Thursday, December 4, 2025
Home Blog

Who’s doing what this week in the South African M&A space?

0

Sappi and UPM-Kymmene Corporation have signed a non-binding Letter of Intent in relation to the possible formation of a joint venture for graphic paper in Europe. The Joint Venture will include the European graphic paper business of Sappi and the UPM Communications Paper Business in Europe, the UK and the USA. UPM is listed on the Nasdaq Helsinki stock exchange. The Joint Venture will be owned 50/50 by Sappi and UPM and will be operated initially as a non-listed independent company.

Hosken Consolidated Investments subsidiary, Permasolve Investments, has entered into an agreement to dispose of the rental enterprise conducted by it at erf 1141 Sea Point West in the City of Cape Town, Cape Division, Province of the Western Cape, trading as The Point Centre to Future Indefinite Investments 180 for R943 million.

Vodacom has announced that it has agreed to acquire an effective interest in 20% of the issued share capital of Safaricom Plc, for an aggregate consideration of US$2,1 billion (R36 billion), equivalent to KES34 per Safaricom share. The Acquisition is comprised of the following: Vodacom has agreed to acquire 12.5% of the issued shares in Vodafone Kenya (an effective 5% stake in Safaricom) from Vodafone International Holdings B.V for consideration of US$0,5 billion (R9 billion), resulting in Vodacom owning 100% of Vodafone Kenya. Vodacom, via Vodafone Kenya, has agreed to acquire 15% of the issued share capital of Safaricom from the Government of Kenya for a consideration of US$1.6 billion (R27 billion); and Vodafone Kenya has agreed to buy the right to receive future Safaricom dividends amounting to KES 55,7 billion (R7,4 billion), that would have accrued to the Government of Kenya on its remaining shares in Safaricom for an upfront payment of KES 40,2 billion (R5,3 billion).

Brimstone Investment has sold a 9.2% stake (11,950,000 shares) in Oceana Group to Marine Edge Capital for an undisclosed sum. Brimstone retains a 16% stake.

Raubex has issued a cautionary that it is assessing the possible disposal of all, or a portion of, its shareholding in Bauba Resources.

Thungela Resources – through its wholly owned subsidiary, Thungela Operations – will dispose of the Goedehoop North Mining Area Assets and Liabilities (including the Rapid Load-out Coal Terminal; the Coal Beneficiation Plant; the Surface Rights; the Mine Residue Dump; the Mining Rights and the Rehabilitation liabilities) to GHN Resources for R700 million excluding VAT.

Remgro has announced that it is in discussions with MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company SA through its wholly owned subsidiary Investment Holding Limited S.à.r.l (IHL) regarding a potential restructuring of interests in Mediclinic Holdings. As currently contemplated, the Potential Transaction would result in Remgro acquiring full ownership of Mediclinic Southern Africa and IHL acquiring full ownership of Hirslanden, being the Swiss operations of Mediclinic. The parties will then continue to hold their respective joint interests in the Middle East and Spire Healthcare Group plc businesses.

Unlisted Deals

Cape Town-based fintech Zazu, has raised US$1 million in pre-seed funding. This funding round saw participation from Plug and Play Ventures, as well as investors and fintech founders from Launch Africa Ventures, AUTO24.africa, Paymentology, Chari, Fiat Republic, and several founding members of European fintech unicorns like Qonto and Solarisbank.

NORDEN has acquired the cargo activities of Taylor Maritime in Southern Africa (previously operated under the IVS brand).  As part of the acquisition, NORDEN takes over the specialist parcelling team based in Durban, South Africa, headed by Brandon Paul, who together with his team will continue to service customers on parcel trades from South Africa.  The acquisition sum is undisclosed

Who’s doing what in the African M&A and debt financing space?

0

Global insurtech, bolttech Group, has announced that it has acquired mTek, a digital insurance platform based in Kenya. Founded in 2019, mTek has developed a best-in-class digital platform that enables customers in Kenya to compare, purchase, and manage insurance seamlessly. Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.

Hamak Strategy, announced that it has entered into a Binding Term Sheet with UK registered private company, CAA Mining, which holds a purchase option with a private Ghanian company, Topago Mining, to acquire the highly prospective Akoko gold licence in Ghana. Hamak will pay CAA £20,000 for a 120-day exclusivity period to conclude technical and legal due diligence on Akoko. Subject to a successful outcome of the due diligence, Hamak will commit to spend a minimum of £500,000 on further exploration and confirmatory work at Akoko during 2026. Subject to satisfactory confirmatory work, Hamak will have the right to exercise its option any time prior to 14 December 2026 to purchase the Akoko licence via the CAA option with Topago through a payment of £50,000 cash to CAA, the issue of £1 million of new Hamak shares to CAA and the payment of US$1.9 million to Topago.

Rology, an Egyptian FDA 510(k) cleared AI-assisted teleradiology platform in the Middle East and Africa, has announced the successful closing of its growth funding round. The round includes participation from the Philips Foundation, Johnson & Johnson Impact Ventures, Sanofi Global Health Unit’s Impact Fund, and MIT Solve Innovation Future. Rology’s platform enables zero-setup cost, AI-accelerated diagnostic reporting across 12 radiology sub-specialties and 8 modalities, delivering reports in as little as 30 minutes. The undisclosed funding round follows on the company’s expansion in Saudi Arabia and steady growth in Kenya and other markets.

TSX-listed Montage Gold has announced that it will extend its Wet African footprint through the acquisition of all of the issued share capital of African Gold that it does not already own, by way of an Australian court-approved Scheme of Arrangement. African Gold holds the high-quality resource-stage Didievi project in Côte d’Ivoire. Montage is the current operator of the project and holds a 17.13% stake in African Gold. The deal is valued at approximately US$170 million.

Vodacom has announced that it has agreed to acquire an effective interest in 20% of the issued share capital of Safaricom Plc, for an aggregate consideration of US$2,1 billion, equivalent to KES34 per Safaricom share. The Acquisition is comprised of the following: Vodacom has agreed to acquire 12.5% of the issued shares in Vodafone Kenya (an effective 5% stake in Safaricom) from Vodafone International Holdings B.V for consideration of US$0,5 billion, resulting in Vodacom owning 100% of Vodafone Kenya. Vodacom, via Vodafone Kenya, has agreed to acquire 15% of the issued share capital of Safaricom from the Government of Kenya for a consideration of US$1,6 billion; and Vodafone Kenya has agreed to buy the right to receive future Safaricom dividends amounting to KES 55.7 billion, that would have accrued to the Government of Kenya on its remaining shares in Safaricom for an upfront payment of KES 40,2 billion.

On November 27, Tanga Cement listed the 127m new ordinary shares issued in the TZS204 billion Rights Issue that closed in October. This is the largest right issue to date in Tanzania and was 100% subscribed. The issue was priced at TZS1,600 per share at a ratio of two new shares for every 1 existing share held.

DEG has announced a long-term loan totalling €16.5 million to German horticultural company Selecta One, to fund the acquisition of Wagagai, a cutting farm in Uganda. Some of the funds will go to modernisation work at the farm. The acquisition enables the Wagagai farm, which employs over 2,000 people, to continue operating. Social initiatives will also be maintained. The initiatives include an on-site health centre, and educational and community work programmes. The Wagagai Health Centre was established in 2002, also funded by DEG.

In October, ASX-listed Predictive Discovery, a company focused on discovering and developing gold deposits within the Siguiri Basin, Guinea, and TSX and ASX-listed Robex Resources, which has assets in Mali and Guinea, announced a merger of equals whereby Predictive would acquire all the shares of Robex via a plan of arrangement whereby Robex shareholders would receive 8.667 Predictive shares for each Robex share held. The combined entity would be held 51% and 49% respectively by Predictive and Rebox shareholders. The merged entity would remain listed on the ASX and apply for a listing on the TSX. This week, Predictive announced that it had received a binding offer from Perseus Mining (also listed on the ASX and with gold mining assets in Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire) to acquire all of the issued shares in Predictive that it does not already own via an Australian scheme of arrangement. Perseus currently holds 17.8% of the Predictive ordinary shares outstanding. The binding offer of 0.1360 new Perseus shares for every 1 Predictive share, has been determined by the Predictive board to be a superior offer and have notified Robex of the offer and they have 5 working days to match or increase the offer. The Robex Matching Period expires on 10 December 2025.

The African Development Bank Group have approved up to XOF15 billion (€ 22,9 million) to support Phase II of Côte d’Ivoire’s Programme Électricité Pour Tous (PEPT). The financing includes up to €16 million from the Bank and up to €6,9 million from the Sustainable Energy Fund for Africa (SEFA). The transaction marks the first African Development Bank subscription to a local currency social bond in the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) region. The project will finance 400,000 new electricity connections over 2025-2026, benefiting 2,2 million people, of which 35 percent live in rural communities.

DealMakers AFRICA is the continent’s quarterly M&A publication
www.dealmakersafrica.com

The perils of oversimplifying technology due diligence in acquisitions

Whether your company makes food, builds houses, manages logistics, sells products or provides services, your critical functions run on information technology. As such, it is no longer meaningful to draw a hard line between “tech” and “non-tech” businesses. In most businesses, sales and marketing depend on digital channels, operations rely on data and automation, finance sits on cloud platforms, and HR manages people through software. In practice, nearly every business is a technology business, and in transactions, technology should not be viewed as a side consideration – it is the engine of value and the source of risk. Yet in many acquisitions, especially by non-tech acquirers, technology due diligence remains dangerously superficial. Too many acquirers treat it as a checklist, while missing the deeper questions that determine whether a target’s technology is and can remain compliant, can scale, and can integrate easily, seamlessly and without undue expense.

Modern enterprises are stitched together by technology. Cloud computing hosts enterprise applications; SaaS tools drive collaboration and CRM; mobile apps connect staff and customers; APIs integrate partners and supply chains. Even seemingly simple functions (like invoicing, timekeeping and customer support) operate on digital rails. The more essential these systems become, the greater the legal and operational exposure if they fail, are misused, or are implemented without appropriate governance.

The traditional, superficial approach to technology due diligence is fraught with shortcomings and, given the reliance that a business places on technology as part of its day-to-day operations, a simple glance at technology contracts is insufficient for a company to mitigate the risks.

1. How clean is the target’s technology stack?

    Superficial diligence often stops at verifying that systems “work.” But functioning systems can conceal serious structural weaknesses. This, in turn, creates a myriad of risks, including integration paralysis (especially where the target has legacy and fragmented systems), vendor lock-in, hidden fragility, and valuation mismatch.

    2. Overlooking cyber and data risks

    Many acquirers still regard cybersecurity as an IT hygiene issue. In reality, it is a regulatory, financial and reputational risk zone, giving rise to issues such as inherited vulnerabilities, regulatory penalties, customer attrition (trust is easily lost by clients where cyber breaches occur), and operational disruption.

    3. Underestimating technical debt

    Every system carries “technical debt”, i.e. the accumulated shortcuts and legacy code that slow innovation and inflate maintenance costs. The risk to the acquirer includes unexpected capital expenditure, erosion of deal value (especially where high maintenance costs affect the EBITDA or end-of-support systems require replacement at significant cost), delayed synergies, and innovation bottlenecks.

    4. Ignoring intellectual property (IP) traps

    Technology value rests on ownership and control. Yet hurried diligence often stops at confirming that “the company owns its IP” and does not consider the hidden risks, such as unknown ownership claims (by staff or contractors), open source contamination, AI and data disputes, and jurisdictional misalignment.

    5. Misjudging integration and scalability

    A target’s systems may work well in isolation, but fail under the scale or compliance expectations of a larger enterprise. Most due diligence processes do not fully consider the risks in relation to integration costs, business disruption, compliance risks and cultural resistance.

    6. The false economy of “light touch” diligence

    Under deal pressure, acquirers often scale back on the diligence scope or timeline, especially on technology. This short-term saving often becomes long-term pain, especially where deal fatigue and distractions mean that hidden liabilities emerge after the deal is done, with an inability to renegotiate post-closing, resulting in reputational fallout.

    Savvy acquirers are shifting from transactional to strategic technology diligence, treating it as a lens into capability, not just compliance. A well-structured technology due diligence mitigates key risks by assessing the architecture – which reveals scalability and technical debt before it becomes a capital burden – and the cybersecurity posture of the target, with a view to quantifying its exposure and defining remediation budgets pre-closing. It also assesses the data governance framework by identifying unlawful or high-risk data flows early; the intellectual property ownership position, ensuring that the target has clear title to all software, datasets, and AI models; integration readiness (including predicting real integration cost and time); and the technical leadership, in order to gauge whether the engineering culture can deliver on post-deal strategies.

    The ultimate goal of a well-structured and comprehensive technology due diligence is to transform the technology due diligence from a cost centre exercise into a predictive risk and value tool. Oversimplifying technology due diligence may save days on a timeline, but can cost years of recovery. In the digital era, the real liabilities are embedded not in balance sheets, but in codebases, data and dependencies.

    For any acquirer, understanding the target’s technology landscape is no longer optional. It is the difference between buying an asset that accelerates growth and inheriting a liability that erodes it.

    Boda is Head of Department and Dullabh an Executive: Technology, Media and Telecommunications | ENS

    This article first appeared in DealMakers, SA’s quarterly M&A publication.

    DealMakers is SA’s M&A publication.
    www.dealmakerssouthafrica.com

    Assessing the risk of the culture to be acquired

    0

    Everyone enjoys a growth story, and mergers and acquisitions (M&A) often stand out as the fastest way to scale effectively. Whether it’s snapping up a competitor, expanding into new markets or acquiring new capabilities, the appeal of an M&A deal is clear. However, beneath the spreadsheets and legal jargon lies a major risk that is often overlooked: the company culture being acquired.

    Even the strongest financials, the best product fit, and the most promising synergy projections cannot compensate for a toxic culture. The 2025 Culture Killers Report by Cape Town-based consulting firm 5th Discipline surveyed 150+ professionals in South Africa’s fast-growing climate change sector, a sector attracting increasing investment. The report reveals that poor culture and weak leadership drive employee disengagement and turnover, which can severely undermine ROI. Disengaged employees are estimated to cost companies upwards of 30% of their salary in lost productivity and related expenses.

    M&A due diligence tends to focus heavily on financials, legal compliance, and market position. The most successful and profitable dealmakers, however, also give serious attention to company culture, due to the risks and rewards created by the people within the organisation being acquired. The Culture Killers Report highlights that nearly 20% of employees struggle to face work daily because of toxic cultures. These toxic environments often lead to domino effects – one exit can set off multiple departures as team cohesion breaks down. The time to hire takes, on average, three months, which means businesses may be suffering a two-month inefficiency period between departures and replacements.

    Ironically, the harshest cultural critics are often those with long tenure and senior roles, who are precisely the key leadership and strategic talent buyers want to retain. This presents a significant risk to leadership value and organisational stability. Poor culture correlates with abysmal retention rates; nearly all employees in toxic environments leave within 15 months, while the average ROI on an employee is typically only realised between six to 12 months.

    Under these circumstances, acquisitions can appear less like lucrative investments and more like costly liabilities that drain resources.

    A common response is to inject capital and appoint a new Chief Executive Officer (CEO) or managing director (MD) to lead the acquired firm, hoping new investment and fresh leadership will spark a turnaround. Yet the Culture Killers data reveals that almost half of employees identify poor communication, lack of motivation, leadership trust and insufficient coaching as major leadership failings. Without addressing these root causes, financial investment is unlikely to translate into productivity gains or improved talent retention, especially where new leaders do not have trust capital.

    Furthermore, replacing a CEO or MD alone does not necessarily solve cultural issues deeply embedded within the organisation. Entrenched behaviours, attitudes and feelings about the company persist far beyond leadership changes. It is entirely possible to invest millions yet lose the talented individuals and competitive edge that originally made the business valuable.

    For M&A to succeed from both strategic and commercial perspectives, culture due diligence must be as comprehensive as financial audits, as many cultural factors are quantifiable in monetary terms. This entails detailed evaluation of leadership styles, employee sentiment, communication clarity, 360-degree feedback, retention, absenteeism, hiring, and training data.

    The 5th Discipline report underscores that companies with engaged leaders and supportive cultures retain their talent longer. Nearly all respondents rating their culture 4/5 or higher reported strong retention beyond 15 months, which translates to three to nine months of additional ROI. Conversely, those who remain solely for compensation or job security tend to rate culture poorly and are more inclined to leave when better opportunities arise. Notably, pay and benefits were less commonly cited as reasons for leaving; the truth remains that people leave people.

    Culture integration is notoriously complex, yet embedding cultural considerations throughout the M&A process can dramatically improve outcomes:

    • Culture audits: Beyond financial due diligence, asking employees what they tell friends about working at the company reveals important cultural insights. Third-party culture assessments encourage candid feedback and uncover gaps early.
    • Leadership assessment & investment: Conducting 360-degree reviews and online performance evaluations identifies leadership strengths and development needs.
    • Leadership enablement: Training leaders in emotional intelligence, effective communication and coaching enhances their ability to inspire and retain teams through transitions.
    • Alignment workshops: Facilitating sessions to unify teams around shared mission, values and operational practices fosters cohesion post-merger or acquisition.
    • Measurement & management: Setting clear KPIs linked to engagement, innovation, productivity and career development not only boosts retention, but aligns culture with business goals.
    • Transparent communication: Maintaining open channels about upcoming changes and providing forums for genuine feedback builds trust and reduces resistance.
    • Tailored integration plans: Recognising that culture cannot be “one-size-fits-all,” integration plans must adapt to different departments, experience levels and functions.

    Almost half of employees surveyed desire better communication and inspiring leadership, which the report identifies as essential for retention and productivity. Investing in these areas leads to lower recruitment costs, heightened engagement and improved returns – precisely what shareholders seek after a deal.

    Ignoring culture means embracing a high-risk investment where multi-million-rand acquisitions could backfire.

    For South African companies targeting significant ROI in renewable energy M&A, culture is not merely a “soft” factor or “PR buzzword”; it is a critical commercial lever. Collaborating with specialists who can transform culture data into practical, financially tangible strategies unlocks enduring impact, agility and market resilience.

    Before deciding to buy, merge, or invest capital in a net-zero economy business, it is essential to understand the culture being acquired, and ensure the readiness to lead, nurture, and invest in the people who will drive sustainable profits.

    Within South Africa’s evolving business landscape, mastering the culture equation is where authentic, lasting financial value begins.

    To access the report by 5th Discipline, follow this link: https://the5thdiscipline.com/home/access-the-culture-killers-report/

    Taylor is the CEO & Founder | 5th Discipline

    This article first appeared in DealMakers, SA’s quarterly M&A publication.

    DealMakers is SA’s M&A publication.
    www.dealmakerssouthafrica.com

    Does regional integration increase M&A regulatory burden?

    0

    This is a tricky topic, which has recently become increasingly important for entities which operate across multiple jurisdictions in Africa. Regional integration, in the form of the SADC, COMESA, EAC and AU (regional organisations), is meant to bring uniformity among the member states. The aim is to remove trade barriers, promote easy movement of labour, increase cross border investment and, in some cases, to facilitate easy access to capital for public and private entities, with better terms through financial institutions established and funded by the regional organisations. However, despite the benefits of regional integration, there is a challenge lurking behind the scenes, in the form of the M&A regulatory burden posed by the regional organisations.

    Some African countries have national merger authorities (NMAs) which are responsible for merger approval processes, and each of these countries’ NMAs has unique key areas on which they focus. Historically, entities operating in multiple African countries would file merger approvals with the NMA in each of those countries. However, regional organisations are now focusing on becoming more integrated and uniform to prevent anti-competitive behaviour and monopoly across the continent, so merger approvals from the regional competition authority are increasingly required. Unfortunately, NMA approvals and local competition laws remain intact and do not cede to the regional competition authority, which means that M&A transactions are notified at both the NMA and regional organisation level. Trying to navigate the multiple regulatory hurdles contributes significantly to the regulatory burden, including time and cost.

    Arguments have been presented that national authorities should focus on the local policies, laws and economic impact of the transaction within the member state, while the relevant regional organisations should focus on the impact across multiple African countries. While this argument is valid, there should be proper integration and uniformity, where each NMA is entrusted with the duty to focus not only on its own market, but also on how the M&A transaction affects the member states of the regional organisation. Alternatively, the NMA should cede control to the relevant regional organisation to make such analysis, with internal dialogue and correspondences between the regional organisation and the NMA to avoid multiple filings.

    Aside from the anti-competition approvals, there may be lack of support or uniformity by regional organisations when it comes to regulatory approvals across multiple jurisdictions on the continent. Some jurisdictions have simpler regulatory controls, while others impose more stringent requirements. These can include free carry in favour of the member state, and/or mandatory local ownership requirements to qualify for the granting of some permits/licences or approvals. It becomes a challenge for businesses to navigate different regulatory approval requirements across each of these jurisdictions, which then hinders cross border investment and the easy flow of capital between member states. With regional organisations pushing for more integration and uniformity, this aspect must be investigated, especially for businesses which have attained an agreed threshold to qualify for merger approval with the regional competition authority.

    The inconsistency of tax frameworks across member states belonging to the same regional organisation calls for harmonisation. These inconsistencies range from withholding tax obligations, rates and accrual, capital gains tax rates and assessment mechanisms, and VAT frameworks, among others. Ultimately, M&A transactions have to comply with the tax laws of each jurisdiction, but in some instances, approvals and implementation timeframes differ significantly from one member state to another. Overall, this impacts the confidence of investors seeking entry into the continent. In addition, it affects the financial support from external financiers, since the continent still largely depends on financing from non-African financial institutions and banks.

    Regional integration should unlock growth, not entrench fragmentation. Aligning competition, regulatory and tax laws, policies and systems should be a priority. It is the key to turning Africa’s economic blocs into engines of cross-border investment. It should make us more competitive and reduce the hurdles of investment across member states, whether emanating from within or from outside the continent.

    Lui is a Partner | Clyde & Co (Tanzania)

    This article first appeared in DealMakers AFRICA, the continent’s quarterly M&A publication.

    DealMakers AFRICA is a quarterly M&A publication
    www.dealmakersafrica.com

    Private Equity and Wheeling: financing the shift to decentralised power

    Africa’s energy story is undergoing a fundamental shift in 2025, as c.600 million Africans lack access to electricity. Rolling blackouts, rising tariffs and strained utilities have forced commercial institutes to look for alternatives, while investors are searching for sustainable, long-term returns. At the centre of this intersection sits wheeling, which allows independent power producers (IPPs) to deliver electricity directly to commercial institutes through the grid. For private equity, wheeling offers more than just a niche investment play. It represents a scalable platform for financing decentralised power, while giving customers reliable, typically cleaner, energy that bypasses overburdened state utilities.

    Wheeling can be explained as an IPP “wheeling” electricity that it has generated across the existing grid to a consumer, even if the two are not physically connected. Contracts and network charges govern the transaction, making it possible for commercial institutes to secure renewable supply without having to build their own dedicated infrastructure.


    African private sector clean energy investments surged to nearly US$40 billion in 2024, with solar capacity alone exceeding 20 gigawatts, and over 10 gigawatts under construction, primarily driven by Southern Africa.
    South Africa’s power story is one of both crisis and innovation. In the late 1990s, South Africa undertook one of the world’s fastest electrification drives, where roughly 2,5 million households were provided access to electricity. When Eskom’s debt burden and rising tariffs collided with surging demand in the early 2000s, the system fell into crisis. By 2007, load shedding had become a national reality, forcing the government and businesses alike to rethink the centralised utility model.


    The introduction of IPPs in 2012 was a turning point in South Africa’s energy transformation journey. IPPs eased pressure on Eskom, while proving that decentralised energy could be both viable and scalable. Today, wheeling takes that shift further by allowing commercial institutes to secure power directly from IPPs, reducing dependence on Eskom while accelerating the transition to cleaner energy.


    In May 2025, the National Energy Regulator of South Africa established a framework for third-party wheeling that includes rules that standardise how network charges for wheeling are set and collected. By clarifying network charge methodology and access, the rules make wheeling commercially predictable, encouraging more competition and renewable investment.


    For commercial institutes – which are generally the continent’s heaviest consumers of electricity – wheeling is more than an energy hedge, and this is perfectly illustrated by Vodacom’s pioneering virtual wheeling deal with SOLA Group. By securing renewable power through a PPA, Vodacom not only reduced its reliance on Eskom, but also set a blueprint for other companies to follow.
    Investec’s award of an electricity trading licence by the National Energy Regulator of South Africa also represents a significant milestone in the country’s evolving energy landscape. The bank will be partnering with IPPs and facilitating structured funding, offtake arrangements and wheeling solutions.


    The decentralised energy model is also gaining traction beyond South Africa. Kenya’s 2019 Energy Act, reinforced by the 2024 regulations, now enables large consumers to contract directly with IPPs. Eligible commercial institutes consuming more than 1 MVA can soon bypass Kenya Power, opening the door to a competitive open-access energy market. Zambia, Morocco and Egypt are also advancing frameworks that could make wheeling a mainstream option.
    The overall benefit of wheeling is significant, with commercial institutes gaining cleaner, reliable power, while IPPs secure bankable off-takers. For investors, particularly in private equity, wheeling creates a pipeline of long-term, creditworthy deals that align with both returns and sustainability mandates.
    Wheeling plays a pivotal role in advancing ESG objectives by supporting Africa’s transition to low-carbon, sustainable energy. Its cost-effective nature enables broader, affordable access to clean power, helping reduce emissions while improving energy equity. This model delivers both environmental impact and socio-economic upliftment, creating long-term value for communities and investors. In short, wheeling matters because it transforms Africa’s power challenge into an investment and growth opportunity.


    The next frontier for private equity in Africa lies in building regional renewable energy platforms that combine generation, storage and digital innovation. Infrastructure outside South Africa may also be required. These integrated solutions, anchored by bankable corporate off-takers, represent the convergence of infrastructure, finance and technology.


    Private equity investors are already positioning themselves as catalysts in this space. Their participation typically takes four forms:


    • Platform aggregation: bundling smaller PPAs into investment-grade portfolios that attract institutional capital. One example is Discovery Green, a renewable energy platform that enables electricity wheeling while unlocking access to clean, affordable power at scale.


    • Infrastructure funds: acquiring or building IPPs and backing construction of new renewable projects tied to wheeling agreements.


    • Fintech solutions: enabling smaller commercial institutes to access flexible financing structures, as they may not be able to commit to long-term PPAs.


    • Storage investments: adding batteries and smart control systems to projects, improving reliability and making portfolios bankable.


    Each of these approaches strengthens the investment case, aligns with ESG mandates, and builds resilience into Africa’s decentralised power ecosystem.


    Wheeling is more than a technical mechanism; it is a bridge between Africa’s power deficit and its investment opportunity. For commercial institutes, it secures cleaner, more reliable supply. For IPPs, it creates direct demand. And for private equity, it offers a scalable play at the intersection of infrastructure, energy transition and corporate finance. As regulators refine frameworks and commercial institutes demand sustainable power, private equity’s role will only deepen.

    References: 

    1. https://www.eskom.co.za/heritage/history-in-decades/eskom-2003-2012/
    2. https://www.eskom.co.za/distribution/tariffs-and-charges/wheeling/#Why-wheeling
    3. https://energy-news-network.com/industry-news/vodacoms-pioneering-virtual-wheeling-solution-goes-live-in-south-africa/?utm
    4. https://efficacynews.africa/2025/06/19/africas-power-sector-transforms-as-kenya-zambia-and-south-africa-embrace-open-access-energy-markets/?utm

    5. https://empowerafrica.com/africa-by-the-numbers-600-million-africans-still-lack-electricity-2024/
    6. https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/08/11/africas-solar-capacity-surpasses-20-gw/
    7. https://www.investec.com/en_za/welcome-to-investec/press/investec-granted-energy-trading-licence-by-nersa.html
    8. https://www.discovery.co.za/business/discovery-green

    Ghost Bites (Araxi | Glencore | Hyprop | Nedbank | Raubex | Sabvest)

    Araxi might be expanding in the payments space (JSE: AXX)

    This is certainly the part of the business that they should be focusing on

    Earlier this week, we saw results from Araxi (previously Capital Appreciation) that highlighted the huge gap in performance between the Payments segment and the Software segment. My view is that they should be getting out of Software and just focusing on what they are really good at – Payments!

    We don’t seem to be at that point yet, but the company has released a cautionary announcement based on negotiations for a potential acquisition of a “meaningful payment services business” – and that sounds like the right sort of thing for them to be focusing on.

    With an unencumbered balance sheet and over R300 million in cash as an acquisition war chest, they are in a strong position to be able to do a smart deal. Now we have to wait and see exactly what that deal is, assuming something actually materialises after this cautionary. Remember, there’s no guarantee of a deal being announced.


    Copper was the focus at Glencore’s Capital Markets Day (JSE: GLN)

    The goal is to become one of the largest copper producers in the world

    Here’s some festive 2025 relationship advice: find someone who looks at you the way the mining sector looks at copper. The bunfight over this commodity has been quite something to watch, with the biggest balance sheets in the game being positioned for copper expansion strategies. If there’s any disappointment in demand vs. current expectations, it’s going to get nasty.

    At Glencore’s Capital Markets Day, the headline story was a plan to significantly increase copper production and become one of the largest copper producers in the world over the next decade. Here’s a useful slide on why copper is the belle of the ball at the moment:

    Interestingly, Argentina is where the action is happening for them, with other South American territories like Peru and Chile featuring as well. They expect copper volumes to achieve a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.4% from 2026 to 2029, while total group production measured on a copper equivalent production basis will have a CAGR of 4.0%. In other words, copper itself will increase a lot faster than the other metals.

    Although they expect copper to self-fund its growth pipeline, it doesn’t hurt to have the cash-generative coal and other assets to support the group. They’ve also achieved a more efficient group thanks to identified cost-saving opportunities worth $1 billion a year across 300 initiatives. They expect to fully deliver these savings by 2026, with half already locked in for 2025.

    Glencore has also been on a drive to simplify the portfolio, with approximately 35 assets either sold or shut since 2021 and $6.3 billion raised from key disposals. They talk about having eliminated around 1,000 roles through a new operating structure. This is clearly where a big chunk of cost savings have come from.

    The full presentation is obviously filled with fascinating details about Glencore and the broader sector. If you’re keen to take a look, you’ll find it here.


    Hyprop taps the market for R300 million (JSE: HYP)

    The capital raises are picking up in the REIT sector

    Hot on the heels of a raise at sector peer Equites Property Fund (JSE: EQU), we now have Hyprop with an accelerated bookbuild. At least they are telling us how much they actually want, in this case R300 million to add to the R808 million raised earlier this year. That’s more than a billion rand of fresh equity this year!

    In terms of the planned use of funds, Hyprop has found a balance between vague explanations and some specifics. There’s the usual “growth pipeline and potential acquisitions” comment that basically lets them do anything, accompanied by references to some specific capex projects like the Somerset Mall extension and a food court upgrade in Canal Walk, along with solar projects in the local portfolio.

    In short, they are tapping a hot market for more equity capital. The timing is good and we are going to see more of this in the REIT sector.

    Importantly, the guidance for growth in distributable income per share of 10% to 12% for the year ended June 2026 is unchanged by the raise.


    It’s been a rough year for Nedbank investors (JSE: NED)

    There wasn’t much growth even before the Transnet settlement

    Sometimes, underperformance is so stark that a share price heads in a completely different direction to the peer group. In this year-to-date chart, it’s unfortunately the bank with the green logo, Nedbank, that is the only one in the red:

    This isn’t entirely due to the settlement with Transnet for R600 million. The market is smarter than that, as Nedbank’s market cap is currently over R120 billion. The settlement is therefore just 0.5% of the market cap.

    No, this underperformance is thanks to Nedbank posting weak growth numbers despite this being a strong year for the South African economy. If they can’t achieve meaningful growth in this period, then what chances do they have when the cycle gets tough again?

    A pre-close update that deals with the 10 months to October shows the disappointment that shareholders have had to stomach. Net interest income (NII) grew by low-to-mid single digits, which is better than the tepid 2% growth in the six months to June 2025. Interest rate decreases obviously put pressure on this number, but Nedbank also has weak margins vs. some of its peers. At least the credit loss ratio is in a decent place, below the midpoint of the through-the-cycle target range of 60 basis points to 100 basis points.

    Non-interest revenue (NIR) growth is the really poor story, sitting below mid-single digits. You cannot boost return on equity as a bank if you can’t grow your NIR at a meaningful rate above inflation.

    To add to the problems, expenses grew by mid-to-upper single digits for the period, which means it increased faster than NII and certainly NIR. This is negative jaws territory (as they call it in banking), with margins going the wrong way.

    These numbers exclude the Transnet settlement, as does the guidance for the full year of diluted HEPS growth being in a range of flat to low-single digits. Return on equity is expected to be 15% or higher.

    Probably the only highlight here is the share repurchases of R2.4 billion year-to-date. But this is taken into account in the HEPS guidance, so things are still far from exciting.

    Nedbank desperately needs to inject some life into its story. Their acquisition of fintech iKhokha was approved by the Competition Commission and closed on 1 December. Their sale of Ecobank to Bosquet is awaiting regulatory approvals across various divisions. They’ve also made some divisional management changes.

    In the absence of any meaningful progress though, Nedbank has proven to be a value trap this year i.e. “cheap” for a reason.


    Raubex has made it explicit: they are looking to sell Bauba Resources (JSE: RBX)

    Here is yet another example of M&A being reversed down the line

    Back in 2022, Raubex went through a mandatory offer process (i.e. they deliberately triggered the 35% ownership threshold) to acquire Bauba Resources. This was a dicey strategic fit from the start, as it brought mining risks into a group that already faces plenty of cyclical risks from construction, infrastructure and other key exposures – including other mining clients!

    Just three years later, the usual fate for poorly conceived deals is about to play out: Raubex is now looking for a buyer for Bauba Resources. It’s the right call, as being stubborn about not sorting out the problem doesn’t help anyone. If anything, it’s just example number five zillion of why M&A should always be treated with caution.

    This move was well telegraphed in the latest set of results, with Raubex making it clear that they were “evaluating the long-term strategic direction” of the business. That’s just fancy corporate speak for “we probably need to sell this thing” – and quickly.

    At this stage, all they’ve done is appoint an advisor to help them assess strategic options and find a potential buyer. There’s no guarantee of a transaction going ahead, even if there’s a “for sale” sign hanging over the door. If they do find a buyer, it’s going to be very interesting to compare the selling price to the 2022 acquisition price.


    Lovely growth numbers at Sabvest (JSE: SBP)

    This is one of the best local investment holding companies

    Sabvest has a strong reputation for capital allocation skills and returns generated for shareholders. They’ve been around for a long time and the track record speaks for itself.

    There will be good years and bad years of course, but the year ending December 2025 will go down as a great year. In a trading statement for the period, they highlighted NAV per share growth of between 18% and 25%, along with an expected jump in the dividend per share of between 19% and 24%.

    The share price reflects this momentum, up 36% year-to-date.


    Nibbles:

    • Director dealings:
      • The current CFO of Growthpoint (JSE: GRT), who is retiring early next year, has sold shares worth nearly R1.3 million.
      • The CEO of Spear REIT (JSE: SEA) bought shares for direct family members worth R92k.
      • An associate of the CEO of Grand Parade Investments (JSE: GPI) bought shares worth R29.6k.
      • An associate of a director of South Ocean Holdings (JSE: SOH) bought shares worth R20.7k.
    • Omnia (JSE: OMN) participated at the Absa Corporate Summit and has made the presentation available here. It’s a goodie to work through if you want to get to grips with the company.
    • Here’s some encouraging news for the Altvest Credit Opportunities Fund (JSE: BACC), by far the best part of Africa Bitcoin Corporation (JSE: BAC). The fund has placed notes worth R50 million under the R5 billion Domestic Medium Term Note Programme. They need to keep scaling that thing and scale requires capital.
    • Will PSV Holdings (JSE: PSV) come back from the dead? There’s been a lot of effort to try and make this happen, with DNG Energy working to get the company out of liquidation and suitable for status as a listed company once more. The latest update is that the liquidator has requested a motivated Section 155 Scheme of Arrangement (essentially a compromise with creditors). This is expected to be received in December.

    Ghost Bites (Araxi | Equites Property Fund | Exxaro | FirstRand | Merafe | Resilient | Shaftesbury | Sibanye-Stillwater)

    Araxi (previously Capital Appreciation) has released interim results (JSE: AXX)

    The Software business continues to drag everything down

    Araxi’s results for the six months ended September 2025 have been impacted by accounting restatements. There are a number of restatements that ended up boosting earnings per share in the prior year without having much of an impact on the balance sheet or the cash flow statement. This means that the base period has created a much more demanding profit number off which to grow. Accounting restatements exist for a reason, as the idea is to improve comparability by ensuring that the policies are applied to both periods being presented.

    Araxi is keen for you to use normalised earnings growth instead of reported earnings growth. In making these normalisation adjustments, they take out the recognition of a licence fee as well as the restructuring costs in the Software division. Normalised HEPS growth is a meaty 58%, while growth in HEPS as reported was just 1.8%. That’s a huge gap that would require high conviction to be okay with.

    Group revenue was up by just 2.3%, so that’s the first concern in the context of this high normalised growth number. Group EBITDA was up just 0.4%. As final evidence, we can just look at the dividend growth – or lack thereof, in this case. The dividend is flat at 4.5 cents per share. As you can probably tell by now, I’m not sure that the normalised growth is any indication at all of “normal” growth in the business, but time will tell.

    We can now dig into the segments. The Payments division is doing really well, with revenue up 23.2% and EBITDA up 33.1% to R184.3 million. Software continues to be a catastrophe, with revenue down 20.2% and EBITDA crashing 82.7% to just R6.9 million. The Payments division has an EBITDA margin of 47.6% and Software sits at 2.7%. The very best thing they could do is get rid of the Software business and focus on what investors are actually interested in: Payments.

    There’s seems to be no desire to do this though, with management promising that the restructuring activities in Software will deliver annualised cost savings of R35 million to R40 million that weren’t visible in the first half because of once-off restructuring costs. Fair enough, we will wait and see what the second half looks like. But the underlying story is what it is – the Payments business is a lucrative, dependable asset and the Software business looks incapable of attracting a high valuation multiple.

    The group is well known for having no debt. In fact, they have over R300 million available for growth. In the context of a market cap of R2.2 billion, that’s a significant cash pile.


    Equites Property Fund raised over R700 million for local development opportunities (JSE: EQU)

    The market seems unbothered by the slow exit from the UK

    As I wrote about earlier this week, Equites announced what I think could be referred to as a “bland accelerated bookbuild” – a capital raise with few or no underlying details. Sure, they’ve given a general idea of the local development opportunities in a separate trading update, but they didn’t even tell the market how much they were planning to raise and which projects would be prioritised!

    None of it seems to matter, as the sun is shining in the property sector and so institutional investors are literally falling over one other to throw capital at listed funds. Equites raised R712 million at a discount of just 1.32% to the 30-day VWAP.

    The good times are here for the REITs. You can expect to see more and more bookbuilds. And somewhere in the next 12 – 24 months, it’s probably going to get silly enough that I will rotate my exposure away from the sector. You only have to look at the charts a decade ago to see how the cycle plays out.


    Exxaro is likely to slightly miss their full-year guidance (JSE: EXX)

    Local coal sales (excluding Eskom) were disappointing

    Exxaro released a pre-close message for the year ending December 2025. With a significant decline in coal export prices having been suffered this year, it hasn’t been an easy year. Despite this, Exxaro reported strong earnings growth at the halfway mark in the year and the share price is up 8% year-to-date.

    Total coal volumes are expected to be in line with the prior year, which means that they expect to miss guidance for the year by 3%. The biggest miss was in domestic coal sales other than to Eskom. Coal capex is expected to be around 3% higher than guidance, so the combined impact suggests that they will probably disappoint the market with full-year free cash flow numbers. It will of course depend on what the full-year costs look like.

    In corporate news, the majority of the key suspensive conditions for the acquisition of manganese assets from Ntsimbintle Holdings and OMH Mauritius have been fulfilled. There are only a few conditions still to be met.


    FirstRand’s guidance is intact – excluding the UK motor finance industry mess (JSE: FSR)

    The battle with the UK regulatory is far from over

    FirstRand released a voluntary trading update for the six months ending December 2025. They are performing in line with expectations, with the guidance of full-year growth of “high mid-teens” still intact. They also expect normalised ROE to move closer to the upper end of the stated range of 18% to 22%.

    Although interest rates have come down, net interest income has grown thanks to the positive impact on margin from strategies to drive attractive growth in advances across South Africa, the rest of Africa and the UK. They expect to see improvement in absolute advances in the corporate business second half of the year, so this is mainly a margin story for now in that book. In the retail and commercial books, there has been an increase in activity.

    Non-interest revenue, a key source of ROE, is up on the previous financial year and showing strong momentum in areas like insurance and global markets, boosted by private equity deals.

    The credit quality looks solid, with the credit loss ratio at the bottom end of the through-the-cycle range.

    In terms of expenses, growth is 2% to 3% above inflation. Aside from negotiated salary increases, my observation across the financial services names is that technology spend runs well above inflation.

    All of this good news excludes the provision for the UK motor commission matter. The FCA’s final redress scheme is seen by FirstRand as going beyond what is fair. It sounds like the scheme would lead to the loss of more than the cumulative profits made over the period by the group.

    In summary: FirstRand is doing well, but this irritating overhang isn’t going anywhere just yet.


    Merafe moves ahead with closing the Wonderkop and Boshoek smelters (JSE: MRF)

    Energy prices mean that these smelters just aren’t viable

    Merafe has been working with Eskom to try and find a solution to the crisis facing the Boshoek and Wonderkop smelters. Although a proposal was received at the end of November, it just isn’t enough to save these operations. The silver lining is that it does create a future for the Lion smelter, so not all is lost.

    This doesn’t help the employees of Boshoek and Wonderkop of course. The Merafe – Glencore (JSE: GLN) joint venture has issued retrenchment notices to the employees of these two smelters. They will both be placed on care and maintenance from 1 January 2026.


    Resilient flags double-digit distribution growth (JSE: RES)

    The positive sentiment in the property sector continues

    Resilient REIT has released a pre-close update for the year ending December 2025. The expected growth in the distribution per share is at least 10%, so that’s a great data point to show just how strong this year has been for the property sector.

    The focus on retail property has been valuable, with retail sales up 5.6% for the 10 months to October. Both renewals and new leases have shown positive reversions, coming in at a blended increase of 6.3%. Escalations on the leases are running between 5.4% and 5.7%, so that’s good inflation protection.

    To add to the happy news, the extensive renewable energy installation programme has led to Resilient being able to generate 39.8% of its own energy requirements. Load shedding may feel like a bad nightmare now rather than a daily reality, but the benefit of this strategy goes well beyond energy security. Based on the cost of power from Eskom, there’s an attractive yield associated with these projects.

    The European exposure – Spain / France and Lighthouse Properties (JSE: LTE) – is also performing well.

    When you layer on the benefit of reducing interest rates, you find yourself having a particularly good time with a story like this. Double-digit growth in the distribution per share is really impressive!


    London’s West End continues to perform for Shaftesbury (JSE: SHC)

    Positive reversions are the order of the day

    Shaftesbury released a trading update covering 1 July to 31 October. The fund is focused on London, so this represents the back-end of summer and then the pre-Black Friday and festive season period.

    Leasing activity has been strong, with recent transactions running 4.3% ahead of the June 2025 estimated rental value (ERV) and 10% ahead of the previous passing rents. Occupancies are strong, with only 2.6% of the portfolio available to let.

    There’s no shortage of asset management and refurbishment initiatives underway, with around 4.1% of the portfolio ERV currently being worked on. This is being supported by a balance sheet in great shape, with the loan-to-value at 17%.


    Sibanye-Stillwater announces a three-year wage deal in the gold operations (JSE: SSW)

    This is great news for the business

    With the gold price continuing to do wonderful things for the industry and for our country, I’m pleased to see that Sibanye-Stillwater has reached a deal with AMCU, NUM, UASA and Solidarity regarding wages. The unions have a history of obliterating investor sentiment in the local mining industry, but those days are hopefully behind us now.

    The agreement covers July 2025 to June 2028, with an increase that works out to roughly 5.4% per annum. The exact increase varies by category of employee.

    This seems like a fair increase that is above the inflation band being targeted by the SARB. Now the gold price just needs to keep behaving itself!


    Nibbles:

    • Director dealings:
      • A director of Impala Platinum (JSE: IMP) sold shares worth R11.8 million.
      • A director of Momentum (JSE: MTM) bought shares worth R180k.
      • An associate of a director of Spear REIT (JSE: SEA) bought shares worth R85k.
      • An associate of a director of South Ocean Holdings (JSE: SOH) bought shares worth R11.5k.
    • Paul Mann has recovered from what I’m sure was the world’s most frustrating post-op process of being unable to travel. This means that he has returned as Executive Chairman and CEO of ASP Isotopes (JSE: ISO). Robert Ainscow will return to the COO role. There’s a lot going on at the company and it’s good to see them back at full strength.
    • Italtile (JSE: ITE) CEO Lance Foxcroft is stepping down from the role due to “increased family commitments” – interesting. He will instead run Ceramic Industries, the segment he previously ran. Given the huge supply and demand imbalance plaguing that manufacturing business, I can’t see it being a much less demanding job than group CEO. Brandon Wood, currently the Group COO, has been appointed as CEO Designate. He’s previously been the Group CFO as well, so there’s no shortage of bench strength here. He will formally take on the CEO position on 1 July 2026.
    • Spear REIT (JSE: SEA) announced that the acquisition of Consani Industrial Park for R437.3 million has been implemented and the property transferred on 2 December. The loan-to-value ratio is between 26% and 27%. Spear’s gross portfolio asset value is now up to R6.8 billion.
    • MTN Zakhele Futhi (JSE: MTNZF) has distributed the circular to shareholders that deals with the final steps in the dance to wind up the scheme and return the residual value to shareholders.

    Ghost Stories #86: The “always-on” mentality at Sirius Real Estate

    Listen to the show using this podcast player:

    Sirius Real Estate is a great example of a JSE-listed property fund that gives local investors a chance to participate in offshore markets. With a strategy focused on the UK and Germany, Sirius follows an “always-on” mentality to the opportunities in those markets.

    Whether following megatrends like defence spending and the further industrialisation of the German economy, or being open to opportunistic plays in business parks that offer attractive upside opportunities, Sirius is never too far away from a deal.

    To understand more about the strategy of the fund and how they win in these markets, I was joined by a full house of CEO Andrew Coombs, CFO Chris Bowman and CIO Tariq Khader. Get ready to learn all about Sirius and the opportunities for this fund.

    This podcast has been sponsored by Sirius Real Estate. As always, I was given an opportunity to dig into the strategy and ask my own questions in my quest to learn more. You must always do your own research and speak to a financial advisor before making any decision to invest. This podcast should not be seen as an investment recommendation or an endorsement.

    Full Transcript:

    The Finance Ghost: Welcome to this episode of Ghost Stories. I’m your host, the Finance Ghost. I’m so excited to be doing this because I get to speak to the management team of such an interesting real estate fund on the JSE. 

    They are very well known for their active management approach, for doing lots of deals. For finding stuff that has some really good tenants, as well as some fixer-upper type elements to it. So, they don’t just sit back and own the properties and wait to see what happens. They actually go out there and really improve them, and follow a very focused strategy in the UK and Germany. So that is, of course, Sirius Real Estate. 

    If you’ve been following property funds on the JSE, you’ll know the name. You’ll probably know a little bit about their strategy. And today we have, essentially, a full house – Andrew Coombs, the CEO, Chris Bowman, the CFO, and Tariq Khader, the CIO. Really cool to have all of you here with us. 

    Andrew, I’m just going to jump in and start with you. Let’s begin with an overview of why the UK and Germany are your markets of focus for Sirius. Because that literally is where you spend your time making acquisitions – and to the extent that you sell properties as well, that’s where the portfolio sits, basically. Why do you believe that Sirius can – and does – win in these regions?

    Andrew Coombs: Well, thank you very much. There are a few reasons. Firstly, it wins because it’s a very well-run, extremely well-disciplined organisation of over 500 people in 150 locations across two countries, those countries being the UK and Germany.

    And of course, what we do is we specialise in the ownership and operation of industrial parks. 

    Typically, what you’ll find us ‘owning’ in Germany is a park consisting of a dozen or 15 buildings all on the same park. Some of those buildings might be warehouses, some of them might have offices above them, factories, basements – a whole range of categories of space that we run and operate on those industrial estates. 

    And if you think about the UK, it’s an interesting story because in the UK there is an undersupply, comparative to demand, of industrial property. And the demand for that property has increased, all the more so since Brexit. Why? Because lots of things that used to be imported from Europe without any trade friction used to come into the UK. Now, a lot more of those things are assembled and distributed from within the UK, because of the Europe-UK trade friction in that post-Brexit world. 

    So what we’ve got is increasing demand, and actually, the supply is not even stable. Because it isn’t really economical for people to build more of this stuff. And what’s happening with things like the environmental rulings that are coming in is these old industrial brick buildings are very often being torn down. So, you’ve got a perfect storm here. A situation whereby the demand is increasing, and the supply is actually shortening. 

    And in addition to that, in the post-Brexit world, the UK is decoupling from the European cycle. 

    You’re seeing it with interest rates. Interest rates in the UK are higher than they are in Germany. So, German interest rates have probably bottomed out now. UK interest rates are still coming down. You’re seeing it with inflation. Inflation in Europe is much lower than inflation in the UK, and less sticky. 

    So, you’re seeing a real decoupling of the economies, which makes it all the more interesting to Sirius. Because if I turn to Germany, the story is different. And the story is different inasmuch as we are involved in two really countercyclical markets. In Germany, unlike the UK, there is an oversupply of industrial property. And actually, whilst demand is increasing, the demand is still not sufficient to fill more than 90% of the industrial space within the market. 

    But our platform and our ability to know and understand well the local markets that we operate in, in and around the seven major cities in Germany, mean that we can mitigate the risk of vacancy. In fact, what we can do with our platform is we can divide our property up into different products, some of them much higher yielding than traditional conventional products that you would find in industrial property. 

    And by doing that, we are in a position where, because of the oversupply, we can buy the property at a discount. Not just a discount to replacement cost, but a discount to the secondary use cost that that property would command, for example, in the UK market. 

    We can get that discount because of the oversupply, but then we can mitigate the risk of the oversupply using our platform to put high-yielding products into the parks and get the best of both worlds: a low entry point, and the ability to manage a much higher, much more sustainable, much more interesting yield. 

    So this is two different stories. In one market, undersupply, overdemand. In the other market, it’s all about being able to access the property at highly discounted rates and then use your platform to be able to run the property as a premium. 

    And we really love the countercyclical nature of the way in which the two economies have decoupled, because what that means is that if I look back over the last 18 months, we’ve invested over 200 million into the UK market and probably something slightly less into Germany. 

    But if we look now, as we see the UK get more difficult and the tailwinds gather in Germany, we will be pivoting towards more investment in that German market. And the fact that we have two countercyclical markets means that we have an always-on mentality in terms of our ability to be able to deploy capital into markets to get return.

    The Finance Ghost: Thank you, that is super insightful and genuinely very interesting. Here in South Africa, you don’t realise – this decoupling, you’re seeing it every day. Obviously, we know about Brexit and what’s happening, more or less, but to actually hear it explained like that is so interesting.

    Because the UK and Germany really do give you diversification, then. It’s not just to say, “Oh, it’s a European fund.” These are two different places, at the end of the day. They are two really different places, and they’ve got two completely different supply-and-demand situations, as you said; macroeconomic situations. 

    I love that ‘always-on mentality’. So that keeps guys like Tariq nice and busy – and I look forward to hearing from him later, definitely. But Andrew, I want to ask you one other question, and that is around specifically the defence strategy in Germany. 

    So I did actually notice in your announcement that came out very recently (it was literally a couple of days ago), you did talk about that focus in the near term on German acquisitions now. But something else you’re doing in Germany is this defence strategy. And obviously, that’s a nice big macro theme around Europe at the moment – thanks to the geopolitical environment, and the Trump administration, and, essentially, this rearmament of Europe and all the stuff that people have been talking about for the past year. So, you’ve made some hires. You’ve recently closed a deal. It’s all very interesting. 

    I think let’s talk through that a little bit because, even sitting here in South Africa, I’ve been wondering. What is it about these properties that makes them so specialised for defence applications? And what does that strategy look like in Germany?

    Andrew Coombs: I believe that we are about to enter a defence supercycle in Germany. And please excuse me, I’m going to go back a little bit. I’m going to go back to 2021, the end of Chancellor Merkel’s grip on German (and arguably European) politics. 

    And it’s something we watched very carefully at Sirius. We said this is going to be a time of very large-scale change. In the same way as the end of the Thatcher era in the UK led to political and economic change, we always saw the Merkel era coming to an end as being a point where things change fundamentally in Germany. 

    And I take you back to something that Merkel said as late as September ’21, when she said that Germany cannot defend its borders. She said it very publicly, and you could have been forgiven for believing she said it to pacify Putin. Because Merkel, who comes from a family that originally grew up in the West and defected to the East – very unusual for people to have defected that way, when the wall was up – Merkel understood the mentality of Putin, and she was pacifying him when she said that Germany cannot defend its borders. 

    Of course, at that time, you had two gas pipelines (one up and running), and you had economic dependability between Germany and also, Russia. Well, look, those days have passed, and we now have a chancellor called Merz. 

    Merz is the first chancellor since German unification who has seen military service. He was an artillery officer in the ’70s. His defence minister and deputy is a gentleman by the name of Pistorius. Pistorius, although he’s been in politics for nearly two decades, has always focused on defence; he’s always been a defence specialist. And Merz is very clear – not only does Germany need to defend its borders, but Germany needs to become the backbone of European defence.

    Now, if you just consider that position between September ’21 and today, that is a huge shift in terms of the national attitude where a subject like defence is concerned. And of course, what we’ve seen in the intervening period is Russia invading part of Ukraine. And people say to me things like, “Yeah, yeah, but if there’s peace, all of this will drop away.” Unfortunately, I don’t believe that is the case. 

    I do not believe that if there is a cessation of violence in Ukraine tomorrow, that Merz will adopt Merkel’s previous position of we have no intention of defending our borders. I think the cat is out of the bag now. And I would love to believe that there’s going to be a cessation of violence in Ukraine, but whether there is or there isn’t, Germany will now continue to invest in its defence. We have entered a new era, whatever happens in Ukraine. 

    And that new era is supported by the lifting of the debt brake. Meaning that not only do we have normal defence spending of 3% GDP in Germany, but what we also have, from the last government, is a €100 billion fund, which is halfway through being spent on defence. 

    And then, in addition to that, following the lifting of the debt brake, we have a further €400 billion that is to be spent on defence. That’s over half a trillion of fiscal stimulus going back into the German economy to focus on defence. That is absolutely huge. It’s like nothing that Germany has seen in modern-day history, either economically or from a defence perspective. 

    Now, what can you point to that’s specific? What can you do to come out of those big headline numbers and say, “Yeah, yeah, but what’s really happening?” Well, something that’s really happening is that the German army has announced the formation of five new brigades. That’s 40,000 soldiers. 

    You probably saw earlier this week that France is contemplating returning to limited levels of conscription. Out of the five new brigades, one of the brigades – the Lithuanian brigade, the 45th Brigade – is already up and running and based in Lithuania. First time German troops have been permanently based outside of their own borders since the Second World War. 

    To support those brigades, the German government has issued orders of €7.7 billion. The main beneficiary of those orders is Rheinmetall. €7.7 billion of orders, on armoured fighting vehicles and associated needs around logistics. 

    Everything from the trailers that transport the armoured fighting vehicles (there’s a mass world shortage of those, even the Americans haven’t got enough tank transporter trailers). Everything to do with the tracks on the fighting vehicles, to the armour, to the laser rangefinders. All of these sit within the €7.7 billion order that is already issued. 

    And what that means is there are thousands of companies now in Germany looking to increase their production of everything associated with those fighting vehicles and those five new brigades. 

    And what you will see, if you look carefully, in the manufacturing figures in Germany, you will see that they have dipped slightly recently. Don’t be misled by that. That is the factories that used to produce cars, the factories that used to produce other things, that are now stopping production because they’re being converted over to the elements involved in that €7.7 billion government order. 

    That is not speculation. It has been issued. The money is there, it’s being passed to suppliers. The production lines will begin in the next two to three quarters. And that will need to be underpinned by industrial property. 

    For every €10 that is spent per year, you are going to need about €1 of rents to underpin the space that the production of the orders associated with that €7.7 billion goes into. And those are not going to be offices, those are not going to be houses, they’re not going to be retail. They are going to be factories and industrial sites that produce things for the defence industry. And that is why Sirius is so well placed in Germany at the beginning of what I believe will be a defence supercycle.

    The Finance Ghost: Yeah. So, if you look at the Rheinmetall share price – I checked now while you were talking – 149% year-to-date. That tells you something about the amount of spend going into the space, and certainly the market’s understanding of that and the positive sentiment towards it. So thank you, that makes a lot of sense. 

    And so, just to confirm, it really is just a case of tons of new industrial space required, as opposed to overly-specialised manufacturing space for the defence industry. It sounds like there’s just this high-level demand, right, that’s going to filter down now?

    Andrew Coombs: Absolutely. 

    The Finance Ghost: So, we’ve heard a lot now about the macro story. We’ve heard all about the German defence story and some really compelling arguments to be made there. I think we’re going to move across now to Chris. That is, the CFO of Sirius. Chris, thank you for your time today. Really good to have you here. 

    The question that I’d like to pose to you is mainly around capital deployment. And of course, we see a lot of capital raises from Sirius, pretty much on an ongoing basis. Andrew spoke earlier to the ‘always-on mentality’, and to do ‘always on’ in property, you’ve got to have ongoing access to capital. You’ve got to raise the stuff, and you’ve got to deploy it. 

    And of course, if you take too long to deploy it, then you end up with a cash-drag problem. And if you deploy too quickly out of desperation, then you end up with really bad deals. So that’s what you guys need to do, of course – is try and balance this off. 

    And perhaps, Chris, you can just talk us through this prioritisation and how you actually do this in terms of managing the risk of cash drag versus the risk of poor transactions?

    Chris Bowman: Yeah, sure, good question. Look, I think – like lots of other facets of the business at Sirius – when it comes to raising capital, first and foremost, we are disciplined. We only raise capital when we have a really compelling acquisition pipeline to actually go and put that capital into, to ultimately create accretion for shareholders in the earnings and the FFO, which is all about the core sort of principle of Sirius: driving shareholder value. 

    So yes, we have raised capital a number of times and, most recently, twice in the last two years. But that’s always been off the back of having a really compelling pipeline. And I think your question expands there as to, “Okay, how do we then maintain discipline about putting that capital to work?” 

    Well, yeah, there are times when things change. For instance, we last raised capital in the summer of 2024, and later that year, there was a lot of upheaval politically, both in Germany (the German government changed) and obviously with the US elections. Then, we remained disciplined in that environment. And we did, we took a little bit longer to deploy capital than we had expected, but at the same time, we have the flexibility within the capital structure to be able to tweak our dividend payout to protect shareholders from that cash drag. 

    And ultimately, what have we done? Well, as you’ve heard from Andrew and as you’ll hear from Tariq shortly as well, we’ve now deployed €370 million into acquisitions just in the last eight months. 

    So, we’ve demonstrated we’ve got the capability to put really significant amounts of capital into a really exciting pipeline and portfolio of opportunities, which will drive value for shareholders in future years. So, I guess I come back to discipline, and very much discipline about creating long-term value.

    The Finance Ghost: Yeah, I love that. And the discipline is in the raise as much as it is in anything else. You only raise when you need to. I think that’s a really good insight for listeners and investors to take from this. And of course, you’ve got to be disciplined in the acquisitions as well. 

    So, Tariq, this is where we can bring you in as the CIO, because the acquisition strategy at Sirius is always super interesting. I must say, I really enjoy reading the Sirius deal announcements. They seem to have quite a common flavour in terms of how you guys do things. I always seem to notice a big anchor tenant, and then there’s some vacancy rate to work with. There are some shorter-dated leases to work with. So, just really interesting stuff coming through there. And in the disclosure by Sirius, you even split the assets into what you call ‘value-add’ and ‘mature’, which I think speaks directly to where they are in their life cycle. 

    So, I’m going to open the floor to you now. Just walk us through some of the approaches that you take to these properties, and why you believe Sirius has had so much success in this area of actively managing these properties and then getting these outsized returns as a result.

    Tariq Khader: Yeah, look, I’m really pleased you’ve mentioned that value-add/mature split that we disclosed, because I think that is probably the one slide in the presentation that we typically turn to, to illustrate the Sirius business model. 

    And it’s really a simple business model on paper. You take value-add assets, you transform them into mature assets, recycle the cash, and then reinvest in value-add assets. But how you go about that transformation, I think, is part of what we’ve built is a platform that has the capability to transform these assets. 

    And what we like to do is one-third of our portfolio at the moment is in this ‘mature’ bucket. So these are assets which have been through this transformation process. And these are assets which have strong cash flows (where we’re enjoying that benefit, of having stable cash flows), or assets which are being held for recycling. 

    But the really interesting part is that two-thirds of the portfolio which is in that ‘value-add’ bucket, because here typically these assets have high vacancy. Where we need to either put our sales and marketing function to drive leads inquiries and sales conversions, or we need to invest modest amounts of capex – low-value capex, typically in the region of €100 per square meter – to invest in these, to generate returns in excess of 30% ROI to drive occupancy and rate across these sites. 

    And right now, the two-thirds probably has about 300,000 square meters of opportunity for us to kind of work through. And that’s typically about a three-year runway that we’ve got there.

    But how do we tie that into acquisitions? 

    We’re always looking for assets which have challenges for other property companies that we see as opportunities, that we know our platform has the capability to address. Now we can’t address every problem that everyone else has, but we have a specific set of criteria that we’re looking out for. 

    Like you’ve mentioned, vacancy is one of them. We’re not afraid of vacancy. We recently acquired an asset in Klipphausen, which is in Dresden. We knew the anchor tenant was leaving in six months, vacating the whole site. Within 12 months, we’ve managed to fill that entire site, and now it’s fully let. So we knew a lot about the area, we knew the capability of our platform, so we were confident in being able to fill that space. 

    We also like assets where there is very poor service charge recovery, because we have an in-house team and we have an in-house service charge process where we’re able to recover 90% of our operating costs at just over 80% occupancy. So, we have built up a way and a methodology that we’re able to optimise service charge recovery. 

    And lastly, what we typically love to find is spaces where other operators deem to be structural void – basements which have never been used; loft spaces; areas above factories. This is the gold dust for the Sirius model, because we love to just invest small amounts of money. 

    And this is where we generate those high-yielding spaces where we’re able to use targeted capex investment (again, low-value capex) to create new types of products – such as self-storage, work boxes, other flexible products – where we’re able to drive the rates up on space which we’ve essentially got for free, because it was structural void. 

    That’s where a lot of our returns and yield come from – through that transformation process. So, hopefully that gives you a bit of a flavour as to our acquisition approach and what we look for.

    The Finance Ghost: No, it does, absolutely. It’s super interesting. And it must be quite a lot of fun, I would think, actually. As opposed to buying something that’s a yield on something that works already and you’re just managing the life of the lease. This does sound a little bit more juicy, for sure. 

    And I guess another source of fun for you (and sometimes it’s not fun, I’m sure. Sometimes it’s a headache, but that’s how running a business works), is that you’ve got this mix of large tenants and SMEs in your tenant base. 

    And I’m sure both types of tenants will have pros and cons. You’ve already talked to it there. When you sometimes have a large tenant with lumpy occupancy movements, that can create a risk which can also be someone else’s opportunity – like yours, for example. It depends on your ability to actually fill the space.

    So maybe you can just walk us through, from a Sirius perspective, how you think about the mix between large and small tenants. Do you always look to have a little bit of both, or what is the approach?

    Tariq Khader: I think that’s correct. We’d love to have a mix of anchor tenants on site. I think that is key for us. Stable income – a good, strong kind of anchor tenant, or a couple of anchor tenants who provide a large chunk of income. We also like to create these flexible products or high-yielding products, and these are typically where we have a high number of customers. 

    And then you’ve got the gap in between, which is the core SME market. This probably makes up about 50% of our portfolio. So, when you look at Sirius in total, you’ve probably got 40% of our customers are these anchor tenants. You’ve probably got 10% of our customer base, which are these small, flexible customers, high-yielding end. And you’ve got the core business, which is kind of that 50% SME market that we look after. 

    So, I think what we look to do is be a bit more flexible and adaptable. We know the anchor tenant market – that’s long, stable income; strong balance sheets; can weather the storms going through the economy. You’ve got that SME market with not as well-established companies; their balance sheets aren’t as strong. A couple of move-outs in there, you have to then go and get it. 

    And then you’ve got these flexible customers, where you’re turning them in and out as they leave. They don’t create too much risk because they’re so small, but you can really keep moving the price and the yield on those assets. 

    But our approach isn’t fixed. If we get a lot of movement in that core SME market, we can create more of that flexible space to drive the yield. Or if we’re seeing that core SME market become very strong, we can flex the smart space down and have more of that space. So, our approach is adaptable, and there are pros and cons to each. But I think being flexible allows us to kind of take advantage of all the upside there. 

    And lastly, I would say we have over 10,000 customers across Germany and the UK. I think having the right process and systems to be able to efficiently manage a large number of customers in a low-touch way is super important. And that’s part of what we’ve built up over the last 15 or so years, is to be able to manage that volume of customers without it kind of dragging down operations.

    The Finance Ghost: Yeah. So it really is all about just looking for that yield uplift as often as you can, managing the risk, etcetera. It’s pretty much as I expected it to be, but it’s also just nice to hear about what life is really like on the ground with this stuff. 

    Keeps you busy, definitely. That’s what I’m hearing here, above all else. Which is not a surprise, because Sirius keeps everyone busy with the number of deals that you guys do, that’s for sure. 

    So we’ve heard from Chris, we’ve heard from Tariq about capital deployment and the types of properties that are being acquired. Andrew, we heard from you earlier about the macroeconomics and some of the mega trends like defence. 

    Let’s talk now about the regional focus, because this is something that always comes out in your announcements when you talk about new acquisitions. You tend to talk about the proximity of the properties, and I’ve always been curious about what these synergies actually are. 

    So maybe you could walk us through the practical stuff (of when the properties are closer together, what the benefit of that is), but also the platforms that you’ve built in these markets?

    Andrew Coombs: Yes, certainly. So, look, I sort of think about the origination of the customer. The first and most basic thing we do is we capture demand, and we disintermediate agents and third parties from that process. 

    So, we don’t want to be talking to someone who’s saying, “You’re one of 10 people in a beauty parade. What can you do for us?” We want to be talking to a potential tenant and saying to them, “Look, we’ve got enough options for you to be so busy considering our options, you don’t want or need to look at anything else.” And in those options, we want to differentiate ourselves by adding points of value that other people don’t or can’t add. 

    And that can be all sorts of things. That can be as simple as a dedicated parking space, or catering in your offices during the day, or dedicated bandwidth that can be operated on a burstable level. So, you don’t need 10 Mbps 20 days a month, you just need 10 Mbps on the last day of the month, but 1 Mbps for the rest of the time. So we charge you 1 Mbps for 19 days, and you burst to 10 Mbps for the 20th, and nobody else can offer you that. 

    But we’re looking at being able to have a direct conversation with a prospective tenant to be able to show them real value, so that what we can do is we can sell our estate at a sensible price – a price that gives them good value, but a price that also gives us a good enough return so that we can invest in the space that they spend time in. 

    Then once they’re in our estate, because our properties are manned (which is, you know, unusual for industrial properties), we can say, “Look, we can focus on running the property so you can run your business.” So, we make sure that the heating is working, the snow’s removed, the wastewater’s taken out, the security on the site is right. We see you every day because we are there.

    What makes that different from everyone else is we’re not an absent landlord that you have to find when something goes wrong. We’re proactive. We’re there every day, and we’re there to make sure the property runs so you can focus on your business.

    And then, of course, we want to understand not just you, but your customer, because we don’t just want to be a supplier. We want to be someone who adds value to your business. So we don’t want to wait for you to say, “Our customers come and visit us, and they need a meeting room with these facilities.” We want to be able to get there before you and make those recommendations. 

    Then when something like Covid hits, we want to be in contact with you – as we were. We’d spotted the risk with Merkel stepping down, and we’d already effectively hedged our gas pricing. So, we were able to supply our customers in manufacturing with gas at pre-war prices all the way through the first two years of the Ukraine conflict. 

    That really just illustrates that point of us understanding your business well enough to understand the kind of risks that we can insulate you from in order to become your partner, rather than just your supplier.

    And then of course, when the time comes for you to either expand, we want to be able to provide you that space, or if it’s leave, we would like to provide you with follow-out-the-door services. Things like virtual offices, where we can forward post, so people can still see you as being based in a location, even though you might have moved to a second city. And we will aim to try and maintain a relationship with you after you have left because we believe, in many cases, there are businesses that, from time to time, will need our services in the evolution of their business. 

    We think that makes us very, very different from your average property company that says, “There’s a contract, we provide the property, there are the keys, give us the money every month. We’ll see you at the end of the lease term.”

    The Finance Ghost: So Chris, let’s bring it back to you then. And we did speak a little bit earlier about your capital raising technique there, of raising with discipline. And when you’ve got a strong pipeline, that’s obviously very much on the equity side. 

    From a debt perspective, I mean, the nature of debt is that it keeps maturing over time. So, you’ve got to manage that maturation as you go. And you’ve also got to then manage a debt-to-equity ratio when you’re raising equity, to make sure that you’re getting the right return on equity. 

    So, it’s a very interesting space. You are definitely the right person to ask this question to. Could you just walk us through the Sirius debt strategy and how you look to optimise your cost of debt versus your balance sheet flexibility?

    Chris Bowman: Yeah, sure. Obviously, you’re absolutely right. The debt strategy is critical to the overall Sirius story. It’s an area which real estate companies can get into trouble with if they’re overly aggressive. And certainly from our perspective, we focus on being conservative with our debt strategy, and we focus on having a long-term approach as well in there.

    At a high level, we have just over €1 billion of debt, which sits alongside the €1.5 billion of equity that we have listed in the stock market. So, we commit to keeping a loan-to-value below 40% despite the fact that our portfolio is actually relatively high-yielding. 

    So on other metrics, such as net debt-to-EBITDA, we’re north of 6x on net debt-to-EBITDA, which is really healthy. So we are very, very conservatively funded, from a balance sheet perspective, in terms of the income and our abilities continue to service that. There are no concerns at all there. 

    That debt stack of just over €1 billion, we then take that and we look at it and we say, “Okay, we want to have a mix of optionality and sources of debt, and we also want to have a mix of term of debt, and we also want to have a mix of both fixed and floating interest rates within there, and different levels of flexibility as well within different types.” 

    So at a high level, we have core debt. We have three bonds outstanding, which are listed institutional rated by credit rating agency, Fitch, at investment-grade-level bonds. They are traded in the markets; they’re owned by institutional investors. And most recently, we issued a bond in January this year for €350 million. We had over €2 billion of demand for that bond, so we’ve got fantastic support from the institutional bond markets to support Sirius. 

    That bond essentially replaces or refinances a bond which comes due in June ’26. So there is no upcoming refinancing on the horizon until November ’28, so we’ve got a very long runway in terms of refinancing window. 

    And again, that comes back to the conservatism. We went out and refinanced that early. We got great support for that. And we have a building relationship and an ever-improving cost of debt in the bond market. Our 2032 bond, for instance, has over six years left to maturity, trades in the market below 4% yield-to-maturity. 

    And then, alongside those bonds, we have strong relationships with some of the specialist real estate bank lenders, particularly in Germany. So, we have just under €250 million outstanding with Berlin Hyp and Deutsche PBB. 

    We also have lending in our JV with AXA. We run a JV on some mature assets with AXA. We have a lending relationship there with Helaba for €150 million. All of those really strong, long-term lending, that secured lending on our balance sheet, is out to 2030. 

    And then alongside that, I put in place a revolving credit facility (which, in simple terms, is really just an overdraft, so that’s real flexibility) for €150 million earlier this year. That is undrawn at the moment, so that is very much flexible. That’s got a five-year term, and that’s priced around 3.5% interest rate as well.

    Net net, our real cost of debt today is somewhere between 3.5% and 4%. We still have one sort of super low-cost bond – the 2028 bond, which is at 1.75% – we need to refinance. But we have to take a journey from a current average cost of debt of 2.5% up to 3.5% to 4% over the coming years. But we can do that while still continuing to grow earnings and FFO. We’ve absolutely got the top-line growth to be more than capable of doing that.

    The Finance Ghost: That ‘always-on’ mentality again, right? It’s not just ‘always-on’ in terms of looking at the macro and everything else; it’s ‘always-on’ in managing the debt. So, maybe that’s the key principle to actually take out of this thing. 

    So, Chris, I’m going to stick with you here because, as we bring this home, I’m keen to understand a little bit more about the growth outlook. And I’m going to ask Andrew just now about the dividend, which I know is a topic he’s passionate about. But first, I’m asking you about the growth outlook. 

    You recently said to the market that the full year’s pretty much in line with management expectations. Now obviously, you can’t disclose anything on this podcast that isn’t already out there in the market, but perhaps you could just take listeners through some of the key drivers of the outlook and what gives you confidence, at the moment, in the numbers that you have put out there?

    Chris Bowman: Yeah, absolutely. So you’re right, we’ve made that statement – and we make that statement, in terms of ‘in line with expectations’ – very much from a position of confidence. And that’s in line with expectations for this year and, as well, for next year looking forwards.

    Now I think, with Sirius, you get growth and you get income. So obviously Andrew will touch on the dividend, but we’re very much focused on growth as well. Because we want to provide that growth in terms of total return to shareholders, but also to be able to pay a growing dividend. 

    So what gives us confidence? We have organic growth. So this is our 12th year in a row now that we are on track to achieve more than 5%, like-for-like rent roll growth. So, that is in an environment where, in Germany, inflation is around 2%, and in the UK, it’s around 3.5%. 

    So, we have consistently more than beaten inflation in the markets in which we operate, and we continue to do that with the strength of our platform and our capital allocation. You’ve heard about acquisitions – we haven’t touched on capex, but that’s key for us as well – but also just the underlying strength of our platforms regionally. That underpins that organic growth. 

    And then on top of that organic growth, we have the acquisition-led growth. Which, again, you’ve heard about how we’ve put €370 million to work in the market this year on acquisitions. You don’t see the full effect of all of that income that’s associated with those acquisitions this year, because a lot of those acquisitions have just happened in months 4, 5, 6, 7, so really, the full effect comes through next year. 

    So, we sit here today, very confident in terms of the outlook for rent roll growth. We have to work hard for that, but we continue to be confident of achieving that – particularly in Germany, with the tailwinds that Andrew’s touched on earlier, but then into future years as well. The combination of that organic growth and that acquisition-led growth gives us great confidence.

    The Finance Ghost: So just to bring it home in this podcast, we know from Sirius’s recent reporting that you’ve essentially baked in around €20 million’s worth of net operating income (NOI) from your recent acquisitions. So, that‘s obviously a nice boost to the numbers coming in the year ahead – and in the years ahead, for that matter. 

    But what does that mean for the dividend, Andrew, which is obviously a big focus for any investor in the space? Obviously, to the extent you can talk about it, it’s just good to give investors an understanding of what they can expect and hope for, in terms of the dividend policy going forward and the sort of numbers you’ve got on your mind.

    Andrew Coombs: Well, look, the dividend’s really close to my heart. It’s close to my heart because I know people in South Africa can invest for dividends, but it’s close to my heart because, in terms of my shareholding, the dividend pays me more than my salary. So, I’m fairly well aligned, where that is concerned. 

    And as you know, it’s Sirius. We always pay a very well-covered dividend, never less than 1.3x. We are now into the 13th year of paying a progressive dividend. And of course, the €370 million of acquisitions that we have now made in this financial year have already generated a forward run rate into next year of €20 million of NOI, but we’re not stopping there. We’re only halfway through the year. 

    We will acquire more than €400 million of new property this year, which is more than the company has ever done before. And we will have baked into next year’s numbers well in excess of €20 million of additional net operating income and FFO that will contribute to the full-year effect next year. 

    And that will mean that our dividend will continue to grow as it has for the last 13 years. It means it will continue to be extremely well covered, and it means that we will continue on our journey towards something they call in the UK ‘dividend aristocracy’. 

    Apparently, if you can deliver, for 25 years, a constantly increasing dividend, that is dividend aristocracy. Well, we are now about to cross the halfway mark in our journey to dividend aristocracy.

    The Finance Ghost: Very impressive goal, indeed. Thank you. It’s a really nice way to just cap it off, talking about dividend aristocracy. And yes, you’re quite right. Many investors in the property space are firmly looking at the dividend. Although certainly from a South African perspective, they like the offshore elements as well. And there are some really good stories there that have been highlighted by not just you, but also the team. 

    So, Andrew, Chris, Tariq. Thank you so much for your time today. Really appreciated having you on the podcast and just bringing this additional layer of detail to the Ghost Mail audience about Sirius Real Estate. And this really has been an excellent resource for anyone looking to do deeper research into Sirius. 

    And of course, this is a listed company on the JSE. You can go and check it out, you can go and find all of the investor relations publications. Go and do the work, do the research, obviously. This is just part of your research process.

    But Andrew, Chris, Tariq – thank you so much for your time. This has been really great. Enjoy the end of the year, and I hope to do another one of these with you.

    Andrew Coombs: Thanks very much, indeed.

    Chris Bowman: Thank you.

    Tariq Khader: Thank you very much.

    Ghost Bites (Accelerate Property Fund | Alexforbes | Equites Property Fund | Fairvest | Hyprop | Lighthouse Properties | Nutun | Remgro | Standard Bank | Tharisa)

    Huge progress was made at Accelerate Property Fund in the past year (JSE: APF)

    The question now is around how much the gap to NAV can still close

    Accelerate Property Fund has been a fun (and profitable) turnaround story to follow. The macro tailwinds have done wonders for them here, giving us an important example of why turnarounds are a much better idea for investors when the broader economy is playing ball. If you need to run into a headwind, you’d better pick a strong athlete. If the property sector is enjoying gusts of wind from behind, then anyone with working legs has a chance.

    Accelerate’s vacancy rate has improved from 21.7% in September 2024 to 15.1% in September 2025, a strong performance over the past 12 months. Much of the good news is obviously at Fourways Mall, with this white elephant slowly becoming a pachyderm of the grey and economically-useful variety.

    The disposal of Portside is expected to take place by the end of December 2025. There are a few other property disposals also expected to close in January 2026. In total, these disposals will reduce debt by R719.1 million, with the disposal of Portside having been the ultimate get-out-of-jail card for Accelerate’s balance sheet.

    When these disposals are concluded, there will be a further decrease in the vacancy rate to 10.3%. The loan-to-value ratio is expected to be 41.8%, a far more palatable number.

    The net asset value per share is R1.86. The share price is currently R0.57, having picked up nicely from the recent rights offer price of R0.40 per share. I’m personally hoping for the stock to get to around 50% of NAV, at which point I’ll probably take profit on this position. So far, so good.


    Alexforbes delivers 9% dividend growth (JSE: AFH)

    The financials aren’t the simplest to read

    It’s always frustrating when a set of numbers is crawling with normalisation adjustments and all kinds of other confusions. Inevitably, the market then skips ahead to the dividend to see what the cash growth was. In this case, Alexforbes reported interim dividend growth of 9% – a far cry from “normalised HEPS” growth of 41%.

    Operating income was up 9% with a decent performance across the segments. Expense growth was only 3% if you’re willing to adjust for various distortions related to long-term incentive plans and leases. If you include those items, expenses were up 10%. Normalised profit from operations was up 18%, while profit without the adjustments was actually down 1%. Sigh.

    Corporate is still the biggest segment, contributing R958 million of the R2.3 billion in total operating income. With growth of 5% in this period, it was a solid underpin to the numbers that was driven by growth in the retirements business.

    The Investments segment is next up at R768 million, with growth of 16% suggesting that it might not be in second place forever. Closing assets under management and administration increased by 23% and blended margins were only slightly lower, so that’s looking good for this business.

    The Retail segment grew operating income by 10%, while “Growth Markets” (their name for operations in certain African and other countries) delivered 6%.

    There’s plenty of corporate gumph in the narrative and not much in the way of hard targets to hang your hat on. There’s an outside chance that the 5.5% drop in the share price on the day was purely from exhaustion in trying to find useful nuggets of information amongst the flowery language in the report. Absolutely nobody wants to read about “navigating the waters ahead” – just give us an outlook statement that includes some numbers!


    Equites brings us the first “unhealthy” REIT capital raise of the cycle (JSE: EQU)

    Blank cheque capital raises with no details are signs of trouble

    After market close on Monday, Equites Property Fund announced an accelerated bookbuild process. This is a way for companies to raise money quickly from institutional investors.

    How much, you ask? No idea.

    Why do they need the money? No idea.

    It’s just: “Hi everyone! We would like some money. Thanks. Kisses.”

    This is proper frothy-market stuff. This approach would get laughed out the door during a weak point in the cycle, but the property market has been on a charge. As I’ve written throughout the cycle, the time to get worried is when the capital raises with a non-existent rationale start happening. This is strike 1.

    Earlier in the day, Equites provided a trading update to at least give the bookrunner something to talk about when phoning institutional investors. They are on track for their full-year guidance of 140 cents – 143 cents per share, so that’s encouraging.

    In terms of corporate news in the trading update, they highlighted a few local development highlights and leases. They also gave an update on the exit from investments in the UK, where they haven’t managed to sell the assets as quickly as they had hoped.

    Do they need money because they have development plans in South Africa that they were hoping to fund with UK exit proceeds that haven’t materialised timeously? In the absence of any other explanation, it sure seems that way.


    Fairvest’s B shareholders enjoy double-digit returns (JSE: FTA | JSE: FTB)

    And more of the same is expected in 2026

    Fairvest has released results for the year ended September 2025. You would be forgiven for getting confused, as the headline for the announcement incorrectly talks about the six months to September instead of a year. Then again, the announcement also talks about the “propsects” for FY26, which is perhaps a new kind of bug. The proofreading was certainly very buggy.

    The numbers in the announcement are hopefully correct, with the property fund achieving revenue growth of 7.1% and like-for-like net property income growth of 5.8%. They delivered dividend growth of 3.1% to the risk-averse holders of Fairvest A shares who get the lesser of 5% or a CPI-linked return. This leaves plenty of meat on the bone for the Fairvest B shareholders who get the residual profits, with growth in their dividend of 11.2%.

    Looking ahead to 2026, the fund expects the B shareholders to enjoy growth of between 9% and 11%. At the mid-point of guidance, that’s another year of double-digit returns to investors. When times are good in the property sector, you would far rather be holding Fairvest B shares than Fairvest A shares:


    Hyprop is on track for FY26 guidance (JSE: HYP)

    Growth in total footcount shows that quality malls do well in an omnichannel environment

    Hyprop released an operational update for the four months to October. The most important news for shareholders is that the group is on track to achieve the targeted growth in distributable income per share of 10% to 12% for the year ending June 2026.

    The fund is well known for owning high quality malls, like Canal Walk in Cape Town. They also aren’t shy to dispose of assets from time to time, as evidenced by the disposal of 50% in Hyde Park Corner (one of the most upmarket malls in Gauteng) for R805 million. They note that they are at advanced stages in concluding another disposal. It will be interesting to see what they are up to.

    These malls are proving to be resilient in an omnichannel environment, with the South African portfolio enjoying growth in footfall of 1.9%. With 43% of the portfolio value in Gauteng and 57% in the Western Cape, Hyprop is focused on attracting shoppers in the country’s economic capitals. The strategy is working, with tenants achieving turnover growth of 5.3% and trading density growth of 8.5%. These strong metrics helped drive vacancies down from 4.2% in June 2025 to 3.2% in October 2025. They are also achieving significant positive reversions.

    Here’s an incredible statistic on the power of a Checkers FreshX store: since the store opened in Hyde Park, the centre has experienced growth in footcount that included 12% year-on-year growth in October 2024! These tenants aren’t known as “anchor tenants” for nothing.

    Hyprop also has exposure to Eastern Europe, with four premier retail centres. They literally have a 0.0% vacancy rate, which is incredible. Tenants enjoyed turnover growth of 2.9% and trading density growth of 3.1%, although footcount is under pressure in that region.

    The balance sheet is in good shape – not least of all thanks to the capital raise of R808 million that ended up being used for debt repayments rather than a deal for MAS (JSE: MSP) – with the loan-to-value ratio increasing slightly from 33.6% in June 2025 to 34.3% in October 2025. Borrowings costs are coming down in the current environment.

    It all looks good for Hyprop, with the share price up more than 20% year-to-date.


    Lighthouse Properties raises guidance (JSE: LTE)

    They are also looking ahead to a strong 2026

    Lighthouse Properties has delivered a pre-close update dealing with the period ending December 2025. The good news is that distribution guidance for 2025 has been revised upwards from 2.70 EUR cents to 2.75 EUR cents. That might not sound like much, but it’s the difference between 5% growth and 7% growth, with the latter providing a particularly appealing premium above inflation (and thus real growth).

    They’ve been busy with acquisitions this year, with net property income for the nine months to September up by a whopping 63.4%. Remember that the distribution on a per-share basis is what really counts, so don’t extrapolate something like growth in total revenue. The pie may be getting bigger, but you need to also consider how many pieces it gets cut into.

    On a like-for-like basis, net property income grew by 5.3%. This is a more sensible metric to look at. Footfall was up 2.8%, with France as the surprising highlight at 3.9%.

    The focus now is on sweating the assets they already have, which means bedding down the acquisitions and looking for further areas of improvement. Although the vacancy rate has increased from 2.0% to 2.6%, this is because of planned vacancies to accommodate new key tenants. They expect vacancies to drop below 2% in 2026 once leases with incoming tenants are finalised. Speaking of leases, positive reversions are a meaty 4.4% excluding regional indexation (inflation increases), so that’s really strong.

    With solid performance across Spain, Portugal and France, Lighthouse expects to deliver a strong 2026. Increasing the guidance for 2025 certainly sends a message!


    Can Nutun return to profits going forwards? (JSE: NTU)

    2025 was another loss-making year, with the group promising that they now have a foundation for growth

    Nutun is the charred remains of what was once a highly successful group: Transaction Capital. With WeBuyCars (JSE: WBC) having been cut loose from that mess and all of the Mobalyz Group (SA Taxi) legacy obligations now sorted out by Nutun, all that is left in Nutun is a business process outsourcing group with local and international operations.

    You would be forgiven for hoping that Nutun is therefore a profitable business, safely protected from the braai coals by a tinfoil wrap. Alas, it hasn’t been quite that simple. The group just reported a continuing core loss of R45 million for the year ended September 2025, which is at least only half as bad as the loss of R92 million in the comparable period.

    The legacy restructuring costs are all behind them now. They’ve got no more exposure to anything to do with Mobalyz, having now created a single point of funding into the South African business with a common security pool across all funders.

    In other words, if 2026 is another loss-making year, then it will be a disaster. Management is bullish about growing off the 2025 foundation. With the share price down 62% year-to-date, I would certainly hope so.


    Remgro wants more of Mediclinic’s SA business (JSE: REM)

    While MSC, Remgro’s co-shareholders in Mediclinic, want Switerland

    You may recall that Remgro partnered with MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company to take Mediclinic private. This was less to do with putting hospitals on cruise ships and more to do with two wealthy families coming together to acquire the Mediclinic group.

    As time has gone on, it seems that Remgro’s partners prefer Swiss exposure to South African exposure. The parties are therefore negotiating a deal that would see Remgro take full ownership of Mediclinic Southern Africa, while the partners would then take full ownership of Hirslanden (the Swiss business). The parties would retain their current joint interests in the Middle East and in Spire Healthcare Group.

    To keep things simple and thanks to relatively similar net asset values across the two geographies, they are looking at a straight swap. This would be based on EV/EBITDA multiples of 6.3x for Mediclinic Southern Africa and 9.4x for Hirslanden. The Swiss business would always carry a higher multiple because of the structurally different cost of capital across the two regions.

    This is only a cautionary announcement, so there’s no guarantee of the deal proceeding on these terms (or on any terms for that matter).


    Standard Bank reaffirms full-year guidance (JSE: SBK)

    A 10-month update shows consistent performance this year

    In an update for the 10 months to 31 October, Standard Bank noted that performance trends are in line with the first 6 months of the year.

    Banking revenue is up by mid-to-high single digits despite lower average interest rates putting some pressure on endowment income. This is too complicated a concept to try explain in one sentence, but I’ll try anyway. It refers to the bank lending out its equity with no associated funding cost, so a drop in interest rates means they earn less on their equity. The thing to remember is that when rates fall, banks experience pressure on their pricing and hence they make less money. To make up for it, they need higher volumes of loans and overall activity. This activity came through in book growth, investment banking deal origination and the non-interest revenue line.

    Revenue growth was ahead of cost growth, so margins are trending in the right direction.

    The credit loss ratio was in the middle of the through-the-cycle range of 70 to 100 basis points. That’s better than we saw at the halfway mark when it was up at 93 basis points.

    Finally, the Insurance and Asset Management business enjoyed a strong performance across life and short-term insurance. It really has been a bumper year for the short-term insurance industry in general.

    The reaffirmed outlook for the year ending December 2025 is revenue growth of mid-to-high single digits, a flat or better cost-to-income ratio vs. the prior period and group return on equity (ROE) in the target range of 17% to 20%.

    In terms of medium-term targets, a capital markets day scheduled for March 2026 will give the market plenty of detail behind the 2028 targets of HEPS growth of 8% to 12% and ROE of between 18% and 22%.


    Tharisa’s SARS victory saved the 2025 numbers (JSE: THA)

    The core mining metrics, like production, are down

    Tharisa released results for the year ended September 2025. They require a more careful read than usual, as there’s a significant adjustment that needs to be dealt with first.

    Tharisa has been in a serious fight with SARS around the calculation of royalty payments for the 2018 to 2021 year of assessment. Tharisa won an important victory in the Tax Court and SARS was set to appeal, but then the parties managed to negotiate a deal where Tharisa wouldn’t pursue costs and SARS wouldn’t appeal. Instead, SARS is now accepting the mining royalty calculations submitted by Tharisa.

    Why is this so important? Here’s why:

    Tharisa has reversed the provision this year, giving a $67.3 million boost to the financials in the cost of sales line. Despite this, EBITDA was only up 5.5% to $187 million. Profit before tax was flat at $117 million. You can quickly see how rough these numbers would’ve been without this adjustment!

    The reason for the disappointing overall performance is that revenue dropped by 16.4%. The PGM business wasn’t the problem, with the favourable pricing environment boosting segmental revenue from $154.5 million to $191.9 million despite a 4.7% decrease in production. Chrome was the issue, with revenue dropping sharply from $491.3 million to $393.3 million as chrome prices fell by 11% and production dropped by 8.2%. When your biggest segment takes a knock like that, it’s rather nasty.

    Although HEPS is only down by 2.1%, the better reflection of the difficult chrome environment can be found in the 33% drop in the dividend for the year. Whenever you see a significant divergence between HEPS and the dividend, you need to go digging. In this case, it’s because of the reversal of the SARS provision.


    Nibbles:

    • Director dealings:
      • Acting through Titan Premier Investments, Christo Wiese bought R14.9 million worth of shares in Brait (JSE: BAT).
      • A non-executive director of Blu Label Unlimited (JSE: BLU) bought shares worth nearly R1.5 million.
      • An associate of a director of South Ocean Holdings (JSE: SOH) bought shares worth R265k.
      • A director of Finbond (JSE: FGL) bought shares worth R120k and an associate of the same director bought shares worth R100k.
      • An associate of a non-executive director of Spear REIT (JSE: SEA) bought shares worth R152k.
      • An employee of the designated advisor of website-less Visual International (JSE: VIS) sold shares worth R10k.
    • On a day this busy, some of the less liquid stocks simply have to drop into the Nibbles. One such stock is Primeserv (JSE: PMV), where results for the six months to September indicate revenue growth of 5% and a juicy increase in HEPS of 16%. The interim dividend is up 17%. This strong performance despite modest revenue growth was largely thanks to cost control.
    • Thungela (JSE: TGA) has announced the disposal of Goedehoop North for a theoretical maximum of R700 million, although the minimum payment is much lower than that. R50 million in cash is payable initially and the remaining R650 million will be structured as quarterly instalments based on various milestones. The minimum total deferred payment is only R60 million though, so it shows you how much variability there is in that number. Mining operations are expected to cease in 2025 and the net loss before tax for the six months to June was R111 million, so the theory behind this deal is that the infrastructure is far more useful to the buyer than it is to Thungela.
    • In July 2025, South32 (JSE: S32) announced the sale of Cerro Matoso, a ferronickel operation located in Colombia. The deal was structured as a nominal initial payment and future cash payments of up to $100 million, although achieving that number would require a considerable improvement in the nickel market. The latest announcement is that the transaction has been successfully completed.
    • SA Corporate Real Estate (JSE: SAC) announced that the acquisition of the Parks Lifestyle Apartments at Riversands has met all conditions and has a deal closing date of 1 December.
    • Hosken Consolidated Investments (JSE: HCI) announced that the JSE has granted the company a dispensation from the 60-day rule to dispatch a circular to shareholders for the transaction with B-BBEE partner SACTWU. It will be distributed to shareholders as soon as the circular has been approved by the JSE, with no further update given around timing.
    • There’s a change in the CFO role at Pick n Pay (JSE: PIK). Lerena Olivier will step down in August 2026 after the 2026 AGM, having been in the role since 2019 (and with the group since 2011). She will be moving into a strategic role overseeing priority projects related to the turnaround. Tina Rookledge will take the CFO role after the AGM next year, joining the retailer from her current role as Regional Managing Partner of the EY Western Cape practice.
    • Castleview (JSE: CVW), a large property fund with practically zero trade in its stock, released results for the six months to September 2025. The distribution per share increased by 21.8% and the net asset value per share is up 13.4%. The loan-to-value ratio, net of cash, is 45.5%. Much of the recent activity has involved an increase in the stake in SA Corporate Real Estate (JSE: SAC) to 24.93%.
    • Africa Bitcoin Corporation (JSE: BAC) continues to add international trading opportunities for its stock. The company is now trading on the Börse Frankfurt Quotation Board. This doesn’t mean that new shares have been issued or that any capital has been raised. It just means that there’s an additional venue for the trading of shares. They are clearly trying to attract a global audience.
    • Guess what? There’s yet another delay to the payment of funds by Gathoni Muchai Investments Limited (GMI) to Shuka Minerals (JSE: SKA). I can only imagine what the tone on the deal calls must be like by this stage. A promise made by a toddler about not touching an ice cream is more dependable than anything GMI says about the timing of cash flow, so I wouldn’t put much faith in that latest timing update regarding the balance of the £2 million loan facility being paid by mid-December. Remember, the final payment for the acquisition of Leopard Exploration and Mining is due by the end of December.
    • As part of its exit from the JSE, Safari Investments (JSE: SAR) is paying a “clean-out distribution” as described in the circular that was sent out in October. For those who have been wondering what the goodbye kiss will be, the distribution has been calculated as 30.0765 cents per share.
    • Insimbi Industrial Holdings (JSE: ISB) announced that its listing will move to the General Segment of the JSE. We’ve seen many small- and mid-caps take this route, as it gives them a more size-appropriate set of listing rules.
    • Quite why Globe Trade Centre (JSE: GTC) is listed on the JSE, I cannot tell you. The stock literally never trades. For the nine months to September 2025, the Polish property group suffered a loss after tax and a substantial decrease in funds from operations (FFO). The net loan-to-value has increased from 48.8% to 53.1%, dangerously high for a property company.
    Verified by MonsterInsights