholding of Workforce. The price was R1.65 per share which is above the current market price of R1.40, so it wasn’t exactly a subsidised trade.
    • Although the total value is small, a few executive directors of Hammerson (JSE: HMN) have elected to reinvest their dividends in the company.
  • African Rainbow Minerals (JSE: ARI) has closed the deal to subscribe for a 15% stake in Surge Copper Corp, which is listed on the TSX Venture Exchange. The total value is C$3.93 million (around R55 million) and the subscription price was an 18% premium to the 20-day VWAP, which isn’t uncommon in a deal like this. To buy up a stake that size in a small listed company is usually impossible due to liquidity constraints. The share price would run by far more than 18% if a stake this size changed hands on-market. The other nuance of course is that the cash is flowing into the company, not to other shareholders.
  • There are wholesale leadership changes at EOH (JSE: EOH), with Andrew Mthembu stepping down as chairman and interim CEO after he helped fill that role to effect a leadership transition. Marius de la Rey comes in as interim CEO, which is an internal appointment as he is currently the CEO of iOCO South Africa. I don’t know why this is yet another interim appointment, as it sends a message to the market that they don’t back him in the role. There are also three appointments of independent non-executive directors.
  • Rebosis (JSE: REA | JSE: REB) gave an update on the property disposals currently underway as part of the public sales process under the business rescue plan. It looks like pretty much all the disposals have either already gone through or are expected to go through by the end of June.
  • Vunani (JSE: VUN) released a cautionary announcement regarding negotiations to dispose of a minority shareholding in a subsidiary. They don’t give any further details at this stage.
  • Between September 2023 and May 2024, Momentum Metropolitan (JSE: MTM) repurchased 3.06% of shares in issue at an average price of R20.87 per share. That’s slightly below the current traded price. They can repurchase a further 1.94% of issued shares under the current share repurchase authority. As the share price is trading at a discount to embedded value, they point out that R1.53 billion in embedded value was repurchased for R913 million. This is a similar concept to an investment holding company or a property fund trading at a discount to NAV.
  • Southern Palladium (JSE: SDL) announced that 46.7 million shares (over half of total shares in issue) will be released from escrow in June after a 24-month escrow period. This might encourage some liquidity in the share price but could also put downward pressure on it. 45.5 million of those shares were issued to the vendors of a 70% interest in the Bengwenyama PGM project. Of those being released from escrow, 22.75 million shares will be subject to voluntary escrow for up to 24 months or until certain project milestones have been achieved, whichever is earlier. The shares may be clawed back by the company and cancelled for a nominal sum if project milestones aren’t achieved within four years from the date of the ASX listing.
  • The acquisition by Novus (JSE: NVS) of Bytefuse, a small related party deal, has been amended to extend the fulfilment date for suspensive conditions from 31 May 2024 to 30 June 2024.
  • Oando (JSE: OAO) is still playing catch-up with financial results, with a flurry of announcements on Friday that included all the quarterly numbers for 2023.

Olympic fever and other ailments

Dominique Olivier
-
2
Olympic fever and other ailments

With the Paris Olympics set to kick off in 55 days, headlines around the world’s biggest sporting event are getting more surreal by the day. From sex-restricting beds in the Olympic Village to a dodgy riverside rendezvous planned on social media, the run-up to the opening ceremony promises to be a doozy. And yet, history has already proven that nothing that happens at the 2024 Olympics will come close to what already happened in 1904.

Amid the blur of election news, I read a headline that stopped me in my tracks earlier this week. “Parisians to ‘take a sh*t’ in Seine ahead of Olympic Games” proclaimed Metro News.

While the headline itself is surprising, the context probably shouldn’t be. Protesting is deeply rooted in the French relationship with their government. As South Africans, this makes sense to us: sometimes, you have to make the government listen to you. From the French Revolution to the numerous strikes and protests seen in modern times, the French have consistently demonstrated a willingness to challenge authority and fight for their rights.

Currently, the object of their ire is the £1.2 billion state-sponsored initiative to clean up the Seine River in Paris. The project aims to prepare the river for various water sports and activities for the Olympics, involving significant efforts to reduce pollution, upgrade sewage treatment facilities and improve the city’s overall water management systems. While one might expect Parisians to welcome this endeavour, they are, in fact, quite furious about it.

So furious that they are organising a “sht flashmob” in the river on the day President Emmanuel Macron and Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo are scheduled to swim in it to demonstrate the success of the cleanup. The hashtag #JeChieDansLaSeineLe23Juin, which translates to “I sht in the Seine on June 23,” started trending on X after Hidalgo announced the date of her swim. Additionally, a website with the same name was launched, allowing participants to share the locations where they plan to defecate.

Charming.

As South Africans, all we can do is set our calendar notifications and watch the headlines to see if they go through with it. While we wait, allow me to remind you that even if the president of France and the mayor of Paris take a dirty dip on the 23rd of June, that still won’t be the wildest story in Olympic history.

That honour belongs to the story of the Men’s Marathon at the 1904 Olympics in North America.

The marathon that almost ended all marathons

Nobody starts off at their job as an expert. Keep this in mind when you think about the team that planned the Men’s Marathon at the first-ever Summer Olympics hosted in the United States, way back in 1904. While they had no experience, these event planners clearly had high aspirations and an irrational sense of optimism in the abilities of human runners.

The marathon took place on the 30th of August. Since no standard for marathons existed yet, the race was an arbitrary distance of 40 km. While most marathon events around the world are usually scheduled as early as possible in the morning, this one started at 15:00 and was run during the hottest part of the day. 32 athletes representing seven nations, including the United States, France, Cuba, Greece, South Africa (in our Olympic debut!), Great Britain and Canada competed, but only 14 managed to complete the race.

So, what went wrong? For starters, the majority of the race took place over country roads that were centimetres deep in dust. There were seven hills, some with brutally long ascents. In many places, cracked stone was strewn across the roadway and runners had to constantly dodge crosstown traffic, delivery wagons, railroad trains, trolley cars and people walking their dogs.

Despite the heat and the dust, there were only two places along the course where athletes could secure fresh water – from a water tower at 9 kilometres and a roadside well at 19 kilometres. This was done on purpose, as James Sullivan, the chief organiser of the games, wanted to minimise fluid intake to test the limits and effects of purposeful dehydration. It sounds like torture (and it probably is), but this was actually a common area of research at the time.

So, how did the athletes fare?

Not great, as you could probably guess.

During the race, John Lordan, who had won the 1903 Boston Marathon, was violently ill after 16 kilometres and retired, while Sam Mellor, who had won the 1902 Boston Marathon, was also overcome by the dust. Despite leading the field at the halfway mark, Mellor became disoriented and ultimately dropped out of the race after 23 kilometres.

The first to arrive at the finish line, after three hours and 13 minutes, was American Frederick Lorz. After being hailed as the winner, he had his photograph taken with Alice Roosevelt, daughter of then-U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt. She placed a wreath upon Lorz’s head and was about to award him the gold medal when spectators claimed Lorz had not run the entire race. Lorz, suffering cramps, had actually dropped out of the race after 14 kilometres and hitched a ride back to the stadium in a car, waving at spectators and runners alike during the ride. When the car broke down at the 30th kilometre, he re-entered the race and casually jogged across the finish line.

Thomas Hicks ended up as the winner of the event, although he was aided by various measures that would definitely not have been permitted in later years. 16 kilometres from the finish, Hicks led the race by 2.4 kilometres but had to be restrained from stopping and lying down by his trainers. From then until the end of the race, Hicks received several doses of strychnine – a common rat poison, which stimulates the nervous system in small doses – mixed with brandy and egg white. He continued to battle onwards, hallucinating the entire time, and was barely able to walk for most of the course. When he reached the stadium, his support team carried him over the line, holding him in the air while he shuffled his feet as if still running.

Cuban postman Andarín Carvajal had also joined the marathon, arriving at the last minute. After losing all of his money gambling in New Orleans, he hitchhiked to St. Louis and had to run the event in street clothes, with his trousers cut around the legs to make them into shorts. Not having eaten in 40 hours, he stopped off in an orchard en route to eat some apples, which turned out to be rotten. The rotten apples caused him to have strong stomach cramps, and he had to lie down and take a nap. Despite his discomfort and the pause, Carvajal somehow still managed to finish in fourth place.

The South African entrants, Len Taunyane and Jan Mashiani, finished ninth and twelfth, respectively. This was a disappointment, as many observers were sure Taunyane could have done better if he had not been chased nearly 2 kilometres off course by wild dogs.

A far cry from the sophisticated heritage of the Greek marathon, the marathon at the 1904 Summer Olympics sounds like it was closer in theme to a carnival attraction. Despite public outcry and a threat to ban the event from future Olympics, the marathon endured and has remained a staple of the Olympics since then.

As a staunch feminist I’m surprised to see myself write these words, but thank goodness there wasn’t a women’s event.

About the author: Dominique Olivier

Dominique Olivier is the founder of human.writer, where she uses her love of storytelling and ideation to help brands solve problems.

She is a weekly columnist in Ghost Mail and collaborates with The Finance Ghost on Ghost Mail Weekender, a Sunday publication designed to help you be more interesting.

Dominique can be reached on LinkedIn here.

Ghost Bites (Afine | Anglo – BHP | Capital Appreciation | Delta | Emira | Nampak | Old Mutual | Trustco | Woolworths | Zeda)

The Finance Ghost
-
1
Ghost Bites (Afine | Anglo – BHP | Capital Appreciation | Delta | Emira | Nampak | Old Mutual | Trustco | Woolworths | Zeda)

Get the latest recap of JSE news in the Ghost Wrap podcast, brought to you by Mazars:

Afine’s dividend has moved lower (JSE: ANI)

There’s also an awkward restatement of financials

Afine owns a portfolio of forecourts across four South African provinces. Revenue for the year ended February 2024 moved 2.7% higher, which is a pretty pedestrian outcome. Distributable earnings fell 4.3% and the dividend per share is down 6.2%. This specialised REIT isn’t giving investors any growth at the moment.

The net asset value is 12.2% higher at R4.06 and the current share price is R4.00, a rare example of a REIT trading at roughly its NAV. Speaking of the NAV, the fund had to correct a embarrassing issue related to the 28 February 2023 numbers, in which the valuation of one of the properties included an extra year of cash inflow in the discounted cash flow valuation. This led to the fair value adjustment being overstated by R7.2 million. They have now fixed this.

The total dividend per year was 41.10 cents, so the current price offers a yield in excess of 10%.

Anglo says no to BHP – yet again (JSE: AGL | JSE: BHG)

Anglo is stubborn about the proposed structure

In and amongst the election news headlines on the airwaves, Anglo American and BHP Group were playing ping-pong on SENS. Due to the local public holiday yesterday and the resultant catch-up of announcements on SENS before the market opened, it looked weirder than would otherwise have been the case.

It started with Anglo American responding to the news from BHP that it doesn’t intend to make a firm offer for Anglo American. There wasn’t much in that announcement beyond the usual corporate gumph reminding investors that Anglo American has a plan to unlock value.

Things then got more interesting, with BHP talking about a range of socioeconomic measures that have been proposed to address Anglo American’s concerned. They must’ve gotten an advisor on board who suggested some ESG stuff to tug at the heartstrings of Anglo shareholders, particularly after BHP gave South Africa the cold shoulder in the deal structure through not wanting any of the local assets.

These measures include things like local procurement, the establishment of a mining centre of excellence and even maintaining funding for charitable commitments. Investors were probably more interested in BHP being willing to discuss a break fee, payable in the event of the proposed structure failing to meet necessary regulatory approvals.

When you consider that Anglo’s value unlock proposal has a few similar steps to the BHP proposal and comes without the benefit of a buyout offer and break fee if implemented, I’m surprised that BHP didn’t give the break fee more airtime in its announcement.

Still, BHP wasn’t willing to put down a firm intention to make an offer and asked for a further extension of the deadline to do so.

Anglo was having none of it, commenting that the socioeconomic measures don’t address the structural difficulty in BHP’s proposal. It’s still beyond me why the BHP proposal is considered bad because all the execution risk is borne by Anglo, yet the Anglo value unlock proposal is somehow better than this even though the risk is quite obviously born by Anglo shareholders as the only parties in an internal restructuring. On this basis, Anglo believes that there is no need for an extension to the deadline.

This brings us to the final position, for now at least: BHP will not make a firm offer for Anglo American. They are allowed to come back to the table if a third party announces an offer for Anglo, or in other limited circumstances.

Watch this share price carefully, as the takeout premium can quickly wash away if nobody else puts their hand up for Anglo American:

Capital Appreciation had a better second half (JSE: CTA)

The expected credit loss for GovChat has skewed the HEPS move

Capital Appreciation released a trading statement dealing with the year ended March 2024. It reflects an increase in HEPS of between 81% and 84.8%, but be very careful in interpreting that, as the expected credit loss for GovChat was included in HEPS in the base period and was significantly reduced in this period.

Also note that Dariel Group, an acquisition completed in July 2023, was included in this period and not in the base period.

Instead of focusing on the percentage move, we can look at the solid second half of the year that took HEPS from the interim period of 6.5 cents to a full-year result of between 13.47 cents and 13.75 cents. This was driven by increased activity in the Payments division, better expense management and strong cash flows. The Software division is still struggling with delays or deferrals of contracts.

Detailed results are due on 5 June.

Delta Property Fund has seen some improvement (JSE: DLT)

The swing into an operating profit is thanks to reduced expenses, amongst other things

Delta Property Fund is fighting for its survival, having renewed debt facilities with Nedbank out to April 2025. Investec facilities have been renewed until June 2025. The banks are hoping that the fund will find a way out of this mess and to their credit, Delta’s management team is giving it a full go. Operating profit came in at R399.2 million for the year ended February, which is vastly better than a R226.1 million loss in the comparable period.

Asset disposals aren’t easy in this environment, with debt reduced by R74.1 million in the past year from disposals and R109.7 million from dividends. The loan-to-value ratio is down from 59.9% to 59.4%. It’s like trying to dig a hole with a spoon. Since the end of this financial period, further disposals of R144.9 million have been achieved.

Portfolio vacancies have increased from 32.9% to 33.4%, so they are fighting that battle as well.

There are still no guarantees whatsoever that Delta will emerge from this in one piece.

Emira releases numbers, but reporting periods changed (JSE: EMI)

This makes the year-on-year comparisons unhelpful

When a company changes its year-end, the annoyance is that year-on-year comparisons become silly. You can’t compare a 12-month period to a 9-month period, or a 15-month period. In the case of Emira, the year ended March 2024 must be compared to the 9 months ended March 2023, so we find ourselves with this problem.

The percentage movements are therefore not worth focusing on. Instead, we can consider numbers like the total dividend per share of 117.02 cents, which puts the fund on a trailing yield of 12.2%. Tell me again about that residential buy-to-let investment on a net yield of maybe 7% if you’re lucky?

Emira’s loan-to-value ratio is 42.4%, which is better than 44.0% as at March 2023. Balance sheet numbers can be compared regardless of changes in the length of a reporting period, as they represent a snapshot rather than a period of time.

You may recall that Emira is selling a large portfolio to Spear REIT (JSE: SEA) for a total price of R1.146 billion. There are various conditions still to be met for this. Emira will use the proceeds to reduce debt and fund new acquisitions.

Nampak releases the circular for the largest disposals (JSE: NPK)

These deals are part of the plan to fix the balance sheet

Nampak is in the process of a difficult turnaround that has been made particularly tricky by the ongoing challenges with African currencies. To try and address the problems in the group and create a sustainable balance sheet that will be supported by lenders and shareholders alike, there are various disposals underway. They’ve been captured in a circular available here.

The Liquid Cartons disposal entails selling Nampak Liquid Cartons to a consortium of Corvest, Dlondlobala Capital and management. This includes the South African Nampak Liquid Cartons business, as well as Nampak Zambia and Nampak Malawi. The base price is R350 million.

The Bevcan Nigeria disposal is to a new company incorporated in Singapore and owned by the Evergreen Trust. Nampak shareholders will be thrilled to see the back of this business, based on all the life that the Nigerian currency has sucked out of various South African corporates recently. The price is $68.5 million and the deal includes Bevcan Nigeria repaying $10 million to Nampak for historic trade payables.

Ultimately, these deals are part of an asset disposal plan to raise R2.6 billion and create a focused group that has a much better chance of success going forward. It’s still not going to be easy, with this paragraph from the circular laying it out pretty clearly:

While actively pursuing these strategies, it is anticipated that there will nevertheless be sustained low growth in most of the geographies the Group operates in, with significant hard currency liquidity constraints. A serious risk is volume loss, some of which has crystalised already, but the Group is responding with appropriate mitigation actions. The Nampak corporate strategy and transformational plan intends to hurdle all these restraining forces.

I can’t see a world in which shareholders don’t approve of these disposals.

Old Mutual is struggling with cash outflows (JSE: OMU)

Hanging onto assets is tough out there

Old Mutual has released a voluntary update for the quarter ended March. Of course, the headline they focus on is double digit sales growth, which is true for Life APE sales (admittedly only just, with 10% growth). This is definitely the pick of the numbers, so I’m not surprised they focused on it.

Gross flows increased by just 4%, driven in part by an acquisition in Malawi. Still, it’s positive at least. Net client cash flow was ever-so-slightly positive at R166 million, down sharply from R899 million in the prior period despite the increase in gross flows. The culprit is large outflows in the investments and personal finance side of the business, despite growth in wealth management.

Loans and advances increased by 3% (mainly in Africa) and gross written premiums grew 7%

Trustco is profitable, but NAV has moved lower (JSE: TTO)

I can only smile at the reference to the CAGR since 1992

After releasing a trading statement, Trustco closed 48.65% higher and on strong traded volumes, so there are people happy to throw their money at this story. I’m not one of them.

The company references its compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 68.97% since 1992. That would be a lot more impressive if it wasn’t for what this chart looks like:

Nevertheless, for the six months to February 2024, HEPS came in at between 8.63 cents and 13.71 cents. That’s a nice swing from the headline loss per share of -25.38 cents in the comparable period. Despite this, the net asset value per share is down by between 10.27% and 30.27%, coming in at between 112 and 144 cents per share.

The share price even after the rally is 55 cents, so that’s quite a discount to net asset value.

Detailed results are due on 31 May. This is another example of a trading statement being released the day before results.

Separately, the company renewed the cautionary announcement related to Sterling Global Trading becoming a 70% shareholder in Meya Mining.

Woolworths’ apparel business is letting them down (JSE: WHL)

This turnaround story is faltering

After the release of a trading statement dealing with the 53 weeks ending June 2024, Woolworths suffered a share price drop that took the return over the past year into the red. It was a bad day overall for the sector, but there has only been one grocery winner in the past 12 months:

Of course, Woolworths is more than just a grocery business. For a while, this was a good thing, as a recovery in Fashion Beauty and Home was driving much of the support from the market, particularly with Woolworths Food under assault from Checkers.

With a 53-week period and all the David Jones noise in the base, we need to wait until the release of detailed results in September to know for sure what the performance looks like. For now, we know that earnings will be down at least 20%, even at adjusted HEPS level.

The major concern is that the second half of the year is proving to be a further disappointment for the apparel business, with discretionary spending power down in both South Africa and Australia. This is putting margins under pressure, which is exactly what the market doesn’t want to see.

The Food business is described as experiencing market share gains, presumably at the expense of hapless Pick n Pay, although the announcement doesn’t say for sure.

Either way, the momentum in this turnaround is gone. As this five-year chart shows, Woolworths needs to hold the current level or potentially face an ugly journey back towards COVID lows:

Zeda announces its maiden interim dividend (JSE: ZZD)

But my hope for a share price pop after earnings hasn’t transpired

Zeda is one of those locally listed companies that looks cheap regardless of how you cut it. This is why I own the shares. I was hoping for the share price to jump after the release of earnings, but this didn’t happen. I’m happily still holding, though.

For the six months to March, Zeda reported revenue growth of 19% and EBITDA growth of 7.5%. HEPS fell by 12.5% to 165.5 cents. Return on equity was still very lucrative at 28.5%. Earnings may have dipped, but the group felt confident enough about the balance sheet to announce an interim dividend of 50 cents per share.

The share price at R11.90 doesn’t look expensive to me based on these numbers, especially as these are interim profit numbers rather than full-year numbers.

The leasing business grew revenue by 17%, with the operations in the rest of Africa contributing 22% to total revenue. EBITDA margin expanded from 57% to 59% in this business and operating margin was up from 23% to 26%.

The car rental business grew revenue by 19.6% but suffered a decline in profitability as the used car market declined. This drove discounts in the market for cars, which hampers the economics over the life-cycle of a rental vehicle that they need to sell once it gets too old. EBITDA was flat in this business and operating profit moved lower, with other issues including damage to the vehicles based on road infrastructure.

I was expecting a solid jump in revenue in car rentals. The impact on profitability isn’t great news, but I still believe in the story and especially the appeal of the current share price, especially with a dividend underpin.

Little Bites:

  • Director dealings:
    • If you read the Discovery (JSE: DSY) announcement carefully, you’ll see that Adrian Gore sold shares worth R29.4 million. Those NHI jitters must be quite something. He’s also hedged 1,873,770 shares in a put-call option structure, with the put at R94.15 and the call at R151.40. Fellow director Barry Swartzberg has entered into put-call options over a total of 1.7 million shares across two tranches. The put option price is R99.60 per share and the call options are at either R150.11 or R160.77 depending on the tranche.
    • An associate of a director of Glencore (JSE: GLN) acquired shares worth £96.2k. In a separate transaction, two associates of a different director of Glencore acquired shares worth £49k.
    • A director of a major subsidiary of Hulamin (JSE: HLM) received shares under the group’s share plan and then disposed of the whole lot for just over R1 million. Particularly in smaller groups, it’s always better to see executives retain a non-taxable portion. Selling the entire award is a bearish indicator for me.
    • A non-executive director of Hammerson (JSE: HMN) has bought shares worth £9k through a dividend reinvestment plan.
  • Although technically a director dealing, this trade is complicated enough to warrant its own section. An SPV related to the chairman of Metrofile (JSE: MFL) has bought 36 million shares from Sabvest (JSE: SBP) for R108.3 million. Sabvest has given limited funding guarantees to facilitate the transaction and will use the proceeds to reduce debt. The selling price is R3.01 per share. The buyer has also been granted a call option to buy another 21 million shares at the same price, exercisable until November 2025. Finally, the buyer has been granted a put option for 21 million shares at R3.01 that can be exercised either in November 2025 or May 2026. The current share price of Metrofile is R2.55. I can see why Sabvest offloaded at R3.01, even if there are strings attached that might come into play down the line.
  • Italtile (JSE: ITE) announced the appointment of Brandon Wood (currently CFO) as COO and the appointment of Lamar Booysen as CFO as an internal promotion. This speaks to a solid succession plan within the group.
  • Acsion (JSE: ACS) announced that the finalisation of results for the year ended February 2024 has been delayed. They expect to release them by 14 June.
  • Salungano (JSE: SLG) announced that KPMG has resigned as external auditor of the company without giving any reason. That’s exactly the kind of look that you don’t want to have as a corporate.
  • Capitec (JSE: CPI) announced that S&P has raised Capitec Bank’s standalone credit profile from bb to bb+. Although this may not have a direct implication for equity holders, the rationale for the upgrade was around the business banking operations and Capitec’s diversification, which gives support to the reasons why investors have been buying into the story.

Shifting gear: SA’s electric vehicle transition

The Finance Ghost
-
0
Shifting gear: SA’s electric vehicle transition

Listen to the podcast here:

This year, South Africa is set to become the tenth-largest solar market in the world. In 2023 R17.5 billion rands of solar panels were imported into this country. In episode 4 of The Current we explore SA’s apparent solar boom. With loadshedding on the decrease does it still make commercial sense to install solar for your business or home? Listen to Iman Rappetti in conversation with Investec’s Melanie Humphries, Bernard Geldenhuys and De Wet Taljaard from the South African Photovoltaic Industry Association (SAPVIA).

Also on Spotify, Apple Podcasts and YouTube:

Ghost Bites (African Media Entertainment | AYO Technology | Pepkor | Reinet | Spear REIT | Vukile – Capital & Regional – Growthpoint)

The Finance Ghost
-
1
Ghost Bites (African Media Entertainment | AYO Technology | Pepkor | Reinet | Spear REIT | Vukile – Capital & Regional – Growthpoint)

Get the latest recap of JSE news in the Ghost Wrap podcast, brought to you by Mazars:

Things look better at African Media Entertainment (JSE: AME)

Video streaming hasn’t killed the radio star

Radio still has a role to play in South Africa. I firmly believe this. We are a nation of people who spend a lot of time commuting, often in cars and taxis where the radio can be played. This is great for advertisers looking to get out of the social media noise and reach people in a different way.

The numbers at African Media Entertainment support this thesis, with the company releasing a trading statement noting an increase of between 53% and 67% in HEPS for the year ended March 2024. I suspect that the return of live events were a major part of this, as radio does benefit tremendously from people being able to get out there and have fun.

Results are expected this week, so we will then have full details.

As you’ll read below in my AYO update, it’s disappointing when companies release a trading statement so close to results coming out. They need to do better in their financial reporting.

Losses are lower at AYO Technology – but it’s still a loss (JSE: AYO)

Detailed results are due this week

Ahead of the release of results on 30th May, someone at AYO woke up and realised that they need to release a trading statement before results come out. I always think that you can tell a lot about a company by the gap between the trading statement and the release of results.

Directors are supposed to release a trading statement as soon as they become reasonably certain that earnings will differ by more than 20% from the prior period. Does that certainty really only happen two days before the release of results?

The headline loss per share for the six months to February 2024 is expected to be between -25.21 cents and -41.04 cents, which is a significant improvement vs. the headline loss per share of -79.13 cents for the comparable period.

It’s still a loss, though, and a large one at that – the share price is only R0.38!

Pepkor is giving plenty of credit where credit is due (JSE: PPH)

Sales are being boosted significantly by the credit strategy

Pepkor has released results for the six months to March. The highlights reel is that revenue has grown 9.5%, gross profit has improved by 200 basis points to 38.1% and operating profit increased 13.0% on a normalised basis.

HEPS increased by 7.8% on a normalised basis, so these are decent numbers.

The normalisation in question relates to a non-recurring gain under IFRS 16 in the comparable period. I’m comfortable with that being ignored for the purposes of understanding the genuine underlying performance in this period. Without that adjustment, HEPS would be down 3.1%, which is a silly way to frame this performance.

The group has taken significant steps forward in the FinTech business, with Flash enjoying a 28% increase in throughput value over the period, with a network of 165,000 traders. Abacus nearly doubled written policies to 650,000. Overall, FinTech revenue increased by 24.5% and now contributes 13% of group revenue. Conversely, group merchandise sales were up 7.0% and like-for-like sales were up 5.1%.

The bulk of revenue (73%) still comes from the clothing and general merchandise segment, with growth of 8.0%. The furniture, appliances and electronics segment is having a tougher time of things, with growth of only 4.5% and a contribution of 14% of group revenue.

The “credit interoperability” strategy in the group is doing wonders for credit sales, which increased 34.0% to contribute 13% to group revenue. Group cash sales were only up by 3.8%. R3.1 billion was invested by the group in credit books. PEP’s sales mix is now 7% credit sales vs. just 3% in the comparable period, so this is a powerful trend.

The gross margin increase of 200 basis points to 38.1% was driven by lower markdown activity, better shipping rates and continued improvement at Ackermans. There’s still a long way to go at Ackermans, with like-for-like growth of 2.5% being the lowest level in the group. Even JD Group managed to do better than that, with like-for-like growth of 3.9%.

Avenida in Brazil continues to show great promise, with like-for-like growth of 9.3% and total sales growth of 23.4%, both on a constant currency basis. PEP Africa is doing even better than that, up 24.7% on a like-for-like basis and 22.8% overall.

Reinet’s net asset value increased 8.1% in the past year (JSE: RNI)

Pension Insurance Corporation is doing the heavy lifting here

Reinet shareholders will be pleased to learn that the net asset value as at 31 March 2024 is €34.02, up 8.1% from €31.46 a year ago. Of course, the rand movement over that time also plays a role in the returns for South Africans. After all, Reinet is designed as a “stay-rich” global investment portfolio.

Dividends of €130 million were received from British American Tobacco and an inaugural dividend of €57 million was received from Pension Insurance Corporation. Capital invested during the year was €128 million, mainly into funds managed by partners.

The pressure over the period was the decline in the British American Tobacco share price. I maintain my view that British American Tobacco is going to end up being a disappointment for shareholders. It might pay dividends, but I expect the share price to be pedestrian over time, leading to a total return that isn’t exciting.

The investments in funds managed by the liked of TruArc do have higher growth prospects, so perhaps that will help offset some of the challenges in returns from British American Tobacco. For now at least, Pension Insurance Corporation is the highlight for Reinet shareholders.

The net asset value attributable to British American Tobacco is €1.35 billion. Pension Insurance Corporation is much larger at €3.4 billion. The private equity and related partnerships net asset value is up to €1.2 billion, so growth there is very capable of making up for British American Tobacco.

The dividend to be paid by Reinet is up 16.7% year-on-year, which is excellent growth especially in euros.

Spear closes the disposal of the Liberty Life building (JSE: SEA)

This does wonders for the loan-to-value ratio

Back in February 2023, Spear announced a deal with Capitec Bank for the disposal of the Liberty Life building near Century City as a going concern for R400 million. The deal was finally implemented on 28 May 2024, with Spear receiving the disposal consideration accordingly. It can take a while to conclude deals of this size.

Of the proceeds, R235 million was used to settle the debt and R165 million will be retained in cash. This will be used for the planned acquisition of the Emira Western Cape portfolio that was announced in April 2024.

The loan-to-value ratio has been reduced by 650 basis points to 24.50%.

Vukile won’t bid for Growthpoint subsidiary Capital & Regional (JSE: VKE | JSE: GRT | JSE: CRP)

Vukile couldn’t reach agreement with Growthpoint on what the deal would need to look like

This is a classic example of a deal that has fizzled out, reminding the market that betting on the outcome of M&A activity is one of the riskiest games you can play.

After the news broke that Vukile was considering a bid for Capital & Regional, the market got excited about what that might look like. There was further news that Growthpoint (which holds 68.1% of Capital & Regional) had received interest from a potential competing bidder.

Bidding wars rarely deliver a good outcome for the buyer, so kudos to Vukile for being disciplined here. After unsuccessful discussions with Growthpoint and no agreement on what the terms and structure of a possible offer would need to look like to be acceptable to Growthpoint, Vukile has opted to walk away. There are some circumstances under which Vukile would be able to return to the table within the next six months, but for now they are off the table.

Little Bites:

  • South32 (JSE: S32) announced that the sale of Illawarra Metallurgical Coal is still on track to be completed in the first half of the 2025 financial year, with the latest update being that BlueScope Steel has waived its pre-emptive right. There are various other conditions that still need to be met, including major regulators.
  • Putprop (JSE: PPR) will go ahead with the odd-lot offer announced in April 2024, as shareholder approval has now been obtained. The price is a 5% premium to the 30-day VWAP that will be calculated based on 3 June. Don’t get too excited here, as even a good guess based on what that price might be won’t be rewarding. At a share price of R3.19 based on Tuesday’s close, there’s no opportunity here to make an arbitrage profit on a basket of 100 shares.
  • Brett Clark is retiring from Mpact Limited (JSE: MPT) at the end of May, having joined the group in 2012 and served as CFO. Hannes Snyman replaces him as an internal appointment, having been there since 2014.
  • Huge Group (JSE: HUG) announced the appointment of Tamryn van Tonder as Chief Commercial Officer. She certainly has an impressive CV, which Huge took the opportunity to splash all over SENS.
  • Trustco (JSE: TTO) reminded shareholders that there are various announced and potential transactions underway. For this reason, the cautionary announcement has been renewed.
  • Globe Trade Centre (JSE: GTC) has just about no liquidity, so I’m not giving much attention to first quarter results. For the three months, revenues were up 7% and FFO increased from €16m to €19m. Net loan-to-value adjusted for cash on escrow comes in at 47%.
  • Conduit Capital (JSE: CND) is still trying to complete the disposal of CRIH and CLL. The Prudential Authority still hasn’t given approval for the deal, so the parties have agreed to extend the date for fulfilment of the conditions to 30 June 2024. The JSE, however, has run out of patience. The circular needs to be finalised and distributed as soon as possible despite results having not been published for the years ended June 2022 and June 2023.
  • Numeral (JSE: XII) (previously Go Life International) is going to be late with its financials for the year ended February 2024 as the auditors have requested additional time for the audit. The Stock Exchange of Mauritius (the primary regulator for this listing) has given an extension until the end of June.
  • PSV Holdings (JSE: PSV) has renewed the cautionary announcement related to the proposed recapitalisation of the company and engagements with the provisional liquidator. The shares are suspended from trading anyway.
  • The shareholder in zombie company Afristrat (JSE: ATI) who submitted an application for leave to appeal the judgement regarding a liquidation application has seen that application dismissed with costs. Either way it seems that Afristrat is going to die off through a legal process. The fight is around exactly which legal process.

Ghost Wrap #70 (Balwin | Quantum Foods | De Beers | Tiger Brands | Bidcorp)

The Finance Ghost
-
0
Ghost Wrap #70 (Balwin | Quantum Foods | De Beers | Tiger Brands | Bidcorp)

Listen to the show here:

The Ghost Wrap podcast is proudly brought to you by Mazars, a leading international audit, tax and advisory firm with a national footprint within South Africa. Visit the Mazars website for more information.

In just a few minutes, you can get the latest news and my views on Balwin, Quantum Foods, De Beers, Tiger Brands and Bidcorp. Use the podcast player above to listen to the show.

Ghost Bites (Alphamin | Barloworld | Collins Property | Datatec | Exemplar | Mantengu Mining | Pick n Pay | RH Bophelo | Tiger Brands)

The Finance Ghost
-
1
Ghost Bites (Alphamin | Barloworld | Collins Property | Datatec | Exemplar | Mantengu Mining | Pick n Pay | RH Bophelo | Tiger Brands)

Get the latest recap of JSE news in the Ghost Wrap podcast, brought to you by Mazars:

At Alphamin, Mpama South is working as planned (JSE: APH)

Production to sales specification has been underway for two weeks now

Alphamin announced that Mpama South has been producing tin concentrate to sales specification since 14 May, so that means two weeks with no hiccups. Even more importantly, the tin grade of the feed ore was increased from 17 May, with the focus on consistent throughput and producing in line with the targeted recoveries for the processing plant.

The good news for shareholders is that the facility is doing what it is supposed to do: operating at targeted levels of processing recoveries and is producing high grade concentrate to sales specification.

Barloworld signs off on a tough period and renews the cautionary announcement (JSE: BAW)

A group with cyclical exposures can’t always go up

Barloworld has released results for the six months to March 2024. Although revenue fell by 7.7%, the highlight is that EBITDA margin was steady at 12.9%. It’s unusual to see margins stay consistent when revenue has fallen.

The consistency goes all the way down to HEPS which also fell by 8% for the period. This is despite finance costs moving 13.4% higher for the period. One of the key offsetting benefits was a much lower effective tax rate after restructuring the domicile of the equipment businesses. The share of profit from associates and joint ventures came in 22.4% higher and this also boosted HEPS.

You might assume that the same is true for the dividend, but the surprising outcome is that the interim dividend is 5% higher at 210 cents per share. This tells you that the balance sheet is in good shape, with net debt to EBITDA at 0.6x (giving plenty of headroom vs. covenants of 3x).

Return on invested capital (ROIC) was in line with the prior period at 14.3%.

As you might guess, the consistency in group level results isn’t because the underlying divisions were all in line with the prior year. In a diversified group like this, there will be good years and bad years at divisional level, with the hope being that the group result is smoother over time than the underlying divisional numbers. In this period, Barloworld Mongolia was the standout performance with a 43% revenue increase, whereas VT in Russia reported a drop of 24%. Between those extremes, we find Equipment Southern Africa with a drop of 10% and Ingrain with a decrease of 3%.

EBITDA movements at divisional level were more volatile than what we saw at revenue level, which is to be expected when a business has fixed costs. Equipment Mongolia led the way with an EBITDA jump of 78.8% and EBITDA margin of 24.7%. Disappointingly, Ingrain put in the worst EBITDA performance despite the modest dip in revenue, with EBITDA down 19.6% as margin contracted from 14.1% to 11.7%. Equipment Southern Africa saw EBITDA decrease by 8.5% and VT was down 16.1%.

For further context, Equipment Southern Africa is the largest EBITDA contributor at R1.4 billion. Barloworld Mongolia is next up at R479 million, followed by VT at R417 million and Ingrain at R372 million.

In a separate announcement, Barloworld renewed the cautionary announcement that was first issued on 15 April. They haven’t indicated what the potential opportunity on the table is. We don’t even know if they are looking to acquire or dispose of something in these discussions.

Collins Property isn’t shy of debt (JSE: CPP)

You won’t often see a target loan-to-value this high – but what’s the catch?

Collins Property Group is officially a REIT and they aren’t wasting any time in getting those dividends out the door, with a dividend for the year of 90 cents based on distributable income per share of 94 cents.

Of course, REITs are supposed to have very high payout ratios. That’s kind of the whole point of being a REIT. It’s easier said than done though, with many of them tripping up when debt is high.

There are no such issues at Collins it seems, despite a very high loan-to-value ratio of 54.3%. The target range is 45% to 55%. Total debt on the balance sheet comes in at R6.3 billion, with various banks lending to the group.

With bank covenants for a 55% loan-to-value as the maximum, Collins is sailing close to the wind and feeling just fine about it. Generally speaking, companies in the Wiese stable aren’t shy of taking a financial risk or two.

Note: an earlier version of this article noted a large outstanding balance of preference shares held by Christo Wiese’s Titan entity. I misread R1.3 million as R1.3 billion. My apologies for this. The loan-to-value ratio information was correct in the original article.

Datatec reports a massive jump in earnings (JSE: DTC)

This is what happens when a low margin EBITDA business goes the right way

In Datatec’s results for the year ended February 2024, you’ll find a 6.1% increase in revenue. That may not sound like much, until you see the 15.8% increase in gross profit and excellent 80.7% jump in EBITDA. The EBITDA increased from 1.9% to 3.3% and there’s an important lesson here about earnings volatility in low margin businesses. It takes just a small change further up the income statement (like a shift in gross margin) to drive big moves in EBITDA.

If you can believe it, the gross margin was 15.8% and the increase in gross profit was also 15.8%. At first I thought it was a typo in the SENS announcement!

The company announces various measures of earnings per share, not least of all because of Analysys Mason as a discontinued operation in the comparable year. The best measure is probably continuing underlying earnings per share, as this has the minimal level of distortion. Even then, it increased by 231.1% to 20.2 US cents!

The dividend was lower this year though, coming in at 130 cents vs. 195 cents in the prior period (a 33.3% drop).

Looking deeper, Westcon International is the largest contributor with EBITDA of $121 million, up by 150% thanks to significant improvement in gross margin. Logicalis International saw its EBITDA increase by 31.7% to $66.5 million, once again thanks to improved gross margin. Logicalis Latin America wasn’t so fortunate, with gross margin increasing but not enough to offset foreign exchange losses in Argentina that led to a drop in EBITDA from $21.2 million to $11.5 million.

In terms of prospects, the company highlights the opportunity of AI driving a new cycle of computing hardware investment. I’m hearing this more and more in the market and it certainly makes sense to me.

At Exemplar, the bankers are smiling more than shareholders (JSE: EXP)

Despite strong growth in net operating income, the distribution per share has dipped

Exemplar’s portfolio is rather unusual in the modern South African context, in that it has absolutely no exposure to the Western Cape. The fund has 26 retail assets across five provinces with a particular focus on malls that service township areas. 86% of tenants are national and international tenants, or those with rental guarantees, featuring many large retailers who want to service lower income consumers who represent a high growth opportunity. If you’re building out a property portfolio, this is a good example of how you can diversify vs. many funds that are focused on properties in premium urban areas.

Despite a 16.4% increase in rental and recovery income, as well as a 13.2% increase in net property income, the total distribution per share for the year ended February 2024 fell by 1.5%.

The culprit? You guessed it: finance costs. They increased from R200 million to R287 million, completely offsetting the increase in net property income. This is what it looks like when you’re working hard so your bankers can have a better life:

Mantengu Mining is profitable (JSE: MTU)

The share price closed 32% higher on strong volumes (for a small cap)

Mantengu Mining released results for the year ended February 2024. This is the first year-end in production for the group, so the year-on-year movements look a bit silly (e.g. revenue up from R4.5 million to R109.9 million).

It’s probably better to just look at the results in isolation as opposed to comparing them to the prior year. Gross profit came in at R52.6 million and operating profit was R24.9 million. HEPS came in at R0.01 per share – positive by the smallest of margins. Even then, these results don’t tell much of the story, as there were only two months of steady state production at Langpan.

Aside from the a full production period at Langpan for FY25, the future looks interesting with the recent acquisition of 100% of Birca Copper and Metals that approximately doubles the existing chrome ore supply at Mantengu.

Be careful of the wide bid-offer spread in this stock, with the best bid currently at R1.07 and the best offer at R1.57. The share price closed 32% higher at R1.03 on strong volumes of roughly 8x the average trading volume.

The Ackermans get out the way at Pick n Pay (JSE: PIK)

The financials are in disarray and the turnaround will be extremely tough

Pick n Pay has released results for the 52 weeks to 25 February. They reflect revenue growth of 5.4%, which is pretty poor, along with a particularly revolting decline in gross profit margin from 19.6% to 18.1%.

Trading profit collapsed from just over R3 billion to only R385 million, with a paltry trading profit margin of 0.3%. It only gets worse from there of course, with a loss after tax of nearly R3.2 billion. A vast increase in finance costs to just over R700 million was a major contributor here, along with impairments of R2.8 billion. The impairments are a non-cash item. The same cannot be said for the finance costs.

Unsurprisingly, there’s no dividend. This is what happens when the headline loss per share is -254.72 cents.

Net debt ballooned to R6.1 billion at the end of February vs. R3.7 billion the year before. What’s that old story about gradually and then suddenly?

Silver linings? Well, Boxer grew revenue 17.3% and they will need to get the market to pay a decent price for those shares when Boxer is set free from this mess, so that’s good news. Pick n Pay Clothing standlone stores were up 17%, a strong result that might bring some hope to the broken grocery business.

The SENS announcement claims that experienced leadership has re-energised the supermarkets business. I can hand on heart say that my last visit to a Pick n Pay was many things, but energetic wasn’t one of them. I’ve heard that some stores look much better, but it’s the inconsistency in the footprint that makes Pick n Pay so hard to believe in. Although like-for-like sales growth for the first 12 weeks of the year is up vs. FY24, that’s hardly saying much. They are in a different postal code to Shoprite these days in terms of in-store execution. Just ask your friends where they shop.

Part of the turnaround is to either close 100 loss-making supermarkets or convert them to Pick n Pay franchise or Boxer stores. I somehow doubt that franchisees will be queuing around the block for these.

Pick n Pay has a huge mountain to climb here and they will probably only have one shot at raising the equity capital required to get it right. People have a limit to how willing they are to throw good money after bad.

The big news at the top is that Gareth Ackerman is stepping down as chairman, getting out of the way after being there for a period of time during which Pick n Pay’s core supermarkets business was left for dead by Shoprite. In even bigger news, the Ackerman Family has agreed to let go of majority shareholder voting control. The SENS announcement puts a positive spin on this, calling it a vote of confidence in the current management team. Somehow, I suspect the boardroom discussions weren’t quite that simple.

Ackerman Investment Holdings will follow its rights in the recapitalisation up to a maximum of R1.025 billion. The offer is R4 billion in equity, with three banks (Absa, RMB and Standard Bank) coming in as underwriters in equal proportions. I can’t help but wonder just how exposed those banks are to Pick n Pay. At this point at least, perhaps it hurts less to underwrite the equity raise than to face facts around the debt.

Speaking of the debt, the R4 billion in equity will primarily be used to repay group debt. If they don’t achieve a proper turnaround quickly, the debt hole will be back before you know it.

Remember when property funds invested in Edcon to try and save a sinking ship? The jury is still out on Pick n Pay, but you would be incredibly naïve to think that Shoprite won’t try and deliver the death blow here. Pick n Pay better pray night and day that load shedding doesn’t come back after elections, as I think an environment devoid of load shedding is the best chance they have to emerge in a sustainable (albeit smaller) form.

Just take a look at how difficult this will be, based on this slide from the strategic turnaround presentation:

RH Bophelo grew its NAV by 19% this year (JSE: RHB)

They have moved through the R1 billion NAV mark

RH Bophelo is an investment holding company in the healthcare sector. The group now boasts a net asset value (NAV) of over R1 billion after growing NAV by 19%. NAV per share is now R15.99 and the share price is only R2.25, so the market clearly has a very different view on what the NAV is.

They do make some rather odd investments, like 29% in Ambit Health (a pathology company) for just over R1 million. How does this move the dial on a R1 billion NAV? Or even influence the dial?

If you can believe it, that was the biggest of three new investments in this period. Like I said, odd. The market doesn’t reward investment holding companies with vast portfolios of small investments. If they want to close the gap between the share price and NAV per share, this isn’t the way to do it.

The road ahead won’t be easy at Tiger Brands (JSE: TBS)

Income from associates saved the growth as core operations went sideways

Tiger Brands is under new management, with a new CEO and CFO in place as well as managing directors for the six business units in the group. The new brooms need to sweep clean, as Tiger Brands is currently trading at levels that we also saw in 2011. There have been some encouraging rallies in the past year, but the price just can’t seem to sustainably break higher:

The results for the six months to March 2024 show why this might be the case, with revenue decreasing by 1%. Volumes fell by 9% and price inflation came in at 8%, with the loss in volumes being a deliberate strategy in some cases to improve pricing.

Group operating income fell by 3%, so the top half of the income statement clearly isn’t telling a positive story.

Finance costs also moved significantly higher, so the numbers at headline earnings level would’ve been pretty rough were it not for income from associated companies (Carozzi and National Foods in particular) that shot up from R274 million to R396 million.

I’ve included a screenshot of the income statement below to show you the shape of the financials and how it was the associates that came in right at the bottom to save the trajectory of profit before tax:

HEPS may have been up by 11% thanks to the associates, but not a cent in dividends was received from them in this interim period. In the context of such difficulties in the core businesses, as well as the levels of debt and associated finance costs, I therefore found it surprising that the interim dividend increased 9% to 350 cents per share.

Little Bites:

  • Director dealings:
    • A director of a major subsidiary of RFG (JSE: RFG) sold shares worth R248k and an associate of a director of the same major subsidiary sold shares worth just over R3 million.
    • The CEO of Quantum Foods (JSE: QFH) was willing to increase the price for a share purchase to R10.00 per share, with the value of the purchase being R354k.
    • Associates of the CEO and CFO of Spear REIT (JSE: SEA) bought shares in the company with a total value of R234k.
    • Not quite the standard type of update in this section, but a few non-executive directors of Orion Minerals (JSE: ORN) have elected to receive a portion of accrued director fees in shares in lieu of cash. This helps to preserve the company’s cash reserves.
  • MTN Uganda is one of the better African subsidiaries in the MTN (JSE: MTN) stable. MTN is taking advantage of the recent positive momentum by selling down a portion of the stake while the going is good. A substantial 7.03% stake in the company is being made available for sale to retail and professional investors, thereby broadening local ownership and unlocking value on the MTN balance sheet.
  • AYO Technology (JSE: AYO) released an updated circular dealing with the specific repurchase from the PIC. The independent expert has valued AYO’s shares at between R4.94 and R5.04. The repurchase is at R36 per share, so that’s clearly unfair to all other shareholders. The post-transaction fair value range is R3.30 to R3.40. The funny thing is that the current share price is R0.50, which is actually way below that fair value range. If you’re curious to read more, the circular is here.
  • Gemfields (JSE: GML) confirmed that the currency conversion rate for the final dividend for the 2024 financial year equates to a dividend of R0.1574624 per share, payable on 24th June.
  • Equites Property Fund (JSE: EQU) announced the dividend reinvestment price as being R12 per share, which is a 1.34% discount to the spot price per share on Friday 24th May, adjusted for the pending dividend. That’s not much of a discount to encourage investors to reinvest their dividends in the company.
  • In the incredibly unlikely event that you are a shareholder in Cafca Limited (JSE: CAC), you should note that the company has released results for the six months to March 2024. They are in Zimbabwean Dollars, so prepare yourself for some truly gigantic numbers. I also couldn’t get their website to work, unfortunately.

Short stories v.01: The future is an AI experiment

Dominique Olivier
-
0
Short stories v.01: The future is an AI experiment

Every so often, I come across a story that I think would work well for this audience, only to find that it is actually just too light to justify a full article. Never one to deny you informative (and interesting) content, I’ve decided to alternate my usual long writing format with the occasional collection of short stories, tied together by a central thread but otherwise distinct from each other.

In v.01 of my Short Stories, I’m sharing five tales of AI to educate, captivate and horrify. Read them at your own peril.

The new world is (still) being built on African shoulders

When you picture the people who built ChatGPT, you probably envision a slick office in Silicon Valley, staffed with bespectacled tech virtuosos who spend their days and nights writing endless lines of code. The last thing that crosses your mind when you’re creating this image (I’m guessing) would be a building full of underpaid Kenyan data labellers.

For all its promise of changing the world as we know it back in 2022, the earliest versions of ChatGPT presented a significant stumbling block: its tendency to spit out racist, biassed and sexually suggestive answers. It makes sense if you consider that this is a large language model that was trained on that which already exists on the internet – and we all know what kind of stuff can be found on the web. From smut fiction to hate speech, this dicey content was poisoning the data pool and resulting in some seriously toxic responses.

The solution? To build a filter that would catch these kinds of responses before they made it past ChatGPT’s blinking cursor. Of course the building of this filter would require more human input than the usual data scraping that was used to train ChatGPT, because human beings would need to assess whether or not something was offensive. By identifying and labelling enough offensive inputs, they could feed ChatGPT a “guidebook” of topics, words and ideals that are not OK to use.

That’s where the Kenyans come in. In 2021, OpenAI (ChatGPT’s parent company) partnered with Sama, a data labelling partner based in San Francisco that claims to provide developing countries with “ethical” and “dignified digital work”. Sama recruited data labellers in Kenya to work on behalf of OpenAI, playing an essential role in making the chatbot safe for public usage. But despite their integral role in building ChatGPT, these workers faced gruelling conditions and low pay.

In order to obtain the labels it needed, OpenAI outsourced tens of thousands of text snippets to Sama, who then sent it to their Kenyan teams. Many of these texts seemed to originate from the darkest reaches of the internet, detailing graphic situations such as child sexual abuse, bestiality, murder, suicide, torture, self-harm and incest. Kenyan workers were expected to read and label between 150 and 250 passages of this text per nine-hour shift, with those passages ranging from around 100 words to well over 1,000. For this, they were paid a take-home wage of between around $1.32 and $2 per hour.

While the nature of this work eventually led to the cancellation of the contract between OpenAI and Sama, the harsh realities faced by these data labellers sheds light on a darker facet of the AI landscape. Beneath its techy allure lies a reliance on covert human labour in the Global South, often characterised by exploitation and harm. These unseen workers persist on the fringes, yet their contributions underpin billion-dollar industries.

Your dead granny wants you to sign up for premium

The digital world is brimming with personal remnants, from forgotten MySpace profiles to dormant social media pages, lingering online even after a person’s passing. But what if AI used these artefacts to recreate the presence of those we’ve lost?

It’s a reality unfolding before us as we speak – and one that AI ethicists caution could lead to a new phenomenon: “digital hauntings” by “deadbots.” With the ongoing advancements in generative artificial intelligence, there emerges a novel possibility for grieving individuals to interact with chatbot avatars trained on the digital footprint of the deceased, encompassing their voice, appearance and online persona.

Certain products from companies like Replika, HereAfter and Persona, marketed as “digital replicas”, are already pushing these boundaries, allowing users to simulate the departed. Amazon’s 2022 demonstration, wherein its Alexa assistant mimicked the voice of a deceased woman using just a brief audio clip, underscores the potential of this unsettling trend.

In their recent publication in Philosophy and Technology, AI ethicists Tomasz Hollanek and Katarzyna Nowaczyk-Basińska employed a technique known as “design fiction” to envisage various situations where fictional characters encounter challenges with different “postmortem presence” enterprises. The scenario that stuck with me the most is one where an adult user is impressed by the realism of their deceased grandparent’s chatbot, only to soon start receiving premium trial and food delivery service advertisements in their deceased relative’s voice.

“These services run the risk of causing huge distress to people if they are subjected to unwanted digital hauntings from alarmingly accurate AI recreations of those they have lost,” Hollanek added. “The potential psychological effect, particularly at an already difficult time, could be devastating.”

“We need to start thinking now about how we mitigate the social and psychological risks of digital immortality,” Nowaczyk-Basińska added.

No, that’s not really Katy Perry

Earlier this month, New York City saw a grand gathering of music, entertainment and fashion icons for the annual Met Gala, themed “Garden of Time”.

However, amidst the glamorous snapshots flooding social media, Katy Perry was notably absent. Or was she?

Despite the fact that Perry was in studio recording while the Met celebrations went on, two images of her (wearing two completely different dresses) seemingly posing for photographers at the Met started circulating on social media channels as other celebrities made their entrances.

While it’s unclear where these AI-generated images originated from, they were realistic enough that they were shared and liked thousands of times before sharp-eyed viewers cried foul. According to a screenshot shared by Perry herself, even her mother was fooled into commenting on her flowered ball gown.

No, that’s not really Scarlett Johansson

Less amused by AI’s imitation of her is Scarlett Johansson, according to recent headlines.

The actress stated that she was left “shocked and angered” after OpenAI launched a chatbot this month with a voice that sounds “eerily similar” to hers.

This comes on the heels of Johansson turning down an offer from OpenAI to voice the chatbot, named Sky, in September last year. Two days before Sky went live, Sam Altman reached out to Johansson again, requesting that she rethink the offer. She declined, and the contested demo version of the chatbot went live days later.

In a statement shared with the BBC by OpenAI, Mr Altman denied that the company had sought to imitate Johansson’s voice. “The voice is not Scarlett Johansson’s, and it was never intended to resemble hers,” he wrote.

Johansson’s lawyers have retaliated by sending two letters to OpenAI, demanding insights into how the voice was created. While OpenAI continues to deny that the voice of its chatbot was designed to imitate Johansson, they have since suspended the use of that particular voice.

The AI train is running out of coal

As AI continues to soar in popularity, researchers have raised concerns that the industry could be facing a shortage of training data – the essential fuel powering advanced AI systems. This potential scarcity threatens to decelerate the development of AI models, particularly the expansive language models that rely heavily on vast datasets.

In other words: after scouring the world wide web for half a decade and scraping data from billions of sites (presumably both legally and slightly-less-than-legally), AI is running out of fresh data to learn from.

When I first read this headline, I was a bit surprised that we could be at this junction already. To me it feels as though OpenAI and its cousins have only really been a major part of our lives since 2022. Consider that the internet itself is over four decades old – that’s four decades worth of writing. It’s a bit astonishing to consider that these large language models have burned through this much fuel already.

Obviously, training powerful, accurate and high-quality AI algorithms requires an immense amount of data. For example, ChatGPT was trained on an extensive dataset encompassing 570 gigabytes of text data, equivalent to roughly 300 billion words.

In a similar vein, the stable diffusion algorithm, which powers many AI image-generating applications like DALL-E, Lensa and Midjourney, was trained on the LIAON-5B dataset. This dataset includes an impressive 5.8 billion image-text pairs.

High-quality AI models cannot be developed using low-quality data sources, such as social media posts or blurry photographs, despite their abundance and ease of access. These types of data do not provide the richness and precision needed to train high-performing AI systems. Therefore, ensuring both the quantity and quality of data is paramount for the advancement and reliability of AI technologies.

To further complicate the problem (although this writer in particular was quite gleeful to learn this fact), AI models cannot be trained on AI-generated content. All of those blogs and LinkedIn articles that are being churned out at pace by ChatGPT? Those are absolutely useless for training purposes – in fact, their inclusion in learning datasets can actually cause damage to the algorithm. By making ChatGPT so freely available to the masses, OpenAI has effectively contributed to its own training data shortage.

(For the record, I don’t usually subscribe to schadenfreude. But when something has messed with your industry and your ability to work as seemingly effortlessly as ChatGPT has, well… it does make you smile a little to see them struggle for once.)

So, what next? Innovation, of course. The people building AI models are way too smart to be held back by something as trivial as a data shortage. One promising avenue for AI developers is to enhance algorithms to utilise existing data more efficiently. By refining these algorithms, it is likely that, in the coming years, they will be able to train high-performing AI systems using less data and potentially less computational power. This optimisation would not only advance the capabilities of AI but also contribute to reducing its carbon footprint, addressing environmental concerns associated with large-scale data processing.

Another viable strategy is the use of specially-designed AI to generate synthetic data for training systems. In this approach, developers can create the specific data they require, tailored precisely to the needs of their particular AI model. Obviously, this kind of content differs from the break-the-algorithm type of AI-generated content I mentioned before. This synthetic data can mimic real-world data scenarios without the need for massive data collection efforts. It can fill gaps in datasets, provide diversity in training examples, and even help in creating rare or hard-to-obtain data instances.

By focusing on these strategies, the AI industry can overcome the challenges posed by data limitations, paving the way for more sustainable and efficient AI advancements.

Hooray for that, I guess. Or not.

About the author: Dominique Olivier, founder human.writer

Dominique Olivier is the founder of human.writer, where she uses her love of storytelling and ideation to help brands solve problems.

She is a weekly columnist in Ghost Mail and collaborates with The Finance Ghost on Ghost Mail Weekender, a Sunday publication designed to help you be more interesting.

Dominique can be reached on LinkedIn here.

Ghost Bites (Balwin | Brikor | Brimstone | 4Sight | ISA Holdings | MC Mining | Pan African Resources | Quantum Foods)

The Finance Ghost
-
0
Ghost Bites (Balwin | Brikor | Brimstone | 4Sight | ISA Holdings | MC Mining | Pan African Resources | Quantum Foods)

Get the latest recap of JSE news in the Ghost Wrap podcast, brought to you by Mazars:

Balwin targets growth in the KZN market (JSE: BWN)

This deal also has an interesting funding mechanism

Balwin has agreed to acquire 13.41 hectares of land in Shongweni in KZN. The property is adjacent to Westown Square, which is a 50,000 square metre retail site due to be completed in 2025. The broader area includes plans for a hospital, hotels, warehousing, schools and all sorts of other things. I don’t know this particular area at all, but Balwin reckons its an LSM 8 – 10 opportunity that has strong population growth among 30-somethings in particular.

What makes this deal particularly interesting is the “pay-as-you-register” model that Balwin has put in place with the seller. Basically, a contracted amount per apartment is paid to the seller on the registration of each apartment. Balwin will acquire development rights once all infrastructure has been installed by the seller and the property is fully serviced.

The benefit here is obvious: Balwin can do this deal with far less strain on the balance sheet than would otherwise be the case. They will develop 1,260 residential apartments and pay for the development rights as each one is sold. The value of the development rights is R133.7 million.

The price paid to the seller will be R100k for a 1-bedroom, R110k for a 2-bedroom and R120k for a 3-bedroom apartment. Balwin must settle the full price within 6 years and expects to sell all the units within 4 years, so they’ve built in some fat. Importantly, there are no inflation escalations on the purchase price.

There’s a further R27 million payable to the landowner when apartments are sold to clients. This is based on 1.5% of the selling price of each apartment. The seller of the development rights must also pay 1.5% over to the landowner, so Balwin and the seller are sharing the cost equally.

Long story short, Balwin has found a way to defer the payment of the development rights and make this a less capital-hungry exercise. Importantly, the company must still fund the development of the apartments and of course takes the risk on the development being a success, as the development rights must be settled within 6 years regardless of how well the development performs.

This is a category 2 deal, so shareholders won’t be asked for an opinion or a vote on it. The share price closed 5.4% lower on the day but this announcement came out after market close, so keep an eye on share price action on Monday when trade reopens.

Brikor is back in the green (JSE: BIK)

The company has guided a return to profitability

Brikor has released a trading statement for the year ended February 2024. It’s an important one, as it reflects a move from a headline loss per share to positive headline earnings.

With full details due to be released before the end of May, we at least know in the meantime that HEPS will come in at between 1.2 cents and 1.4 cents per share vs. a headline loss of 0.1 cents per share in the comparable year.

The share price is trading at R0.15 and there is limited liquidity in this thing, with a market cap of just over R100 million.

Brimstone’s intrinsic NAV is heading the wrong way (JSE: BRT)

Sea Harvest is the source of pressure on intrinsic NAV in the past three months

Brimstone’s intrinsic net asset value (NAV) per share is the key metric to assess the performance of the business, as this is an investment holding company with a variety of investments ranging from very small stakes through to control.

The investments in Oceana (a 25.1% stake) and Sea Harvest (53.4% stake) contribute the bulk of the intrinsic NAV per share. These are valued based on the market value per share, so this can lead to significant swings in the Brimstone intrinsic NAV.

Between December 2023 and March 2024, intrinsic NAV fell by 6.7%. Pressure on the Sea Harvest share price is largely to blame, although some other investments also went the wrong way (like MTN Zakhele Futhi). A reduction in net debt helped limit the pain at least.

If we take a longer-term view, it’s easy to see that the intrinsic NAV per share has been a really disappointing story in recent years. On a fully diluted basis, it reduced from R12.827 per share as at December 2020 to R11.097 per share as at March 2024. The market has valued the share price at roughly a 55% discount to intrinsic NAV, with little sign of that discount closing.

4Sight: full of buzzwords, but also growth (JSE: 4SI)

Revenue is up substantially

4Sight operates in the technology space and it really won’t take you long to figure that out, with words like digital transformation and artificial intelligence featuring prominently. Buzzwords aside, the growth in the business across Africa and the Middle East is significant. This table shows how they make money:

Total revenue is up by 57.7% and the increase in support and maintenance is particularly encouraging, as that sounds recurring in nature. Operating profit is up by 76.9%, so the revenue growth is being accompanied by an improvement in margins – a wonderful combination for investors. Gross margin did dip though, so the operating expense management was where the good stuff happened.

But here’s the trick: you need to read really carefully. The latest period is for the 14 months to February 2024 and the comparable period is the 12 months to December 2022. This is because of a change in year-end. Those growth rates are impressive regardless, but clearly that plays a role.

HEPS is up by 153.8%, coming in at 6.037 cents per share. The dividend is 5 cents per share vs. no dividend in the comparable period. Again, this is for 14 months, so you can’t use this in the normal way to calculate a dividend yield or P/E multiple. They did also release 12-month results which help, but there’s an odd situation here where January and February added plenty of revenue but not much profit. It’s not clear how much of this is seasonal.

Change in reporting period and other questions aside, there’s still a very high growth rate and the dividend is a high payout ratio vs. HEPS, suggesting that these are high quality earnings.

The share price is R0.84.

ISA Holdings is another tech small cap on a charge (JSE: ISA)

Revenue and profits are up strongly

ISA Holdings seems to be in the right place at the right time, with a business model focused on cybersecurity solutions. This is a major area of investment by corporates at the moment. ISA offers a consumption-based solution that is resonating with consumers.

Revenue is up by 33% and profit before tax is up 23% for the year ended February 2024. These are great growth rates, even if there is some margin contraction. They attribute the dip in margin (gross profit margin down from 53% to 49%) to product sales during the current period that excluded any of the higher margin services.

Share of profits from equity associate DataProof (another cybersecurity offering) increased by 63%. This helped drive HEPS higher by 35% to 18.9 cents.

But here’s the real kicker: the dividend payout ratio is 100%. The interim dividend was 7.7 cents and the final dividend is 11.2 cents. This adds up to 18.9%, which is equal to HEPS for the year. As cash quality of earnings goes, you won’t find better than that.

And in case you think it’s a fluke, they did exactly the same thing in the comparable period with a 100% payout ratio.

A chance for MC Mining shareholders to sell to Goldway (JSE: MCZ)

There is no compulsory squeeze-out envisaged

Goldway is giving the remaining shareholders in MC Mining another chance to sell their shares on the same terms and conditions as the recent buy-out offer. This means a cash price of A$0.16 per share.

This gives remaining shareholders until 25th June to accept the offer. Those who do not accept it will then sit with a highly illiquid stake in the listed company. There’s no guarantee whatsoever of being able to sell those shares to Goldway or anyone else.

Goldway intends to delist the shares from the ASX and the JSE but has not commenced the process yet. The listing on the AIM in London is being cancelled, though.

A most unusual situation at Pan African Resources (JSE: PAN)

The company needs to rectify a technical problem with previously paid dividends

Here’s one that you won’t see every day! Pan African Resources has released a circular that seems to reclassify the share premium account on the balance sheet as a distributable reserve. The reason is that dividends paid from 2019 to 2023 met the net assets test on a ZAR basis, but not on a USD basis which is the presentation currency for the group.

The substantial depreciation in the rand over the past few years led to a Foreign Currency Translation Reserve with a negative equity balance of $171 million. It gets deemed as a distributable reserve under the rules for assessing whether a dividend can be paid, leaving the group with a serious problem. Even though the ZAR numbers look perfectly capable of supporting a dividend, the USD balance sheet tells a different story.

Share buybacks over the same period suffer from the same problem.

The company has no intention of trying to recover the past dividends from shareholders. Instead, the goal is to get shareholders to agree to remedial resolutions that take the form of a capital reduction, which means reclassifying some equity as distributable reserves.

What isn’t clear at this stage is how the company fixes this problem going forward. They note that a number of accounting strategies are being considered to ensure adequate distributable income going forward. Changing the presentation currency to ZAR is presumably one way to do it, although this goes against the company’s attempts to appeal to a global shareholder base.

Like I said: you won’t see this every day.

Revenue dropped at Quantum but HEPS is way up (JSE: QFH)

This was a period of margin improvement

Revenue at Quantum Foods fell by 13% for the six months to March 2024. That doesn’t sound like the start of a great highlights package, yet operating profit was up a ridiculous 327% and HEPS jumped by an even sillier 653%.

To put more sensible numbers to it, headline earnings increased from R6 million to R43 million. This is a good reminder of how touch-and-go the base period was.

Although there was an impact from avian flu outbreaks in this period, the real win came in higher egg prices and a drop in input costs in the form of raw materials for feed (yellow maize and soya meal). This is despite the weaker rand, as international prices thankfully fell by enough that the rand couldn’t offset the benefit. And of course, less load shedding took some strain off the system in terms of diesel costs etc.

In summary, despite the pressure on revenue from a drop in egg volumes, the unit economics improved so much that profitability went firmly in the right direction. This is a great reminder that margins matter more than revenue. It doesn’t help to sell more of something that is barely profitable.

Of course, first prize would be a recovery in egg volumes along with these improved margins.

As this paragraph in the outlook section shows, Quantum isn’t buying the story that load shedding is gone for good:

No interim dividend has been declared despite the improved results.

Little Bites:

  • Director dealings:
    • A director of a major subsidiary of Shoprite (JSE: SHP) sold shares worth R1 million.
  • Telkom (JSE: TKG) shareholders have approved the category 1 transaction to dispose of Swiftnet to an infrastructure investment consortium that includes Actis and Royal Bafokeng Holdings. In fact, the deal achieved 100% approval from shareholders in attendance at the meeting, which is an unusual level of support.
  • Afine Investments (JSE: ANI) released a trading statement noting that earnings per share will be 94.70 cents for the year ended February 2024. This is because of upward revaluations of properties. They haven’t given a specific number for HEPS but they have noted that it will be within 20% of the prior comparative period, so cash earnings aren’t as exciting as the property revaluations.
  • Accelerate Property Fund (JSE: APF) released an announcement correcting an error in the circular regarding the directors’ intention to subscribe for the rights offer shares. The circular initially noted that it is likely that the directors won’t subscribe for them. The correct position is that directors have disclosed an intention to participate, which makes sense given how discounted the rights offer is price is.
  • Hammerson (JSE: HMN) announced the results of the dividend reinvestment plan alternative. It had very little uptake, which isn’t a great show of faith in the company. Holders of 1.57% of shares on the UK register and 0.58% of shares on the SA register elected to receive shares in lieu of a cash dividend.
  • Momentum Metropolitan Holdings (JSE: MTM) is looking to do all of us a favour by shortening the name to Momentum Group. This requires the issuance of a circular to shareholders – admittedly a very small one. In case you’re curious, you can find it here.

Ghost Bites (Anglo American | Bidcorp | Bytes | Capital & Regional – Vukile – Growthpoint | Emira | HCI – eMedia – Frontier Transport – Tsogo Sun | Investec | Kore Potash | Mahube Infrastructure | Shaftesbury | Stefanutti Stocks | Tharisa)

The Finance Ghost
-
0
Ghost Bites (Anglo American | Bidcorp | Bytes | Capital & Regional – Vukile – Growthpoint | Emira | HCI – eMedia – Frontier Transport – Tsogo Sun | Investec | Kore Potash | Mahube Infrastructure | Shaftesbury | Stefanutti Stocks | Tharisa)

Get the latest recap of JSE news in the Ghost Wrap podcast, brought to you by Mazars:

Anglo American reports a further drop in diamond sales (JSE: AGL)

The latest De Beers sales numbers are in

In and amongst all the noise around potential offers for the group, Anglo American has released the latest sales cycle numbers for De Beers. With $380 million in sales for cycle 4, the trend is firmly negative. Cycle 4 2023 was much higher at $479 million. Cycle 3 2024 was also significantly higher at $446 million.

Apart from the obvious issues of macroeconomic pressures, there was a quieter period of trading in India during the elections. The next sales event is in the US – and in Las Vegas, no less. The company has already tried to temper expectations by referencing macroeconomic issues and hoping for a recovery in coming years.

As a reminder, Anglo American’s current proposal to shareholders to unlock value involves a disposal of some kind of De Beers. Selling a business with falling sales isn’t straightforward – at least not for a decent price.

Bidcorp is still growing despite much lower inflation (JSE: BID)

This is one of the best rand hedges on the JSE

Bidcorp has updated the market on performance for the ten months to April. In case you aren’t familiar with the group, this is a global food services giant that is one of the genuine rand hedges on the JSE, as very little of its revenue is generated here.

A key feature of this result is that food inflation has come all the way down to 2.6% vs. 15.2% in the comparable period. They point out that food inflation is lower than core inflation for the first time in two years. Another important point is that rand weakness has delivered a 9% positive impact on the reported numbers, as much of the revenue is generated elsewhere.

The performance across Australasia, Europe and the United Kingdom looks solid, with sales growth and stable or improving margins. Emerging markets are more of a mixed bag, with China and Brazil of particular concern. South Africa is actually performing well despite the challenges here, with other highlights being Malaysia, Chile and the Middle East.

Group sales for the ten months increased by 8.8%, with the UK as the standout at 15.9% (rand weakness helps here). Gross margins are slightly ahead of the previous year, which is just as well because operating costs as a percentage of revenue deteriorated by 40 basis points to 18.9%.

The EBITDA before IFRS 16 margin of 5.6% of net revenue is in line with 2023 which was a strong year. This is a period of working capital absorption for the group, with the good news being that working capital is in line with management expectations and slightly better than the comparable period.

R4.4 billion has been invested by the group, which is well up on R2.0 billion in the comparable period. Aside from two bolt-on acquisitions (a small bakery in Germany and a seafood wholesaler in South Africa), the focus has been on vehicles. They are busy with a “couple” of potential deals in the UK and one in Europe, all expected to close early in the new financial year.

Bidcorp is a powerhouse of note. Like most of the really high quality businesses on the JSE, the multiple reflects that. Based on last reported earnings, the Price/Earnings multiple is roughly 19x.

Bytes is growing strongly, despite the ex-CEO mess (JSE: BYI)

If you bought the panic selling around the departure of Neil Murphy, you’re smiling

Disgraced ex-CEO Neil Murphy is no longer involved at Bytes, after it came out that he had executed many, many undisclosed trades over a few years. The share price reflected panic when the news broke and those who were smart enough to buy the panic have already locked in a roughly 20% return in the past month.

This is because the group is still doing well, although margin compression in the IT services industry continues. Gross invoiced income increased by 26.7% and revenue was up 12.3%, so they are having to work harder and harder for that revenue. Gross profit increased 12.5% and operating profit was up 11.4%. By the time we reach HEPS, growth has been leveraged up to 15.4% – a very presentable result, especially in GBP.

The final dividend is 17.6% and the board has decided to pay another special dividend like last year, with a 16% growth rate in the special dividend as well. The only reason why they call it a special dividend is because they don’t want to commit to the higher payout ratio forever, just in case they need the capital for something else.

Plenty of activity around Capital & Regional (JSE: CRP)

And a 19.7% increase in the share price on the day

Capital & Regional is suddenly the talk of the town, confirming that on 19 April it received a non-binding indicative proposal from Vukile Property Fund (JSE: VKE) regarding a possible cash and share offer for the share capital of the company. I’m surprised it was kept under wraps for this long.

There’s nothing binding at this stage, with Vukile facing a PUSU (Put Up or Shut Up) deadline of 20 June 2024. As the juicy name suggests, they need to announce a firm intention to make an offer by that date or they need to confirm that they won’t make an offer.

On top of all this, Capital & Regional announced that Growthpoint (JSE: GRT) (which holds 68.13% in the company) received a non-binding expression of interest from NewRiver REIT in relation to a potential offer for Capital & Regional. The board of Capital & Regional hasn’t received a proposal from NewRiver at this stage.

Of course, the outcome of all this was a significant jump in the Capital & Regional share price as punters hit the buy button in the hope of a juicy offer coming in.

The growth rate at Emira isn’t useful (JSE: EMI)

But the range for the distribution certainly is

Emira Property Fund released a trading statement for the year ended March. The challenge here is that the comparable period is only nine months long as there was a change of year-end, so the increase in distribution per share of between 19.86% and 21.93% isn’t a valid growth rate as the comparable period was shorter.

It does tell us that the range is 116 to 118 cents per share and that’s the useful bit of information. This puts the fund on a trailing yield of 11.7%.

These HCI group companies all released numbers: HCI, eMedia and Frontier Transport (JSE: HCI | JSE: EMH | JSE: FTH)

I’ll deal with them all in one place – and Tsogo Sun separately as it is much bigger

I’ll start with eMedia, which reported for the year ended March 2024. Load shedding doesn’t help TV viewership at all, with advertising down 1%. It’s worth highlighting that e.tv spends R600 million per year on local drama series. Media Film Service got hurt badly by the writer’s strike in Hollywood, with profit down R31.5 million year-on-year. They also spent R8.8 million in legal battles with MultiChoice related to channels being carried on that bouquet. Revenue in eMedia fell 2.1% and HEPS was down 11.7%. The dividend of 16 cents per share was 20% lower.

Moving on to Frontier Transport, a wonderful example of how to make money in an unsexy industry, revenue increased by 8.9% and HEPS was up 37.8%. This is because operating costs increased 6.3%, with the resultant margin expansion driving that juicy improvement in HEPS. In addition to the ordinary dividend of 48.4 cents, there was a special dividend in January of 137.38 cents.

We now get to the mothership, Hosken Consolidated Investments (or HCI for short). We have an interesting scenario here where HEPS fell 29% and the dividend per share doubled to 100 cents. The major negative move was in oil and gas prospecting, where the headline loss jumped from R75 million to R528 million. That’s a very big move when total headline earnings came in at R1.18 billion. The reason why we can see negative moves of this side and yet a higher dividend is that the negative moves are non-cash in nature, with downward fair value adjustments recognised on the investment held by Africa Energy Corp.

Here’s what the total group looks like:

Although HCI controls Tsogo Sun, I’ve dealt with that company further down as the market cap is much larger than the likes of eMedia and Frontier. And in case you’re wondering, Deneb reported earlier in the week.

Investec’s earnings moved higher in GBP – and thus much higher in ZAR (JSE: INL | JSE: INP)

Key metrics like Return on Equity (ROE) also moved higher

Investec has released results for the year ended March 2024. This was a period of significant corporate activity, like the major deal in the UK to combine Investec Wealth & Investment UK with the Rathbones Group. They also sold the property management company to Burstone Group for a small fortune.

To make the numbers more comparable, Investec has presented adjusted operating profit as though the abovementioned transactions took place at the start of the period. On that basis, adjusted operating profit is up 8% in GBP or 24.6% in ZAR. Return on Equity has moved higher, up from 13.7% to 14.6%.

The cost to income ratio improved from 54.7% to 53.8% as total operating costs increased by only 3.2%, an impressive show of discipline.

The full-year dividend increased by 11.1% to 34.5 pence for the year.

It’s interesting to note the revised through-the-cycle targets for the credit loss ratio. In Southern Africa, where the book is mainly high income private clients and large corporates, the range is 15 to 35 basis points. In the UK with more of a mid-market positioning, the range is 35 to 55 basis points. This tells you something about the economic resilience of the different books.

The share price closed 4.5% on the day of these results, taking the 12-month gain to 19%. Those who enjoy range trading strategies might want to take a look at this chart:

Kore Potash’s share price took off on a rocket (JSE: KP2)

The ASX has even queried the recent price action

The Australian Stock Exchange sent Kore Potash a price query, which means they noticed an unusual uptick in price and volume in the stock and wanted to understand if there is any information that should’ve been disclosed that could have leaked into the market.

Here’s the chart – and it’s not hard to see why the ASX took notice:

The company reiterated that no formal legal agreements have been entered into with PowerChina re: the all-important EPC contract for the development of the Kola Project. In other words, the last release from the company is still the latest news.

Speculators seem to be lining up for a release of good news and what that might do to the share price.

Winds of change at Mahube Infrastructure (JSE: MHB)

As in, literally

Mahube Infrastructure released a trading statement dealing with the year ended February 2024. There’s a huge swing in profitability and in the right direction. Compared to a headline loss per share of 53.68 cents, HEPS will come in at between 91.05 cents and 100.64 cents.

Aside from dividends received from investee companies (including special dividends), the earnings were driven by a favourable change in the fair value of financial assets due to a revision of wind forecasts an improvement in the macroeconomic indicators.

Strong momentum at Shaftesbury (JSE: SHC)

Things seem to be going well in this London-focused fund

Shaftesbury has released a trading update that was presented at the company’s AGM. The highlight is that leasing demand is producing rents that are 7% ahead of 2023 numbers, with the company also enjoying the recycling of capital at a premium to the values at which the properties are held on the balance sheet.

They have completed £213 million in asset sales since the merger that created Shaftesbury as we know it today, with a premium of 3% to the valuation on the books. They have reinvested £83 million in target acquisitions.

The loan to value is at 30% which is a very healthy level for a property fund. The current weighted average cash cost of drawn debt is 4%.

Perhaps most interesting, the office portfolio is showing the best increase in contracted rent vs. 2023 levels, with the return to office trend gaining momentum:

Never a dull moment at Stefanutti Stocks (JSE: SSK)

The group is hoping that the Eskom claim will be finalised in Q3

Stefanutti Stocks is in the midst of a turnaround plan. If you aren’t sure why, a quick look at the balance sheet where liabilities exceed assets will dispel that uncertainty for you. The financials are still prepared on a going concern basis due to the expected cash flows under the restructuring plan.

For those punters willing to take a speculative position here, the key is the dispute with Eskom that is now with the Dispute Adjudication Board (DAB). This relates to contractual claims and compensation events at Kusile Power Project. Independent experts evaluate the delays and related numbers and the DAB then makes a decision that is binding on the parties. Stefanutti Stocks submitted a total claim of R1.6 billion to the experts and will now wait to see how much it gets. It is hoped that a binding decision will be issued in Q3 2024.

The rest of the group still has all the usual uncertainty and difficulty that seems to follow construction companies around. For example, Hyvec JV was previously shown as a discontinued operation. A change of plan means that it is back in continuing operations. Delays in on-boarding labour due to legislative changes led to the recognition of an onerous contract provision and a loss for the year there of R78 million.

Although the year-on-year swing in continuing and discontinued operations is rather wild, the combined operations managed to show what looks like a smooth result: growth in profit for the year of 9%.

HEPS tells a different story though, deteriorating by 44% to a loss of 55.73 cents.

Revenue up and HEPS down at Tharisa (JSE: THA)

Chrome prices helped mitigate the fall in PGM prices

Tharisa has announced results for the six months to March. They reflect a 9.9% increase in chrome production and a 7.7% decrease in PGM production. Chrome prices were 16.9% higher and PGM prices were 39.3% lower.

The net effect is that revenue was actually up 10.1%, with EBITDA slightly down and EBITDA margin contracting from 24.2% to 21.6%. Due to higher finance costs, HEPS fell sharply, down 25% to US 13.2 cents.

The interim dividend of US 1.5 cents per share is 50% lower than the prior year.

Tsogo Sun is facing pressure at casinos (JSE: TSG)

Adjusted HEPS has dipped

Tsogo Sun has released results for the year ended March 2024. Income is up 2% and operating costs increased 3%, with load shedding having an impact on both those metrics. This led to adjusted EBITDA decreasing by 2%.

When operating profits are going the wrong way, it’s hard for HEPS to avoid following suit. Due to the termination of hotel management contracts in the base year, it’s important to look at adjusted HEPS to see the impact of operational performance. This is down 5%.

Perhaps the final dividend tells the best story, down a substantial 30% after the interim dividend was flat year-on-year. There’s clearly uncertainty in this space and the group has also had to recognise impairments based on the financial performance.

It might help matters if exposure to the Western Cape can be increased. The casino footprint is heavily geared towards the northern parts of the country. The group notes a plan to develop a new casino and hotel precinct in Somerset West, as well as upgrades to the Caledon site.

Little Bites:

  • Director dealings:
    • Des de Beer has bought shares in Lighthouse Properties (JSE: LTE) worth R15.8 million.
    • A non-executive director of WeBuyCars (JSE: WBC) bought shares in the company worth R506k.
  • Spear REIT (JSE: SEA) is due to release the circular for the substantial acquisition of a Western Cape portfolio from Emira (EMI) by no later than 2 July. In the meantime, Spear has released the forecast financial information for the target portfolio on the assumption that the transfer date for the properties is 1 December 2024. It shows that the expected distributable income from the portfolio for the year ending February 2026 (the first full year) is R8.1 million, with net property income of R118.9 million and finance costs of R104 million due to the level of leverage. The release of the circular will give far more detail.
  • Mondi (JSE: MNP) has launched a €500 million 8-year Eurobond. The issue will close on 31 May and the proceeds are for general corporate purposes. The bonds are due in 2032 and have a coupon of 3.75%, so that gives you an idea of where investment grade corporate credit in London is trading. The debt is rated Baa1 by Moody’s and A- by Standard and Poor’s.
  • Ibex Investment Holdings (JSE: IBX) (formerly Steinhoff Investment Holdings) received almost unanimous approval from shareholders for the repurchase of the preference shares at R93.50 per share plus pro-rate preference dividends from 1 January 2024 until the scheme operative date. This isn’t a surprise, as there’s no other way for major holders to realise their investments.
  • Chrometco (JSE: CMO) announced that the CEO is stepping down and will be replaced by William Yang. Greg Hunter will be appointed executive chairman of the company. The share price is still suspended from trading.
1...646566...208Page 65 of 208

Focuses on making market news and investment concepts accessible, understandable and fun!

Ghost Mail is free to read

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

Partner with Ghost Mail

CONTACT US

© Ghost Mail

Verified by MonsterInsights