Thursday, May 7, 2026
Home Blog

Who’s doing what this week in the South African M&A space?

Although PPC has not released any information to shareholders, and is currently not trading under cautionary, reports in the media suggest that Heidelberg Materials, a German building materials firm, is considering making a bid for the local cement maker. This is not the first time that PPC has attracted attention. Past suitors have included Fairfax Africa Investments, Holcim, Dangote Cement, CRH and AfriSam.

Diversified technology group 4Sight acquired X4 Solutions and XFour Technology in April 2025 in a move to expand its digital enterprise ecosystem and strengthen its footprint in workforce technologies. The acquisitions, which specialise in integrating and optimising HR and payroll systems in 20 countries across Africa, can tailor enterprise-grade offerings to the unique dynamics of the African labour market. The purchase consideration payable was split into two separate tranches with an initial payment of R21,2 million comprising equally of cash and share components. The second tranche, in the form of an earn-out of R21,2 million, was subject to the financial performance of the companies over the year to 28 February 2026, which the group exceeded, resulting in payment of the related earnout.

Burstone’s disposal of the rentable office property located at 2 Ncondo Place in Umhlanga in KZN to Pappamia for an undisclosed sum has been approved by the Competition Commission.

Black woman-owned and managed Siyanqoba Ngamandla Engineering Services (Siyanqoba) has received undisclosed funding support from the Abadali Fund, a black Business Growth Fund which forms part of the Abadali Equity Equivalent Investment Programme (EEIP). The programme is an economic inclusion initiative by the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition in partnership with J.P. Morgan and managed by Edge Growth Ventures. The facility will enable Siyanqoba to acquire specialised mining equipment, expand its operational capacity and create additional jobs. Siyanqoba services the likes of Seriti Resources, Thungela and Glencor.

Pan-African infrastructure fund, the Africa50 Infrastructure Acceleration Fund which had raised US$300 million by the end of its third close in December 2025, is looking to add a further $100 million in the final round. The fund will invest in equity and quasi-equity in infrastructure companies and projects in Africa focusing on power and energy, transportation and logistics, water and sanitation, and digital and social infrastructure.

Weekly corporate finance activity by SA exchange-listed companies

In August 2024, MC Mining signed an agreement with Kinetic Development Group (KDG) which would see KDG subscribe for shares in aggregate of 51%. The deal was structured to be completed in two tranches. The first tranche, completed in 2024 and equal to a 13.04% stake, was valued at the time at US$12,97 million (R230,88 million). The second tranche valued at $77 million (R1,43 billion) has now been completed, raising KDG’s shareholding in MC Mining to 51%.

This week the following companies announced the repurchase of shares:

During the month of April AIMIA repurchased and cancelled a total of 228,900 of its shares representing 0.3% of the company’s issued share capital. The shares were purchased at an average price of US$2.79 for an aggregate $638,344.

Quilter announced it would commence a share buyback programme to repurchase shares with a value of up to £100 million in order to reduce the share capital of the company and return capital to shareholders. This week Quilter announced the repurchase of a further 1,655,272 shares on the LSE with an aggregate value of £3,03 million and 59,963 shares on the JSE with an aggregate value of R2,46 million.

Ninety One plc announced the extension of its repurchase programme from 31 March 2026 to 3 June 2026. The shares to be purchased on the open market are cancelled to reduce the Company’s ordinary share capital. This week the company repurchased a further 732,914 ordinary shares at an average price 213 pence for an aggregate £1,277 million.

GreenCoat Renewables has implemented a share buyback programme totalling €100 million over 12 months with a first tranche amounting to €25 million beginning on 5 March 2026 – representing 13% of the issued share capital. This week 1,071,217 shares were repurchased for and aggregate €1830,378.

Anheuser-Busch InBev’s US$6 billion share buy-back programme continues. The shares acquired will be kept as treasury shares to fulfil future share delivery commitments under the group’s stock ownership plans. During the period 26 April – 1 May 2026, the group repurchased 1,017,064 shares for €64,12 million.

In December 2025, British American Tobacco extended its share buyback programme by a further £1.3 billion for 2026. The shares will be cancelled. This week the company repurchased a further 517,811 shares at an average price of £42.83 per share for an aggregate £22,18 million.

During the period 28 – 30 April 2026, Prosus repurchased a further 1,528,155 Prosus shares for an aggregate €62,21 million and Naspers, a further 515,869 Naspers shares for a total consideration of R460,58 million.

One company issued or withdrew a cautionary notice: Sebata.

Who’s doing what in the African M&A and debt financing space?

Fintech platform, Kaleidofin, has closed Kenya’s first private-sector local currency securitisation in the smallholder agriculture sector, in partnership with Apollo Agriculture and with investment from the IDH Farmfit Fund. The transaction mobilised KES276 million (approximately US$2,5 million) through the securitisation of receivables originated by Apollo Agriculture, covering a portfolio of 23,839 smallholder farmers, 51% of whom are women, with an average loan size of KES 17,942 and approximately 22% first-time borrowers. Structured through Kaleidofin’s ki platform, a dedicated debt capital market infrastructure, the transaction enables the conversion of granular agricultural loans into investable assets for institutional investors.

Botswana-listed, African multinational financial services group, Letshego Africa, has announced the sale of 100% of the issued share capital of five of its East and West African subsidiaries to Axian Digital Venture Holdings and Management Limited. The subsidiaries, Letshego Ghana Savings and Loans PLC; Letshego Faidika Bank Tanzania Limited; Letshego Microfinance Bank Nigeria Limited; Letshego Rwanda PLC Limited and Letshego Uganda Limited were sold to the UAE-based company for an undisclosed sum.

Nigeria’s BFREE, a Pan-African debt recovery and distressed credit investor, has secured new funding aimed at expanding its ability to purchase bad loan portfolios from banks and digital lenders across Africa. The funding round was led by AfricInvest through its Financial Inclusion Vehicle (FIVE) and also included Algebra Ventures and existing investors Capria Ventures, VestedWorld, Axian CVC, Angaza Capital, and 4Di Capital.

Trafigura Pte Ltd. has entered into exclusive negotiations with the Egyptian Aluminium Company (Egyptalum) and the Metallurgical Industries Holding Company (MIH) to develop a new primary aluminium smelter in Egypt. The trio intend to establish a newly-incorporated company that will construct, own and operate a 300,000 tonne per annum primary aluminium smelter, alongside a 150,000 tonne per annum anode plant, at Egyptalum’s Nag Hammadi complex. The new facilities would nearly double the site’s current annual production capacity. Trafigura will participate as a minority equity investor in the new company, as well as a debt provider and long-term offtake and feedstock supply counterparty. Total investment costs for the project are estimated at between US$750 million and $900 million.

The Africa Ecosystem Catalysts Facility, a US$4 million pilot investment facility managed by Village Capital with funding from the Dutch Entrepreneurial Development Bank (FMO) and the Netherlands Enterprise Agency (RVO), has announced its first two investments in Ghana. The Facility is investing in Rivia Clinics, a tech-enabled primary healthcare startup ($200,000), and VDL Fulfilment, an e-commerce logistics platform built for African SMEs ($150,000), both based in Accra.

The Emerging Africa & Asia Infrastructure Fund (EAAIF) has committed a US$40 million senior secured loan to support the development of Egypt’s first sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production facility. The $212,4 million project will be located in Egypt’s Sokhna Special Economic Zone and developed by Green Sky Capital Limited and its local subsidiary, SAF Fly Egypt. Once operational, the facility is expected to produce 200,000 tonnes per year of biofuels, including SAF, hydrotreated vegetable oil, bio-propane and bio-naphtha. Additional financing was provided by Qatar National Bank, through its Egyptian subsidiary, with a commitment of up to US$31,4 million, and by The Arab Energy Fund, which contributed $71,4 million.

PODCAST: No Ordinary Wednesday Ep126 | Investing through the noise

Listen to the podcast here:

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Investec-banner.jpg

Markets are moving fast but are investors moving with intent?

In this episode of No Ordinary Wednesday, we go beyond market headlines to unpack what investors are actually doing in a volatile, news-driven environment.

From trading the news cycle to navigating currency swings and concentrated markets, Investec’s Tinus Rautenbach and Bongani Nhleko share real insights from the Clarity platform, revealing where capital is flowing, how behaviour is shifting, and the risks investors may not see.

Listen now to understand the gap between perception and portfolio reality and what it means for your investment decisions. Read more on www.investec.com/now

Please scroll down for the transcript if you wish to read instead of listen.

Hosted by seasoned broadcaster, Jeremy Maggs, the No Ordinary Wednesday podcast unpacks the latest economic, business and political news in South Africa, with an all-star cast of investment and wealth managers, economists and financial planners from Investec. Listen in every second Wednesday for an in-depth look at what’s moving markets, shaping the economy, and changing the game for your wallet and your business.

Also on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and YouTube:

Transcript:

[00:00:00] Jeremy: Investors in South Africa are navigating a market shaped less by fundamentals… and more by reaction.

In recent weeks, geopolitical tension has driven sharp moves across oil, currencies and global equities. The rand has swung – weakening, recovering, and shifting again, often within days.

And yet, despite the volatility, equity markets have remained relatively resilient, with returns increasingly concentrated in a narrow set of sectors and stocks.

Because what feels like active decision-making is often just exposure playing out beneath the surface. A concentrated local market can mean portfolios are less diversified than they appear. And a volatile currency means offshore returns are driven as much by the rand as by the underlying assets.

So, in an environment like this, the real question isn’t just what markets are doing… but how investors are responding.

I’m Jeremy Maggs, and this is No Ordinary Wednesday – Investec’s podcast on what’s moving markets, shaping economies and influencing investment decisions.

In this episode, I’m joined by Investec’s Tinus Rautenbach, Head of Clarity, and Bongani Nhleko, Operations Consultant for Clarity – an online trading platform that provides instant access to local and global markets, in rands or foreign currency, with a low minimum investment.

Together, we’ll go beyond theory to unpack what investors are doing in real time, where capital is flowing, and the risks that may not be immediately visible.

Tinus, Bongani, welcome to No Ordinary Wednesday.

[00:01:43] Jeremy: So Bongani, I want to start with you. When headlines hit, whether it’s escalation in the Middle East or a sharp oil move, how do Clarity users react within 24 hours? Are they stepping into volatility or stepping away from it?

[00:01:59] Bongani: Well, what we usually see is a mix, but the dominant reaction is pausing rather than panicking. There’s an initial spike in connectivity as you’d expect, people logging in, checking their balances, scrutinising the share prices, but fewer impulsive trades than you might expect.

Some clients do step into volatility though, as you would expect from the more experienced traders who see it as an opportunity. The vast majority tend to wait, digest, and look for confirmation before acting.

[00:02:27] Jeremy: And I’m assuming that in a moment like this, timing as far as outcomes are concerned, means everything.

[00:02:34] Bongani: Yes, that is generally the accepted term. However, in this specific case, timing is more about sequencing not speed. The better outcomes usually come from investors who take a moment to see how the story evolves before reacting, because sometimes markets can often overshoot on the first move. Those who wait for direction rather than the drama tend to make more considered decisions.

You act too fast and your emotion can get in the way. You act too late and the markets already priced it in. The sweet spot is responding once the dust has settled.

[00:03:06] Jeremy: So Tinus, talking about drama despite intense geopolitical tension, equity markets, I think you’ll agree, have been relatively resilient, even hitting highs in some cases with gains concentrated though in a handful of sectors. So, here’s my question, if only a few sectors are driving returns, are we underestimating how fragile this rally actually is?

[00:03:27] Tinus: I think it’s fascinating to be in a world where we’ve got a war in the Middle East, we still have a war in the Ukraine on the go, we have got changing politics coming out of America by the minute or by the tweet, and it is interesting that the equity market is so resilient and robust. Having said that and looking at how concentrated it is, it does feel like it’s fragile, and part of that fragility you have seen in some big market moves over the last month, in the past six weeks, and so yeah, there is a bit of a fragility in the move.

It’s been very hard for the market to call whether this is a rally that will keep on going and it’s probably too soon to tell. The market is very excited whenever there’s any inkling of the Strait of Hormuz opening again. And, at the moment, the market is news-driven.

[00:04:17] Jeremy: And that’s the conundrum, then it’s the problem. We often talk about flight to safety in theory, so gold, dollars, bonds, but in practice, some investors don’t always follow the script. So, I’m interested to know what you’ve observed. Are investors following the textbook crisis path or are they writing their own playbook?

And is it driven by conviction or, as Bongani alluded to earlier, the speed of information?

[00:04:42] Tinus: The playbook has definitely changed, and the playbook we’ve seen is gold rally and essentially a dollar weakness maybe for the last 18 months or 12 to 18 months. That has played out outside of this loss – the crisis in the Middle East – and the playbook has maybe moved away from just purely looking at a single asset class as your safe haven towards clients looking at diversification. And we see clients instead of maybe going into a single asset class, going into ETFs or diversified plays, to be able to to weather the storm, and looking at various indices etc, to do that instead of just buying, as you say, gold or just trying to park in dollars.

Specifically between gold, dollars and bonds, the correlations have broken down, some of the narrative that used to be gospel is not gospel anymore. And so clients have definitely moved away from just blindly following the old about what to invest in when there’s risk. And the playbook has become more diversification across multi-jurisdiction, multi-index, multi-asset class.

And that’s been made much simpler through some of the products available now.

[00:05:54] Jeremy: So Tinus, if the playbook has changed, it’s all now about philosophy and mindset and I wonder then if investors are trying to trade the busy news cycle rather than investing through it. Does that behaviour actually add value over time, I wonder?

[00:06:11] Tinus: Picking up on what Bongani said earlier, we definitely have a spread of clients that we see that some of them are really familiar with both instruments and the market and are very comfortable to trade the news and to take a view on how they think things will play out. But we also have a big base of clients that are using investment as a real long-term play, and news cycles are less relevant. So, we are seeing a bit of both.

We’ve seen so many research articles showing that ad hoc trading around news usually destroys value instead of creating value, for most of your novice traders, but we see some experienced traders that enjoy trading the news cycles.

[00:06:53] Jeremy: Bongani, I’m coming to you in just a moment, but Tinus looking at the concentration of stocks, as we outlined at the beginning of this conversation, which we are seeing both locally and globally, I guess we’ve got to ask whether investors are diversified enough? Are they leaning into that or trying to diversify away from it, and which approach is then proving to be more effective?

[00:07:15] Tinus: We on average see that platforms nowadays give you easy access, both local and foreign diversified through, as I mentioned earlier, products like ETFs. We on average see accounts being well diversified, geography as well as industry. So clients are using the tools to easily diversify.

You might actually now get into a space where clients are over diversified and buying ETFs that hold similar stocks across, or similar indices across, and you’re not necessarily getting incremental value.

So, diversification is very good. It creates a different tool to deal with obviously the shocks and the volatility that we’ve seen, but we almost have to be a little bit weary of being too diversified, and they’re not necessarily getting the equity risk premium that you will get from owning stocks.

[00:06:53] Jeremy: So Bongani, let me push a little bit on diversification for local investors. Offshore exposure is often seen as diversification, but obviously returns are heavily influenced by the rand. Strategically then, how are they navigating this dynamic? Are they investing offshore for assets or for currency?

[00:08:24] Bongani: It’s honestly a bit of both. We see some investors are very deliberate about their offshore exposure. They want access to the global companies, the sectors, and the growth themes that they offer, which simply aren’t available locally. For them the asset comes first and the currency is almost a secondary benefit. What we’re seeing more recently is growing awareness of this trade off.

Though investors are starting to understand that offshore returns aren’t just about picking the right shares or stocks and ETFs, currency can amplify your gains just as much as it can mute it. So as a result, we’re starting to see investors have more realistic expectations of what the market can do for them, both on the stocks level as well as from a currency level.

People are thinking more consciously about when they want to go offshore and how much they want to allocate to their offshore allowance, and whether they’re comfortable with the currency swings being a major driver of their returns in the short term.

[00:09:18] Jeremy: Gentlemen, we are going to get back to the conversation in just a moment, but before we continue, I just want to touch more on Clarity by Investec.

It is a secure, straightforward investing platform designed for those who prefer to do it themselves.

It gives you direct access to local and global markets, with seamless currency exchange and share trading built in.

There’s no advice layer and no complexity – just the tools you need to invest on your terms, backed by the infrastructure and regulatory standards of a global bank.

Clarity by Investec. Investing, your way. Visit nowclarity.com for more information.

[00:09:55] Jeremy: Tinus, back to you then. Which sectors are seeing the biggest increase in interest on Clarity right now? And is that being driven by fundamentals or, as we’ve discussed a little earlier, the narrative?

[00:10:08] Tinus: At the moment, interest is driven by the narrative and not necessarily by the fundamentals. We have seen lots of activity in oil and oil- related exposure, which is fully expected. And so, at the moment, it’s more driven by narrative, I think. Interesting.

Just to touch on local or foreign narrative – as of the budget speech, South Africans can now take out R2 million under the SDA. It creates a lot more opportunity for clients to invest or makes it much easier to invest internationally.

And so it’s easier to get exposure to the BP’s, the Shells, to play this narrative. So, we’ve definitely seen a pickup in that.

[00:10:46] Jeremy: Which means Tinus, increase in activity in areas like commodities, energy, and even global tech. Given this current uncertain environment, is that positioning sustained or do you think it’s just short term?

[00:10:59] Tinus: Well, there’s no crystal ball here, Jeremy. I know you’d love to get the stock tip, but I think it’s harder to talk about the sustained runs or rallies.

Commodities and energy, ultimately, we’ll find a way to normalise because it drives inflation, and if inflation gets too hot, ultimately activity comes out of the GDP and out of industry, and therefore, demand will fall.

So, I think around commodities and energy, there’s a self-correcting process, and the cycle will correct itself if it runs too hot.

Global tech is a slightly different narrative. We all read a lot about AI and the advancements, etc, and a big part of the global tech rally is actually around –perceived correctly or not – increasing in productivity that AI can bring to civilisation as a whole.

And so maybe depending on whether we think it’s really overvalued or not, we’ll have different driving forces because you obviously can still see the massive productivity gains if some of the prediction around how the technology plays out comes true. So, some of it, I think, may be more sustained, but commodities and energy will have some self-correcting process to it.

[00:12:12] Jeremy: So Bongani, back to you then. Beyond equities, what instruments are gaining traction and what does this reflect? What are you seeing?

[00:12:19] Bongani: So, we’re seeing a growing interest in cash-like instruments on some defensive income-style assets. This tells us that investors aren’t necessarily bending all risk, but they’re rather becoming a little bit more selective.

There’s a clear desire for them to earn something whilst they’re waiting, rather than being completely all in or sidelined at the same time. We’re seeing quite a few people branch out into alternative investments, particularly cryptocurrencies. For some investors, crypto is viewed as a long-term hedge or diversification play rather than your short-term trade.

Alongside that, there’s also been a noticeable trend, as Tinus actually mentioned, toward AI-related investments. And whilst neither of us have a crystal ball here, it’s gaining a lot of traction. A lot of clients are trying to get all their hands on top of AI-related products, whether it be directly through companies or global tech companies that are actually producing these AI bots or agents as you may want to call them.

What we can see again is that there is some form of a structural trend that people are starting to see whether that’s going to be a long-term decision or long-term perception that holds or a passing cycle, we’ll only be able to know in a couple of years, I suppose.

[00:13:31] Jeremy: Tinus, back to you, and correct me if I’m wrong, but one of the risks I imagine in volatile markets is increased activity without improved outcomes. What are the most common mistakes that you are seeing right now?

[00:13:44] Tinus: I think it’s part of your old trading strategy, trading style, trading philosophy, “plan the trade and trade the plan”, and in high news flow environments like we have at the moment, trader individuals do tend to overreact, change their plan without necessarily going through the thoughtful process on why they’re in the position. What’s the target price for this position, what’s the stop loss for this position, etc.

So yes, we do see trading frequency, it’s news-driven. You’re a hundred percent right, not necessarily for better outcome. And the mistakes we’re seeing, it’s not different to any other news cycle, and that’s really to move away from the plan, the reason that someone got into a position and rather just get worried about the current year’s flow.

[00:14:31] Jeremy: And Bongani, I’m assuming that you are seeing a meaningful increase in trading frequency during this period of heightened volatility?

[00:14:39] Bongani: We certainly seeing quite a decent increase in trade and frequency, but it’s not uniform across all users, one could say, as myself and Tinus have been discussing earlier, we do have some of the more experienced traders who actually feel a little bit more comfortable, making those kind of decisions across periods of volatility.

Whereas other individuals or investors or long-term holding investors would prefer to wait and see how the market plays out in their favour.

Obviously, there would still be a lot more monitoring from their side because as Tinus did mention earlier, there’s quite a bit of news-driven narrative out there that are making people make hasty decisions, one would say, so a lot of the people who are inexperienced or the novice traders or investors obviously panic as soon as they hear that something is tanking or something’s dropping, or there’s some ridiculous news coming out there that shifts a specific industry.

The problem again with them is that their initial reaction is to get out immediately, as opposed to, as Tinus said, maybe, possibly just wait it out, figure out whether or not this is the position you want to hold, what’s your price point, when you’re going to get out.

So we do see increased activity from both sides, from experienced individuals and from the novice traders. However, there is something I want to stress though in terms of patience, because the distinction is quite important for an individual who’s wanting to hold a position versus somebody who’s immediately trying to get out because of a news-driven narrative.

And I said this distinction is quite important because it suggests a level of discipline. Increased awareness doesn’t always translate into increased action. In many cases, restraint is a healthy response. So, investors who tend to navigate volatile periods best are often the ones who stay well informed.

They reassess their positions, and they only act when something genuinely no longer aligns with their longer-term view.

[00:16:27] Jeremy: Tinus, there is a growing narrative around higher for longer interest rates and persistent inflation, you’ve both alluded to that. Are your users positioning for that reality assertively right now or still investing as if conditions will normalise quickly? And again, part of it is the crystal ball debate, I guess.

[00:16:49] Tinus: Yeah, I think we’ve definitely seen clients move some of their portfolios a bit more conservatively as the war in the Middle East began. And as you’ve seen and alluded to, the market has bounced off the lows and rallied hard.

And so some of our clients have definitely felt like they’ve missed out on some of the rally. Some of it has been to go into cash-like products as Bongani alluded to earlier. So yeah, we have seen it.

Clients are definitely positioning for this idea of high interest rates as inflation come through. Gone into a bit more defensive ETFs that doesn’t necessarily just give you, and I’ll talk about the S&P 500, for instance, but maybe more consumer defensive ETFs.

So yeah, we’ve seen it and clients are positioning for it. Are they too early?  Well, if the war’s over tomorrow, would that mean inflation will normalise sooner? Or this scare of inflation won’t come through as bad as everyone’s predicting it at the moment with the high energy prices. Again, that’s the crystal ball.

[00:17:47] Jeremy: So Tinus, lastly then, against that backdrop, how should a South African investor interpret global conflict risk in their local portfolio?

[00:17:56] Tinus: We are quite lucky to be at the South of Africa at the moment. It feels like, at least from a safety point of view, we’re well removed from it. But how do you look at your portfolio?

We have definitely seen it over the previous five years there was a massive flight into dollar assets and how clients invest internationally. But with the top 40 in the South African index doing so well last year, stellar returns, we have seen clients coming back to having a more local flavoured portfolio, making sure that that balance is right between local and offshore. And as I said earlier, good, diversified portfolio will weather the storm.

[00:18:36] Jeremy: That is where we are going to close off today’s episode of No Ordinary Wednesday. Tinus, Bongani, thank you so much for joining me.

A new episode of No Ordinary Wednesday drops every two weeks. To ensure that you don’t miss out, search for Investec Focus radio SA wherever you get your podcasts and hit the follow button.

Until next time, goodbye from me, Jeremy Maggs, and the entire Focus Radio team.

Disclaimer: Clarity by Investec is a service offering of Investec Bank Limited, an authorised financial services provider, and over the counter derivatives provider, a registered credit provider, NCRCP 9, and a member of the JSE Limited.

Ghost Bites (DRDGOLD | Jubilee Metals | Sibanye-Stillwater | Quantum Foods)

DRDGOLD’s quarterly update looks promising (JSE: DRD)

Gold production is now heading the right way

In recent times, DRDGOLD has been greatly assisted by a gold price that has been moving sharply in the right direction. Focusing on gold tailings is a tough business, as they have to process plenty of ore to extract any gold whatsoever. If yields drop, or if access to material becomes difficult, then DRDGOLD’s margins can come under significant pressure at lower gold prices.

Thankfully for the company, “lower gold prices” seem to be a thing of the past. In an operating update for the quarter ended March 2026, the quarter-on-quarter move in the average rand gold price was 13%. To be clear, “quarter-on-quarter” means we are comparing this quarter to the immediately preceding three months (i.e. to December 2025), not to the quarter ended March 2025 (which would be a year-on-year move).

A 13% jump in that price over just three months is juicy. And it would’ve been even juicier if gold sales had increased. Alas, there was actually a 6% decrease in gold sales despite a 6% increase in gold production. The announcement doesn’t go into detail on this unusual mismatch.

With higher production comes greater efficiencies. Cash operating costs per kilogram of gold decreased by 4%. This means that total cash operating costs increased by 5% vs. a revenue increase of 6%, leading to adjusted EBITDA jumping by 21% as they unlocked an increase in margin. Remember, even a small difference in growth rate between group revenue and expenses can do great things for the margin in a company like this.

Further good news can be found in the capital expenditure update, where there’s a 16% decrease in capex on a quarter-on-quarter basis. But it’s worth noting that capex has been at elevated levels over the past nine months, jumping from R1.2 billion to R2.3 billion on a year-on-year basis. They’ve been investing heavily in their key projects, a necessary step to secure production of gold. Capex has now peaked though, so the company will no doubt be relieved that the gold price supported them throughout the capex programme.

If you want to see what happens when the market washes away from you during a period of heightened capex, just look at names like Sappi (JSE: SAP) and Gemfields (JSE: GML).

To end off on DRDGOLD, the balance sheet looks fat and happy with cash of R2.3 billion (vs. R1.7 billion as at December 2025). Although they have debt facilities in place, the company is currently free of debt as they haven’t drawn down on them. This bodes well for dividends, with the share price closing 8.3% higher in response to this update.


Production is up at Jubilee Metals, but guidance is a mixed bag (JSE: JBL)

Production guidance is “under review” based on recent developments

Jubilee Metals has released an operational and production update for the nine months to March 2026. With total saleable copper production for the period up by 28.7%, they are making progress on their strategy.

Production at Roan more than doubled, up 112.8% from the comparative period. Commissioning of the expanded Roan copper concentrate facility is near completion.

At the Molefe Mine, although there was a significant increase in ore mined and transported to the Sable Refinery, the announcement talks about interim numbers rather than nine-month numbers. I’m not sure if that’s just a typo.

Production at the Sable Refinery increased by 27.4% year-on-year. This is why the jump at Roan was watered down to a group increase of 28.7%.

Guidance for the year is an unusual situation. The company notes that it is currently “under review”, but they don’t make it clear whether it will be going up or down. The positive factor is the fast tracking of the expanded stripping programme at Molefe Mine, expected to be completed by July 2026. The negative factor is the delay in the commissioning and ramp-up of the expanded concentrate dewatering circuit at Roan, with targeted production expected to be reached in May.

The issue isn’t whether Jubilee Metals is increasing its copper production. The debate is around whether they are increasing it quickly enough!

What are your thoughts on this company?

191
Jubilee's copper strategy

How do you feel about the latest update at Jubilee Metals?


Quantum Foods flags double-digit growth (JSE: QFH)

This is despite a significant drop in average egg selling prices

People often talk about how food prices seem to head in one direction only. It certainly feels that way at the till for consumers, but the truth is that prices do sometimes go down.

In a trading statement dealing with the six months to March 2026, Quantum Foods noted that average egg selling prices fell by 9%. That’s good news for Eggs Benedict enthusiasts everywhere – like me!

Despite this, the company achieved HEPS growth of between 12% and 20%. The market would probably show some support for this if there was trade in the stock. Alas, liquidity is so thin that not a single share changed hands on the day.

As we’ve seen elsewhere in the poultry sector, the results were supported by important external factors like higher demand for poultry products in general, lower feed costs, and much less disruption from energy availability and avian influenza.

The egg business suffered a downturn in earnings as the price decrease more than offset the 4% increase in volumes. Thankfully, the feeds and broiler farming businesses registered an increase in earnings, while the layer farming business was stable. Earnings in the other African businesses are described as being significantly higher, with the exception of Mozambique.

It’s worth noting that head office costs increased in this period due to management incentivisation, so that’s something to look out for when the company releases detailed results on 22 May.


Things are going very well at Sibanye-Stillwater (JSE: SSW)

The latest quarterly update reflects incredible growth in earnings

With exposure to gold and PGMs as its primary commodities, Sibanye-Stillwater has enjoyed that rarest of rare things: an upswing in both commodity prices at the same time. At the right point in the cycle, these mining companies are basically a licence to print money.

In an operating update for the three months ended March 2026, Sibanye has delivered the incredibly happy news of a 371% spike in group adjusted EBITDA. Perhaps even more encouragingly, the positive contribution to earnings is across the group’s operations, rather than driven by just one area.

Prices have obviously played the major role here, with PGMs up 87% and gold up 49%. But you still need to get the stuff out of the ground, with a 2% increase in South African PGM production and stable local gold production. There was unfortunately a 5% decrease in production in the US PGM operations. Importantly, the US operation was profitable in this period, a huge swing from the losses seen a year ago.

In the recycling business, adjusted EBITDA jumped dramatically from under R200 million to nearly R1.6 billion. To put that in perspective, US PGM adjusted EBITDA was R777 million, or less than half of what they made from recycling. All of this pales in comparison to SA PGMs (R12.4 billion) and SA gold (R4.7 billion). It’s also worth touching on Century zinc, more than doubling year-on-year to R467 million.

The Keliber lithium project is an important strategic push by the business, with construction completed on schedule in this period. Negative adjusted EBITDA of R209 million is a feature of a development period – you have to spend money today in order to make money in future.

Trying to guess where these commodity prices will go is a risky game. There are myriad factors involved, ranging from jewellery demand in China (a key platinum driver) through to the more obvious stuff like catalytic converters and tariff risks. China is also a major factor in the lithium market, as are the supply and demand forces of AI-driven energy needs.

Sibanye can’t control external prices, but they can do their best to manage costs. Although all-in sustaining costs (AISC) per ounce was flat in the South African PGM business, it jumped by 15% in the South African gold business due to operating cost pressures and higher royalty taxes. The underground gold operations need to be managed carefully from a cost perspective.

The US PGM business needs to tighten up on costs, with AISC per ounce increasing by 14% year-on-year as production dipped. This is one of the hardest things about mining: when production falls, it’s a double-whammy as AISC inevitably increases and the margin per unit deteriorates.

With one quarter behind them, the company has left 2026 guidance unchanged. The share price closed 11.3% higher on the day.


Results of previous poll:


Nibbles:

  • Wesizwe Platinum (JSE: WEZ) is still trying to catch up on financial reporting and lift the suspension on the trading of its shares. They’ve released a trading statement dealing with the year ended December 2025, noting that HEPS swung from losses to profits – an increase of between 171% and 191%. The range is more useful than the percentage movement, with positive HEPS of between 8.64 cents and 11.08 cents. Results are due for release on 8 May.
  • Mantengu (JSE: MTU) has replaced the offtaker of its chrome. The legacy deal with RWE Supply & Trading seems to have had some difficult commercial terms around pricing, driving a negative impact on Mantengu’s numbers of R29 million in the previous interim period. The new deal with HMS Bergbau Africa (that sounds like the name of a ship!) has no such issue. Mantengu indicates that this commercial improvement should eliminate the recurrence of onerous terms, while delivering a route to market for Mantengu’s chrome.
  • ASP Isotopes (JSE: ISO) announced that subsidiary Quantum Leap Energy has further boosted its brains trust with the appointment of Dr. Peter Fiske to the strategic advisory board. Dr. Fiske comes with a long and impressive CV in the energy space in the US. It’s true that the company is being dressed up for its IPO, but it’s just as true that there is genuinely an incredible amount of talent in the organisation.

UNLOCK THE STOCK: CA Sales Holdings

Unlock the Stock is a platform designed to let retail investors experience life as a sell-side analyst.

Corporate management teams give a presentation and then we open the floor to an interactive Q&A session. I facilitate the Q&A alongside Mark Tobin of Coffee Microcaps and the team from Keyter Rech Investor Solutions.

We are grateful to the South African team from Lumi Global, who look after the webinar technology for us.

In the 70th edition of Unlock the Stock, CA Sales Holdings returned to the platform to talk about the recent numbers and the strategic outlook for the business.

Watch the recording here:

Ghost Bites (AB InBev | MC Mining)

AB InBev’s beer volumes increased this quarter (JSE: ANH)

South America clearly hasn’t heard about the reduced consumption trend

Alcohol sales are a difficult thing to predict.

The recent narrative has been focused on the reduction in consumption by health-conscious adults, especially Gen Zs who seem to be drinking far less than prior generations. It’s not about cutting alcohol entirely – it’s about having three drinks instead of four. If everyone did that, consumption would drop by 25%!

I’m not exactly sure what has driven the latest uptick in beer volumes. It could be a low base effect. It could also just be a more stressful world, with people seeking out fun experiences to offset the constant barrage of negative news. Whatever the cause, AB InBev’s beer volumes increased by 1.2% in the latest quarter – and that’s a big surprise.

The market was caught off-guard by this news, with the share price up 8.3%.

But if we dig deeper, was this really because of alcohol consumption, or just the social pressure of wanting to drink something other than a soft drink? No-alcohol beer volumes were up 27%. I’m not a subscriber to the “all of the calories, none of the fun” camp, but each to their own.

There are also low calorie and even gluten free options these days. I won’t mention this to my dad – it’s not worth the trauma it will cause him.

Corona is still winning in the post-pandemic era, demonstrating that one of the best marketing tricks possible is for a global flu to be named after your product. Corona achieved 16% growth outside of its home market. Mexico, Corona’s home market, is still a very important source of growth for AB InBev. Colombia and Brazil reported record beer volumes, so South America doesn’t seem to be showing much interest in reducing their consumption. In stark contrast, it’s the “Beyond Beer” portfolio that was a meaningful contributor in the United States. Regional tastes make a big difference to performance!

Another important source of growth is the distribution capability. Their marketplace gross merchandise value jumped by 55% – and this is for sales of third-party products. Overall, the BEES marketplace was up 15%. This makes it a great driver of revenue and an important source of risk mitigation in terms of reliance on other ways to distribute product.

The increase in volumes, combined with price hikes, took revenue 5.8% higher in constant currency terms. It was up a delightful 12.0% as reported, with currency movements being highly favourable in this period.

Normalised EBITDA is a slightly less encouraging story, up by 5.3%. Normalised EBITDA margin contracted by 15 basis points to 35.6%.

By the time you reach the bottom of the income statement, you’ll find that constant currency earnings per share increased by 8.8%. There’s clearly some leverage in this thing below the EBITDA line.

There’s little doubt that the ESG consultants have been all over AB InBev, with terms like Balanced Choices and Beyond Beer. It sounds a lot like British American Tobacco (JSE: BTI). But what investors actually care about is the numbers – and with numbers like these, the share price will find support in the market.

And in case you’re wondering, South Africa achieved record high volumes, with Corona up in the mid-twenties. Premium beer brands are showing the strongest growth here, with Carling Black Label only achieving low single digit revenue growth.

What has been the recent trend in the consumption of alcohol by you and your peer group?

304
Alcohol consumption trends

What has been the trend in your behaviour with alcohol?


Kinetic Development Group is now the 51% holder of MC Mining (JSE: MCZ)

The second tranche of the subscription has closed

MC Mining has one potentially very good asset (the Makhado Project) and some scrappy stuff that is perhaps best described as being in damage control mode.

To make the Makhado Project a reality, they attracted Kinetic Development Group (KDG) as a major investor. This is a big deal and a strong show of faith in South Africa by a foreign investor.

With the latest tranche now completed, KDG has a 51% stake in MC Mining. A substantial $90 million has flowed into MC Mining over the course of the share subscription agreement.

MC Mining has also reminded the market that KDG brings plenty of operational and technical expertise to the table as well, being a leading global coal operator listed in Hong Kong. They have deep relationships in China, which will be helpful during the construction and commissioning phase.

KDG has appointed two directors to the board of MC Mining, so these aren’t just empty promises about contributing time and expertise in addition to the capital.

Thanks to the funding received from KDG, the Makhado Project is in advanced construction phase and is making progress towards commissioning and joint trial operations. They are targeting 800,000 tonnes per annum in hard coking coal and 700,000 tonnes per annum in thermal coal.

The share price closed 8.7% higher on the day. Although the market knew that the money was coming, there’s nothing quite like confirmation of money in the bank.


Results of previous poll:


Nibbles:

  • Director dealings:
    • The COO of Nedbank (JSE: NED) sold share awards worth R10.4 million. These relate to older schemes and the announcement doesn’t specify that the sale is for tax, so I assume that it isn’t.
  • Here’s some good news for shareholders in Aspen (JSE: APN): the company has received approval from the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) to release the first commercial batches of human insulin manufactured for sale in South Africa. The facility in Gqeberha is manufacturing this insulin. Aspen close 5.6% higher on the day.

Ghost Bites (KAL Group | Metair | Pick n Pay | Vodacom)

Double-digit HEPS growth at KAL Group (JSE: KAL)

This looks like a strong outcome for shareholders

KAL Group has released a trading statement for the six months to March 2026. They’ve given some helpful underlying details around the drivers of performance, with HEPS expected to be up by between 10.5% and 14.5%.

Recurring HEPS, also an important metric, is up by between 13.1% and 17.1%. That’s a great set of numbers for investors, with the share price up 18.5% over the past 12 months.

To achieve this growth, KAL managed a 4.8% increase in retail revenue, a 7.4% increase in agri input revenue and a 6.7% increase in fuel volume sales.

My concern here would be the impact of the rapid increase in fuel prices on the fuel business in the second half of the year. A higher fuel price is worse for retail fuel businesses, not better. As I understand it, the retailer makes a similar amount per litre regardless of the fuel price, but consumption drops when prices skyrocket. It also means that consumers have less money to spend at the forecourt shop.

Still, on a modest Price/Earnings multiple and with a solid underlying business, they will hopefully weather the storm without too much pain for investors.

I’m curious – how do you plan to respond to higher fuel prices?

262
Fuel flexibility

How will you respond to much higher fuel prices?


Metair has achieved some breathing room on the balance sheet (JSE: MTA)

But at what cost?

Metair always seems to be on the receiving end of bad luck. But for once, they’ve been thrown a bone by the universe in the form of a refinanced debt package for the “SA Obligor” group.

In simple terms, the reference to “SA Obligor” means the debt linked to Hesto Harnesses and the remaining South African subsidiaries. When banks start carving up groups and lending based on specific underlying assets, you know the risks are tricky to manage.

Despite plenty of concern about the underlying automotive manufacturing industry, as well as the difficulties in turning AutoZone around (remember that it was acquired out of business rescue), Standard Bank has approved a refinancing of the debt package. This extends the term of the full R3.3 billion to five years, with a structured repayment profile that is closely aligned with the group’s expected earnings growth and cash flows.

Importantly, this takes into account the capex in the year ending December 2026. A feature of Metair’s business is that they incur significant capex when an underlying customer introduces a major new vehicle model. This means that a structured debt package rather than a traditional amortising loan is required.

Another critical improvement to the package is that the cumulative EBITDA performance hurdle has been removed. The group has been operating under the extreme pressure of quarterly EBITDA targets, something that is very difficult for a business like Metair. This gives them more flexibility and reduces the risk of forced equity raises and asset disposals.

They aren’t quite done yet, with a working capital facility of R600 million that will be subject to review during the third quarter of this year. For now at least, they’ve got room to breathe on the term debt.

And the cost of debt, you ask? The SENS announcement doesn’t confirm this. They simply note that the reference rate has changed from JIBAR to ZARONIA (no surprise there). I suspect that this additional balance sheet flexibility has come at a cost.

If you’re keen to learn more about Metair, you can check out the recording of the very recent Unlock the Stock presentation and Q&A session here.


Pick n Pay moves into a s189 process at store level (JSE: PIK)

They are trying to address their cost base

Pick n Pay’s turnaround has faltered recently. Well, to be honest, I’ve always been bearish on it, but the last set of numbers confirmed my beliefs that it would be much harder than most people realise.

Having upset the market back in February with a trading update, Pick n Pay has now announced a s189 process aimed at resetting the store labour model. They are specifically targeting scheduling flexibility and benefits and allowances, particularly those that aren’t in line with peers. The objective isn’t to reduce head count, although I’m sure the changes to remuneration will lead to some attrition along the way.

It’s important for the sustainability of companies to make sure they are running efficiently. It’s also a reminder that bad strategies lead to poor outcomes for all stakeholders, including employees. Head office employees have already been through retrenchment and salary freeze processes. They now need to unlock savings at store level.

On The Money Show with Stephen Grootes on Monday evening, I discussed the Pick n Pay situation and the immense difficulties they face in a wildly competitive grocery market. Specifically, I talked about Pick n Pay’s “right to win” (or lack thereof). You’ll find the segment here (8 minutes long).

The share price is down 32% over 12 months. It’s fallen by a nasty 23% on a year-to-date basis.


Even Vodacom is a growth company these days (JSE: VOD)

With macroeconomics holding steady, HEPS has jumped sharply

Get ready for a potentially significant move in Vodacom on Tuesday. The company released a trading statement after market close on Monday and it tells quite the positive story.

For the year ended March 2026, Vodacom’s HEPS increased by between 20% and 25%. That’s a really impressive growth rate, particularly for the telco that has historically been seen as the “safe” choice vs. sector wild child MTN (JSE: MTN).

Vodacom has upped the risk in recent years in pursuit of growth, with deals like the major push into Egypt. If the macroeconomics can keep it together in East Africa and Egypt, then Vodacom can pull off growth rates that will attract some attention away from rivals.


Results of previous poll:


Nibbles:

  • Trematon (JSE: TMT) has released the circular dealing with the proposed disposal of Club Mykonos Langebaan. This is a related party deal that would get this resort off Trematon’s balance sheet. The company uses the circular to remind investors that the original investment thesis was to obtain a casino licence. It was subsequently disposed of in 2017 for a “significant return” – leaving them with the fixed property and limited ways to really move the dial for shareholders. Then again, the Trematon CEO and related parties seem to want to own the asset, so this is where the inherent conflict of interest becomes difficult. The independent board justifies the deal by noting that a sale to an unrelated third party would require an extensive due diligence and more onerous profit warranties. Whilst there is truth to this argument, shareholders should always be alert to situations where companies are transacting with executive managers. You can read the circular here.
  • It’s technically still early days in the AttBid offer to RMB Holdings (JSE: RMH) shareholders, but there aren’t many acceptances at this point. Holders of only 0.4% of shares in issue have accepted the offer. Together with the current holdings of AttBid and Atterbury Property Fund (including some additional recent purchases), this would take the concert parties to a stake of 44.05%. The offer closes on 29 May, so there are still a few weeks to go. I’ve observed in other deals that most shareholders wait until the last minute to accept these things, preserving their optionality along the way.
  • Nampak (JSE: NPK) has announced the appointment of Thiru Naicker as CFO with effect from 1 August 2026, replacing Glenn Fullerton. Thiru has held a number of senior executive roles in the FMCG space, with the most recent being as Senior Finance Director Supply Chain at PepsiCo South Africa. This sounds like strong operational appointment rather than a helicopter CFO. Given Nampak’s business model, that makes a lot of sense.
  • A sad day at Sibanye-Stillwater (JSE: SSW) and a reminder of how dangerous the mining sector still is – during a route shaft inspection at the Kloof 8 shaft, an inspection platform detached and led to the fatal injury of two contractor employees. Shaft operation has been stopped while investigations take place.
  • Numeral (JSE: XII) has renewed the cautionary announcement regarding the restatement of the financials for the year ended February 2025. At this stage, the restatements remain subject to completion of the audit and are in line with the information announced by the company on 22 April.

Ghost Bites (Clientèle | Glencore | Merafe | MTN | Santova)

Dividend darling Clientèle wants to delist (JSE: CLI)

When shares trade at a discount for long enough, this is what happens

Clientèle is one of the companies on the JSE that has historically offered a fat dividend yield. This is because the market isn’t willing to pay up for the shares, despite the company generating decent growth at times.

Lack of liquidity in the shares creates a structural impediment for the valuation, as it means that institutional investors struggle to get involved here.

This creates the perfect conditions for a buyout offer.

In this case, Clientèle is giving investors a chance to remain invested in the delisted company. It’s always worth remembering that liquidity in unlisted companies is close to zero, so investors must think carefully here.

The offer price is 85% of the embedded value per share as at December 2025, which implies a base price of around R19.25. Before the news of the offer, the shares were trading at only R16.

The offer price escalates over time, with the company assuming an offer price of R19.90 with a payment date of 29 June 2026. An independent expert opinion on this price will be included in the circular that will be distributed to shareholders in due course.

It’s worth noting that there is also a process that will allow executive directors and members of management to subscribe for up to 4.8 million shares at the same price as the offer price. This will be funded by Clientèle Life on favourable terms, so you can essentially think of this as a management incentivisation programme.

There’s a maximum acceptance condition in this deal. If more than 8% of the offer shares are tendered in the offer, then the entire deal falls over. This should be fine, as irrevocable undertakings not to accept the offer are in place from holders of 93.08% of shares.

Holders of 30.74% of shares eligible to vote have already provided irrevocable undertakings to vote in favour of the delisting. There’s still a long way to go here, as they need 75% approval for the delisting.

The announcement also notes that Acacia Empowerment Investors (a subsidiary of the Hollard Foundation Trust) will invest over R270 million in new shares in Clientèle. This will help address the challenge of Black Ownership, which has dipped below 10%. It will also do wonders for Clientèle’s post-offer balance sheet. Technically, this subscription for shares isn’t inter-conditional with the delisting.


Glencore is telling a bullish story after Q1 (JSE: GLN)

With the share price up 40% year-to-date, the market was expecting nothing less

Glencore has released its production report for the first quarter of 2026. They’ve reiterated guidance for full year 2026, so things have gone to plan thus far in terms of production.

This doesn’t mean that there aren’t huge percentage movements on a year-on-year basis (like cobalt production down 39% and copper up 19%). It just means that they are running more or less in line with internal expectations and forecasts.

In the mining operations, the energy price spike is putting pressure on input costs. For now at least, price increases in commodities like copper, zinc and energy coal are more than offsetting the cost impacts, so Glencore has flagged margin expansion as a likely outcome this year.

But the real treat lies in the Marketing business, essentially Glencore’s energy trading activities. Glencore’s team has a reputation for being the Wall Street bankers of the mining sector. As the market expected, their brains trust made a killing this quarter. If they keep up the performance seen in Q1, they will “comfortably exceed” the top end of the long-term adjusted EBIT guidance range of $2.5 billion to $3.5 billion.

Remember: volatility is how trading houses make their money. This is exactly why I have long-term investments in US banks like JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs – global equity markets are highly interconnected places that regularly dish up dislocations that can be taken advantage of. Glencore does much the same thing in energy markets, so those who hit the BUY button on this stock in response to the war in Iran are certainly smiling.


Merafe should have an answer on electricity tariffs by June (JSE: MRF)

A public participation process will take place in May

Merafe shareholders are anxiously awaiting a solution to the crisis facing the company’s ferrochrome smelters. This is also relevant to shareholders in other companies like Afrimat (JSE: AFT), where the pain in the industry is being felt further up the value chain.

Engagements with Eskom and NERSA have been encouraging, with Eskom and Merafe agreeing on a proposed tariff that has been submitted to NERSA for consideration and approval.

A public participation process for the tariff will be held on 25 May. NERSA expects to publish a final decision by 15 June. Merafe is pushing the regulator as hard as possible, as a section 189 retrenchment process at Merafe hinges on the outcome.


MTN continues to print money in Nigeria (JSE: MTN)

The relative strength of the naira is supporting earnings

With Nigeria as a major oil producer, the recent spike in the oil price is supporting the economic story in that country. The naira actually strengthened against the US dollar during the first quarter of the year, giving MTN Nigeria a buffer against capex and other inflationary pressures.

This is really important, as currency movements have historically been a huge headache for MTN’s ambitions in the country. With all outstanding foreign currency loans repaid, they’ve derisked the business significantly.

The latest results are great, with service revenue up by a meaty 41.9%. You would expect data revenue to be doing well (up 56.2%), but a significant increase in voice revenue of 22.5% is a reminder that Nigeria is a frontier market with immense upside.

EBITDA jumped by 68.1%, with EBITDA margin expanding by 8.7 percentage points to 55.3%.

Capex increased by 92.8%, serving as the perfect reminder of how currency weakness can take capex to really difficult levels. Even with the strength of the naira, capex increased at a much faster rate than EBITDA. This is why free cash flow was up by “only” 55.6%.

MTN Nigeria is investing in network capacity and quality while the going is good. This is a sensible strategy, as they are playing the long game in the country. With smartphone penetration up by 5.5 percentage points to 66.2%, the growth opportunity in areas like data is clear.

Notably, with diesel costs locked in for Q1 and Q2, they have indicated a potential negative impact of 180 – 200 basis points on full year EBITDA margin if costs remain elevated. This is due to the energy component of tower lease costs.

At corporate level, they are looking at separating the fintech businesses from the rest of MTN Nigeria. This will allow MTN Group Fintech to take a 60% stake, with MTN Nigeria holding 40%. Activity like this is aimed at creating different entry points in the group for investors with specific mandates e.g. those who are only interested in the fintech business.

You might be wondering about the suspension of airtime credit services and the impact this had on the Optasia (JSE: OPA) share price. Optasia is down 11.5% year-to-date, with one of the factors being that MTN Nigeria has simply switched off the airtime and data credit offering due to the implementation of new regulatory processes.

Here’s the real concern though:

“Following the initial impact of the suspension, recharge patterns have continued to normalise as affected customers settle outstanding balances and maintain service usage. This has supported a progressive recovery in revenue driven by higher self-funded recharges.”

Correct me if I’m wrong here, but if MTN Nigeria can just switch off Optasia and then see a normalisation in demand, what exactly is Optasia’s moat?

Now that we’ve covered both Glencore and MTN today, give me your views on investing in the oil theme:


Santova clawed back some lost ground in the second half (JSE: SNV)

The full-year HEPS decline is far better than the interim numbers were

Santova has released a trading statement for the year ended February 2026. They have flagged a decline in HEPS of between 4.9% and 9.9%.

That’s not great of course, but it’s a whole lot better than the nasty decline in HEPS of 23.1% that shareholders were asked to stomach for the six months to August 2025.

Santova’s share price has bounced back strongly since the immense pressure it came under in the aftermath of those interim numbers:

With a 52-week low of R6.11 and a spot price of R8.15, those who bought the dip are solidly in the green. Investors will have to wait for 26th May to get the details on the improved financial performance in the second half of the financial year.


Results of the previous poll:


Nibbles:

  • Director dealings:
    • A director of Sasol (JSE: SOL) sold shares worth R2.25 million. The share price has more than doubled year-to-date thanks to the oil price spike.
    • An associate of a director of South Ocean Holdings (JSE: SOH) bought shares worth R193k.
  • In case you wanted more details on the excellent recent performance at CMH (JSE: CMH), the company has made the analyst presentation available on its website here.
  • MC Mining (JSE: MCZ) released an activities report for the three months to March 2026. They suspended operations at Uitkomst Colliery with effect from 1 March, so they are looking to minimise the pain there while they deliver the far more exciting Makhado Project. Kinetic Development Group has a 51% stake in MC Mining after investing a further $6 million during April 2026. This capital, along with the previous investments by Kinetic, is being used to develop Makhado into South Africa’s largest hard coking coal producer. Development work was slow at the beginning of the quarter due to flooding, but picked up towards the end. Hot commissioning activities and the start-up of the coal plant are scheduled for May 2026.
  • South32 (JSE: S32) released an update on the Taylor zinc-lead-silver project at Hermosa in the United States. Infill drilling programs have taken the life-of-mine to 33 years, an increase of 5 years since the final investment approval. At the adjacent Peake deposit, exploration activities have increased the Mineral Resource estimate by 32%. Unfortunately, there seem to be performance issues with the development contractor, with first production now expected in H2 FY28 and nameplate capacity by FY31. They are putting $3.3 billion into this project, with expected steady-state EBITDA of $650 million and a net present value of $3.1 billion. If spot prices hold, which is a very big “if”, then EBITDA would be $800 million and the net present value would be $4.5 billion. Mining development is a game of educated guesses.
  • Orion Minerals (JSE: ORN) released a quarterly update that reflects the company’s transition from an explorer to a base metals producer. The main achievement during the quarter was the finalisation of the agreements for the prepayment facility and concentrate offtake with Glencore (JSE: GLN). They are aiming to complete the remaining conditions precedent in the second quarter. The broader plan for the year is to commence the construction of the Uppers at Prieska Copper Zinc Mine and to finalise the optimisation studies at the Okiep Copper Project. Another useful milestone was the selection of Orion’s Northern Cape exploration portfolio for the 2026 BHP Xplor accelerator programme.
  • Kore Potash (JSE: KP2) added its name to the list of quarterly operating updates. There are various workstreams underway at the Kola Project. There’s also a party busy with a due diligence process on potentially acquiring the entire company, so current shareholders might be out of this thing before it even reaches production. But for now, absolutely nothing is guaranteed. The company had $8.3 million in cash as at 31 March 2026 to fund ongoing activities. They continue to engage with OWI-RAMS regarding financial packages for the full project, with development finance institutions having indicated the importance of Kola appointing a suitable contract operator. It seems like there are a bunch of moving parts and interdependencies at the moment.
  • Just to add insult to considerable injury, ArcelorMittal (JSE: ACL) released its audited financials for the year ended December 2025 along with a “change statement” – a rare thing on the JSE. It means that something changed between the initial financial release and the final audited accounts. There are a few changes, with one example being the impairment of a gas treatment plant by R112 million. This is a non-cash charge, but it’s still a perfect summary of the troubles that the group is currently dealing with.
  • Salungano (JSE: SLG) has released interim results for the six months to September 2025. As you can see, they are still catching up on their financial reporting. In this now very outdated period, normalised EBITDA jumped from R272 million to R511 million. HEPS was 38.48 cents vs. 21.56 cents in the comparable period. This was thanks to a sharp increase in the Moabsvelden mine’s production, as well as the restart of Vanggatfontein. Given the underlying momentum here, I’m sure the company is looking forward to being in a position to lift the trading suspension on its shares.
  • Zeder (JSE: ZED) shareholders have given near-unanimous approval to the transaction to dispose of Zaad. Only 0.01% of votes at the meeting were cast against the transaction.
  • enX (JSE: ENX) has now completed the disposal of the remaining 75% stake in West African International to Trichem SA. Just under R295 million has flowed, although there are still post-closing adjustments to work through. Once that has all happened, the board will consider a return of net surplus cash to shareholders.
  • Hammerson (JSE: HMN) announced that CFO Himanshu Raja will be retiring as a director on 12 August 2026 after the publication of results for the year ending June 2026. He’s served as CFO for five months and will stick around for a 12-month transition period. Richard Shaw, Deputy CFO, will become Interim CFO when Raja steps down.
  • In case you wondered whether we were firmly in a return-to-office environment in large corporates, Aspen (JSE: APN) announced the resignation of Group Chief Corporate Officer Reginald Haman due to his desire to relocate to the Western Cape. At that level, you would think that a relocation is something that could be managed without losing such a senior resource.
  • Heaven knows what the backstory is here, but Labat Africa (JSE: LAB) announced the removal of Farook Paruk as a director of the company based on “certain governance matters” and Paruk being the “subject of an external investigation” (with no conclusions reached at this stage). I can’t find any other information online on this matter.
  • Cilo Cybin Holdings (JSE: CCC) announced that Jessica Moodley-Theron has been appointed as acting CFO. She was already on the board as a non-executive director, with the switch in role necessitated by the resignation of the group CFO.
  • African Dawn Capital (JSE: ADW) is suspended from trading. They are way behind with financials, having been suspended since July 2025 for failure to release February 2025 accounts. They aim to catch up on the outstanding annual and interim financials by June 2026 – just in time to be behind on February 2026 numbers!
  • Trustco (JSE: TTO) is suspended from trading due to the time it has taken to finalise the appointment of auditors that meet the requirements for the dual-listed structure in Namibia and on the JSE. They are in the process of appointing suitable auditors from a JSE perspective, with the Namibian process ongoing at subsidiary and investee levels.
  • Globe Trade Centre (JSE: GTC) has almost no liquidity at all in its stock on the JSE. In case you are somehow sitting with shares here, you’ll want to know that the results for the year ended 31 December 2025 have been published. FFO (funds from operations) halved and the net LTV (loan-to-value) jumped from 52.7% to 57.0%. Ouch.

Hello hello, Art Nouveau

At the height of the Belle Époque, the Art Nouveau movement pushed back against industrial sameness with unapologetic beauty. As AI ushers in a new age of effortless production, that same tension between efficiency and aesthetics is beginning to surface again.

The little convenience centre close to my house – the one that I go to most often to do my shopping – is currently in the process of retiling its floors.

While I can understand why this is a necessary thing (the contrast between the few remaining old tiles and the new ones makes it clear just how worn and weathered the old ones really are), I can’t say that I am thrilled with the design choices that have been made here. For one thing, the retiling project required the removal of a lovely little water feature which (sadly) does not appear to be making a return. For another, the new tiles that have been installed are not just uninspiring: they are mindnumbingly, achingly plain. Almost offensively so.

I know I sound like a cranky old lady when I say this, and I promise that I still understand the logic behind these decisions. It all comes down to costs, right? Removing the water feature probably saves the centre a little bit of maintenance money every month, plus it frees up space for more vendors. Choosing a plain (boring), durable tile over something interesting or patterned is more cost-effective. With the economy where it is, now is probably not the moment to roll out the marble and mosaics.

I get it. But it does make me wonder: is late-stage capitalism responsible for making the world uglier?

A world without scarcity

A while ago, I read a short story called The Midas Plague, which was written by a man named Frederick Pohl way back in 1954. In this story, the author imagines a semi-utopian future world where energy is cheap and everything humanity needs is made in extravagant quantities by robots. With no labour to keep them busy, the humans in Pohl’s story occupy themselves mainly with consumption.

The Midas Plague is a brilliant illustration of what is known as a post-scarcity society. This is a theoretical economic situation where most of the goods we need can be produced in great abundance with minimal human labour. Since human labour is an expensive ingredient, removing it from the equation results in these goods being made available either very cheaply or freely. The defining feature of a post-scarcity society is that all people can easily have their basic survival needs met, along with some significant proportion of their desires for goods and services.

For all the naysayers who believe that artificial intelligence will lead humanity down a path of destruction and ruin, there is a slightly more optimistic group of thinkers that reckons AI could help us to take our first steps towards realising a post-scarcity society. While I acknowledge that I’m simplifying things quite a bit here (necessarily so, otherwise I’d be writing a novel), the concept of an AI-powered post-scarcity society where labour is optional and the standard of living is high is a fun thought experiment to play around with. And because I still can’t stop thinking about those dull shopping centre tiles, I’m preoccupied with what that kind of future would look like.

The golden age

Luckily, I don’t have to wonder about the design choices of a hypothetical utopian future. Not when history has already illustrated it in full colour.

There was a brief period in European history when the world thought it was close to achieving this. It’s known as La Belle Époque, or “the beautiful era”. From around 1871 to 1914, much of Western Europe experienced a stretch of relative peace that coincided with a wave of technological progress that must have felt, at the time, quite dizzying. Steel, chemicals, petroleum and electricity were all invented in a relatively short window of time. These advances reshaped entire systems of production and daily life. Welcome to the Second Industrial Revolution.

Goods became cheaper and easier to produce, cities expanded and modernised, and more people found themselves able to afford things that had previously been out of reach. Wages rose and standards of living improved to the point that people got used to the idea of having leisure time. There was, if not a universal sense of optimism, then at least a growing belief that society was moving in the right direction.

Knowing what we know now – that World War 1 was on its way, in 1914 – it is difficult not to read into all this optimism with a certain amount of caution. Still, to people living through La Belle Époque, there must have been a sense of positive momentum, or the feeling that a series of problems was being steadily and sensibly solved.

The downside of industrialisation

Still, progress rarely arrives without trade-offs, and one of the important shifts during this period had less to do with what was being made and more to do with how it was being made.

Industrialisation meant that production of all sorts of things moved from individual craftsmen to factories, which meant that objects that had once been shaped by hand quickly became standardised. Designs were repeated, ornament was simplified or removed, and in many cases, new products were less acts of invention than efficient approximations of older styles. None of this was especially controversial, because it all made perfect economic sense. If something can be produced faster and at a lower cost, there are very few incentives not to do so.

(Is anyone else getting a feeling of AI-deja vu, or is it just me?)

It was in the wake of this sweeping industrialisation that a group of artists and designers across Europe began to push back against the status quo.

The beautiful everyday

The result of this pushback was a visual movement known as Art Nouveau, which had its prime between 1890 and 1910.

Art Nouveau was essentially a blurring of the line between art and functional design. One of the movement’s key concerns was to confront the established hierarchy of fine art over applied art. This was done by intentionally giving prestige back to craftsmanship, rejecting ‘standard’ designs, and by designing everyday objects as if they were works of art.

So what did this look like? Lines that used to be straight and easily replicable suddenly curved and twisted into organic shapes, surfaces filled with patterns drawn from nature, and objects that had previously been treated as purely functional were approached with a new level of care and intention. A bus stop could carry the same visual weight as a sculpture, a poster for cigarettes could be designed as thoughtfully as a painting, and a staircase in a building could feel as though it had grown into its surroundings rather than been assembled from a set of interchangeable parts. There is in much of Art Nouveau a kind of deliberate excess, an unwillingness to settle for the merely adequate, and a dedication to using rare materials as if they were commonplace. If there was ever a movement that captured humanity’s desire to be surrounded by beauty, it was this one.

Sadly, this kind of excess couldn’t last. By 1911, global sentiments were already shifting towards the negative, and by the advent of World War 1 in 1914, the Nouveau bubble had burst. Time, energy and money that had been poured into making beautiful things was quickly redirected into war efforts. The rest, as they say, is history.

Is the next “beautiful era” waiting in the wings?

It is difficult not to see echoes of this pattern in the present moment, particularly in relation to AI. If the Second Industrial Revolution transformed how we produced physical goods, AI appears to be reshaping how we complete tasks – the kinds of things that, until recently, required a combination of time, effort, and specialised skill. Increasingly, these can be generated quickly, at low cost, and at a scale that would have been difficult to imagine even a few years ago.

If previous cycles are anything to go by, the response to this newfound ease of production will not be a wholesale rejection of new technologies, but a gradual rebalancing. As certain forms of production become easier and more widespread, other attributes tend to gain importance: the visible investment of time, the sense of intentionality, the little irregularities that signal human involvement. These are not new values, but they tend to become more noticeable when they are no longer ubiquitous.

All of this suggests that it is at least possible that we are approaching the conditions for something resembling another “beautiful era,” even if it does not take the same form as the Belle Époque. History suggests that when people have the means to do so, they do not simply settle for adequacy; they experiment, embellish, and, at times, push things to excess. The result is not always consistent, but it can produce periods of remarkable creativity and visual richness.

Maybe in a decade, the little centre near my home will retile its floors again. Could it be possible that when that time comes, a different sensibility will inform the choice of tiles? Will we be at a point once more where the aesthetic qualities of our surroundings matter more to us than their cost?

This artist remains optimistic.

About the author: Dominique Olivier

Dominique Olivier is the founder of human.writer, where she uses her love of storytelling and ideation to help brands solve problems.

Her first book, Lessons from Loss, has been published by Penguin Random House.

She is a weekly columnist in Ghost Mail and collaborates with The Finance Ghost on Ghost Mail Weekender, a Sunday publication designed to help you be more interesting.

Dominique can be reached on LinkedIn here.

Verified by MonsterInsights