Tuesday, July 14, 2026
Home Blog

The Finance Ghost Plugged in with Capitec: Entrepreneurship without excuses – the Planetworld story

In Season 2 of this podcast, The Finance Ghost talks to South African entrepreneurs about the ideas, choices and turning points behind building a business from scratch.

Listen to the podcast:

From humble beginnings selling Bluetooth car kits to building Planetworld into a diversified importer and distributor of 78 global brands, Planetworld co-founder and CEO Maurice van Heerden shares a refreshingly honest view of what it takes to scale a business. 

In this episode, Maurice shares why culture and curating a team of winners are key to thriving in South Africa’s tough market. While the product range varies from musical instruments and pro audio to smart home tech and consumer electronics, the foundation of this business is its people. 

Episode 3 covers:  

  • How Planetworld grew from a small family business into a distributor across multiple industries
  • Why focusing on what you can control is critical in volatile markets
  • Building a culture that celebrates trying (and failing) rather than not trying at all
  • The role of people, partnerships and saying ‘no’ in scaling a business
  • Why most entrepreneurs underestimate the 20-year journey
  • The power of understanding your client deeply and owning that relationship
  • Expansion ambitions across Africa and beyond
  • Lessons from Capitec, Netflix and other culture-driven success stories
  • Why entrepreneurship isn’t for everyone

The Finance Ghost plugged in with Capitec is made possible by the support of Capitec Business. All the entrepreneurs featured on this podcast are clients of Capitec. Capitec is an authorised Financial Services Provider, FSP number 46669.

Read the transcript:

The Finance Ghost: Welcome to this episode of The Finance Ghost Plugged in with Capitec, where I get to chat to some really interesting South African business owners and understand more about their journey to get to where they are today.  

In this episode, I am thoroughly looking forward to speaking to someone who is no stranger to the audio world and podcasting. It’s quite rare that I get to chat to someone who has a better microphone than me, better headphones than me and a lovely Shure background there.  

That is Maurice Van Heerden, co-founder and CEO of Planet World. Maurice, thank you so much for doing this. I can’t wait to chat. I actually know a fair bit about this industry based on my upbringing and my dad having been in this industry forever.  

So, lots and lots of cool nostalgic memories of going to music stores, helping to deliver stuff; really growing up in an entrepreneurial household in this space. Thank you for doing this. It’s great to have you. 

Maurice Van Heerden: Thanks. Appreciate it. Yeah, it’s really great to be here and share our story and looking forward to a great conversation. 

The Finance Ghost: Yeah, absolutely. So, let’s dive straight in. We are all very accustomed to hearing about how tough it is to grow a business in South Africa. As an importer and a distributor of products, as Planet World is, you really do have to deal with so much of the tricky stuff, right?   

You’ve got to deal with the rand, which jumps around all over the place. It’s been better recently, but we all know how hard it’s been over the years. Delays at the ports, import tariffs. It’s really a Venn diagram of so many things that make it difficult in South Africa, and yet here you are.  

I think just to set the scene, give us an overview of the Planet World business, so people know what you’ve built; and maybe just some more context to the journey over what is essentially two decades, right?  

Maurice Van Heerden: 18 years ago I was a schoolteacher in the UK. My brother was working with a small business called Planet Electronics, and he convinced me to come back.  

Collectively with my two brothers and my father, we bought the business. And at the time, they were selling Bluetooth car kits and parking sensors. That’s kind of where the journey started.  

But today we’re a pretty significant importer across several different industries. We have roughly 200 staff across our different locations in the country (we have four). We supply roughly 3,000 customers on a monthly basis. And we do that across a bunch of different verticals.  

So, the first is the one that you’re close to, which is musical instruments. We have a big portfolio of musical instruments that we supply across music stores. We then also have a pro audio division, which is essentially any large-format sound.  

So, if you think of the sound that goes into a stadium, into a concert arena, into a house of worship, or into the education sector, into schools and so on, any large gathering of people, the audio and heavy equipment required for those is what we import and distribute.  

We also have a residential business. If you think of any high-end home audio, home automation and lighting and security, we have a business that services those needs.  

And then we have a very strong retail business where we have recently mostly focused on audio, but we’re also starting to focus increasingly on consumer electronics, especially smart products around smart cleaning and so on that we import and distribute to retailers across the country.  

And then lastly, we’ve got an automotive business. The automotive business is actually how we started. Back in 2008, we started importing infotainment systems for vehicles, and that’s really how the business got on its feet. 

Today we’re the largest importer of car audio. We import six or seven leading international brands and distribute those across retailers and fitment centres and dealerships in the country. We’re very diversified, and we work through a lot of complexity.  

But I suppose to your point, to give you a very simple answer of how we deal with the complexity, and certainly the outside influences, is that I really just don’t care. I don’t really think about it.  

All sorts of things like currency fluctuations and import tariffs and duties are totally out of our control. And so, as a business, we try and focus on the things that we can control. We are all subject to this, and all the competition that we have in the market are all subject to the same challenges, and they’re totally out of our control. So, wasting any of our time being concerned about them seems like a waste of time to me.  

The things that we can control, of course, are great customer service. We’ve got 3,000 customers that buy from us on a monthly basis. And these are businesses, so they require our products and services to survive. We take the customer experience really seriously.  

We also take our people really seriously. And we try and create an environment that’s fun and challenging and exciting, where people really belong and feel like they’re achieving something.  

And then, of course, we have great relationships with suppliers, and we manage those closely, and we work very closely with our suppliers to develop the South African market.  

And so those are things within our control, and that’s kind of what we focus on.  

We also really cherry-pick the brands that we work with. So, we’re very fortunate to be in a position that we are a desired distributor by international suppliers. We say no a lot more often than we say yes. 

In order for us to take on a product, we need to really love the product. Our values need to align with the supplier. We need to feel that the product really is leading in its market and that they’re really progressive and building a great business we can piggyback off.  

And, of course, that our values align as a business, that we know this is a partner for the long term, and we enter into that partnership with the best potential outcomes for both them and for us. Those are the things that we can focus on. And that’s really what our energy goes into. 

The Finance Ghost: Love it. There’s so much cool stuff in there. This is exactly why entrepreneurship is so exciting, right? Because when you go and read about the biggest companies in South Africa, they will so often blame the economy for slow growth.  

And half of it is true, because it is very hard to grow at that size if the economy is not in your favour. But some of it is just a cop-out by listed company executives, as opposed to people who need to eat what they kill, right? Like entrepreneurs. That’s part of why entrepreneurs are just so great.  

And it’s exactly as you’ve described it there. It’s focusing on what you can control, not being hamstrung by all of the external reasons why something won’t work. Obviously, you have to be careful. There’s no point in running into a burning building and thinking that it’s going to work out well. But if you just do the right stuff over time, then you’ll get there as you’ve done, which is fantastic.  

It’s two decades almost – about 18 years I think you said. And it is amazing to me how often I’ve seen it in my advisory career. Even now speaking to entrepreneurs, two decades seems to be the amount of time it takes for a business to really become a settled thing of value, that can exist beyond the original founder.  

It seems to take that long. I’m not sure what it is about that length of time. I’m only in year six of The Finance Ghost. So, I don’t know yet. But if you think back on your two-decade journey, what do you think it is that makes it take that long?  

And maybe as part of that, you can also just speak to the people around you. You’ve spoken about this team of winners, but it sounds like there are other execs involved, there are co-founders. What does that journey really look like for you? 

Maurice Van Heerden: This is by no means a one-man enterprise. As I mentioned, we’re a team of roughly 200 people. We’ve got an executive team; we’ve got quite an extensive management team.  

I do think, and I can only speak for my instance, the reality is when you start the business, you’re typically naive and quite stupid, to be totally honest. You don’t really know the levers that you can pull to make your business successful. You screw it up a lot. And I could tell you countless stories of things that I’ve screwed up, but it’s part of the journey.  

Something that’s potentially a personality trait, not something that I think you necessarily can learn (maybe you can, but in my experience, you either have this in your personality, or you don’t), is to not have this fear of failing. And by failing, I don’t mean mass failure and the entire business closes, and you have to sell your house and live on the street.  

What I mean is trying things and then being so pessimistic that you want certainty of the outcome. And so in fact, what you don’t do is try. You rather just kind of stay within your safety net. 

I think that’s a personality trait that’s consistent with entrepreneurs in general – they’re not afraid to try.  

In fact, we’ve got an internal culture document. One of the things about maturing over time is that in the early days, I never even thought about culture, what kind of business we wanted to be and how we wanted people to perceive us. And if we as a business took a look in the mirror, what did we want to see? I never even thought about that. It didn’t even cross my mind.  

But one of the things that we have now, we’ve got like a Planetworld standards document. And one of the standards is that we celebrate failure. And hidden in that sentence is that what we are really hard on is not trying. Never in this team at Planetworld are people punished for failure. Where people are taken to task is when they don’t try.  

And so, I’d much rather have a team of people that are constantly pushing the edge and trying new things and trying to approach problem-solving in a unique and different way and screwing it up. I’d much rather have that than a team of people that are hiding behind a computer and not trying to solve the complex problems, because the reality is somebody else is going to solve them and then you’re stuck behind.  

But this all sounds like wisdom now, but it has taken 20 years to get to the point where I and my executive team and management team are very, very clear about these things. And we’ve got a very clear culture and dynamic and way that we work that really works within our industry and within our business.  

When you’re young or when you’re just starting, it’s very difficult to know those things. To some degree, that’s where people will lean on mentors or their formal education for guidance. But in reality, the real world is a lot more complex, and it’s a lot more challenging and difficult. And you will have to take on challenges that no university can prepare you for.  

And I think this inherent non-fear of failure is probably the strongest quality that you can have.  

To speak to your point of the 20 years, as you mature as a business, you start to figure out what you’re really good at and what you’re not so good at. And you start to lean into the things that you’re really, really good at. And me as a leader in the business, it’s also very important for me to know what I’m not good at.  

There are certain things that I’m good at, but there’s a hell of a lot that I’m really, really not good at. And over time, I’ve managed to bring people in not only as management and as executives, but also as owners in the business who are really, really good at the things that I’m not good at.  

I’m a big-thinking guy. I love risk, love the next big opportunity. I’m hugely optimistic about the world around me, and I see success everywhere. But unfortunately, life doesn’t work like that. So, I need people around me that will also just ground me and give me the realities and lean into the facts and the data so that I can make strong decisions for the business.  

And I’ve been very lucky that I’ve got a team of absolute rock stars around me. We all complement one another, but inherently we all have this same very ambitious drive to win. 

That’s really what the foundation of this business is. Whether we sold toilet paper or musical instruments, we would be successful at it because of our drive and our culture and the way that we work. 

The Finance Ghost: Again, so much wisdom in there, which is fantastic. I love that reference to fear of failure. And like you say, it’s not enormous, life-changing, life-ruining failure, like I’ve lost everything. Everyone should be fearful of that, clearly. But I do agree with you that if you are a risk-taking person, you’ve just got a way better chance of cracking it as an entrepreneur.  

And there’s nothing wrong with this, but if your idea of success is to go and have this very long career in one place and you kind of work your way up the ladder and everything – sometimes I’m jealous of those people because it strikes me as a simpler life. Look, I’m sure you’ve had these moments as well where you look at what you’re doing, you’re like, why am I like this? Why is this inside me? You know? [Laughs]. 

Maurice Van Heerden: It’s also a very boring life, in my opinion. I agree with you. Some people find comfort in predictability and security.  

The first thing I say to any senior person that’s coming into our business, and sometimes it scares very talented people off. But I always say, if you’re joining Planetworld because you’re looking for job security, please don’t come.  

And I say that because we’re not the type of business that offers job security. What we offer is a lot of freedom to solve very complex challenges in your own way and to be super creative about how you do it. That’s what we offer. So, when you work here, you’ll be very challenged. 

You will get a lot of freedom, be given a lot of responsibility, and of course with that, some expectation. And if that excites you, then brilliant.  

But it doesn’t excite everybody. Then I always say, well, I’m sure you could find a job at ABSA because you probably work there for 30 years and do well, climb the corporate ladder slowly. This is not that kind of place. And I don’t think any entrepreneurial, truly entrepreneurial environment is like that. I just don’t think it works. 

The Finance Ghost: No, absolutely. Look, just to be clear, you know, the reference to ABSA there is not because of who’s sponsoring this podcast. It’s really just corporates that have that slightly older-school culture. And it is like job security, safety. There are a lot of people who crave that. To be honest, I think most people crave that.  

And it’s really just this crazy few who want to go out there and disrupt and do these things. And maybe that’s why you bank with Capitec hey? Because that DNA is firmly there, based on the experience I’ve had. 

Maurice Van Heerden: We do an annual management get-together. And in that get-together, we look at the year ahead and some of what our big audacious goals are. And last year I actually presented the Capitec story as part of our executive session.  

I’d been at a talk at Capitec a few months before. Then I was absolutely blown away by the way that they’ve managed to build this business of enormous scale, yet retain this loose entrepreneurial style, which is very, very uncommon, and especially in banks.  

Banks by their very nature are quite rigid. They’re complex businesses. Yet Capitec was this extremely entrepreneurial start-up kind of environment, but in a very significant big bank. And they’ve since extended that into business banking. Obviously we bank with them and very proud to be banking with them.  

But another good example would be Netflix, which also retains – a lot of our culture stuff is really just plagiarised from Netflix. You can build significant businesses that perform by all the measures that you would be expected to and yet retain this very loose entrepreneurial style of doing business, where you’ve got great people that are all working towards a common cause.  

And because you’ve got great people, you don’t have to create a thousand rules to protect yourself from the stupid people [laughs] because you don’t have any. You’ve got real talent in your business that’s super ambitious. And that’s very much something that we’ve tried to imitate. 

The Finance Ghost: Oh, I love that. That’s very, very good. I actually have TJ Strydom’s book on Capitec on my desk. And I always remind myself what I took from that book was if you just focus on the thing you’re really good at and you focus long term on it, you can do exceptionally well.  

Every entrepreneur at some point doubts themselves and goes, “Oh, I need to do 100 other things. Maybe I should go into this or go into that.” – or it’s a slow month or whatever. You’ve just got to keep that true north.  

Yours sounds like culture, actually, above all else. I was going to ask you with all these product categories and your finger in so many pies and yes, audio is the thing that just brings it all together. 

What actually brings it all together maybe is just the culture, actually. Maybe that’s what makes Planetworld so interesting. You could almost sell anything. As you say, look, you’re selling cool stuff. I mean, let’s call a spade a spade. Musical instruments, audio, those epic home systems. Very fun products.  

But it’s the culture, right? That’s actually what ties it all together. It’s not the product range. 

Maurice Van Heerden:  I believe so. So early on it’s very difficult to establish yourself as a recognised distributor in South Africa. Especially when you don’t have large amounts of capital behind you, which we didn’t have. I was a schoolteacher and my brother was a waiter.  

So, it takes a lot of time and a lot of hard work to get going. But once you have a little bit of a name for yourself, you just need that one product that retailers like, or the one product that has quite a lot of demand in the market that kind of sets you off on a journey.  

But now we distribute 78 global brands. I would be very surprised if there are any distributors in the country that do more than that. And the thing that allows us to deal with the complexity and allows us to deal with all the different industries, is that our culture remains the same throughout, and they are also very different industries.  

You come from a musical instruments background. That’s guys with ponytails and Led Zeppelin T-shirts; relaxed. And there’s a certain way that they communicate with each other. There’s a whole vibe about that industry. 

The Finance Ghost: In my dad’s case, it was an Afro and Led Zeppelin T-shirt straight out of the 70s. It’s amazing. Those photos make me happy. 

Maurice Van Heerden: I can see where the afro comes from! [laughs] So that’s one industry. But on the other side we do pro AV business, so we basically service corporate South Africa with all of their boardroom solutions, video conferencing equipment and so on. And that’s stiff. I always say that’s pointy shoes and button-up shirts.  

We at Planetworld maintain this – we’ve got a very casual, loose style. When somebody from our business turns up, it’ll likely be in a cool, unique-design Planetworld T-shirt and jeans and a pair of Jordans or something. They will be a highly competent person that’s genuinely interested in delivering the best value for you as humanly possible.  

A high level of integrity – they’re not there to siphon money off you. They’re there to give you the best possible solution that we can give. But they are going to be very ambitious. They’re going to push you to be ambitious about your project and your plan. That’s what translates across all the industries.  

Industries that are typically one way or another way. What people really care about is doing business with people that are honest and truly want what’s best for them. Doing it to a high degree, and a high standard, and knowing that when the proverbial hits the fan, I’ve got somebody that’s going to support me and have my back.  

That’s the culture that we drive throughout the business. And I think we could sell toilet paper, cosmetics, I think we could sell anything because that universal truth is true, no matter what it is that we’re selling. 

The Finance Ghost: Yeah, it’s so interesting. And the route to market here is also fascinating because you spoke earlier about your dealer base. Very important to you. That’s how you get these products out broadly. You’d never have the capital to go and open all of those places yourself. It just wouldn’t make sense.  

But you’ve also got these experience centres, which is obviously where you have invested. So, from the outside looking in, my guess would be that there are certain products that you need people to see and touch, in an environment that is more controlled, hence the experience centres.  

And then there’s other products where people can see and touch them adequately in a music store or in a car audio store or whatever the case may be. Is that how you choose what gets an experience centre and what doesn’t? 

Maurice Van Heerden: We have two different methodologies at play. One is our retail business, where we supply hundreds of retailers around the country with equipment. And so, the retailer is the showroom.  

We create a beautiful point of sale or demonstration within a retail store. And they, of course, have feet walking through there throughout the week. And people get to experience our products in the way that they should. That is by far the easier way.  

The second part of our business we call project-based business. So, it’s relatively long-pipeline business. And a good example would be if you were building a home and you know that you want a relatively high level of AV equipment throughout the home, and you want it to disappear into the home (so you don’t want freestanding speakers and things all around the house).  

So now it becomes a project. And so, at the stage when your architect’s designing the home, he needs to meet with somebody to go and design all of these elements into his drawings. And that’s really where the journey starts on a project like that.  

But in order to do that, the end user or the homeowner needs to see, well, what’s the finished picture going to be if I invest all this money? And that’s quite difficult to showcase.  

So, what we’ve done is we’ve created these experience centres where we basically tell the story. We become your imagination of what is possible in your home, at your church, at your school, in your boardroom, and we sort of paint that whole story.  

And at the point at which the end consumer and the architect want to start looking at what’s available, they would then come to our offices and get a full demonstration from very entry-level equipment all the way up to the ultimate experience. And that’s why we created these facilities.  

They’re hugely expensive, they’re difficult to manage. If you looked at them purely on a P&L, you would tell me I’m crazy. The intended consequence, is, of course, to create more business. The unintended consequence is that customers love spending time in our offices because they’re beautiful, they’ve got all this equipment.  

And we increasingly get businesses that genuinely just want to do business with us because they just love our facilities and our approach and that we’ve got this incredible showroom that absolutely blows them away. And on the first interaction they go, “Wow. I just – I’ve never seen anything like this. I want to be part of this”.  

And that’s the intangible benefit of building these facilities. I would say the last thing is that it really inspires our teams because it keeps them on the cutting edge of what is possible in these different environments. And also, they’re super proud of what we build and how we execute from an experience level.  

So, there’s a lot of financial reasons to do it, but solely those don’t entirely make sense. There are also just cultural reasons to do it. It really entrenches you in these industries and they’ve been hugely successful for us. And in fact, we start our next renovation in our showroom on Monday. So here we go again. 

The Finance Ghost: So, Maurice, you’ve shared so many excellent, excellent stories here and insights into how to actually build a business like this. I love the point on culture, and building this culture of winners, I think that comes through 100%, and the business is a winner. So clearly it works.  

But it’s all about the future, right? I think any entrepreneur tends to focus on the future rather than where we’ve come from. Very few entrepreneurs I meet sit there and pat themselves on the back for what they’ve done. They’re always looking ahead. It’s just what makes us entrepreneurs.  

So, as you look ahead over the next few years, what is the next big step for the business? What is going to make a really big difference to the extent, obviously, you’re willing to talk about it publicly. What’s the big dream here? 

Maurice Van Heerden: I’m 42, I’m very early in my career and very, very excited about the future for the business. At the position we are in now, we’re really like a 100-metre athlete who’s prepared for the Olympics and the tournament’s now starting.  

We’re well conditioned, we’re in fantastic shape. Our diet’s right, our mindset is right, and really, we’re ready to sort of jump and go and win the opportunity that we see in the market for sure. We’re very, very good at telling brand stories. What we’ve done particularly in our retail business is we’ve become very, very good at speaking to high-income groups.  

So, if you think across our brand portfolio, we distribute a brand called Sonos, which eight years ago nobody really knew what it was. Today it’s by far the largest premium audio brand in the country.  

Through that process, we know where those high-end consumers shop, we know what their activity online is, we know what kind of influencers and advocates they follow. We know so much about that consumer, and so really our sort of next five years is about owning that customer to an extent.  

So, the products and services that these customers, medium- to high-net-worth income homes require, is really the gap that we want to fill. And so, we’re constantly looking for international brands that appeal to these customers, and we know exactly how to take those brands to market. So that’s one end that we’re very focused on.  

We’ve recently launched a consumer electronics brand called Roborock, which is a premium floor-care business, totally out of our audio wheelhouse. But they’re the largest manufacturer of robotic vacuum cleaners in the world. And it’s been an enormous success.  

And the reason it’s been an enormous success is because we know exactly how to reach the customer in a way that they are comfortable, and they trust our communications and so on. And so, we’re looking to add more product to that portfolio.  

And really the only guiding principle for us is that it needs to appeal to a mid- to high-end type of customer. And two is it needs to be really technology driven.  

So, we’re really, really interested in robotics, we’re interested in AI, we’re interested in products that are saving people time, making life easier and that are sexy.  

And the second thing I will say is that across our project-based business is that we’ve got very big ambitions to expand into Africa. So, we do quite a lot of business, probably 5% of our revenue to 8% of our revenue, is in Africa now. We want that to be 50% over the next five years. And Africa is a difficult place to do business, right?  

It’s difficult for South Africans to do business in Africa, but it’s particularly difficult for the US or the East to do business in Africa. So, we want to be that gateway of taking brands into Africa as these markets are developing and growing, that we really establish ourselves at the forefront of bringing technology into particularly Sub-Saharan Africa. 

The Finance Ghost: I love that, Maurice. Well done. That’s a really cool strategy. And a lot of the people listening to this podcast and reading Ghost Mail would definitely be in your high-income category where they’ve got some pretty cool setups at home.  

So I would encourage you, if you are listening to this, it’s time to, shall we say, upgrade your leisure space. Go and check out planetworld.co.za, reach out. Check out the experience centre. It sounds very, very cool.  

And Maurice, from my side, just congratulations and thank you for sharing such an upbeat description of what it’s like to actually build something like this over 20 years. It’s very clear that you have had, and are still having a lot of fun and, like you say, you’re still early in the journey.  

So, I’m slightly jealous of the people who get to work with you because I think it sounds like a very cool culture and those cultures are hard to find.  

And all the best. It’ll be very nice to actually just stay in touch and see how the thing progresses because I think it’s going to go very far. So well done. 

Maurice Van Heerden: Awesome, Ghost. I appreciate it. It was a real pleasure. 

Ghost Bites (Mantengu | Northam Platinum | Purple Group | Schroder European Real Estate | Spear REIT)

In this edition of Ghost Bites:

  • Mantengu may have locked in a profit on the iron beneficiation plant
  • Northam Platinum met or exceeded guidance for key metrics
  • Purple Group reaches for the Telescope with a spicy acquisition
  • It’s time to put Schroder European Real Estate out of its misery
  • Spear REIT locks in a tidy return on two properties

Mantengu may have locked in a profit on the iron beneficiation plant (JSE: MTU)

It all depends on how the next year pans out

Mantengu has announced the disposal of the iron beneficiation plant in Limpopo for R50 million. Having bought the asset little more than a year ago in February 2025, they are locking in a profit on disposal of R33.5 million!

It’s not quite that simple, as only R20 million of the price is payable immediately. The remaining R30 million becomes payable when the iron plant achieves “commissioning” – which they define as the plant achieving not less than 75% of its full capacity for three consecutive months.

Weirdly, the purchaser will have 12 months to achieve that status. If they don’t, then the R30 million lapses. That doesn’t feel like the right incentive to me, but presumably the underlying scenario analysis checks out.

An important element of the deal is that Mantengu will have the ability to construct additional iron plants globally under a licence agreement. This may become useful down the line, especially if the Averi transaction goes ahead.

Ghost Bite: There’s absolutely no guarantee that the R30 million will go through. If it doesn’t, then Mantengu got their money back on this asset and some change. But if it does, then they’ve locked in a juicy little profit here!


Northam Platinum met or exceeded guidance for key metrics (JSE: NPH)

It’s just a pity that PGM prices have let them down

Northam Platinum released a production update for the year ended June 2026.

They came in ahead of guidance on key metrics including total equivalent refined metal produced from own operations, equivalent refined metal purchased from third parties, total chrome concentrate produced and sold, as well as total 4E metal sold. A mouthful, I know. But all four of those metrics achieved record levels in this period, so they deserve a mention.

Other production metrics were all within guidance, driven by a solid performance across the group’s operations. This includes the ramp-up at Eland, which is proceeding on schedule.

On the PGM side, refined metal sales were up 10%. In chrome, total concentrate production was up 17.4%.

Ghost Bite: Production performance is the primary measure of a management team’s performance in the mining sector. They can’t control commodity prices, but they can control production. Despite Northam putting in a solid operational performance, the ugly correction in the PGM sector means that the price is down 30% year-to-date.


Purple Group reaches for the Telescope (JSE: PPE)

Vertical integration is coming at quite the price

Purple Group now boasts 1.3 million active clients and over R100 billion in assets on its platform. The group has done a spectacular job of scaling to this size, which is exactly why I’m a happy investor.

It’s worth pointing out that I avoided the COVID-era hype entirely though, choosing to time my entry based on when Purple Group was under pressure. They had lost their “darling” status, and the market had turned its attention elsewhere. Those are excellent ingredients for a successful entry.

My average purchase price is R1.06 vs. the current price of R1.72, a gain of 61%.

Purple has been focused on organic growth and allowing the platform to do its thing. Cross-selling has been the order of the day. I personally think that the platform has become too cluttered now, so I hope they don’t lose the “Easy” part of EasyEquities. For now at least, the numbers look fantastic and people seem to be more active than ever on the platform.

To augment this growth story, Purple has announced the acquisition of 100% of Telescope AI.

Telescope provides investment research and compliance infrastructure to platforms including IG Group, tastetrade and EasyEquities, among others. They already reach over 3 million end users across 7 jurisdictions. The compliance offering, Guardrails, has completed more than 2.5 million checks across global jurisdictions.

In other words, Purple is vertically integrating here and moving further up the value chain. Interesting.

The total price is up to $10.75 million, with $7 million payable upfront and $3.75 million payable on a deferred basis. Goodwill is the order of the day here, as Telescope NAV is just AUD494k (around $340k!) and the attributable loss after tax for the six months to February 2026 was AUD88k ($61k).

The more interesting metric would be to see what EasyEquities is currently paying to Telescope each year. By owning the company, Purple is essentially bringing that spend in-house. But even then, I suspect that you would need an actual telescope to see how high this valuation multiple is.

Of the $7 million initial payment, $5 million will be paid in cash and $2 million will be settled by issuing Purple shares at the 30-day VWAP as at the closing date.

Then, of the $3.75 million deferred amount, $2.75 million will be split into five annual instalments of $550k. Each instalment will be reduced by the extent to which the operating cash outflow of Telescope exceeds $250k per year. The net instalment can be settled in cash or shares.

The remaining $1 million deferred payment will be based on the achievement of certain milestones by Telescope AI within five years. Again, this can be settled in cash or shares.

I would love to see the underlying agreements around what the buyers can and can’t do with Telescope. It would make zero sense for the sellers to simply allow the buyers to avoid deferred payments by investing in the business and ensuring that it is operating cash flow negative. I must tell you that I’ve seen huge loopholes in many a transaction though, so anything is possible here.

Ghost Bite: This is a Category 2 transaction, so shareholders won’t be asked to vote. There also isn’t a transaction circular. If there was a vote, I suspect that there would be a lot of questions asked about the valuation. With the market cap of R2.45 billion, at least Purple Group isn’t betting the farm here.

117
Purple Group's vertical strategy

What are your thoughts on this acquisition?

Errata: the first version of Ghost Bites this morning noted that Purple is buying 50% of Telescopic. My apologies for misreading the announcement. I’ve corrected this Bite to reflect that they are buying 100%.


It’s time to put Schroder European Real Estate out of its misery (JSE: SCD)

The valuation is just getting worse

Schroder European Real Estate intends to wind down the company. In many ways, they would simply be putting it out of its misery.

The recent story has been anything but happy, with Schroder suffering disappointing property returns and dealing with huge tax headaches as well.

Things aren’t getting any better unfortunately. The latest portfolio update reflects a decline in value of 3.9% over the past quarter. Aside from yield pressure, there are also more conservative assumptions around investment demand for secondary offices. Some of the industrial assets have also moved the wrong way.

Ghost Bite: It really has been a horrible story, with a total return over 5 years of just 12.7%!


Spear REIT locks in a tidy return on two properties (JSE: LAB)

This has worked out beautifully for them

Spear REIT has finalised the disposal of Hamilton House and Chiappini House, both of which are situated in De Waterkant, Cape Town. Spear originally acquired these properties in October 2024 as part of the broader deal to acquire the Western Cape portfolio from Emira Property Fund (JSE: EMI).

Spear originally paid R80.75 million for the properties. They are now selling them less than two years later for a disposal price of R108 million. That’s a 34% return over two years – a seriously impressive outcome!

Apart from the obvious financial benefit of this disposal, it also has strategic benefits in the form of simplifying Spear’s portfolio and reducing the fund’s exposure to smaller, decentralised office assets.

Ghost Bite: This is yet another reason why I leave property management to the experts. I’ll stick to buying REITs and investing in these management teams, rather than doing buy-to-let myself. I can’t see myself finding a property that can give me a capital return of 34% in two years.


Results of previous poll:


Nibbles:

  • Director dealings:
    • The CEO of Africa Bitcoin Corporation (JSE: BAC) bought ordinary shares in the company. Unlike his other recent purchases, this is at group level in the holding company itself, rather than preferred shares in one of the underlying investments.
  • Italtile (JSE: ITE) is looking for a new CEO of major subsidiary Ceramic Industries. Lance Foxcroft, who also previously served as group CEO, is taking early retirement. The reason provided is that the travel demands between Australia and South Africa are simply too great. As an interim measure, group CEO Brandon Wood will assume oversight responsibility for Ceramic Industries. The group has commenced a process to appoint a Head of Manufacturing to look after that side of the group.
  • AngloGold Ashanti (JSE: ANG) is trying to persuade shareholders to vote in favour of a proposed repurchase programme of up to $2 billion. The sticking point seems to be the tenure of the authority, with AngloGold obviously looking for as much flexibility as possible (up to five years). Proxy advisory firm Institutional Shareholders Services has recommended that shareholders vote against the programme, as their belief is that it should be limited to 18 months. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
  • Afine Investments (JSE: ANI) announced the results of the dividend reinvestment alternative. Investors were able to reinvest up to 25% of their dividend in new shares. The end result is that R5 million in new shares will be issued and a cash dividend of R16.7 million will be paid by the company.
  • Araxi Limited (JSE: AXX) announced that Michael Pimstein will transition from Executive Chairman to Non-Executive Chairman. He is one of the four founders of the business, so this is an important step in the broader succession plan of the group.
  • African Media Entertainment (JSE: AME) announced that a company called Trucha Limited has increased its stake from 7.70% to 10.09%. I can’t find anything particularly useful about Trucha online.

Satrix: Why you’re wrong about emerging markets

Whatever you think about emerging market (EM) equities, you’re probably wrong. The popular misconception is that EM indices are a single, monolithic, low-tech, high-risk/potential-high-reward bucket. The reality is far more nuanced and far more interesting – especially if you’re building a well-diversified investment portfolio.

“When it comes to offshore diversification, most local investors automatically think of developed market (DM) indices, such as the S&P 500 or the MSCI World Index,” says Nonhlanhla Mphelo, Senior Portfolio Manager at Satrix. “And while these indices have added significant value to investor portfolios since 2010 (largely on the back of tremendous technology sector growth), looking ahead, investors may be well served by adding a diversified global equity exposure in the form of emerging market equities.”

Common misconceptions about emerging markets

EMs are often characterised as politically unstable, commodity-driven and highly dependent on global cycles. But while these risks remain relevant in parts of the universe, this view is increasingly outdated.

“EMs are diverse, spanning multiple regions and development stages, with many economies becoming more domestically driven,” says Mphelo. “They are also home to globally competitive companies, resulting in a wide range of risk and return profiles across the asset class.”

You’re looking at regions like Asia-Pacific (including countries like China, India, South Korea, Taiwan, etc), Latin America (Brazil, Chile, etc), Europe (Czech Republic, Poland, Turkey, etc), Africa (Egypt, South Africa, etc) and the Middle East (Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE, etc). When you’re investing in EM funds, all these countries (and others) represent a diverse range of geographies and industries.

Mphelo says that EMs embody both growth potential and risk. “On the opportunity side, many EM economies typically benefit from faster economic growth as they develop,” Mphelo explains. “This growth is driven by favourable demographics, rising consumption, infrastructure investment, and expanding labour forces, as populations tend to be younger and growing.”

Sectors covered by emerging markets

Another false assumption is the idea that EM funds are light on tech and heavy on resources. In fact, EMs are diversified across all Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) sectors.

MSCI data (30 June 2026) shows the Emerging Markets Index has higher weightings in Information Technology (45.26% vs 30.27% in MSCI World Index) and Financials (18.4% vs 15.88%), while Healthcare (2.37% vs 9.08%) and Industrials (6.75% vs 11.64%) are lower.

“This reflects the structure of EM economies, where technology hardware, financial services, commodities, and materials play a more prominent role,” says Mphelo.

How EMs enhance a diversified portfolio

When you’re building a portfolio, choosing between EM and DM funds shouldn’t be an either/or debate. If anything, EM funds provide a compelling complement to those well-known DM indices – whether it’s a broad EM option like the Satrix MSCI Emerging Markets Feeder ETF or the Satrix MSCI EM ESG Enhanced Feeder ETF, or a country-specific EM fund like the Satrix MSCI China Feeder ETF or the Satrix MSCI India Feeder ETF.

“While DMs are dominated by large, mature companies and economies, EM exposure offers access to potentially faster‑growing economies, broader geographic diversification – and, in many cases, more attractive valuations,” says Mphelo. “Analysts have in recent years pointed to stretched valuations in DM equities, contrasted with EM Market equity valuations more in line with long-term aggregates.”

Within the Satrix balanced funds, EM equities are viewed as a source of meaningful long‑term upside and diversification. As a result, EM equity exposure was increased above the approximate 12% MSCI ACWI benchmark levels in the 2024 Strategic Asset Allocation review to roughly 20% of the global equities segment.

“This positioning was based on higher expected returns due to lower valuations,” says Mphelo, comparing the MSCI World’s price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 24.6x to the MSCI Emerging Markets P/E of 18.6x as at 30 June 2026. “Our belief was also that EMs offered more attractive economic growth prospects and attractive upside potential, while adding important sector diversification from the high-tech exposure offered by DM equities,” she explains.

“Emerging markets offer significant long‑term potential and have delivered competitive performance relative to the MSCI World and S&P 500 over certain periods,” Mphelo concludes. “As part of a diversified portfolio, EM exposure can provide both growth opportunities and diversification benefits. And while volatility is higher with EMs, patient investors who can tolerate risk may benefit from the structural growth trends present across EM economies, including Africa and beyond.”

Disclaimer

Satrix Investments (Pty) Ltd is an authorised Financial Service Provider (FSP) in terms of the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act, 2002 (FSP no 43670). Satrix Managers (RF) (Pty) Ltd (Satrix) is an authorised Financial Service Provider (FSP no 15658) and a registered and approved Manager in Collective Investment Schemes in Securities. Collective investment schemes are generally medium- to long-term investments. With Unit Trusts and ETFs, the investor essentially owns a “proportionate share” (in proportion to the participatory interest held in the fund) of the underlying investments held by the fund. With Unit Trusts, the investor holds participatory units issued by the fund while in the case of an ETF, the participatory interest, while issued by the fund, comprises a listed security traded on the stock exchange.

ETFs are index tracking funds, registered as a Collective Investment and can be traded by any stockbroker on the stock exchange or via Investment Plans and online trading platforms. ETFs may incur additional costs due to being listed on the JSE. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance, and the value of investments / units may go up or down. A schedule of fees and charges, and maximum commissions are available on the Minimum Disclosure Document or upon request from the Manager. Collective investments are traded at ruling prices and can engage in borrowing and scrip lending. A feeder fund is a portfolio that invests in a single portfolio of a collective investment scheme, which levies its own charges, and which could result in a higher fee structure for the feeder fund. International investments or investments in foreign securities could be accompanied by additional risks such as potential constraints on liquidity and repatriation of funds, macroeconomic risk, political risk, foreign exchange risk, tax risk, settlement risk as well as potential limitations on the availability of market information. The manager has the right to close the portfolio to new investors in order to manage it more efficiently in accordance with its mandate.

Visit www.satrix.co.za for more information.

Ghost Bites (Labat Africa | Old Mutual | South Ocean Holdings)

In this edition of Ghost Bites:

  • When will Labat Africa engage with the market and tell their story?
  • Old Mutual reminds us just how well our market infrastructure works in South Africa
  • South Ocean Holdings expands in Cape Town

When will Labat Africa engage with the market and tell their story? (JSE: LAB)

They now own 100% of Classic International, yet the share price remains stuck at R0.03

Labat Africa has now concluded the acquisition of the remaining 24.45% in Classic International. This means that they’ve issued another 900 million shares (at R0.03 per share) to settle the purchase price of R27 million.

Classic International is an IT company. Unsurprisingly, it doesn’t take long for the words “artificial intelligence” to be thrown around as well. This is part of Labat’s broader transformation into a tech company, something that the market is finding difficult to understand. Historically, Labat was a cannabis business, so you can’t really blame the market for the confusion.

Ghost Bite: Labat Africa has been promising to talk to the market and explain the strategy. This implies that a Capital Markets Day is in the pipeline. Let’s see if (and when) that happens.


Old Mutual reminds us how well our market infrastructure works in South Africa (JSE: OMU)

By emerging and frontier market standards, we are very spoilt here

There’s never a dull moment when it comes to frontier markets like Zimbabwe.

Old Mutual has been suspended from trading on the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange (ZSE) for years now, despite the suspension having absolutely nothing to do with Old Mutual itself.

After years of engaging with regulators, Old Mutual has determined that the easiest route to achieving some liquidity for investors in Zimbabwe will be via a transfer of the listing from the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange to the Victoria Falls Stock Exchange (VFEX).

Interestingly, VFEX now has 19 counters listed on its exchange vs. just one listing in 2020 when the nonsense started with the ZSE suspensions. Another element worth highlighting is that VFEX trading is all denominated in USD, so you also don’t get the same currency volatility that you’ll find on the ZSE.

Ghost Bite: This makes no difference to South Africa investors in Old Mutual, but I think it’s a good reminder of some of the difficulties in doing business in markets like these. Our financial markets infrastructure in South Africa is literally world-class.


South Ocean Holdings expands in Cape Town (JSE: SOH)

A related party deal gives them a foothold

South Ocean is a R200 million market cap company with thin liquidity in its stock.

The company is focused on low voltage electrical cables. This is a difficult business that saw profitability plummet in the year ended December 2025, hence why the share price is down 41% over 12 months.

South Ocean is now acquiring Southern Atlantic Cables for R4.5 million. South Ocean will pay for the deal through the issuance of shares at 98 cents per share. The current traded price is R1.00 per share.

The unusual element to this deal is that it is a related party transaction, thanks to the involvement of the Chairman of South Ocean in this asset. It’s a rather convoluted story, with the summary being that the Chairman got involved in this asset a year ago to acquire it from a former customer. For whatever reason, the opportunity wasn’t available to South Ocean at the time.

As with all related party deals, the director with a conflict of interest reclused himself from the meeting to discuss the transaction. The rest of the board believes that the deal is fair, particularly in the context of the cost of setting up distribution in Cape Town.

Southern Atlantic Cables generated net profit of R968k in the period ended December 2025, so they are picking it up on a P/E of roughly 4.5x.

Ghost Bite: Single-digit P/E multiples are market practice for industrial assets in South Africa. If anything, given the size of this business, 4.5x is probably slightly on the high side. With part of the justification being the route-to-market in Cape Town, this valuation is being substantiated by more than just the existing earnings. A build-or-buy analysis is common in corporate transactions.

133
Strategic vs. financial investors

Are you familiar with how strategic investors (like South Ocean) differ from financial investors?


Results of previous poll:


Nibbles:

  • Director dealings:
    • As part of broader share awards, the CFO of Lewis Group (JSE: LEW) sold shares in excess of the taxable portion worth R1.34 million.
    • A founding director of Famous Brands (JSE: FBR) sold shares worth R98k. This adds to the recent selling by that director.
  • Accelerate Property Fund (JSE: APF) made a mistake in their last SENS announcement. Distributable earnings will be between 1.96 cents and 2.31 cents, not between R1.96 and R2.31. With the share price at R0.49, I imagine that most people just read straight over the error without realising it. Anyway, the company has now corrected it. For anyone who thought that the company is trading on a P/E of around 0.25x, this will be an unpleasant correction.
  • Visual International (JSE: VIS) has confirmed that Serowe Industries has terminated its non-binding offer to acquire up to 34.9% of the company. This is yet another reminder that a corporate deal is never done until the cash has flowed. Even binding offers can fall over, so non-binding offers are little more than a promise to meet up for dinner at some point.
  • Novus (JSE: NVS) continues to build its stake in Mustek (JSE: MST). These are on-market trades, so it takes a long time to meaningfully add to an existing position via this approach. Recent purchases have taken Novus from a direct stake of 50.44% to 50.67%. Together with concert parties, the stake has increased from 70.73% to 70.96%.
  • Shuka Minerals (JSE: SKA) released another set of drilling results at the Kawbe Zinc Mine. As usual, you need a degree in geology to understand anything about the technical elements of the announcement. It seems like the latest drilling was in a northern area of the project that isn’t as well understood as the rest, so this was exploratory drilling in the truest sense. Having now learnt more about the orebody, they will return to more central areas that aren’t as unknown.

What really happened on Dyatlov Pass?

A slashed tent, frozen footprints, and injuries with no visible cause. The Dyatlov Pass case has everything a good mystery needs, except a conclusion.

At the end of the 1950s, nine experienced hikers walked into the Ural Mountains in Western Russia. None of them walked out again. What they left behind has puzzled the world for decades: a tent slashed open from the inside, warm clothing and shoes left behind, and bodies scattered across the frozen slopes in various states of undress.

The events that took place on the Dyatlov Pass are shrouded in mystery; we have many theories, but no irrefutable conclusions. Grim though it may be, it has become one of the internet’s favourite enigmas, probably because it has so many tantalizing clues scattered across it. 

Proceed with caution, dear reader, and with the knowledge that no straight answers lie in wait at the end of this article. 

First, the facts

In January 1959, a 23-year-old radio engineering student named Igor Dyatlov led a group of 9 experienced hikers into the northern Urals on a ski expedition. One member of the group turned back early with joint pain, thereby becoming the only member of the 10 to survive. 

The 9 remaining hikers pressed on toward a mountain that the local Mansi people called Kholat Syakhl, which roughly translates to “Dead Mountain”. As far as names go, that one is probably the closest that a mountain can provide in lieu of an actual indemnity form. 

The group had arranged to send a telegram to their sports club once they reached the settlement of Vizhai, which they estimated they would get to no later than 12 February. When the date came and went with no sign of a telegram, nobody panicked. After all, there was a great distance to cover and delays were quite normal on such ambitious expeditions. It wasn’t until the 20th of February, when stressed relatives of the hikers started demanding action, that search parties were sent out. 

On 26 February, volunteer searchers found the hikers’ tent on the slope of Kholat Syakhl. It was half-collapsed and appeared to have been cut open from the inside. The hikers’ clothing and supplies were still inside, but they were not. Instead, footprints leaving the opening in the tent indicated that they had walked towards the treeline, which was about 1.5 kilometres away, in single file and at a normal pace. What was even stranger was the fact that the footprints revealed that only some of the hikers were wearing boots when they left the tent – some were barefoot, and one set of prints was left by a person wearing only one sock. 

They found the first two bodies under a pine tree. They were stripped down to their underwear and huddled around the remains of a small fire. Some distance away from them, three more bodies, slightly better dressed, were found in the snow, in positions that suggested that they were attempting to return to the tent when they died. The final four were only found about two months later, buried under metres of snow in a ravine. 

Next comes the inquest

A legal inquest started as soon as the first five bodies were found. A medical examination found no injuries that might have led to their deaths, and it was concluded that they had all died of hypothermia – unsurprising, considering nighttime temperatures in the area were recorded as low as -40 degrees Celsius. It seemed like a relatively open-and-shut case (with the odd inexplicable detail here and there) until the second batch of bodies was recovered from the ravine. At this point, things got a little weird.

Three of the hikers found in the ravine had fatal injuries: one had major skull damage, and two had crushing chest fractures. These were the kinds of internal injuries that coroners usually saw in car crash victims – and they were almost exclusively internal. With the exception of some soft tissue damage to their faces (which is to be expected from being found face-down in running water), none of the four bodies from the ravine had external wounds that aligned with their severe bone fractures. 

The Soviet inquest opened in February 1959 and was hastily closed that May with the deliberately hollow verdict that the hikers had died from “a compelling natural force”, whatever that means. The files were then classified and packed away in a secret archive, where they stayed for three decades. Relatives were told only that the group had frozen, and the dead were buried in closed coffins

Now, the theories

Given the combination of unusual circumstances, unanswered questions and unyielding Soviets in charge of the information, human imagination was left to fill in the gaps in this story. And boy, did we produce some colourful theories over the course of the past 67 years.

Of course, there’s a Yeti theory, because you can’t have people dying under strange circumstances anywhere near a snowy mountain without invoking a shaggy, slouching cryptid. Proponents of this theory point to the fact that some of the hikers died of physical trauma (they don’t have an explanation for the fact that the hikers had almost no external wounds – maybe the Yeti was wearing gloves that day). What really fanned the flames of this theory was a creepy photograph retrieved from one of the hikers’ film cameras, which showed what appeared to be a dark, blurry figure peering around a tree. There’s every likelihood that this was just another hiker. Unfortunately, the image really is too blurry to say for sure. 

One hypothesis, popularised by Donnie Eichar’s 2013 book Dead Mountain, is that wind going around Kholat Syakhl created a Kármán vortex, which can produce infrasound (low frequency acoustic waves) capable of inducing panic attacks in humans. Eichar claims that, because of their panic, the hikers were driven to leave the tent by whatever means necessary and fled down the slope. By the time they were farther down the hill, they would have been out of the infrasound’s path and would have regained their composure, but in the darkness would have been unable to return to their shelter.

Another popular theory is that the campsite fell within the path of a Soviet parachute mine exercise. This theory alleges that the hikers fled the tent in a shoeless panic after being woken by loud explosions overhead. The four found in the ravine were fatally injured by parachute mine concussions. 

There’s a bit of meat to this theory, as there are indeed records of parachute mines being tested by the Soviet military around the time the hikers were in the area. Parachute mines detonate while still in the air rather than upon striking the Earth’s surface and produce signature injuries similar to those experienced by the hikers: heavy internal damage with relatively little external trauma. The theory also coincides with reported sightings of glowing, orange orbs floating or falling in the sky within the general vicinity of the hikers. However, mines detonating overhead, or anything striking the ground, should leave traces – and searchers found no metallic shards, no fragments, no blast debris and no craters at the site. There’s also no explanation for why the physical trauma would affect only four out of nine hikers.

And then of course, there are the avalanche theories, of which many different versions exist. The original searchers dismissed the idea almost immediately, and for good reason: there was no debris, no obvious slide path, and the slope looked too gentle to produce one. Experienced hikers like Dyatlov and his group would not have pitched their tent in the path of an obvious avalanche risk.

But in 2021, two scientists at Swiss universities, Alexander Puzrin and Johan Gaume, offered a version that answered those objections. Their model proposed a slab avalanche – not the roaring, tree-flattening wave of the imagination, but a smaller slab of hard-packed snow. 

Their theory is that the hikers had cut into the slope to pitch their tent, weakening the snow above them. Over the following hours, fierce katabatic winds loaded fresh snow onto that weak spot until a slab broke loose and slid down onto the tent while they slept. It was small enough to leave almost no trace by morning, which explains why the first searchers saw no avalanche at all. 

A compressed slab of snow pressing sleeping bodies against the hard floor of the tent could, the researchers argued, produce exactly those crushing injuries without breaking the skin. The single-file march from the tent and the retreat to the trees reads as the disciplined response of trained mountaineers who knew that disturbing the snow too much could spring another avalanche. The pace of their exit could also have been slowed by the need to carry the injured. How the injured wound up separated from the rest of the group if they couldn’t walk on their own remains a lingering question. 

To their credit, Puzrin and Gaume are the first to admit they haven’t closed the case, only made the avalanche theory plausible again. Critics still point out that the slope is shallow and the classic signs were missing. But of all the theories, this one is probably the one that asks us to believe the least.

The mountain is keeping its mystery

So, what happened on the Dyatlov Pass? Even if we trade a supernatural mystery for a natural one, the natural one keeps a few cards face-down. The avalanche model is the most convincing thing we have, but it still can’t fully explain why the group split up, why they cut the tent open instead of using the door, why the Soviets guarded the inquest files so fiercely or what those orange lights in the sky were.

In 1962, a monument bearing the faces of all nine hikers was raised beside their graves in the Mikhaylovskoye cemetery in Yekaterinburg. A year later, a group of climbers fixed a plaque to the mountain itself, with an inscription naming the pass in the group’s honour. It has been called the Dyatlov Pass ever since. Yuri Yudin, whose sore knee sent him home early and saved his life, carried the weight of that luck until he died in 2013. Before his death, he requested to be buried alongside his friends. For the first time in 54 years, Dyatlov’s hiking party rested together again.

If you want to really dig into this story and see more photos, this website is quite a thing.

About the author: Dominique Olivier

Dominique Olivier uses her love of storytelling and ideation to help brands solve problems.

Her first book, Lessons from Loss, has been published by Penguin Random House.

She is a weekly columnist in Ghost Mail and collaborates with The Finance Ghost on Ghost Mail Weekender, a Sunday publication designed to help you be more interesting.

You can learn more about her work at dominiqueolivier.com and she can be reached on LinkedIn here.

Ghost Bites (Accelerate Property Fund | Bytes Technology | Capitec | Sappi)

In this edition of Ghost Bites:

  • Accelerate Property Fund makes more progress
  • Bytes Technology investors will have to be patient
  • Capitec sells the rental finance business to Sasfin
  • Sappi unlocks some positivity in the market

Accelerate Property Fund makes more progress (JSE: APF)

This is one of the few speculative positions in my portfolio

Accelerate Property Fund is an interesting special situation on the JSE.

The fund has been trading at a vast discount to net asset value (NAV) per share for a variety of reasons. These include questions around whether Fourways Mall can be turned into a success, as well as the historical disputes and legal claims with ex-CEO Michael Georgiou (whose entity Azrapart is now in business rescue, and being managed by the business rescue practitioners).

I bought this stock a while ago based on progress they had made with major disposals like the Portside building. When a fund is trading at such a large discount to NAV, the main thing you want to see is the disposal of properties at a price close to NAV. Portside was a perfect and very large example of this.

Technically, if the fund sold absolutely everything and returned the capital to shareholders, the discount to NAV would close and there would be large gains on the table. In practice, what happens is somewhere in the middle – some of the buildings are disposed of, and the discount partially closes.

To that end, I’m happy to see that Accelerate has sold the BMW Fourways dealership showroom for R174 million to a subsidiary of Toyota. That probably gives us a clue about the future of the cars you’ll find at that property. But more importantly for me and the other Accelerate shareholders, the valuation of that property is R180 million.

This means that Accelerate has achieved close to NAV on this disposal, with a strong disposal yield of 6.4%. It’s a prime property, but I’m still glad that they’ve gotten this price. Nothing is ever guaranteed until the deals are actually done.

In further good news, Accelerate’s distributable earnings for the year ended March 2026 came in between 1.96 cents and 2.31 cents per share. That’s a massive swing from a distributable loss per share of 3.97 cents in the prior period. There’s still no dividend (the company’s balance sheet needs further improvement), but the direction of travel is clear.

The final piece of good news is one that will be the subject of debate. The company has decided to derecognise the obligation of R371 million linked to the rebuilt claim by Azrapart. This is a more aggressive accounting policy than we’ve seen before, so the company must be feeling confident that this claim has no merit. This does mean that the NAV will need to be adjusted by investors based on the risk weighting that they are willing to put on this claim.

Ghost Bite: My average in-price is R0.41 per share and the current price is R0.51. Accelerate has been as high as R0.76 per share. Of course, hindsight has demonstrated that I should’ve sold and re-entered lower down. I remain confident that my position will work out nicely here.


Bytes Technology investors will have to be patient (JSE: BYI)

Income is growing, but operating expenses are soaking up that growth

News broke the other day that VCP has taken a stake of over 5% in Bytes Technology Group. The market would see that as a positive sign. There’s now more information to consider, as Bytes used its AGM as an opportunity to give a brief update on recent trading.

For the first four months of the new financial year, Bytes achieved double-digit growth in gross invoiced income and gross profit. This is across both the private and public sectors.

Sounds wonderful, except operating profit is flat year-on-year. Investing for growth is fine, but one wonders about a strategy in which such strong top-line growth isn’t converting into anything for shareholders.

According to management, this performance is consistent with the company’s outlook, so they are on track with their plans at the moment.

Ghost Bite: Over 90 days, Bytes is up 44%. But on a year-to-date basis, the share price is only up 11%! Talk about perfect market timing for those who bought the selling pressure at the end of March.


Capitec sells the rental finance business to Sasfin (JSE: CPI)

Both financial services houses are sticking to what they are good at

Here’s something interesting, not least of all because it’s the first piece of news I’ve seen on Sasfin in a while.

You may recall that Sasfin was taken private as part of a significant strategic shift away from their traditional banking business and towards the areas in which Sasfin traditionally has strength.

Similarly, Capitec built its group by focusing on the things they are really good at.

The latest transaction is a good example of two financial services companies sticking to their knitting.

Capitec will sell the Capitec Rental Finance business to Sasfin for R201 million. Additionally, Capitec will provide a secured credit facility of R1.6 billion to that business to fund the ongoing rental receivables book. This means that Capitec retains indirect exposure to this segment via a loan, rather than through equity ownership and operating risk.

Capitec originally acquired the Capitec Rental Finance business as part of the Mercantile Bank deal in 2019. They’ve no doubt developed a good understanding of the business over the past 7 years, giving them the confidence to switch from being an equity holder to being a lender.

As for Sasfin, it’s good to see some positive momentum there after the take-private.

Ghost Bite: A R201 million transaction is literally a rounding error vs. Capitec’s market cap of R547 billion. But for Sasfin, this will be an important transaction.


Sappi unlocks some positivity in the market (JSE: SAP)

Recent trading has been better than expected

Sappi closed 15% higher on Thursday after giving the market some hope about the financial prospects of the group.

Previous guidance was that adjusted EBITDA in the third quarter would be lower than in the second quarter. Updated guidance is that group adjusted EBITDA should be broadly in line with the second quarter.

There’s a big difference between going backwards and ending up flat quarter-on-quarter. This is why the market gave this broken stock some love.

This performance was driven by stronger-than-anticipated results in North America, along with the steady ramp-up of Somerset Mill PM2 sales volumes.

Ghost Bite: Sappi is as speculative a stock as you’ll ever find. Even after the 15% jump, the share price is still down 58% year-to-date!


Results of previous poll:


Nibbles:

  • Director dealings:
    • Two directors of Goldrush (JSE: GRSP) bought shares worth over R1.65 million.
    • The CEO of Vunani (JSE: VUN) bought shares worth R130k. The spouse of another long-standing top exec bought shares worth R200k.
    • The CEO of Finbond (JSE: FGL) bought shares worth R45k.
  • S&P upgraded the credit rating of NEPI Rockcastle (JSE: NRP) from BBB (with a positive outlook) to BBB+ (with a stable outlook). This is a factor of the company’s strategy and strength of the balance sheet. If you’re interested in learning more, I explained the importance of credit ratings in a video and podcast available here.
  • Aspen (JSE: APN) announced that chairman Kuseni Dlamini will step down as Chairman and independent non-executive director. He’s been in that role since 2015, so that’s quite an innings! Ben Kruger will take on the role of Chairman after the AGM in December. Notably, Chris Mortimer is also stepping down as an independent non-executive director. He’s been on the board since 1999!
  • Numeral (JSE: XII), one of the most obscure names on the local market, gave an update on its healthcare and biotech segment. Aside from the development of a flagship facility in Kyalami, they’ve also invested into WestMed in the Western Cape. They are exiting Longevity and Isopharm. Also, the shareholding in Cryo-Save was increased to 51% as expected. Financials for the year ended February 2026 are expected to be finalised by mid-July.
  • Zeda (JSE: ZZD) has issued additional notes to the value of R1.1 billion under its Domestic Medium-Term Note (DMTN) Programme. They got this done at 5 basis points below price guidance, so that should assist a bit with their cost of funding.
  • Sebata Holdings (JSE: SEB) is no longer suspended from trading. There were initially suspended in October 2025 due to failure to release results for the year ended March 2025. They’ve now caught up, so the shares can trade again. With a market cap of under R100 million, I still wouldn’t expect much in the way of traded volumes.
  • Two non-executive directors of Cilo Cybin (JSE: CCC) have resigned. Replacements haven’t been named yet. There’s also a change to the company secretary. That’s a lot of governance churn at the same time for a small cap.
166
Sappi - sad or happy?

Does this news make you want to get involved in Sappi?

VIDEO: Why credit ratings matter | Why REITs raise capital so easily

The recently launched Ghost Bites podcast brings you an audio supplement to the daily Ghost Bites that you know and love in Ghost Mail. This gives me an opportunity to expand on certain topics in detail, while bringing in the results of the poll as well.

This edition of Ghost Bites makes sense of these SENS announcements:

  • Fitch upgrades the credit ratings of several local banks
  • Hyprop initially announces a R500 million capital raise, but raises R739 million in the end

Always do your own advice and speak to your financial advisor before making any investments. The Finance Ghost may hold positions in any of these stocks at time of recording or subsequently.

Watch on YouTube

Listen to the podcast

Who’s doing what this week in the South African M&A space?

Capitec Bank has entered into an agreement with Sasfin Capital to dispose of Capitec Rental Finance (CRF), a business it acquired in 2019 as part of its acquisition of Mercantile Bank. CRF provides asset financing solutions for businesses across various industries. The disposal consideration is R201 million. Concurrent with the disposal, Capitec Bank will provide a secured credit facility of R1,6 billion to CRF to fund the ongoing rental receivables book.

Accelerate Property Fund has reached an agreement with CFAO Mobility Properties to dispose of the BMW Fourways motor dealership and the land on which the dealership is built in a transaction valued at R220 million. The proceeds will be applied to the reduction of debt.

Numeral has made an undisclosed strategic investment into WestMed, a healthcare platform based in the Western Cape. WestMed operates primary healthcare clinics, specialist medical practices, aesthetic medicine, advanced surgical services and regenerative medicine capabilities. The company also announced the exit of its investments in Longevity and Isopharm due to the inability to secure timely operational and financial information from the founder for purposes of consolidation.

Warsaw-headquartered Globe Trade Centre has, via its 70%-held subsidiary Euro Structor, entered into an agreement to dispose of Avenue Mall, a shopping and office centre located in the Novi Zagreb district in Croatia for a purchase consideration of c.€98 million.

Mantengu, which is currently subject to exclusivity arrangements in favour of Afresources Mining, has received an unsolicited conditional offer to acquire the entire issued share capital of Blue Ridge for an aggregate cash purchase consideration greater than the Afresources’ offer of R50 million.

Hammerson has divested of non-core assets to the value of £75 million during 2026. The proceeds will be allocated to balance sheet strengthening and recycling into existing assets and new opportunities at attractive yields. To this point the company recently completed the acquisition of the remaining 50% interest in the Dublin ILAC Centre.

The disposal announced in May 2026 by MAS plc of six Romanian open-air malls to AFI Europe was completed on 8 July 2026. The category 2 transaction was valued at €197,7 million (R3,78 billion).

Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) is to acquire the South African downstream business from Shell. The deal includes 580 fuel stations and Shell South Africa’s wholesale, aviation and lubricant businesses. The transaction has an implied enterprise value of US$1 billion. As part of the transaction, ADNOC will sell a 28% stake in the local business to a BEE party.

HyperDev, a South African AI coding platform has raised US$1 million in pre-seed funding from venture capital investors in Europe and the UK. The funding will support the continued development of its AI coding platform which is designed to assist developers and non-technical users to build software more efficiently. Launched earlier this year, HyperDev platform already has some 100,000 users.

Weekly corporate finance activity by SA exchange-listed companies

Hyprop Investments has successfully raised R738,9 million in an accelerated bookbuild – up from the initial R500 million target announced. The company will issue 12,631,505 new shares, the maximum it is authorised to issue, at a price of R58.50 per share. The issue price represents a 1.4% premium to the 30-day VWAP of R57.71 per share on 7 July 2026. The proceeds will be used to fund new and organic growth opportunities both locally and offshore.

Novus has acquired an additional 440 Mustek shares at R14.90 per share on the open market (outside of the Mandatory Offer) for R6,556. The company now holds 29,02 million Mustek shares constituting 50.44% of the issued shares in Mustek. Together with concert parties this shareholding increases to c.70.73%.

In October 2025 Sebata’s trading on the JSE was suspended due to the failure to publish its audited financial results for the year ended 31 March 2025. The company has brought its financial reporting fully up to date with the publication of its interim results for the six months ended 30 September 2025. As a result, its suspension was lifted on 9 July 2026.

This week the following companies announced the repurchase of shares:

Reinet Investments intends to purchase its ordinary shares at market value for an aggregate maximum amount of €500 million subject to a maximum of 16.5 million ordinary shares over a period up to the 2027 Annual General Meeting of the Company. The implementation will be through several successive and separate programmes and shares will not be cancelled. The Rupert family has declared its intention not to sell any shares during the duration of this Programme. This week Reinet acquired 481,749 shares on the JSE for an aggregate R215 million.

To reduce the share capital of the company and return capital to shareholders, Quilter commenced, in March 2026, a £100 million share buyback programme. Repurchases to date total £40 million of which £32 million were conducted on the LSE and £8 million were conducted on the JSE. The maximum aggregate purchase price payable by the Company under Tranche 2 is up to C.£30 million. During the period 29 June to 3 July 2026, Quilter repurchased 5,750,565 shares on the LSE with an aggregate value of £11,19 million and 1,715,374 shares on the JSE with an aggregate value of R72,84 million.

In June, Greencoat Renewables announced its intention to commence a second tranche of the repurchase programme which will return a further €25m of capital to shareholders, following the completion of the first tranche which is expected during July. The second tranche repurchase will be complete by end-December 2026. This week 948,720 shares were repurchased for an aggregate €722,652.

Bytes Technology announced in May 2026 its intention to implement a new share repurchase programme to purchase the company’s shares for an aggregate value of up to £25,0 million. This week the company repurchased 350,799 shares at an average price per share of £3.88 for an aggregate £1,35 million.

In December 2025, British American Tobacco extended its share buyback programme by a further £1.3 billion for 2026. All shares repurchased will be cancelled. Over the period 29 June to 3 July 2026, the company repurchased a further 477,743 shares at an average price of £46.53 per share for an aggregate £22,2 million.

Ninety One plc announced an increase in the repurchase programme from £30 million to £55 million to be completed by 21 July 2026. The shares, to be purchased on the open market, will be cancelled to reduce the Company’s ordinary share capital. This week the company repurchased a further 1,242,934 ordinary shares at an average price 211 pence for an aggregate £2,63 million.

Anheuser-Busch InBev’s US$6 billion share buy-back programme continues. The shares acquired will be kept as treasury shares to fulfil future share delivery commitments under the group’s stock ownership plans. During the period 29 June to 3 July 2026, the group repurchased 521,7054 shares for €37,68 million.

During the period 29 June to 3 July 2026, Prosus repurchased a further 2,218,033 Prosus shares for an aggregate €84,23 million and Naspers, a further 898,420 Naspers shares for a total consideration of R737,68 million.

Four companies issued or withdrew a cautionary notice: Efora Energy, Dipula Properties, Mantengu and Trustco.

Who’s doing what in the African M&A and debt financing space?

A mandatory takeover offer has been triggered by Emerald HoldCo’s acquisition of a controlling interest in Beta Glass through a broader restructuring involving the former Frigoglass Group’s Nigerian operations. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has approved a mandatory takeover offer valued at ₦6,94 billion by Emerald HoldCo B.V. for up to 11,74 million ordinary shares of Beta Glass Plc. The offer will see Emerald acquire shares at ₦590.94 each representing a total transaction value of approximately N6.94 billion.

Bridge Bank Group Côte d’Ivoire has opened a public offer for a fifth of its shares, looking to raise about US$118 million (67.5 billion CFA francs) ahead of a listing on West Africa’s regional stock exchange, BRVM.

VBL Industries (Kenya) wholly-owned subsidiary of Varun Beverages has entered into an agreement to acquire the value-added dairy beverages, juices and packaged drinking water of Devyani Food Industries (Kenya) for a consideration of US$32 million.

OLA Energy Group has signed an agreement with TotalEnergies to acquire TotalEnergies Marketing Ethiopia. The transaction covers TotalEnergies Marketing Ethiopia’s full downstream operations — a network of more than 120 service stations strategically located across major cities, serving retail, B2B, aviation and lubricant customers. The network includes 10 storage assets, world-class logistics infrastructure, and digital payment solutions already in operation. Financial terms were not disclosed.

Verified by MonsterInsights