An interesting segmental story at Argent Industrial (JSE: ART)
And a strong group performance overall
Argent Industrial released results for the six months to September 2025. They look solid to say the least, with revenue up 12.4%, EBITDA up 13.2% and HEPS increasing by 13.3%. That’s quite an unusual shape, as there isn’t much margin expansion despite a strong top-line performance.
The segmental story is rather interesting. In South Africa, revenue was down 3.1% and profit increased by 9.6%. In the Rest of World segment, which contributed over two-thirds of group profit in this period, revenue was up 38% and profit only increased by 13.5%. It’s amazing how the group margin can look so steady, yet the underlying segments experienced significant changes. This is true for so many companies out there, particularly when they are making acquisitions and bringing in businesses that have structurally different margins.
City Lodge: I’m very happily in the green (JSE: CLH)
And all you needed to do was read the previous announcement (or Ghost Bites)
When I wrote about City Lodge in early September based on earnings for the year ended June 2025, I included this paragraph:
“We now get to the particularly good news: July and August 2025 saw an uptick in occupancy of 400 basis points year-on-year. Food and beverage revenues jumped by 16% and 14% for July and August respectively. To add to this, the group is now debt free. Perhaps it’s time for that share price chart to start heading back into the green?”
I thought about it for a bit, tested the thesis with a few people and then decided to go long myself. The market just wasn’t picking up on this uptick in occupancy, so it struck me as an opportunity.
I’m now up 25% thanks to the market taking its sweet time to catch onto what the company was saying. That’s exactly why investors talk about the opportunity to generate alpha (returns in excess of the market) in local stocks, particularly among mid-caps that are big enough to matter and small enough to fly under the radar of most investors.
The latest operational update at City Lodge only adds to the good news, with the company noting a 460 basis points uptick in occupancy for the four months to October 2025. Combined with an inflationary increase of 3% in average room rates, things are looking good. November month-to-date is even better, with occupancy up by a whopping 800 basis points year-on-year to 65%!
You won’t find a more up-to-date view than this: the announcement notes that group occupancy “last night” was 90.7%. That’s fantastic at this relatively early stage in the holiday season.
The good news continues in the food and beverage business, where the first four months were up 16%. In November, they are up 32% thus far!
Looking beyond our borders, Botswana is struggling due to diamond industry pressures among other reasons, but they have seen some recent improvement. Namibia is doing well. Mozambique seems to be on the up.
To add to the happiness, City Lodge repurchased 6.1% of shares in issue (measured at at the beginning of the 2026 financial year) at an average price of R4.00 per share. The share price is now trading above R5.
There are some great companies on the local market that get ignored by investors until all the best returns have been made. Sometimes, all you need to do is read and pick up the bread crumbs that management is leaving for you.
A reminder from Crookes Brothers that agriculture is really hard (JSE: CKS)
There are just so many exogenous factors in this industry
Business is hard enough when you’re able to control most of the things that affect your profitability. In some sectors, the biggest drivers of earnings are external, which means that management focuses on “controlling the controllables” while asking the deity of their choice for help with the rest.
A trading statement from Crookes Brothers for the six months to September lays bare the difficulties in the agriculture sector. HEPS is expected to drop by between 42% and 46%, driven mostly by softer commodity prices (beyond their control) and extreme weather events that hit the banana and macadamia segments (also beyond their control).
It’s hard to think of a tougher industry!
Steady funds from operations at Delta Property (JSE: DLT)
This is quite the achievement for this group
If you’ve ever watched a movie where somebody is digging their way out of a jail cell with a spoon, then you’ll have some idea of how hard things have been for Delta. With a loan-to-value ratio that is too high and a property portfolio that is filled with difficult buildings, they’ve had to chip away at the debt by selling off properties as often as they can.
Kudos to management: persistence has paid off. The share price is up nearly 70% year-to-date as this speculative play has paid off for those who took a punt. The main reason for the upswing is that the company has stabilised, with funds from operations per share actually increasing from 8.1 cents to 9.2 cents. Combined with a loan-to-value ratio that has improved from 59.5% to 58.4%, it seems that the worst is behind them.
They still have plenty of vacancies to try and fill, with the vacancy rate improving from 31.9% to 29.7%. They are achieving this through new leases and the disposal of properties that they can’t fill.
With a 100% rental collection rate (!) and now a decrease in interest rates in South Africa, it feels like things will start to get easier for Delta.
Kore Potash has raised capital to cover the next 12 months (JSE: KP2)
This removes the near-term pressure and allows them to properly consider any offers
Based on recent announcements, we know that Kore Potash has attracted some potential suitors. This isn’t a surprise, as the company has gotten through some major hurdles related to the Kola Project in the Republic of Congo. This puts it at an interesting point on the risk/reward curve.
My concern was that the balance sheet would force Kore Potash to act too quickly on these negotiations, as they need capital to move forward with the project. The company has addressed this issue by raising $12.2 million with existing shareholders and new institutional and other investors.
They need $2.2 million for the final payment to PowerChina International Group, as well as $3 million for advisory and legal costs. The rest is going on other costs and general working capital.
They might be able to raise more, as the two largest shareholders (the Oman Investment Authority and Sociedad Química y Minera) each have the opportunity to invest in more shares to avoid being diluted. Such an investment would be in addition to this $12.2 million raised elsewhere.
Return on Equity has dipped at Investec (JSE: INL | JSE: INP)
Earnings might have grown modestly, but ROE matters more
Investec’s share price fell 5.2% on Thursday in response to the release of results for the six months to September 2025. The banking group grew revenue by 2.4%, adjusted operating profit by 1.5% and HEPS by 3.4% (all measured in ZAR).
The currency plays a big role here due to the extent of UK business interests. Expressing those numbers in GBP leads to negative growth in revenue and adjusted operating profit, with just 0.3% growth in HEPS.
ROE is where the rubber hits the road in banking. Investors care about the returns that the bank can achieve with their capital, so ROE tends to be a major driver of the valuation multiple for a banking group. Investec’s ROE has unfortunately dipped from 13.9% to 13.6%. Combined with low growth, this would’ve contributed to the drop in the share price as the market digested the numbers. The mitigating factor from a valuation perspective is that the tangible NAV per share increased by 7.9% in ZAR.
Net core loans increased by 8%, but declining interest rates and lower income in the SA investments portfolio led to pre-provision adjusted operating profit decreasing by 2.6%. The credit loss ratio on core loans was 35 basis points, an improvement vs. 42 basis points in the comparable period and well within the target range. The reason for the decline in earnings is more to do with pricing rather than concerns around credit quality.
An interesting nugget is that trading and investment income is down in SA, as the base period included the sharp upswing in sentiment from the formation of the GNU.
Investec expects second-half performance to be broadly in line with the interim period, so there isn’t much for investors to feel excited about there. The group needs to show some progress on moving ROE higher despite the interest rate decreases that will impact margins.
Excellent numbers at Lewis (JSE: LEW)
Margins are up and the footprint has expanded rapidly
Lewis has released results for the six months to September 2025. The group has a strong reputation for turning difficult operating conditions into great numbers. And in this period, they took a more bullish view on the environment by opening more new stores in a six-month period than ever before.
Revenue was up 11.3% overall, including solid contributions from value-added lines like insurance revenue. If we focus purely on merchandise sales, we find total growth of 6.7% and comparable store sales of 2.3%.
Notably, cash sales were up 3.7% and credit sales were up 8.0%. It’s not a surprise seeing this, particularly as the furniture sector has always been reliant on credit sales. At Lewis, credit sales are 70.3% of total merchandise sales.
Cost growth of 10% was impacted by the store rollout programme, so it would be best to compare this number to total revenue growth rather than comparable store sales.
Operating profit was up by a juicy 21.4% as the operating margin moved 250 basis points higher to 20.7%. HEPS came in 16% higher, with a jump in net finance costs blunting the story between operating profit and HEPS.
The interim dividend increased by 12.3%. When you consider the rapid expansion and capex investment as the backdrop to this story, double-digit growth in the dividend is impressive.
For the remainder of the year, the expansion in store footprint will focus on specialist bedding brands. And although management doesn’t explicitly say it, it’s worth remembering that the second half of the year is up against a base period that includes the two-pot boost.
Mr Price: an earnings rally, but can it break out of the current range? (JSE: MRP)
This is my long position in the sector
The apparel retail sector has been a fascinating story to follow this year. Just take a look at the year-to-date chart:
The only position I hold of these four names is Mr Price. I bought at an in-price of R203.05, as my view is that it was the baby thrown out with with the bathwater – The Foschini Group (JSE: TFG) and Truworths (JSE: TRU).
It’s been a sideways story for a couple of months, with my position now 8% in the green thanks to a 7% rally on the day of results at Mr Price. I’m certainly hoping for more obviously, with the idea being that Mr Price closes some of the gap to Pepkor (JSE: PPH).
So, what do the numbers at Mr Price for the 26 weeks to 27 September tell us?
Firstly, total revenue is up 5.4% and gross margin expanded by 30 basis points to 40.0%, so that’s an encouraging start. Operating margin was up 10 basis points to 11.5%. This means there was some margin expansion, but not as much as I would’ve liked to see based on that gross margin expansion. By the time we reach the bottom of the income statement, diluted HEPS was up 6.4%.
In-store sales were up 5.4% and online sales were up 9.7%, so Mr Price is responding to the omnichannel opportunity rather than playing any kind of leading role in it. They increased their weighted average trading space by 3.5%.
Mr Price is primarily a cash model, which is one of the things I like most about it. Cash sales were 88.2% of retail sales and increased 5.6%, while credit sales grew by just 4.3%.
Looking deeper into the business, the Telecoms segment was the best performer with retail sales up by 12.4%. It only contributes 3.8% to group sales though, so it won’t move the dial by itself.
The Home segment contributes 17.7% and is thus more important than Telecoms, with growth of 5.1%. Within that segment, Yuppiechef has continued its excellent performance with double-digit growth.
The Apparel segment is 78.5% of group sales and grew by 5.3%, with the expanded gross margin being particularly impressive when you compare this to the numbers we’ve seen elsewhere in the SA apparel sector.
The balance sheet is in excellent shape, with no debt and cash of around R3 billion to fund capex and other growth opportunities.
Mr Price has flagged a tougher second half in terms of year-on-year comparison, as the prior period included the boost from two-pot withdrawals. On the plus side, operational improvements at the Durban port have positively impacted the inventory position. For the first 7 weeks of the new period, retail sales are up 3.3% against a base period that grew 12.3%, so that’s an acceptable two-year stack.
I’m happy with this. Mr Price is strongly outperforming The Foschini Group and Truworths. It might be lagging behind Pepkor, but it’s doing so with cash sales rather than meaningful credit exposure. I feel like I bought at the right time (more or less).
A juicy jump in earnings at Netcare (JSE: NTC)
They’ve carried on where they left off in the interim period
Netcare has had a fantastic year. In a trading statement for the year ended September 2025, they’ve highlighted a jump in adjusted HEPS of between 19% and 22%. This is a lovely continuation from the interim period, where adjusted HEPS was up 20%.
In case you’re wondering, HEPS (without adjustments) is up by between 17% and 20%, so don’t let the adjustments scare you. It’s been a great year for them.
There are a number of drivers of these earnings, ranging from better activity through to cost efficiencies, lower interest rates and the benefit of share buybacks.
Despite this, the share price is basically flat year-to-date, having been on a wild journey that looks like the side profile of a pre-G20 Sandton pavement:
Full details will be released on 24 November. I look forward to understanding more about the performance.
A vastly better second half at Reunert (JSE: RLO)
Can they capitalise on this momentum?
Reunert has released results for the year ended September. Revenue from continuing operations was down 2% and operating profit fell 8%, while HEPS was down 5%. That’s not great.
But here’s the thing: compared to the interim results, these numbers look fantastic. Reunert was down 5% in revenue and 20% in HEPS at the halfway mark. With a 6% improvement in HEPS in the second half of the year, they’ve managed to stem the bleeding. They will hope to carry that momentum into the new year.
Another positive element to these numbers is the cash flow. The final dividend was up 6% and net cash jumped by 39%, so this is very much a story of cash generation in a difficult environment. I guess that’s better than poor cash flow in a strong environment, but it’s still not exactly what shareholders want to see.
With all to play for in a new financial year, Reunert will hope for improvement in the Electrical Engineering segment in particular. Revenue was down 3% and operating profit tanked 31% in this part of the business, with the double whammy of weak infrastructure investment in South Africa and the impact of tariffs on exports to the US.
The ICT sector also had a tough time, with flat revenue and a 9% reduction in operating profit. In Applied Electronics, revenue was down by 7%, but operating profit jumped by 21% as they focused on margins. The Defence business has a strongly positive narrative and the Renewable Energy business grew EBITDA year-on-year.
The share price is showing strong momentum now, with a long way to go to get back to where it started this year:
Supermarket Income REIT buys more “omnichannel stores” (JSE: SRI)
This shows you how entrenched the omnichannel model is in Europe
South African online shopping penetration is still way below what you’ll see in markets like the UK. It is growing rapidly though, with companies like Shoprite (JSE: SHP) and The Foschini Group (JSE: TFG) leading the way in their respective sectors, while competitors hustle to try and catch up. As a sign of where we might get to in South Africa, we can look to Supermarket Income REIT in the UK.
This company recently announced the acquisition of a portfolio of Carrefour supermarkets in France that were seen as “omnichannel stores” – the rents are affordable and the catchment area is lucrative.
This language has come through once more in the latest announcement for an acquisition of 10 Asda supermarkets in the Blue Owl Capital joint venture. Much like the Carrefour deal, this is also a sale and leaseback transaction. The Asda supermarkets have 25-year leases and annual CPI-linked rent reviews with a cap of 4% and a floor of 1%. They are described as stores that support online fulfilment and click-and-collect services. In modern retail, stores are just an extension of the distribution network.
Supermarket Income REIT is also transferring five of its assets into the joint venture to help it achieve scale. The assets are being transferred at a 3% premium to book value and the company will receive an annual management fee.
Nibbles:
Director dealings:
The CEO of Mondi (JSE: MNP) bought shares worth just over R4.7 million.
A non-executive director of Brait (JSE: BAT) bought shares worth R660k. Separately, Christo Wiese (acting through Titan Premier Investments) bought shares worth R3.7 million.
ASP Isotopes (JSE: ISO) released its quarterly numbers for the period ended September. The company is putting in place the route to market for its products and is preparing Quantum Leap Energy for a distinct listing, so the market value and the investment thesis aren’t really based on current numbers. Still, bulls will need to be comfortable with a net loss for the quarter of $12.9 million vs. a loss of $7.3 million in the comparable quarter. The year-to-date comparison is even more severe, with a loss of $96.4 million vs. $23.2 million.
Here are some interesting numbers at Deneb (JSE: DNB): a trading statement for the period ended September 2025 reflects an expected jump in HEPS of between 91% and 111%. This means that earnings have roughly doubled! I look forward to seeing the detailed results on 27 November.
Renewable energy may be a lovely asset class for people to feel good about the world, but it’s by no means a licence to print money. Power generation is variable based on Mother Nature herself, plus there are all of the usual maintenance and other issues to think about. Mahube Infrastructure (JSE: MHB) demonstrates this with a trading statement for the six months to August, where negative fair value movements have made them swing from positive HEPS of 67.58 cents to a headline loss of between 30.77 cents and 34.01 cents. They also flagged lower dividend income from underlying investments due to operational challenges at one of the wind assets. Full details should become available on 28 November.
It might be time to get the popcorn out for Trustco (JSE: TTO), as the company has announced that Riskowitz Value Fund has demanded a shareholders’ meeting to consider the appointment of a new board of directors. The company is considering the validity of the demand and will make a further announcement in due course.
Here’s an interesting one for you: Brait (JSE: BAT) has hedged part of its stake in Premier (JSE: PMR), giving them protection (on that portion) from the Premier share price dropping below R166.69. They also give away any upside above R186.16. Premier is currently trading at just over R167, so they are locking in some of the recent gains. This structure reduces Brait’s economic interest in Premier from 32.3% to 28.7%.
In case you’ve been wondering, Orion Minerals (JSE: ORN) has updated the market on the financing and offtake agreement with Glencore (JSE: GLN). Glencore is in the final stages of its technical and financial due diligence, while the legal due diligence has been largely completed. The parties are working towards binding terms for the deal. They expect to sign docs by the middle of December.
Spear REIT (JSE: SEA) announced that the acquisition of Berg River Business Park in Paarl for just over R182 million has been completed. Their loan-to-value ratio after the deal is sitting on between 21% and 22%. For context around the relative size of this deal, the gross portfolio value is now R6.39 billion.
Labat Africa (JSE: LAB) announced that the Classic Transaction has been completed and all profit warranty conditions have been met. The 116.5 million shares related to this acquisition have been issued and listed at an issue price of R0.07. The share price is currently around R0.05.
Africa Bitcoin Corporation (JSE: BAC) announced that Forvis Mazars South Africa has been appointed as the group’s external auditor. This doesn’t surprise me at all, as Wiehann Olivier (the audit partner) has particular interest in crypto. Look out for a podcast with him coming soon on the topic of blockchain and regulation in that space!
Efora Energy (JSE: EEL) has released a bland cautionary about “various negotiations” that could affect the company’s securities. The company is suspended from trading anyway.
Duma Mxenge (Head of Business and Market Development at Satrix) joined me right at the start of the year to talk about some of the things we would be looking out for in the markets this year. With the benefit of hindsight, we could now dig into some of our winners, overall surprises and missed opportunities in 2025.
We also took the opportunity to talk about the nuances for entrepreneurs when it comes to personal financial management. Drawing on my own experience, I shared some of the strategies I use for dealing with variable income. As Duma has these conversations with other entrepreneurs on a regular basis, he threw some great insights into the mix about how entrepreneurs tend to think about their wealth creation journeys – and the biggest mistake they make: treating their businesses as their retirement plans.
Satrix Investments (Pty) Ltd & Satrix Managers (RF) (Pty) Ltd is an authorised financial services provider. The information does not constitute advice as contemplated in FAIS. Use or rely on this information at your own risk. Consult your Financial Adviser before making an investment decision. While every effort has been made to ensure the reasonableness and accuracy of the information contained in this document (“the information”), the FSP’s, its shareholders, subsidiaries, clients, agents, officers and employees do not make any representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or suitability of the information and shall not be held responsible and disclaims all liability for any loss, liability and damage whatsoever suffered as a result of or which may be attributable, directly or indirectly, to any use of or reliance upon the information. For more information, visit https://satrix.co.za/products.
Full Transcript:
The Finance Ghost: Welcome to this episode of the Ghost Stories podcast. It’s another one with Satrix and with a gentleman who I always just really enjoy chatting to. That is Duma Mxenge. He is the Head of Business and Market Development at Satrix.
Duma, I always enjoy these podcasts with you. The last one we did was like 10 months ago. We seem to always do the annual kickoff show and then you go off, get into the washing machine of life and get basically thrown around for 10 or 11 months, as do I. Then someone presses pause and says, “Wait, these two should speak to each other again.” And here we are, to do exactly that. So, welcome!
Duma Mxenge: Thank you! And I’m excited to be back on your podcast, Ghost. Thank you for having me.
The Finance Ghost: No, it’s a great pleasure. It always is. So, let’s jump straight into it and let’s look back on the 10 months or so since we spoke. I’m curious about what some of the wins have been in the market that might have surprised you. Specifically your biggest win (if you’re willing to share), otherwise, any of the wins that you might have observed out there as well. And as I said, was it a surprise? Was it something that you expected? Give us the good news part of the report card here.
Duma Mxenge: I guess I can’t speak of my own book. My approach, I have to be honest, is that I etcetera. What I tend to do is once a year, annually, I kind of sit down, look at the trends – so based on what we’re seeing in 2024, what we think 2025 would look like. And then on the back of that, I try and think, “Okay, cool, so how do I then position my portfolio?”
And when we talk about that, I kind of think of it, Ghost, in three buckets. Your savings bucket remains the same, so it’s either in money markets or your income funds as well (or flexible income, if you’re into that). Then, when you get to your medium-term bucket, like three to five years – I typically put it into balance funds.
The position that I’m going to talk about here is more in the bucket of more than five years, which is more wealth creation or aligning it as a complementary to my retirement.
And essentially what I’ve done is pretty simple, basic weightings. I’ve got 30% in the local market (because I feel like I’ve got a better understanding of the local market) – and that’s normal ETFs – the Satrix Top 40. And then offshore, it’s been a mixture of the developed world versus the developing market, so I’ve got a slight overweight to emerging markets. I kind of like the story, especially in terms of what’s happening in China as well as in India, so I did that in December.
But then you had tariffs. You’re like, “Oh my goodness, what’s going on? Like, shucks, man – should I be doing anything?” And over and above that – obviously you’ve got your own personal portfolio, so I don’t know how you felt – you’re also having clients saying: “Is this the time now to sort of sit out on the market?” I’m like, “No, no, that’s not what you do. This is a long-term portfolio. You’ve made this decision, stick it out.”
But I have to say that, 10 months later, the local market has been roaring. I think we’ll get into it in terms of what the drivers were. And with the offshore market, I think my overweight to emerging market versus DM has actually also benefited quite handsomely. I’ve missed stuff, but I want to hear you before I share stuff that I’ve missed in the local market.
The Finance Ghost: Yeah, look, there are always misses, right? A couple of things that I just want to comment on there which I really love: So, having the different buckets – it’s great. I think people can take a lot from that. And that’s really just risk buckets at the end of the day. It’s the immediate emergency fund stuff, then it’s, “Okay, beyond that, I need stuff that I can at least have access to if I need it, but it’s earning a decent return.” And then there’s, as you say, the “over-five-years wealth-creation, pure-equity-risk” bucket.
And I actually think it’s pretty cool that you sit once a year, figure out what you want to do, allocate accordingly (or at least have a plan accordingly – whether you allocate during the year or not), and then look again down the line or if there’s something major that’s changed, while you get on with your day job.
That’s a very healthy relationship with investing, and I think a lot of people could do well by emulating some of that. There are far too many people who treat the market like an overexcited Jack Russell that’s just barking all the time: “You must give it attention. I have to do something now.” That’s not true. Not doing something is also a choice, and just leaving your money to compound is actually often the smartest choice.
I would encourage listeners to go listen to the podcast with Kingsley from Satrix, which would have been released just before this one. Go and have a look because there we actually spoke about how valuable it would have been to buy the dot-com crisis and then just ride it out. Now, obviously, that’s one specific example that’s worked out brilliantly, but there’s a good lesson in there.
JSE Top 40, Duma – I can’t believe you’re doing this podcast. Aren’t you retired on a yacht, if you had a lot of Top 40 this year? You’re basically a gold baron. Well done!
Duma Mxenge: It was purely by diversification! There was no super thinking around that. I’ve really benefited from being in the right portfolio that actually gives you the right exposure in terms of what has done well in the South African market.
The Finance Ghost: Well, well done, because it certainly did do well, and you would have done very well out of it, so good job. I’ll touch on a couple of my winners. I’ve had a few that have made me very happy this year.
So, I really timed it beautifully with Prosus right at the start of the year. Share price did this weird reaction to something that happened and I thought, “No, no, no. I really like the new CEO. I’ve been waiting to get in.” It’s kind of been on my watch list. I was waiting for weakness. And my Prosus position is up 80%, so that’s rather delightful.
Duma Mxenge: Nice!
The Finance Ghost: International tech has obviously continued to do the things. I’m mildly terrified about when this bubble pops, not if this bubble pops. But all of those companies are in my over-five-years bucket, like yours. And the reality is, if/when it pops and things drop hard, I’m waiting. I’m waiting at the bottom, thank you very much. I’ll add to my favourite positions that I hope will make a lot of money for me over literally decades.
Duma Mxenge: I see. So you’re saying you’re not in, you’re waiting.
The Finance Ghost: No, I’m in. I’m in! I’m just waiting to buy more. The point is I’m not selling, so I am deeply in. I continue to have to manage myself in terms of not taking profit and not saying, “Oh, the run is over. Let me get out.” Because then obviously you create a tax event for yourself, is the first point. And the second point is that it can just keep going. And even if it goes another 50% and then it drops 20%, guess what? It wasn’t a smart move to wait for the drop. You still lost out.
So, that’s the point: it’s hard to time these things. Timing the sale is really difficult. I think timing a sensible purchase, in some ways, is easier. That has started to become my approach to the market.
Another single-stock win that I’ll call out: Weaver Fintech. There’s a local one for you. Really happy with how that’s gone, the little buy-now-pay-later business. That’s up more than 50% since I bought.
And then ETFs. So, tech, as I spoke about – I’ve still got some nice exposure into some of those.
What we spoke about at the beginning of this year (you may recall we did a bit of a rent-versus-buy situation). I said to you that for the time being, I’m positioning a good chunk of my tax-free savings in REITs, because I think there’s still some upside in some of those property names. They’re paying good yields. That has pretty much been what’s happened, and the propertymarket has gone from strength to strength. They’re doing capital raising now, which is always a sign that things are getting a little bit hot, but not quite there. So, that’s still a healthy market. I’m still very happy with that.
I haven’t bought a house. I did change the target area, but we’re not going to… we won’t get into all the details on that. If someone wants to listen to rent-versus-buy in detail, go find the podcast I did with Duma earlier this year. TL;DR: I’m still renting, still happy with that. Still buying REITs in my tax-free savings account.
Those have been some of the wins. I can’t say that any of them have been massive surprises, because I bought the stuff I bought because I thought it would do well (if that makes sense). So, it’s more the stuff that I maybe missed. I had some gold. Obviously, I wish I had all the gold. That would have been amazing. Everyone wishes that, that’s just how it goes.
What’s been your biggest disappointment? Because I’ve definitely had a couple of those.
Duma Mxenge: It is exactly the same thing that you just mentioned – it’s more the misses than disappointment in the current environment. And for me, it’s gold, definitely. And as well as resources, more like the RESI, because our RESI has done exceptionally well. I give myself a little bit of leeway and say, “Look, I really didn’t do the work.”
And not having done the work, and now you want to participate on the next biggest craze. It’s also problematic because you’re going in for the wrong reasons. You’re going in because everyone else is talking about that specific asset class or that specific strategy.
So, what I’ve actually now told myself is, again now in December when things quiet down, I do want to spend some time just understanding the resource market – in terms of where that’s going. Whether it’s going to persist. There are also talks about how the central banks are concerned about the policy stance of the US trying to undervalue the US currency in order to compensate for the tariffs around trade. Which means that central bankers will buy more gold, so the gold bulls are saying this thing is going to continue.
I want to spend some time just getting my own understanding and my own position in terms of: is this an asset class that I want to actually take a strategic weight in from my equity exposure? Maybe a 1% or 2% of my total portfolio. So those are the things I’m weighing up at the moment.
The Finance Ghost: Yeah, that’s the topic on everyone’s lips at the moment. And at the time we are recording this (it’ll go out a couple of weeks later) we’ve actually finally seen gold roll over a bit. It’s dipped back below $4,000 an ounce. So, I had a look, the Satrix RESI ETF, which is a really nice pure way… it’s not a gold ETF, it’s the resources index, but because of the shape of the South African market there’s a lot of gold in there.
And that ETF is up year-to-date 87%, at time of recording, but it has come off pretty hard from the 52-week high. Let me actually just work it out quickly because it’s fun. You see, these are the dorky things I do, is look at things like, “Oh, how far off the high is it?” Anyway, it’s over 18% off, roughly, from recent highs. That’s a nice little healthy correction there.
And I am actually looking at doing a bit of rotation in my tax-free savings account, so the RESI is kind of on my shopping list, but I’d like it to come down more.
I think there are a lot of good reasons why gold long-term remains solid. I mean, you’ve raised them there: it’s the state of play in central bank policies, etcetera, etcetera. But, things do correct. Things get hot, they extend, then they come back – It’s how markets work. If you can kind of time those pullbacks nicely…
Duma Mxenge: It’s all about valuations, so you want to get in at the right time. Even from a tariff perspective, the US obviously has slapped tariffs on different sectors of the market.
And the only market that actually hasn’t been taxed or given the tariff is the precious metals, because the US wants them. So that’s at zero, which means that there’ll still be demand for those specific commodities, as well as that specific sector, so that sector will probably continue to do well.
But you want to get in at the right time. You don’t want to overpay for a sector or a company.
The Finance Ghost: Yeah, it doesn’t matter what you buy – if you overpay, it’s going to be trouble.
And the other thing in the RESI is to look at the platinum group metals miners – the PGMs are on a charge at the moment. The narrative coming out of all of the international car companies is that they assumed too much around electric vehicles. The Europeans just keep pushing this narrative and the rest of the world is really not as interested in EVs as they are. So that’s good for PGMs, because that’s the primary use for them. It’s good for the South African economy, thank goodness. We’ll take the wins where we can get them. We need the money to be flowing into Rustenburg.
Duma Mxenge: Like the greylisting – we’ll take it. We need all the good news.
The Finance Ghost: No, we do. We absolutely need the good news. We do a lot of things wrong and we make things harder for ourselves. It’s like Bafana qualifying. We made it as hard as possible. That’s what we do with our economy as well!
Anyway, biggest disappointments my side, Duma – I’d love to be able to tell you that it’s only things I missed. Unfortunately, it’s things I own, so that’s a bit sad, but it is what it is.
I wish I’d sold Cashbuild at the end of last year, because I bought it at the right time last year and then rode that kind of post-GNU exuberance. It got very silly. And I should have let it go, but I was like, “No, I don’t want to let it go. It’s a long-term thing.” Anyway, it’s ridden all the way back down. So, I recently added some more – because Cashbuild now is a better company than it was a year ago when I bought it and it’s at roughly the same price.
So, fair enough, it’s still in the long-term bucket. I still like the underlying story around them just ticking things up over time, interest rates hopefully will come down. It’s just some exposure that I do want in my portfolio. That’s a small position, though. And there it’s just profits that I missed out on taking, rather than in the red.
There are places where I am in the red. Lululemon, by far the worst one in the US market – that has turned into a lemon. It’s not great. Apparel brands, hey. You invest in apparel and FMCG at own risk. You really do. The biggest brands in the world can turn you into a pauper or a king, and it’s hard sometimes to know which way it’s going to be.
But I can tell you the one that’s upset me – like, sincerely irritated me – is Accenture. And that’s because my theory was, “Okay, Accenture is a management consultancy, but they’re very focused on a lot of AI stuff, or just tech stuff. So, in a world where corporates, governments, etcetera, are trying to understand AI, surely Accenture is in the pound seats? Surely they’ll do well?”
And I was right (kind of) in terms of: yes, they have got demand for their services. But the thing I missed – and that they clearly also missed – was along came Donald Trump, and there was a changing of the guard in terms of the US. There was DOGE, there was cost cutting. And the US government is a huge client for Accenture, and they were totally on the wrong side of that. Got absolutely hammered by that. To the point where, in Accenture’s last earnings transcript, they’re talking about doing a partnership with Palantir (because obviously Palantir is so close to the Trump administration).
So, yeah, you know. It feels like we’re talking about an African government story, right? It’s a big changing of procurement, then one company gets thrown out and the other one who knows them too well is in. But that is the United States government, ladies and gentlemen.
Duma Mxenge: No, that is true.
The Finance Ghost: The US is just South Africa that went to private school.
Duma Mxenge: It actually reminds me – remember way back we had Gijima Technology, when they were actually listed?
The Finance Ghost: Yes!
Duma Mxenge: And that was exactly the same thing. I mean, you were banking on the government contracts, essentially.
The Finance Ghost: Yeah, and that was my own fault – I didn’t realise just how much exposure inside Accenture was US-government-focused. So, I’ve bought the dip there a couple of times and we’ll see what happens long-term.
Look, if you’re going to play in single stocks, you’re going to get some winners and you’re going to get some losers. That’s a reality that I’m comfortable with. And anyone who plays in single stocks needs to be comfortable with that.
If you’re going to do long-term ETFs, the market long-term, on average, goes up. That’s the beauty of it, right? That’s kind of the point.
Duma Mxenge: Yeah – thanks to diversification.
But since you’re talking about the US, I’m interested to get your take. The big driver in terms of performance at the moment is anything that is AI or AI-related. All those stocks have done exceptionally well. Are you concerned that that price has not been backed up by the earnings? Do you think those stocks are overheated?
The Finance Ghost: So, I recently became more concerned with some of these deals that NVIDIA has done where – it’s like that Spider-Man meme, you know? With all the Spider-Mans looking and pointing at each other. It’s like, “Oh, wait. I’m buying from you and you’re buying from me, but I’ll invest in you and I’ll make your market cap bigger.” It’s very dicey. That is classic top-of-the-cycle behaviour.
The other thing I’m worried about is that I hear really good stories about AI implementations out there actually doing the things, and then I’ll have my own experiences with Copilot where I’m just like, “This is nonsense. Just absolute rubbish.”
Literally this week, I asked Copilot to go and download – because I couldn’t get the Netflix investor relations website to work – for some reason it wasn’t working properly for me. In desperation, I thought, “Okay, wait. Maybe AI can go and fetch this PDF for me, so I don’t have to go hunting for it on the SEC site.” I ask Copilot, “Can you get this PDF?” It comes back with, “Oh, these are the PDFs. Would you like me to download it?” Great. “Yes! I’d love you to download it.” It comes back, “You can download it from this link.”
Thank you, Copilot, for completely wasting my time (and some electricity and some water along the way). I’ve had a few of these experiences with Copilot.
Duma Mxenge: Yeah, you need to have patience. But the Copilot feature – it’s actually quite smart of Microsoft to do that, because that’s like the easiest way to get into the enterprise space. I couldn’t see a world where ChatGPT would have been able to convince big corporates to actually adopt it.
The Finance Ghost: It’s exactly what Microsoft did with Teams, right? And just smashed Zoom. Product bundling is their game. And that “kill-off-the-competition” ethos at Microsoft was built by Bill Gates from the start. It really was. It was literally, “How do we just crush everyone else through product bundling as far as we can do it?” So…
Duma Mxenge: Yeah, it’s exceptional.
The Finance Ghost: …maybe, to give a better answer to the question: my AI position in my tech positioning is very focused on the market leaders. I’m not buying any of the super-frothy, all-of-a-sudden-everyone-wants-it kind of names.
Oracle comes to mind. I mean, that share price went parabolic. I would have loved to have owned it before that. I didn’t. I’m definitely not chasing it now, because if there’s a rug pull in AI, those are the share prices that will lose 60% – 70% of their value.
Whereas, Microsoft was a great business before AI. It will still be a great business in whatever version of AI survives. Hence, that’s my biggest individual position – Microsoft. For exactly that reason.
Duma Mxenge: I hear you. I’m more orientated to the emerging market in terms of things that I’m looking at. Have you taken a look at China? It’s an interesting market because there are two sets of stories: The tech is doing well, but the local demand is quite challenging. There’s a lot of deflation that’s happening in that market. And they’ve tried the stimulus – it hasn’t worked. People are not buying, which is like the weirdest thing ever. Everyone’s sitting on cash!
The Finance Ghost: It is fascinating, right? So, I have a small exposure to a China ETF, but it is pretty modest. I do have a decent-sized position in Prosus, which obviously has look-through to Tencent. So, you’ve got to take that into account as part of your China exposure. And then I also look at the extent to which I have consumer brands, because there, China is a big story. That’s a really important story.
So, China continues to fascinate me, bluntly. It really is interesting.
It’s true for all the emerging markets. There’s a lot of good stuff happening in emerging markets that is actually worth looking at, because where the win is not really happening – if you look at Europe, for all of the noise around, “This is Europe’s time to shine, and now they have to really come into their own.” In reality…
Duma Mxenge: The numbers have disappointed.
The Finance Ghost: Yeah, “European innovation” is basically an oxymoron. There’s really not much of it. Their automotive sector has been murdered by the Chinese. They’ve got two decent-sized tech companies, one of which is ASML (which is in the chip manufacturing space, so obviously look-through into AI – that’s done well this year). The other is SAP, which has been very sideways. It’s software as a service (SaaS), you know? How exciting. And even the US SaaS names are getting hurt, actually. Adobe, Salesforce – they’ve both had horrible years.
So, it is interesting. I think it’s great to be in South Africa this year, and that’s why I was saying: your JSE Satrix Top 40 ETF is fantastic. That’s the one you wanted this year, because you’ve had the diversified exposure. Well, to a point. Obviously, there’s been one or two big drivers of that performance.
Duma Mxenge: Of course.
The Finance Ghost: It’s never the case that all 40 companies do well. What’s happened this year is that a big portion of the market has done really well, and that’s worked out.
I guess the point is: diversification remains your friend – a theme that’s come through on many of my podcasts with Satrix team members. And that’s because it’s true – you’ve got to try and spread your money. You can look like a real hero one year in a highly concentrated portfolio, but at some point, you are also going to get hurt. This is just how markets work.
Duma Mxenge: Yeah, it is what it is. But that being said, I’m also super interested, when I actually sit down at the end of the year and look at opportunities and try and see if I want to rotate my portfolio, I hope I still maintain the same buckets – in looking at the emerging markets, seeing if there are opportunities between China and India.
India is also a place that’s looking quite interesting. But, performance hasn’t been great, it has gone sideways somewhat.
The Finance Ghost: It’s just been very, very overvalued.
Duma Mxenge: It could be a buying opportunity, so I still want to see that.
When it comes to SA: If you look at SA Inc. stocks, they haven’t really done exceptionally well. It’s been primarily your telcos, your resource companies, as well as Naspers and Prosus. That’s pretty much what has been driving the market in South Africa.
But we really need the Government of National Unity (GNU) to actually come to the fore. I’m also hoping this greylisting will help somewhat. At least now, we’re back, we’re getting foreigners buying bonds now. That’s quite positive.
So, I don’t know. We have to be optimistic, but at the same time, you don’t want to be buying these opportunities at overvalued prices.
The Finance Ghost: Absolutely. That was one of the things I wanted to ask you. Where in the market are you seeing some interesting opportunities at the moment? And I think you’ve touched on it there, which is that SA Inc. has largely been left behind by the rally. That Top 40 performance is masking a very bleak year-to-date on SA Inc. – less bleak if you look versus the period before elections last year, because what happened was you had this huge run-up to the end of 2024, and then we came into 2025 with a lot of promises in those stocks that then didn’t materialise. Plus at a macro level, tariffs! This then really hit global markets in certain areas pretty badly, emerging markets outside of stuff like gold. A lot of those companies were sold off.
Cashbuild is a perfect example. Cashbuild’s business, like I mentioned earlier, is better now than it was a year ago, but the share price is exactly where it was. And in the meantime, it went bananas purely based on promises.
So, a lot of SA Inc. stuff is getting ignored. I recently bought into City Lodge, because…
Duma Mxenge: Interesting!
The Finance Ghost: …yeah, because this is how the South African market behaves: they release results, the results for the year are kind of okay, but there’s this nugget in there about how it’s picked up so much in the couple of months since financial year-end. Like, materially picked up. You think to yourself, “Okay, that’s… pretty interesting.” And the share price just doesn’t respond. It just goes sideways, flatlines, beeep – it’s like watching Grey’s Anatomy. It’s just horrible.
And you’re like, “Hang on, this is an opportunity.” Because if that kind of narrative goes out on a US stock, the market goes nuts. There are 10 interviews on CNBC and the share price is up 30% because someone said the word “AI” in a transcript. So, it’s frustrating. You have to wait for the value catalysts in South Africa, you have to be patient. But, at least you know you’re buying something at a rational valuation.
Generally speaking, I have an offshore bias, but I can’t bring myself to go and throw money at some of these valuations we’re seeing in places like the US.
Duma Mxenge: No, it’s astronomical.
The Finance Ghost: And the rand is actually doing pretty well. That’s the other thing you’ve got to remember, if you go and take money out. If you go into dollars and buy an overpriced thing in dollars – the rand keeps getting better, the “dollar thing” goes sideways or drops, you’re going to be pretty grumpy if you compare that to the Top 40 ETF you could have bought. So, it is nice to see the local stuff looking relatively more interesting now.
And that, for me, is what the story of the next year will be (I’m hoping, at least). Some of the JSE, like the really good mid-caps and some of the small-caps – and there’s a lot of rubbish on the JSE, there really are a lot of companies that are underperforming – but there are some goodies, and those are worth finding. So maybe that should be your December reading?
Duma Mxenge: That is my December reading. It sounds like one has to be contrarian.
I think, with the current holdings that I have, I’m not missing out in terms of what’s happening in the market. I will get that momentum, I do have exposure to all these themes that we’ve spoken about.
But, for where I think the opportunity sits, it’s these unloved sectors or regions that one has to do a bit of homework and start putting a position there. It will turn around eventually. So that’s the work I want to do, come my December.
The Finance Ghost: Absolutely. And that’s where stock picking can be really fun. It’s so important to have those ETF building blocks, make sure you’ve got your broad market exposure – that’s the truth. But a little bit of stock picking on top can be a really fun way to engage in the markets.
I’ll give you another example, Duma. Remember a little company called EOH? Now it’s called iOCO. It’s been fixed up. It’s a lot less dodgy than it ever was, that’s for sure. It’s solid now, nevermind “a lot less dodgy” – it’s been fixed.
And kudos to them – share price, 74% up year to date. They released results in the week of us recording this, and they put out guidance for free cash flow next year that suggests that they’re on a free cash flow yield of like 14% in rands. That’s really solid.
Duma Mxenge: Sho, where would you get that?
The Finance Ghost: Right? So, go and read the stuff. That’s the thing. If you want to track these kinds of JSE mid-caps: watch when the stuff comes out on SENS, go read it, go read the source materials (certainly read Ghost Mail), read anywhere else. Go and do the research, because it’s really fun and it can really pay off.
I’m hoping that in the next year, we’ll start to see some more catalysts for a lot of these JSE companies that deserve a break. A lot of them don’t, but some of them really do.
Duma Mxenge: The nice thing is we do have professional analysts that are covering these markets. So, that valuation will definitely… there will be an unlock eventually, which is the beautiful thing about our market. It’s not just largely driven by individuals, we also have institutional buyers participating as well.
The Finance Ghost: Absolutely. That seems to be where some of the opportunities are at the moment.
So, Duma, we’ve covered off a lot of the discussions about what we wanted to chat about in the markets this year – stuff that’s gone well, stuff that’s maybe not gone so well. It’s been really interesting, thank you.
Something that you wanted to raise – which is obviously coming from discussions that you’ve been having in the market with clients, with retail investors, and presumably with business owners (because that’s what this is themed around) – is the difficulty of managing a personal finance budget versus a business budget. It’s really interesting.
So, let’s dig into that. What are some of the things that have come up in conversations for you? Why do you think this is relevant?
Duma Mxenge: Thanks, Ghost, for raising that. So we’ve been engaging clients, specifically entrepreneurs, small business owners, guys that are doing side-hustles, also the creator economy – there’s a big focus within our business to also look at that. And what we’ve seen is that there’s been a huge focus on personal finance. But what we’ve never really spent a lot of time on is talking about, “Okay, you’ve got your personal finance, but how do you also think about it in terms of your business? Can you use the same tools to assist your business in one way or another?”
And I guess the first starting point, what actually surprised me (I don’t know if that’s the case with you) – a lot of business owners, especially if it’s a one-man shop, tend to mix their personal bank account with their business account. It’s like one and the same thing. So, when we start talking about personal finance/investments, it’s like they can’t actually untangle the two.
So I first want to just get a sense from you. Have you built your business distinctively to say “this is my personal account” versus the business account?
The Finance Ghost: Yeah, that’s been an interesting journey for me. I registered The Finance Ghost as a separate business, basically from the start, because I wanted it to be distinct. But I think, even if you take that route (and you have a separate bank account, the separate legal entity, the whole story), you still have to be very careful when you start a business that you, number one, keep the business income as clean as possible. Take advantage of the things you can do, but you’ve got to be very careful. Don’t put silly personal things through your business. Not least of all because it can get you into trouble down the line with SARS, but it also just makes the whole business hard to understand. So, commingling expenses is hard.
The other trick (and this is something you really have to get used to) is when you’re earning a salary, the number you see in your account is after tax, after deductions, usually after retirement savings – it’s after all of these things, right? When you’re running your own business, the number you see is the number before you pay VAT, before you pay income tax, before you pay anything else. It’s this much higher number, but it’s not all yours.
And this takes a little bit of adaptation. You quote a client something or whatever and it’s this number, and it’s like, “Wow, that’s great!” And then you have to remember, “Yeah, well, it’s this much for that, and that much for that.” You’ve got to cut the pie…
Duma Mxenge: Correct.
The Finance Ghost: …into a lot of slices, so that’s an important thing to remember. And maybe the other thing that I’ve applied which I’ve found really important is I pay myself a salary out of the business. I pay myself the same salary every month, and I’ve set that salary significantly lower than what the business earns on average.
The reason for that is it forces me to live to that salary. And I’ve been really lucky in this journey, it’s doing well and that’s great, so I can do it. But it kind of creates a buffer, because I think it’s far too easy – specifically in a small business – to say, “Oh, you know, things are going better. Great. Let me just adjust my lifestyle up.”
Stuff goes away. It comes, it goes. You have good months, you have great months, you can have a relatively bad month. And just dealing with that variability in income requires a huge amount of discipline, because it’s not a reality when you have a salary. You’re getting the same salary every month, and you do with it what you do.
I will say this, though: as a small business, it actually creates a lot of discipline. Whereas I think people, when they earn salaries, just assume that salary is going to be there forever. And it’s just not actually real life. Retrenchments do happen, jobs do get disrupted. We are in an AI era. I actually talked about this with Lauren a couple of Satrix podcasts ago and this point kind of came up as well, which is really interesting.
So, I think there’s an element of discipline as a small business owner that you can bring in, that actually puts you above where salaried employees often behave in terms of discipline.
Duma Mxenge: Just on that, I think you raise a very good point around salary and how you basically pitch the salary. Based on the design and how you’re thinking about it, it sounds like (and I want you to correct me or not, because then it gets into this whole passive income discussion) you’ve basically done the budgeting based on, let’s say, your personal expenses being covered. But is there also a portion that’s set aside, for example, for investment or buying a tax-free savings or retirement annuity and the likes within that ‘salarised’ amount that you’ve set aside from your business? Or, which is what we are seeing, mostly, is that a lot of business owners see their business as their investment and their only investment.
The Finance Ghost: Sho, anyone who’s assuming that their business is their retirement plan has never seen corporate failures, deals go wrong – I’ve unfortunately seen a lot of that, and I know how hard it is to sell a small business.
My strong recommendation to anyone with a small business would be: do not rely on that small business as your retirement savings and everything else, because then all your eggs are truly in one basket. That thing is your income, it’s supposedly your retirement – it’s just not right. I’d strongly recommend not doing that.
In the amount that I pay myself as a salary, I leave an allowance for what would be the correct percentage excess, over and above my monthly expenses, to be invested. So, the investing is happening even out of my salary. Then, I come from an investment banking background, so I love my children a lot, but I love bonuses too! And so what I do is every year I pay myself a bonus based on what I can, and then what I do with that is what I do with that. That’s kind of the way I’ve structured it. I’ve almost tried to emulate some of my old investment banking life with that behaviour. It just works well for me.
But, I would certainly say: business owners, you’ve got to be diversifying your wealth. You really, really do. It’s almost more important, when you’re a business owner. You definitely cannot be relying on this one thing. You are then in a hyper, hyper concentrated portfolio in a small business that relies on you. Like that’s… yeah, that’s way past my risk tolerance.
Duma Mxenge: Thanks for saying that, Ghost. That’s essentially what we’ve been telling clients. And as I said, we’ve gone on and on about ETFs (how simple they are, how easy to understand), but what’s been quite surprising with the engagement is that a lot of business owners, obviously, do appreciate risk. When you’re running your own business, you feel like you’re in control. So when they have that excess amount of money, they tend to put it in cash, as if it’s an emergency fund. And we’re like, “But, you should be taking more risk. This is towards retirement.”
I think guys view their own personal wealth differently in terms of how they’re running their business. It’s been quite difficult and challenging to get them to understand that actually you need to start thinking a lot deeper and more seriously in terms of how you build wealth alongside your business in a passive income strategy.
The Finance Ghost: And it’s funny, right? Because any business owner is a risk-taker by design. It’s a guarantee: you are a business owner, hence you are a risk-taker. But then, you really do get two types of entrepreneurs like this. I have friends who are entrepreneurs who are the worst kind in the market – where it’s basically gambling, essentially. It’s like, “What’s hot? Let me have a punt. Okay, cool.” They’re almost tickling their need to gamble, a little bit.
And, it’s certainly better to gamble on stocks than to go and do sports betting (which is obviously all over the news at the moment). But better than that, even, is to go and actually invest.
And it’s interesting how you then get the other type of entrepreneur who just sits in cash, basically. It’s almost like they are so scared that something goes wrong with their business that they almost refuse to take any risk of any other kind, which is also not right.
It’s all this behavioural finance stuff. And I can confirm, the journey as an entrepreneur – it is hard. You’ve got to be tough. You always feel like you’re one phone call away from some or other kind of disaster. That’s part of what makes me very hesitant to buy a house, I suppose.
If I could say what my little personal finance “ick” is, coming from a business owner, is that I am very nervous to take on a bond. Because it just feels like many millions owed to a bank and, yeah, it scares me, you know? I’d much rather rent, invest the excess, and be liquid. Liquidity is your friend. It really, really is. No one ever got anything repossessed because they were “too liquid”. That I can tell you.
Duma Mxenge: It’s usually the other way around! I think where we started off, I was talking about the buckets, right? And I think, even for business owners or people running their own business, the biggest feedback we get is that they’re too busy. They don’t have time to do this. So that’s why, most of the time, the investment is actually sitting in cash.
And I think it’s important, especially at the end of the year, that one just takes time out to look at their financial situation. Think about the buckets, make a decision, put down a debit order, forget about it, revisit again in the new year. That’s the approach one can take. And then during the year, you’re busy trying to put out fires, growing the business, finding clients, etcetera, etcetera.
I think for them, the difficulty of trying to be active in the market – they just don’t have the time to do that. But I think with the products we’ve got from an ETF perspective, they’re easy to understand. You can just sit down for a week, maybe a week-and-a-half, in any given year and just plan your life accordingly leading up to the new year.
The Finance Ghost: So yeah, the encouragement to business owners is: Just keep building that diversification.
And maybe a nice way for those business owners to think about it is that we’re so used to, as business owners, getting an income. You’re chasing income all the time, whether it’s sending out an invoice or whatever it is. But the best kind of income, and this is really hard for business owners, is passive income. While you are sleeping, when you are exhausted after a hard night (or a hard day, rather), you want your money to be working for you – and ETFs can do that. Because they pay dividends, and you can pick ETFs that have a bigger dividend yield.
So, I know that’s something else that’s close to your heart: ETFs as a tool for passive income. Maybe walk us through that, so that listeners can understand: what does that opportunity actually look like? What do you mean when you say “passive income” and using ETFs to achieve that?
Duma Mxenge: So, just going back to where we started, every business owner, in terms of how they need to think about their investments specifically, is in those different buckets (the short term, the medium term, as well as the long term), and be very clear in terms of what goals you’re trying to achieve.
And the beautiful thing about all these ETF products is that they’re very easy to understand. You can make a decision on any given year. Let’s say December is your time where you just sit down and say, “Okay, I just want to look at my plan and plan accordingly.” And then during the course of the year, depending on what strategy you invested in (for example, dividend yield – there you get a nice dividend payout), the money works for you whilst you’re still working on your business. So, it’s something that you don’t need to check during the year or be concerned about. You know that in the background, your money is growing, dividends are being paid out. You can decide whether you want to actually cash out or reinvest.
But we do try and encourage clients to do two things: (1) to reinvest their dividends, and (2) to make sure that they actually set up a debit order account and get into that consistency of just making sure that their future is also well-handled.
Over and above that, of course, we’re assuming that all business owners will be successful, and they’ll also be successful in terms of selling their business. But you have to hedge your bets. At least then you know, whilst you’re running your business, you’ve got a pot of money that’s set aside in any eventuality.
The Finance Ghost: Yeah, I would agree with that. And it really is great to build up that working capital. Build it up in your business, get it into a proper interest-paying account, earn the interest in the business, do that in your personal life, build up those ETFs, earn the dividends.
That is how you start to turn life from hard mode to easier mode. I don’t know about easy mode – I’m hoping that comes somewhere down the line. But right now, I think the most we can hope for is easier mode. So, yeah, lots of tools to do that.
Duma, as always, we’ve had such a fun chat about not just the markets, but also just adulting and making progress in this life. And this time we spoke about business owners and how they should think about the world. I would really encourage listeners to go back to the one we did in January, if you’re keen to hear about the rent-versus-buy argument – I think everything we’ve spoken about there is still valid.
So, yeah, it’s just always fun doing these with you, Duma, thank you so much. I look forward to the next one. I guess it’ll probably be early next year, and we can talk about your 2026 plan. So, thank you, as ever, for your time. And all the best with the December research. I’ll be interested to hear what you dig up.
Duma Mxenge: Thank you, Ghost. Yeah, you can hold me to it. We should have an interesting chat in the new year.
The Finance Ghost: Cool. Ciao.
Disclaimer:
Satrix Investments (Pty) Ltd & Satrix Managers (RF) (Pty) Ltd is an authorised financial services provider. The information does not constitute advice as contemplated in FAIS. Use or rely on this information at your own risk. Consult your Financial Adviser before making an investment decision. While every effort has been made to ensure the reasonableness and accuracy of the information contained in this document (“the information”), the FSP’s, its shareholders, subsidiaries, clients, agents, officers and employees do not make any representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or suitability of the information and shall not be held responsible and disclaims all liability for any loss, liability and damage whatsoever suffered as a result of or which may be attributable, directly or indirectly, to any use of or reliance upon the information. For more information, visit https://satrix.co.za/products
2025’s African mergers and acquisitions have been shaped by shifting global trade dynamics, as geopolitical uncertainty, evolving US policy, growing regional integration, and a fast-moving digital economy continue to redefine investment behaviour. On the global stage, US President Donald Trump’s tariff-driven agenda has not only reshaped international alliances, but has also sharpened focus on the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) – set to become the world’s largest free-trade bloc.
DealMakers’ analysis of the first nine months of 2025 shows that one-third of cross-border transactions undertaken by South African-domiciled, exchange-listed companies involved other African countries, underscoring the growing significance of intracontinental dealmaking.
Across the continent (excluding South Africa), overall deal activity continued its downward trend. Deal value declined a further 6% year-on-year to US$6,85 billion, following a 10% drop in 2024. The number of deals fell to 259, from 282 in the prior period. West Africa, and particularly Nigeria, led activity with 78 deals (Nigeria accounting for 45), followed by North Africa with 67 (43 for Egypt) and East Africa with 63 (37 in Kenya).
General Corporate Finance (GCF) activity mirrored this moderation. For the first nine months of the year, DealMakers Africa recorded 64 transactions (excluding bonds) valued at $2,2 billion, compared with 88 transactions valued at $10,4 billion in 2024. Among the standout transactions was Sun King’s $156 million securitisation, the largest and first majority commercial-bank-backed transaction of its kind in sub-Saharan Africa outside South Africa.
Despite these headwinds, Africa’s structural strengths continue to attract investment. The continent is home to some of the world’s fastest-growing economies, and boasts the fastest-growing working-age population, coupled with rapid digital adoption. Together, these trends present significant opportunity, particularly for private equity investors backing technology scale-ups in an era of tightening global liquidity.
Private equity is no longer viewed as an unconventional funding route, but rather as an increasingly reliable engine for scale, consolidation and long-term value creation, and a pivotal driver of M&A. Still, the sector has not been immune to global pressures, regional risks, and shifts in investor strategy. Private equity deals for the period totalled 114, just one-third of 2022 levels, reflecting the impact of constrained capital and elevated risk premiums.
Among the top transactions for the year, four mining deals featured in the 10 largest by value. Leading the list was Vitol’s $1,65 billion acquisition from Eni of a 30% participating interest in the Baleine project in Côte d’Ivoire, and a 25% stake in the Congo LNG project in the Republic of Congo.
The latest magazine can be accessed and downloaded from the DealMakers AFRICA website
Astoria Investments has distributed to shareholders the circular in relation to its conditional offer to repurchase not more than 42.5% of the company’s shares, for a cash consideration of R8.15 per share. The offer consideration represents a premium of 26.5% to the 30-day VWAP of R6.44 on 24 October. The offer consideration of R214,97 million will be funded from available cash resources. The company has given an updated on irrevocable undertaking in respect of the offer with shareholders representing 61.6% of the total shares in issue (excluding concert parties) having undertaken to vote in favour of the offer and delisting, and shareholders holding 60.1% of the offer shares having undertaken not to accept the offer. The company will declare a distribution of 7,447,473 Goldrush preference shares (GRSP) to Astoria shareholders in the ratio of 12 GRSP for every 100 Astoria shares held.
Supermarket Income REIT has completed the acquisition of a portfolio of 20 Carrefour supermarkets in France for a total purchase consideration of €123 million at a net initial yield of 6.6%. The weighted average lease term of the portfolio is 12 years with a tenant-only break option in year 10. The deal has been funded through existing unsecured revolving credit facilities. The addition of the portfolio brings the total Carrefour stores owned to 46.
KAP subsidiary Unitrans Africa has disposed of its stake in Eswatini business Unitrans Swazi to Freight-X for R138 million. The disposal is in line with KAP’s strategy to focus on turning around its underperforming businesses.
In a cautionary announcement by RMB Holdings, it advised shareholder that the Board had been notified by Atterbury Property Fund of a potential offer to be made to the company’s shareholders. Further updates would be provided in due course.
Shuka Minerals has provided an update to the financing of its acquisition of Leopard Exploration and Mining (LEM) and the Kabwe Zinc Mine in Zambia. The initial tranche will comprise a cash payment of US$300,000 representing 22% of the remaining $1,35 million cash component of the acquisition. In addition, 6,36 million consideration shares will be issued to the vendors to settle $666,667, being a pro-rata consideration for the $3 million share component of the acquisition, together with 444,444 warrants. The shares are subject to a one-year lock-in restriction. The vendors will transfer shares equal to a 22% stake in LEM. On completion of all tranches Shuka Minerals will own 100% of LEM and the Kabwe Zinc Mine.
The announced deal in October 2025 between Labat Africa and 64P Investments has been terminated by mutual consent. Labat has re-engaged with All Trading, a company owned by two directors of Labat. The deal entails the disposal by Labat of its Healthcare assets comprising shareholdings in CannAfrica, Sweetwaters, BioData, The Highly Creative, African Cannabis Enterprises and Labat Healthcare. The purchase consideration of R23 million will be set off against related party shareholder and director loans. This will reduce Labat’s liabilities and no cash proceeds will be received.
In a further update on the offer to Curro shareholders by the Jannie Mouton Stigting, the transaction remains subject to the unconditional approval from the South African Competition Authorities which have requested additional time for the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition to provide its feedback. The additional 10 working days agreed to will require that the dates and times in the circular be revised. Shareholders will be furnished with a revised timetable.
Shareholders have voted in favour of the offer and delisting of Ascendis Health. The offer, via a repurchase of shares not exceeding a 20% stake, is for a cash consideration of R0.97 per share. The offer is conditional on the delisting of the company via the acceptance of the 20% stake with the remaining shareholders to continue invested in an unlisted entity.
Unlisted Companies
South African electrotech company Plentify has raised an oversubscribed Series A funding round. The company uses AI-fuelled hardware and software to connect home appliances to cheaper and cleaner energy. The round was led by Secha Capital, Buffet Investments, and a SA family office with participation from existing investors E3 Capital and Fireball Capital. New investors included Endeavor South Africa’s Harvest Fund and Satgana.
European technology group APP Solutions has acquired Cape-based ESCROWSURE, a software escrow provider. The acquisition combines APP Solutions’ structure dedicated to protecting innovation and software investments with ESCROWSURE’s local delivery and a 20-year footprint in southern Africa. Financia details were not disclosed.
A total of 64,038,857 Pick n Pay shares have been sold to investors in an accelerated bookbuild by the Ackerman family. The shares were placed at a price of R25.50 per share representing a 6.4% discount to the closing price on 17 November 2025 and 8.5% of the total issued ordinary shares of Pick n Pay. The placement raised proceeds of c.R1,6 billion. The 105,2 million ‘B’ shares held by the family which were attached to the placement shares will lose their voting rights and will be cancelled. The Ackerman family’s economic interest will decrease from 26.7% to 18.2% and the aggregate voting interest will decrease from 49% to 36.8%.
Kore Potash has raised c.£9,2 million in a fundraise. A total of 319,688,816 shares were place with certain existing shareholders and new institutional investors at a price per share of 2.9 pence. The proceeds will be used, among other things, to cover working capital over the next 12 months.
Combined Motor Holdings will undertake a Pro Rata Repurchase of up to 11,200,300 shares, representing 15% of the company’s current total issued ordinary shares. The offer consideration of R35.50 will see the company utilise R398,32 million. The offer will close on 15 December, and the repurchased shares will be delisted from the JSE on 17 December 2025.
Southern Palladium will issue 59,092 new shares in respect of the opportunity given to shareholders to subscribe for up to $30,000 worth of shares at A$1.10 per share up to a maximum of A$1 million. The Share Purchase Plan raised an additional A$65,000 (R728,000).
Labat Africa has issued 116,5 million new shares at an issue price of R0.07 per share in relation to the asset for shares agreement signed in November 2024 for the acquisition of a 75.55% interest in Classic International Trading.
In the release of its interim results Brait said it plans to list its fitness chain Virgin Active by December 2027. The planned listing is on the back of a steady turnaround in Virgin Active – reporting a 42% rise in EBITDA earnings and an 11% rise in group revenue, boosted by a strong membership performance in SA, Italy and the UK.
The JSE listed shares of Deutsche Konsum REIT-AG will be suspended on 3 December 2025 following the decision by the company to withdraw its secondary listing on the JSE and to re-focus exclusively on its primary exchange listing on the Frankfurth Stock Exchange (FSE). The listing will terminate on 9 December 2025. Shares will be transferred from the JSE to the FSE prior to the date of delisting.
This week the following companies announced the repurchase of shares:
Under its repurchase programme, through its wholly owned subsidiary Sabvest Finance and Guarantee Corporation, Sabvest Capital has repurchased a total of 770,000 shares since May 2024 for a total consideration of R95,5 million. The shares will be delisted with effect from 22 November 2025.
MAS has repurchased 21,162,295 ordinary shares through a series of on-market transaction on the JSE between 14 October to 14 November 2025. The shares, representing 3.03% of the companies issued share capital were acquired at an average rate of R21.14 per share at a total cost of R444,75 million. The repurchases were funded from available cash resources.
In May 2025 Tharisa announced it would undertake a repurchase programme of up to US$5 million. Shares have been trading at a significant discount, having been negatively impacted by the global commodity pricing environment, geo-political events and market volatility. Over the period 7 to 14 November 2025, the company repurchased 9,454 shares at an average price of R21.91 on the JSE and 140,352 shares at 97.21 pence per share on the LSE.
In October 2024, Anheuser-Busch InBev announced a US$2 billion share buy-back programme to be executed within the next 12 months which will result in the repurchase of c.31,7 million shares. The shares acquired will be kept as treasury shares to fulfil future share delivery commitments under the group’s stock ownership plans. During the period 10 to 14 November 2025, the group repurchased 1,113,726 shares for €61,63 million.
On 19 February 2025, Glencore announced the commencement of a new US$1 billion share buyback programme, with the intended completion by the time of the Group’s interim results announcement in August 2025. This week the company repurchased 9,600,000 shares at an average price per share of £3.70 for an aggregate £35,53 million.
South32 continued with its US$200 million repurchase programme announced in August 2024. The shares will be repurchased over the period 12 September 2025 to 11 September 2026. This week 620,137 shares were repurchased for an aggregate cost of A$2 million.
The purpose of Bytes Technology’s share repurchase programme, of up to a maximum aggregate consideration of £25 million, is to reduce Bytes’ share capital. This week 530,230 shares were repurchased at an average price per share of £3.53 for an aggregate £1,87 million.
In May 2025, British American Tobacco extended its share buyback programme by a further £200 million, taking the total amount to be repurchased by 31 December 2025 to £1,1 billion. The extended programme is being funded using the net proceeds of the block trade of shares in ITC to institutional investors. This week the company repurchased a further 609,000 shares at an average price of £41.52 per share for an aggregate £25,29 million.
During the period 10 to 14 November 2025, Prosus repurchased a further 1,120,709 Prosus shares for an aggregate €69,2 million and Naspers, a further 436,848 Naspers shares for a total consideration of R541,97 million.
Six companies issued a profit warning this week: Cilo Cybin, Brikor, Life Healthcare, Conduit Capital, Mahube Infrastructure and Crookes Brothers.
Six companies issued or withdrew a cautionary notice: Combined Motor Holdings, RMB Holdings, MTN Zakhele Futhi (RF), EPE Capital Partners, Mahube Infrastructure and Efora Energy.
TotalEnergies announced the signing of agreements with Conoil Producing Limited, under which TotalEnergies is to acquire from Conoil a 50% operated interest in Block OPL257 and Conoil is to acquire the 40% participating interest held by TotalEnergies in Block OML136, both located offshore Nigeria. Upon completion of this transaction, TotalEnergies’ interest in OPL257 will be increased from 40% to 90%, while Conoil will retain a 10% interest in this block.
AD Ports has acquired Saudi Egyptian Investment Company’s (SEIC), 19.328% equity stake in Alexandria Container & Cargo Handling Company (ALCN), one of the largest container terminal operators in Egypt, in a deal valued at approximately EGP 13,2 billion. Established in 1984 and listed on the Egyptian Exchange since 1995, ALCN operates two strategically located terminals on the Mediterranean, in Alexandria and El-Dekheilla.
Kimbo Fund, BFA Asset Management’s private credit impact fund, has announced a strategic growth investment in Angola’s FoodCare. FoodCare specialises in processing 25 traditional African foods, including cassava, mufu, and mopane worms, catering to both local and international demand. The value of the convertible note transaction was not disclosed.
Early-stage fintech venture capital fund, DisrupTech Ventures, has made its first investment in Morocco, investing in fintech and e-commerce platform Chari. The investment, the size of which was not disclosed, forms part of Chari’s Series A extension round. Chari is a B2B e-commerce and fintech platform that aims to serve the fragmented market of neighbourhood shops by offering a mobile app that allows them to order fast-moving consumer goods for their inventory and receive no-charge delivery within 24 hours.
Syrah Resources has entered into an agreement with the US International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) in connection with its existing DFC loan. Under the agreement, Syrah’s subsidiary Twigg Exploration and Mining will receive a further US$8,5 million disbursement from the DFC loan, which will be used to fund working and sustaining capital for Syrah’s Balama Graphite Operation in Mozambique.
The European Investment Bank (EIB), through its development branch EIB Global, and Vista Group have signed two financing agreements of respectively €20 million with Vista Gui and €10 million with Vista Bank (SL) to strengthen access to finance for SMEs and mid-caps in Guinea and Sierra Leone. The loans will focus on enhancing private sector development, with at least 70% of the funding targeting agricultural value chains, such as cashew, infant food, fruits and vegetables processing and rice value chains across both countries, and country-specific priorities, such as fish and seafood processing, as well as cereals, including fonio and rice, in Guinea, and cocoa, palm oil, cassava, and coffee in Sierra Leone.
Acorn Holdings has received authorisation from the Capital Markets Authority for the establishment of a Build-To-Rent Development Real Estate Investment Trust (D-REIT) aimed at expanding Kenya’s affordable housing rental market for young urbanites. The Acorn Build-To-Rent D-REIT will offer investors an opportunity to participate in large-scale, professionally managed rental property developments which are targeted at young urbanites who are looking at world-class, yet affordable housing in urban areas. To support the establishment of this venture, US$17 million (KES 2,2 billion) has been committed by three entities: Private Infrastructure Development Group (PIDG), who have committed US$10 million (KES 1,3 billion) in equity investment to anchor the new ABRT D-REIT; US$2 million (KES 258 million) from Shelter Afrique Development Bank, and USD 5 million (KES 645 million) of equity from Acorn.
Heineken N.V. has agreed to transfer its brewery in Bukavu in the Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) for €1 to Synergy Ventures Holdings, a Mauritian company owned by a group of entrepreneurs and operators with experience in the Region. Since suspending operations at the site in February 2025, Heineken has continued to pay all Bukavu brewery employees in full. Upon completion of the transfer, Synergy Ventures Holdings will assume full responsibility for operating the brewery, ensuring the safety and well-being of employees and fulfilling all tax obligations to the government of the DRC. Heineken retains a buyback option, exercisable 3 years after the sale, if conditions allow for viable operations.
Salvo Grima Group announced the acquisition of a 75% majority stake in Noble Outlook Ltd, a fast-moving consumer goods distribution company operating in western Kenya. No financial terms were disclosed.
The Cameroonian government has signed an agreement to buy back the stake held by British private equity fund Actis in Eneo, the country’s main electricity distributor. The transaction is valued at 78 billion CFA francs, according to sources familiar with the deal. Actis, which bought a 51 percent share in Eneo in 2014, is expected to finalise its exit at an upcoming extraordinary board meeting. Once the transaction is completed, the state will hold 95% of the company, with the remaining 5 % set aside for employees. The new structure effectively places Eneo back under state control.
South Africa’s merger control landscape has been undergoing a quiet shift, as the South African Competition Commission’s (Commission) approach to public interest remedies evolves. After years of the Commission rigidly applying its “ownership” requirements, usually in the form of mandatory Employee Share Ownership Programmes (ESOP) imposed on merger parties – often with the associated delay of transactions and frustration of investors – the Commission has quietly started adopting a more pragmatic and commercially-aware approach to its public interest considerations. This transition (from its previously inflexible 5% ESOP benchmark established post-Burger King and the publication of its Public Interest Guidelines) to a more flexible approach represents an encouraging development for business.
The Commission’s 2021 recommendation to prohibit ECP Africa’s acquisition of Burger King (South Africa) and Grand Foods Meat Plant (Pty) Ltd, because the transaction would result in significant reduction in ownership by Historically Disadvantaged Persons (HDPs) in the target, marked a significant moment. Although the transaction was ultimately approved through a settlement before the Competition Tribunal, the initial prohibition garnered much criticism for the Commission’s rigid approach to the public interest criterion under section 12A(3)(e) of the Act. This provision requires that the Commission consider whether a merger results in the “promotion” of a greater spread of ownership, particularly by HDPs and workers (language that remains open to interpretation as to whether there is an obligation on parties to propose HDP and worker ownership in every transaction). To date, the Competition Tribunal has not substantively opined on the scope or application of this provision, leaving its precise meaning and boundaries unresolved. This continues to generate debate among practitioners.
From 2021, the Commission adopted a rigid stance: that all transactions must promote HDP and worker ownership, and other public interest benefits could not offset any ownership dilutions or neutral ownership positions. This approach gave rise to the imposition of specific ownership-related remedies, most notably the requirement for ESOPs as a condition for approval. At the time, the appropriate threshold to remedy such dilution remained unclear, until the Commission published its Public Interest Guidelines on 20 March 2024. While these guidelines are non-binding, they introduced a de facto benchmark, signalling that a 5% (or more) ESOP would be regarded as the appropriate remedial measure for mergers which did not have any other positive BEE or HDP ownership component. This rigid approach and insistence on the imposition of ESOP “remedies”, even where there was no negative effect on ownership, was to the detriment of many deals, which either became too impractical or too costly for the parties.
The regulatory shift: From rigid requirements to pragmatic solutions
Recent developments reveal a nuanced shift toward pragmatism by the Commission. As evidenced by trends in its annual reports, and in our experience as advisors, we have observed that the Commission has begun adopting a more pragmatic, balanced and commercially-aware application of the public interest test. Notably, in transactions where there is no dilution of HDP ownership (or a neutral effect), the Commission has shown a willingness to forgo the imposition of a 5% ESOP or similar ownership remedies. In transactions where it is not commercially or practically feasible for parties to include ownership commitments, the Commission has been open to adopting alternative public interest remedies.
While the promotion of HDP and worker ownership remains a critical policy objective, the Commission appears more open to assessing deals on a case-by-case basis, and considering broader commercial and contextual factors. Increasingly, we are seeing mergers approved subject to a range of alternative public interest commitments, instead of ownership conditions, across the following three categories: • Enterprise and supplier development, localisation and growth conditions involving commitments to procure products from local small, micro and medium-sized enterprises (SMMEs) and HDP suppliers.
• Employment and head office conditions, including moratoriums on retrenchments, the creation of new jobs, commitments to maintain aggregate employment levels, and training commitments, such as setting up learnerships and providing bursaries.
• Capital investment and production conditions encompassing commitments to invest in localisation initiatives, programmes to support and develop SMMEs and firms controlled by HDPs, training, bursaries, new outlets or facilities, and reskilling initiatives.
From a transaction advisory perspective, this trend towards pragmatism by the authority is positive. It provides greater flexibility in structuring deals and conditions while maintaining public interest objectives, making the South African market more attractive to both local and foreign investors. The shift suggests that the Commission is aware of the need to balance transformation objectives with economic growth and investor confidence, an approach that better serves the complex realities of modern commercial transactions.
However, merger parties must still exercise caution and carefully assess the commercial feasibility of any alternative commitments offered or agreed with the Commission (which may still have a material financial impact on deal values and purchase prices), and not to over-promise on commitments which can’t be delivered later. It is essential for dealmakers to understand and be advised on this evolving landscape when structuring transactions and strategically navigating competition approvals.
Shawn van der Meulen is a Partner, Lebohang Noko a Senior Associate, and Gina Lodolo an Associate | Webber Wentzel
This article first appeared in DealMakers, SA’s quarterly M&A publication.
Launched in October 2003, the JSE’s Alternative Exchange (AltX) was designed as a “nursery board” for ambitious small- and mid-cap issuers. Its purpose was clear: to give high-growth companies access to capital and a pathway to the Main Board once they achieved the necessary scale and maturity.
The AltX has, at times, delivered on this mandate. Several companies have successfully graduated to the Main Board, with Curro Holdings and Sirius Real Estate standing out as notable examples.
By February 2008, the AltX hosted over 75 issuers with a combined market capitalisation exceeding R28bn. However, since then, numbers have gradually declined amid a difficult macroeconomic environment, emerging peers, limited investor interest and weak liquidity, and the increasing allure of private capital.
This trend has not been unique to South Africa. London’s AIM – on which the AltX was modelled – and other international peers have also seen waves of delistings and take-privates, coupled with higher cost of capital and lower valuations.
To address this issue, the JSE has, over recent years, introduced reforms aimed at improving competitiveness and increasing investor appetite. Chief among these was the Segmentation Project, which split the Main Board into two tiers: the Prime Segment – catering to larger, more liquid counters under the traditional regime – and the General Segment, which offers a lighter touch, more enabling version of the JSE Listings Requirements, while still safeguarding transparency and disclosure.
The creation of the General Segment and the dwindling interest in the JSE’s growth board in recent years raises important questions about the AltX’s long-term future within the JSE ecosystem. This article explores seven focus areas through which the JSE could enhance the AltX’s role as a growth platform while supporting the strength and competitiveness of South Africa’s capital markets.
Roadmap the journey: JPP → AltX → General Segment → Prime Segment
For the JSE to truly unlock its growth potential, it needs to clearly map out the journey that companies can take as they evolve on the exchange – starting with JSE Private Placements (JPP), progressing through the AltX and the General Segment, and ultimately graduating to the Prime Segment. By positioning these boards as interconnected stages of growth, rather than isolated platforms, the JSE can demonstrate how it supports issuers at every step of their corporate lifecycle.
The JPP, as a digital marketplace for private equity and debt, should be marketed as the ideal pre-listing ecosystem. It enables companies to raise capital privately, while building the governance, scale and resilience needed for a successful public listing. From there, a stronger, better-prepared pipeline of issuers can naturally transition to the AltX, revitalising the platform with credible growth businesses that attract investors and deepen liquidity.
Layering this roadmap with dedicated mentorship, governance training and global investor reach would create a compelling ecosystem that not only elevates the quality of listings, but also boosts market turnover and strengthens South Africa’s capital markets. Over time, as issuers mature, they can seamlessly evolve from the AltX to the General Segment and, ultimately, to the Prime Segment – building a virtuous cycle of innovation, credibility and liquidity that cements the JSE as Africa’s premier listing destination.
Unlock institutional investment
Ownership of JSE-listed companies is largely concentrated among institutional investors. For AltX-listed firms, this poses a challenge, as pension funds, asset managers and insurers are often restricted by mandates that limit investment in smaller or higher-risk companies, making it harder for AltX firms to attract significant capital. We understand that there are ongoing discussions in this regard, and continued active engagement between the JSE and representatives of South Africa’s largest institutional investors will be essential to explore practical mechanisms for addressing mandate restrictions and facilitating greater institutional investment in AltX-listed companies.
Incentivise, incentivise, incentivise
To encourage AltX participation, listing, trading, clearing and settlement fees for smaller issuers could be reduced or waived – similar to the 50% relief offered during COVID-19 – to lower entry barriers and stimulate liquidity. Simultaneously, investors could be incentivised through tax deductions, credits or capital gains relief, enhancing after-tax returns and making investment in AltX-listed companies – as major contributors to economic growth – more attractive and financially rewarding.
Rename, rebrand and market
A strategic rebrand could transform the AltX’s identity and appeal. Just as Outspan Rusks became the beloved Ouma Rusks and BackRub evolved into the global giant Google, a stronger, more resonant AltX brand can attract new businesses and investors. Coupled with a targeted marketing campaign highlighting success stories, growth potential and investment opportunities, the AltX can position itself as the premier launchpad for South Africa’s growth-stage companies.
AltX-focused indices and exchange traded funds (ETFs)
Creating AltX-focused indices and ETFs could provide demand, improve liquidity, and increase investor participation. These products would also offer institutional and retail investors simplified access to the growth-stage segment of the market.
Educate
The JSE could collaborate with retail investment platforms to raise awareness and educate investors about companies listed on the AltX. Furthermore, through JSE-sponsored analyst coverage, the JSE can help lessen informational gaps among both retail and institutional investors.
Rule Review
The JSE should undertake a detailed review of the AltX-related provisions in the JSE Listings Requirements to determine whether such provisions are still fit for purpose. A careful balance will have to be struck between ensuring sufficient protection for investors and not overburdening issuers with unnecessary obligations.
Conclusion
By implementing these strategies, the JSE can transform the AltX into a high-impact platform for early growth-stage companies. Its success is critical, not only for investors and listed firms, but for a broad range of stakeholders, and South Africa’s economy at large. A thriving AltX fuels growth, drives innovation, creates jobs, promotes entrepreneurship, attracts foreign capital, and strengthens confidence in the country’s markets – helping to position South Africa as a truly competitive investment destination.
Johann Piek is an Executive | PSG Capital
This article first appeared in DealMakers, SA’s quarterly M&A publication.
Burstone’s local growth was partially offset by flat numbers in Europe (JSE: BTN)
They remaincommitted to building a large platform in South Africa
Burstone Group released results for the six months to September. Distributable income per share was up by 3%, but the more interesting story can be found in the segmental analysis.
In South Africa, like-for-like net operating income was up 5.3%. Negative reversions were 2.5%, an improvement on negative 8.4% in the prior period. Vacancies in South Africa also went the right way. Unfortunately, due to higher vacancies in Europe that offset positive rental reversions and indexation, like-for-like net operating income was flat in that market.
With the strategic focus on building property platforms and earning fees using that most wonderful concept of OPM (Other People’s Money), Burstone’s fee income is now 14.1% of group distributable income per share. It grew by 70.6% year-on-year!
Building on the success achieved in offshore markets (including the deal with Blackstone in Europe that will hopefully pay off in years to come), Burstone is still looking to build their SA Core Plus platform that will be seeded with around R5 billion in retail and industrial assets.
For now though, investors have to be patient. The interim dividend is only 3% higher, which seems rather tame in the context of all the excitement around these platforms.
Mid-single digit growth at Life Healthcare – provided you look at maintainable performance (JSE: LHC)
The numbers are complex thanks to various recent corporate actions
Life Healthcare released a trading update for the year ended September 2025. The company recently sold the Life Molecular Imaging business and distributed billions to shareholders in the past year. With large corporate deals always distorting the comparability of numbers, it’s important to know which percentages to focus on.
Paid patient days increased by 1.1% and tariffs were up 5.1%, with an expectation for overall revenue growth of between 5.5% and 6.5%. The blemish on the performance is the healthcare services business, where revenue fell by 7.5% due to the loss of two government contracts.
Normalised EBITDA was up by between 4.5% and 5.0%, or between 6.6% and 7.1% on a like-for-like basis. One of the pressure points here is the margin-dilutive nature of the renal dialysis business acquired from Fresenius Medical Care, with initiatives underway to improve the margin.
Life does get cheeky in their announcement here, with disclosure around what the growth would be if you exclude “assets in the portfolio that form part of an optimisation plan” i.e. all the bits that aren’t working. I’m all for normalised numbers if they tell a fair story, but this attempt is straight out of the “if my grandmother had wheels, she would’ve been a bicycle” bucket. Every company on the JSE would love it if investors only focused on the good stuff.
Speaking of normalisation, the best metric to focus on is probably normalised earnings per share from continuing operations, up by between 7% and 12%. This gives you a good idea of how the underlying business is doing (including the uglier bits). HEPS is severely impacted by the contingent consideration payable to Piramal for the Life Molecular Imaging business though, so treat all these numbers with caution.
The market saw something that it didn’t like, with the share price down 7.3% on the day on strong volumes.
Most of Momentum’s numbers are heading in the right direction (JSE: MTM)
Value of new businessis being impacted by mix changes
Momentum released an update for the three months to September 2025. It’s interesting to see this come out so soon after the Old Mutual (JSE: OMU) update, where growth seems to be hard to come by. Momentum’s numbers look more inspiring, with mid-single digit growth across a number of important metrics. The solid performance is coming through in the share price this year, with Momentum outperforming Old Mutual and Sanlam (JSE: SLM) in 2025:
But here’s the chart that might really impress you, with Momentum as comfortably the best of the three over a 5-year period as well:
If we look at the three months to September, we find growth of 8% in recurring premiums and 5% in single premiums. The metric they place much importance on is the present value of new business premiums (PVNBP), up by 8%. In this complicated sector, the value of new business (VNB) is also an important metric, dropping by 26% in this case due to lower life annuity sales in Momentum Investments that were only partially offset by improvements elsewhere.
If we look segmentally, the largest segment (Momentum Investments) grew its PVNBP by 9%. This segment contributed 61% of PVNBP in this period. The other segments are quite an even spread in terms of size, with Momentum Africa growing rapidly (up 58%) and Momentum Life having a tough time (down 9%). In the Africa business, Namibia features prominently as a source of growth across the corporate and retail businesses.
Another interesting nugget from the segmental analysis is that the Indian business is still scaling towards profitability. They hope to break even under Indian GAAP (their accounting system in India) in the latter part of FY26.
In terms of expenses, group direct expenses increased by 5% thanks mainly to pressure on regulatory and IT spend. The group has already realised savings of R389 million and is looking for another R500 million. The latter part of FY26 is expected to see more of this benefit coming through.
Overall, Momentum is growing in most areas and delivering on their promises to shareholders. There are some underlying focus areas of course, as is the case for any business of this size.
NEPI Rockcastle has reaffirmed guidance (JSE: NRP)
Due to acquisitions, it’s important to look at like-for-like growth
NEPI Rockcastle has released a business update covering the third quarter and thus nine months ended September. Net operating income was up by 12.3%, but you have to remember that NEPI Rockcastle has been active in acquisitions. It’s therefore critical to focus on like-for-like growth as the best indication of how the underlying portfolio is performing, with growth of 4.4% in that metric.
Tenant turnover was up by 3.5% on a like-for-like basis, with footfall down 0.6% and average spend per visitor up 4.6% excluding the recent acquisitions in Poland.
The company is pushing the renewable energy narrative pretty hard, noting double-digit returns in their energy business. They raised a €500 million green bond in September in an offering that was more than 8x oversubscribed! This will support the significant construction pipeline.
The loan-to-value ratio as at the end of September was 31.4%, below the 35% strategic threshold. In other words, the balance sheet is healthy. It’s worth mentioning that this is based on June 2025 values of the properties, as they are not revalued for the September quarter.
The group has affirmed guidance for distributable earnings per share growth of 2.5% to 3%.
International volumes are the big headache at RFG Holdings (JSE: RFG)
At least the second half was much better than the first halfin this regard
RFG Holdings released results for the year ended September 2025. Remember, this is the group that Premier (JSE: PMR) is looking to acquire in a share-for-share deal. I’ve written about it quite a bit, including my concerns about the strategic fit and whether these businesses actually belong together.
RFG’s results give us insight into some of the volatility that the business needs to navigate. Group revenue was up just 1.6%, but the underlying story is that the Regional segment (i.e. local) was up 4.1% and International fell by 7.9%. The good news is that the Regional segment is 81% of group revenue, so the bulk of the exposure is to the less volatile segment.
In the International segment, the currency is responsible for a 1.3% dip, with a 6.8% decline in volumes as the biggest reason for the segment going the wrong way this year. The trouble lies in global oversupply of deciduous fruit products. It seems as though the situation is improving at least, as International volumes were down 11.7% in the first half of the year and only 3.7% in the second half. Operating profit margin in the International segment more than halved from 11.4% to 5.7%. Ouch!
In the Regional business, fresh foods were up 7.4% despite volumes decreasing by 0.5%. In Long life foods, revenue was up just 2.1% due to volumes pressure in canned meat in particular. Alas, Regional operating profit margin was down by 170 basis points to 8.9% as reported (which includes an impairment to the meat operation), or down 20 basis points to 10.4% on a normalised basis (excluding the impairment). Margin compression isn’t what investors want to see.
HEPS fell by 10.3% and the total dividend per share for the year followed suit, down 10.4%.
These aren’t exactly the kind of numbers that can easily justify the significant premium being offered by Premier.
Southern Sun: highest October occupancy since FIFA ran our country in 2010 (JSE: SSU)
But adjusted HEPS is flat year-on-year
Southern Sun released interim results for the six months to September. Income growth was 5%, boosted by South Africa’s performance (up 8%). Offshore had a tough time, down 29% due to refurbishments and weaker trading in certain African markets.
The South African hotels saw their occupancy rate improve from 59.4% to 60.6%, accompanied by a 6% increase in average room rates. Operating expenses were up 7%, with pressures from IT and energy costs among others. Despite this, EBITDAR was up 6% to R827 million. That’s certainly a lot better than in the offshore business, where EBITDAR swung from a profit of R39 million to a loss of R9 million. And no, EBITDAR isn’t a typo – the hotel industry has a nuanced take on the more commonly observed EBITDA.
There was a significant decrease in net finance costs, but there was also a substantial jump in amortisation and depreciation. This is a good reminder that a lot still happens between EBITDAR and HEPS. Although HEPS as reported was up 2%, adjusted headline earnings was flat at R334 million.
Unsurprisingly, the coastal regions were the highlight – the Western Cape was up 9% on revenue and 14% on EBITDAR, while KwaZulu-Natal’s revenue increased by 7%. Alas, EBITDAR in KZN fell by 2%. In Gauteng, revenue was up 4% and EBITDAR fell 6%, with one of the issues being water outages. Poor governance has a cost.
Nibbles:
Director dealings:
Richemont (JSE: CFR) doesn’t give you much to work with when it comes to director disclosure, so all we know is that an executive director sold share awards worth over R50 million. There’s no indication of whether this is the taxable portion or not.
A senior exec at Nedbank (JSE: NED) sold shares worth R5.2 million.
Christo Wiese’s Titan Premier Investments bought shares in Brait (JSE: BAT) worth R4.5 million.
There’s been a purchase of shares in Lighthouse Properties (JSE: LTE) by a director, but not Des de Beer for once! Instead, it was the independent chairperson who bought shares worth R3.6 million.
A senior exec of Standard Bank (JSE: SBK) sold shares in the company worth R1.9 million.
The chairman of Afine Investments (JSE: AFI) bought some shares with his lunch money – a whopping R725. And no, I didn’t leave out any zeroes. Jokes aside, I suspect that liquidity in the stock is the challenge.
Merafe (JSE: MRF) has given us another look into just how bad the local ferrochrome market is. The company’s joint venture with Glencore (JSE: GLN) has been investigating ways to try and avoid retrenchments, including through engagement with the South African government. The urgent request is for a competitive energy tariff, something that doesn’t seem to be forthcoming. Retrenchments are therefore set to begin in the coming weeks, with the Wonderkop and Boshoek smelters to be placed on care and maintenance. This will leave only the Lion smelter operational.
Southern Palladium (JSE: SDL) has completed its share purchase plan, a valiant effort by the company to give retail shareholders an opportunity to invest in new shares alongside institutional investors. The juice is rarely worth the squeeze here, which is why most companies don’t bother and just focus on accelerated bookbuilds to institutions instead. Case in point: Southern Palladium raised A$20 million from sophisticated and institutional investors, while retail shareholders only subscribed for A$65k worth of new shares. They were hoping to raise up to A$1 million from the share purchase plan, so it was way off target. There’s a huge amount of value in retail investors – it’s just a question of reaching them in the right way and with a consistent story that builds up over time.
Deneb (JSE: DNB) has been trying to dispose of properties recently. In August, they announced the sale of Mobeni Industrial Park in Durban. The good news is that the Competition Commission has given it the green light. The transfer of the property is expected by the end of January.
Afine Investments (JSE: ANI) released results for the six months to August. There is very little liquidity in the stock, so it just gets a mention in the Nibbles. Revenue was up 11.5% and the dividend per share was up 8.8%. That’s a decent uplift from this specialised REIT that is focused on fuel forecourts.
Brikor (JSE: BIK) is certainly one of the smaller and more obscure names on the local market, with a market cap below R100 million. In a trading statement for the six months to August, the company has guided a headline loss per share of between 1.7 cents and 2.0 cents vs. positive HEPS of 1.1 cents in the prior period. They give no other details at this stage.
Shuka Minerals (JSE: SKA) has been trying to get through all the weirdness around cash availability from Gathoni Muchai Investments (GMI). As you may recall, GMI has been very slow to provide the promised capital to Shuka that is necessary for the acquisitions in Zambia. With the initial $300k having come through, Shuka has managed to buy itself some time for the deal with the sellers of Leopard Exploration and Mining. Through various steps, Shuka will receive an initial effective position of 22.2% in Leopard and thus the Kabwe Mine in Zambia. There’s no time to waste though, as the remaining tranches must all be settled by the end of December.
Coronation has released results for the year ended September. They reflect much stronger market conditions in South Africa, leading to assets under management (AUM) growing by 14%. This boosted revenue from fund management by 10% and fund management earnings per share by 12%.
Importantly, that measure of earnings excludes the SARS matter that distorted earnings in recent periods. In the prior period, a reversal of the tax amount led to an inflated earnings base, which is why group HEPS is down 25%. That is no reflection of performance though, so I wouldn’t focus on this number.
HEPS is good, but it’s not perfect when it comes to unusual items that impact earnings.
Finding growth at Old Mutual is no small task (JSE: OMU)
The latest voluntary update shows how tough it is
Old Mutual has been in the shadow of Sanlam (JSE: SLM) for as long as I can remember. Although recent share price performance has been similar for the two companies, the picture over 5 years tells a very different story:
Closing this gap is going to take a lot of work at Old Mutual. The voluntary update for the nine months to September shows that growth is hard to come by. For example, Life APE sales were up just 1%, while loans and advances fell by 1%. Gross written premiums were the highlight, up 5%.
Although gross flows were remarkably flat, net client flows were negative R6.7 billion (vs. negative R2 billion in the prior period). Old Mutual notes that there were large outflows in low-margin indexation products from a significant offshore investor. Hopefully, once that works its way through the system, net flows will be a prettier picture.
This is a game of inches for investors, with much hope being placed on Old Mutual’s bank ambitions.
Reinet’s NAV dipped over six months (JSE: RNI)
Almost a third of the NAV is sitting in cash
Reinet has released results for the six months to September. Much of the focus in the market is on the intended use of the cash on the balance sheet, especially as far more cash is coming if the deal to sell Pension Insurance Corporation goes through.
If you look at the breakdown of net asset value as at September, you’ll find that cash is 31.7% of the NAV. This is thanks to the previous sale of British American Tobacco (JSE: BTI). With Pension Insurance Corporation as just over 50% of the NAV, this would put them in a position where over 80% of NAV is sitting in cash if that asset is sold.
The group is still reinvesting the cash received in dividends from Pension Insurance Corporation, so that’s a sign of intent that they plan to keep going with investments rather than wind up the structure and return cash to shareholders. I don’t think the portfolio of private equity and alternative assets will cut it though, so Reinet will need to identify new anchor investments when the cash lands on the balance sheet.
I have no doubt that corporate finance advisors are constantly bugging management to figure out what the plan is for the cash!
Data is nearly 60% of revenue at Telkom (JSE: TKG)
The share price has enjoyed a strong year for the telco sector
The Telkom turnaround story has been quite something to behold. The group has been working hard to get out of non-core assets and focus on areas of growth, all while trying to overcome the treadmill of their legacy busy gently dying. Talk about life on hard mode!
They are doing a solid job though, with group revenue up 3.4% for the six months to September. That number might not sound exciting, but underneath it lies a business that continues to grow in the right places. As the mix improves at Telkom over time and the legacy businesses become less important, then the group growth rate should improve. That’s the theory, at least.
If we dig deeper, we find highlights like mobile data revenue growth of 10.3% and fibre-related data revenue growth of 12.3%. Telkom is really promoting the data story, noting that data revenue is up 7.9% and contributed 59.1% to group revenue.
They enjoyed a 7.4% increase in adjusted group EBITDA, while EBITDA margin expanded to 27.2%. Net debt to EBITDA was stable at 0.7x. “Stable” is a theme that also comes through in their free cash flow number.
As for HEPS, it grew 16.4% as the benefits of the solid performance filtered through the income statement.
Keep an eye on Telkom Mobile, where they grew their mobile subscriber base by 26.7%! Of all the growth rates in these numbers, that one really caught my eye.
Their outlook for the remainder of the year can best be described as one of cautious optimism.
Nibbles:
Director dealings:
There’s been some more significant selling by Richemont (JSE: CFR) executive directors in response to the recent positive share price performance and the release of results that takes them out of a closed period. Being Swiss, Richemont doesn’t disclose the name of the directors, but there were two separate announcements and hence I assume two separate directors who sold shares for for over R62 million in aggregate.
A non-executive director of Anglo American (JSE: AGL) bought shares worth around R550k.
An associate of a director of OUTsurance (JSE: OUT) hedged exposure to the shares through various derivative transactions. This included buying call options with a strike price of R75.10. To help fund this purchase, there was a sale of call options with a strike of R87.30 and put options with a strike of R63.84. The specifics of these complex structures will vary each time, but the underlying principle is that large shareholders often look to hedge their stake so they can use it for other funding purposes.
Here’s something interesting: RMB Holdings (JSE: RMH) released a cautionary announcement regarding a potential offer to be made by Atterbury to RMH shareholders. To make it spicier, the cautionary notes that the announcement is necessary as RMH suspects that confidentiality hasn’t been maintained around the potential offer. This comes after RMH recently impaired their assets and brought down the NAV. The value unlock was always expected to be RMH selling the stake in Atterbury, not Atterbury buying the shares in RMH! At the end of the day, if RMH shareholders get the value they are looking for, they won’t really care exactly how it happens. As I’ve said before, there are some big brains on both sides of this negotiating table.
Ascendis (JSE: ASC) shareholders voted strongly in favour of the delisting transaction. The shares will be delisted on 4 December, bringing an end to a story that started in the JSE frothiness in the middle of the “lost decade” and ended with a pretty messy process to eventually get the thing delisted.
After recently updating the market on the NAV per share in light of the Optasia (JSE: OPA) IPO, Ethos Capital Partners (JSE: EPE) released another update that gives details on the state of the balance sheet as at September 2025. But the Optasia numbers are actually more recent, so shareholders would be better off looking at that. The reporting calendar vs. the IPO timing just means that the numbers are coming out in a funny order. As at 17 November, Ethos Capital’s NAV per share was R9.41. This is 9.8% higher than the June 2025 number thanks to the valuation uplift at Optasia.
Eastern Platinum (JSE: EPS) has secured a loan of C$1 million to ramp up the underground production at the Crocodile River Mine. The lender is Ka An Development Co, a related party. The interest rate is 10.5%.
Curro (JSE: COH) announced that the only remaining condition to the offer by the Jannie Mouton Stigting is the approval by the South African Competition Commission. Engagement with the regulators has led to an extension of 10 days for them to provide feedback. I’m really hoping there won’t be some crazy conditions coming through here, as our competition regulator has been known to dream up some highly uncommercial “public interest” conditions. It’s hard to imagine anything being more in the public interest than this deal going ahead!
There are some significant changes to the board at Standard Bank (JSE: SBK) due to director rotation rules that deem directors to no longer be independent once they have served for a period of 9 years. This means several changes to board committees, including Lwazi Bam being appointed as Lead Independent Director.
Capitec (JSE: CPI) noted that S&P has upgraded the bank’s credit rating and affirmed the positive outlook. This is a direct result of the similar upgrade and positive outlook for the sovereign rating, as the ratings of the banks are strongly tied to the ratings of South Africa’s sovereign debt. The lesson from this? A better credit rating for South Africa means a cheaper cost of funding for the local banks, which in turn means they can play a better role in stimulating the economy.
Pepkor (JSE: PPH) announced that Moody’s has affirmed its credit rating with a stable outlook. This is good news for Pepkor as the company has a domestic medium-term note programme and makes use of debt to grow the business.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.