Friday, October 31, 2025
Home Blog Page 5

Who’s doing what in the African M&A and debt financing space?

0

Gabonese startup, POZI, has closed a €650,000 fundraising round led by Saviu Ventures, with participation by Emsy Capital and Chazai Wamba. POZI specialises in telematics and fleet management. Using data and artificial intelligence, the platform provides managers, insurers, and institutions with predictive analytics to anticipate breakdowns and incidents, real-time performance indicators to manage their operations, and risk management solutions tailored to African realities.

Barrick Gold, a Canadian-based global mining company, has announced the sale of its interests in the Tongon gold mine and certain of its exploration properties in Côte d’lvoire to the Atlantic Group for total consideration of up to US$305 million. Owned by an Ivorian entrepreneur, Atlantic is a leading privately held multisectoral Pan-African Group with diversified interests in financial services, agriculture, and industry, and a strong footprint across 15 countries in Africa.

Inspired Evolution’s Evolution III Fund, a fund dedicated to next-generation energy transition, has committed US$20 million to Cold Solutions East Africa Holdings (CSEAHL), a temperature-controlled warehousing and logistics platform operating across Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, and Tanzania. The investment will support the development and construction of modern cold-chain infrastructure throughout East Africa, helping to reduce post-harvest losses, strengthen food systems, enhance food security, and drive energy and resource-efficient growth in the region.

To help improve access to clean and affordable water in Sierra Leone, Zvilo Africa, a working capital lender, has partnered with So Pure to support the scale of treatment and distribution of safe drinking water across the West African country. So Pure targets low-income and middle-class households across Sierra Leone with clean water, handling every step of the supply chain: purifying the water, packaging it into half-litre sachets or large dispenser 20-litre bottles, and then distributing it to mom-and-pop kiosk shops across the Freetown region. Since 2019, the company has focused on water purification and filling up sachets sourced from a range of local packaging suppliers. An expansion phase aims to distribute 10-12 million litres of purified drinking water monthly by year-end, helping provide clean, safe and affordable drinking water to over 500,000 people.

French long-term infrastructure and impact investor, STOA, has made a US$27 million equity investment into Atlas Tower Kenya (ATK). Backed by Kalahari Capital, Atlas Tower Kenya owns and operates more than 450 telecom towers nationwide, providing critical digital infrastructure that enables mobile network operators to deliver reliable and ubiquitous connectivity. ATK has been operating in Kenya since 2019 with a blended mix of sites in urban, rural, and underserved communities.

Zambian integrated poultry producer, Hybrid, has received a debt investment from specialist impact investors, AgDevCo. The investment, a US$10 million senior debt loan, will enable Hybrid to increase its processing capacity by building a modern abattoir which will create 270 jobs and support the company’s growth.

Tagaddod, an Egyptian tech-powered renewable feedstocks platform, has closed a US$26,3 million Series A led by The Arab Energy Fund, with support from existing investors FMO, Verod-Kepple Africa Ventures and A15 Ventures. Tagaddod has developed a proprietary, tech-powered platform that collects, aggregates, and traces renewable waste-based feedstocks from thousands of suppliers, including households, restaurants, food manufacturers, and collectors across its operating markets.

Ellah Lakes an integrated agro-industrial company in Nigeria,has announced that it has entered into an agreement for the acquisition of 100% of Agro-Allied Resources & Processing from ARPN PTE, Singapore. ARPN PTE. is equally owned by Tolaram Africa PTE Ltd and Valuestar Holdings PTE. The acquired assets comprise 11,783 hectares of cultivated land (planting over 6,280 hectares of oil palm plantations and associated infrastructure), 2,093 hectares of cassava plantations land and an additional 10,393 hectares of uncultivated land. Financial terms were not disclosed.

The impact of AI on M&A transactions

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming our everyday lives, including merger and acquisition (M&A) transactions.

Currently, 77% of businesses use AI or plan to implement it.1 Most of these businesses believe that AI will increase their productivity, leading to higher revenue.

This trend has increased the number of businesses undergoing M&A processes that either use or have developed AI tools across various business areas. The growing use of AI necessitates bespoke considerations for M&A transactions, both in evaluating the business and conducting due diligence investigations.

When undertaking a due diligence, first consider whether and to what extent the business utilises AI, and how this AI is deployed. A strategic assessment must be undertaken to determine whether AI usage adds value to the business, and whether it will continue after the M&A transaction. Some general aspects for consideration include:

  • AI development and maintenance in businesses
  • Strict restraint of trade, confidentiality and intellectual property provisions in employment contracts for AI development and maintenance
  • Ownership of intellectual property rights in relation to strategic AI inputs and outputs
  • Costs of in-house AI updates and maintenance
  • Consideration of off-the-shelf AI solutions for cost-effectiveness over bespoke solutions
  • Quality of training data which affects the AI system’s value
  • The difficulty with assessing the value of the AI system during M&A transactions

Almost every AI model processes personal information, requiring compliance with data protection laws during M&A processes. These laws prescribe strict conditions for processing personal information, and often limit automated processing. AI models’ lack of transparency makes it nearly impossible to comply with data subject requests for deletion or correction of processed personal information. M&A transactions may identify this as a risk, potentially decreasing business value or resulting in warranties and/or indemnities against potential sanctions from data protection non-compliance.

As demonstrated above, AI can add immense value to businesses, but it also introduces risks – many unknown – associated with its use. Businesses must balance AI’s added value against these risks. This balance makes it extremely difficult to accurately value businesses that have developed bespoke AI, or which rely heavily on AI systems.

Standardised risk-based approach
Foreign jurisdictions have developed AI risk management frameworks to manage AI-associated risks. For example, the US Department of Commerce classifies generative AI risks into the following categories: technical/model risks (risks of malfunction), human misuse (malicious use), and ecosystem/societal risks (systemic risks).2 Additionally, the European Union’s high-level expert group on AI has developed assessment tools, including ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI, policy and investment recommendations, assessment lists, and sectoral considerations.3 This development raises questions about whether due diligence investigations should apply a standardised approach when assessing AI systems. Evaluations aligned with these frameworks could provide in-depth and uniform AI system assessments. However, these remain recommendations, and many businesses are likely to avoid applying these frameworks due to their onerous obligations.

Contractual risks
Most contracts reviewed during a M&A due diligence predate widespread AI adoption and, therefore, inadequately address AI-related considerations. This gap becomes particularly critical when examining agreements with key business partners, including suppliers and customers, where AI usage creates unforeseen legal and commercial implications. Since AI systems generate novel outputs and creative works, contracts must clearly delineate intellectual property ownership rights in any content, data or innovations produced by the AI systems.

Cybersecurity risks
Integrating AI technologies into business operations introduces substantial cybersecurity vulnerabilities requiring careful evaluation during M&A processes. These elevated security risks necessitate comprehensive incident management frameworks and robust response protocols to address potential cybersecurity incidents. AI systems significantly alter a target company’s risk profile, often compelling buyers to seek additional contractual protections through specialised indemnities and/or warranties designed to mitigate emerging technological threats. This creates challenges for sellers, as businesses now face exponentially higher probabilities of cyber incidents. The prevalence of cyber incidents makes sellers reluctant to accept expansive liability provisions that could materially impact M&A transactions.

Businesses can use AI at nearly every stage of the M&A transaction, including:

  • Target identification and screening
  • Due diligence investigations
  • Report editing
  • Transaction document drafting
  • Post-merger integration monitoring

AI’s ability to process large volumes of data quickly makes it ideal for due diligence processes. Legal-specific AI can review multiple documents simultaneously and provide outputs in user-defined categories.

But while AI expedites due diligence processes, it can also hallucinate outputs. AI hallucination refers to the phenomenon where AI systems, particularly large language models, generate outputs that are incorrect, nonsensical, or lack factual basis, while presenting them as accurate.

The consequences of hallucinations in due diligence processes, where AI fails to identify risks in M&A transactions, could prove ruinous. Thus, dedicated human oversight must ensure factually accurate AI outputs. To mitigate this risk, practitioners can adopt a sampling approach, manually reviewing a sample of AI-reviewed agreements and comparing results to AI outputs. These samples should come from different document categories of varying complexities and importance.

M&A practitioners must also consider potential confidentiality breaches resulting from AI tool use. When uploading confidential M&A transaction documents to AI tools, this information generally becomes available to AI service providers, who may store it on their servers or use it to train their models. This creates significant risks, as sensitive commercial information, financial data, strategic plans, and proprietary business details could be inadvertently disclosed to third parties or accessed by unauthorised persons. M&A transactions require strict information security protocols due to their confidential nature, yet AI systems’ ability to process large data volumes quickly makes them attractive despite these confidentiality risks. Organisations must carefully evaluate AI providers’ data handling practices, security measures and privacy policies before uploading sensitive M&A documentation to AI systems.

AI integration into business operations fundamentally transforms the M&A landscape in two critical ways. First, the proliferation of AI-enabled businesses creates new complexities in transaction evaluation and execution that require specialised expertise and risk assessment frameworks. Second, AI tools revolutionise how businesses conduct M&A processes, offering unprecedented efficiency gains while introducing novel risks requiring careful management.

Moving forward, successful M&A practitioners must master both the evaluation of AI as a business asset, and the strategic deployment of AI as a transaction tool. This dual competency, combined with robust risk management frameworks and stakeholder transparency, will prove essential for navigating the AI-transformed M&A environment.

1 AI in Business Statistics 2025 [Worldwide Data] by T Benson accessed at https://aistatistics.ai/business/ (on 8 July 2025).
2 National Institute of Standards Technology, Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile accessed at https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ai/NIST.AI.600-1.pdf on 8 July 2025.
3 European Union accessed at https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/expert-group-ai on 8 July 2025.

Tayyibah Suliman is a Director and Izabella Balkovic an Associate in Corporate and Commercial | Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr

This article first appeared in DealMakers, SA’s quarterly M&A publication.

African private capital investment in renewable energy and infrastructure projects

Private capital investors in Africa are successfully navigating a turbulent investment environment – shaped by global economic challenges and rapidly evolving regulations – and in the process, seizing exciting opportunities in the continent’s energy and infrastructure space.

According to a recent AVCA report, Understanding the Context – Africa’s Infrastructure Financing Gap (Report), Africa receives only 5% of global infrastructure investment, despite hosting 18% of the world’s population.

The report notes that between 2012 and 2023, private capital investors demonstrated a growing confidence in African infrastructure, deploying US$47,3 billion across 847 reported deals, and establishing new models for sustainable development across the continent.

The sector leading the way is Energy, which has attracted significant private sector investment to date, particularly in South Africa, with open access energy regimes evolving across the continent. The aim of such regimes is to open up private investment opportunities, increase grid reliability, and offer energy consumers greater value and more choice.

Other sectors necessary for economic growth, and in which there has historically been underinvestment, such as transport and logistics, and water infrastructure, are also beginning to attract private sector solutions to encourage the pace of development.

South Africa stands out for the rapid growth in private sector involvement in the energy space since the introduction of the Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Programme in 2012. Growing investor confidence, market deregulation and a demand that exceeds available supply have led to the emergence of a competitive private power and trading market which has reshaped the way investors and heavy industry users participate in these sectors.

The South African government’s commitment to private sector participation and the liberalisation of the energy market has unlocked substantial foreign direct investment in the renewable energy sector. The UN Conference on Trade and Development noted in 2024 that South Africa’s renewable energy sector attracted US$16 billion in investments between 2020 and 2023 alone.

Over and above the rapidly growing bilateral power market – which was unlocked in recent years through the changes in licensing legislation – the Draft Market Code (Code), issued by the National Transmission Company South Africa (a subsidiary of Eskom) in April 2024, will assist in establishing a transparent, non-discriminatory trading platform based on a multi-market structure under the Electricity Regulation Amendment Act, which became effective in January 2025. The target commencement date of the Code is April 2026, with an open and competitive electricity market expected to be operational by 2031.

The increasing integration of renewable energy into the grid has led to substantial constraints, creating further opportunities for private sector involvement in electricity transmission. The recently announced invitation by the South African government – seeking private sector investment in electricity infrastructure – is expected to result in further private sector participation at the same time as reforms are being introduced.

Across Africa, governments are following suit and launching initiatives to harness private sector participation in the energy sector. This has resulted in private sector-driven, business-to-business power solutions that assist businesses to meet their decarbonisation goals and ensure a stable energy supply.

In Kenya, the country’s National Energy Policy 2025-2034, published in February 2025, focuses on developing the country’s ability to produce sustainable energy, and on improving energy access, affordability and security. A big part of this plan is the implementation of an open energy regime.

The Energy (Electricity Market, Bulk Supply and Open Access) Regulations 2024 were published last year to facilitate the opening of the electricity market, and to enable private sector investors to participate in the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity.

The emergence of private transmission opportunities has resulted in the first transaction of its kind on the continent, a public-private partnership involving the development of two power transmission lines: the 400 kV Loosuk-Lessos line and the 220 kV Kisumu-Musaga line.

Zambia also recently adopted an open access regime, which enables IPPs and large power consumers to engage in electricity trading by connecting to and utilising the electricity transmission and distribution networks, irrespective of the network’s ownership or operation. This new regime is anchored by the Electricity Act of 2019 and the Electricity (Open Access) Regulations 2024.

Historic underinvestment in the maintenance of South Africa’s ports and rail has led to increased use of road transport for bulk logistics, which in turn has led to increased transportation costs and roads that are buckling under the strain. According to reports, as of 2024, these challenges are estimated to cost the South African economy approximately R1 billion per day in lost economic activity.

The South African government is turning to the private sector to fund the infrastructure development, which is desperately needed.

For example, South Africa’s state-owned freight logistics company, Transnet’s PSP programme represents a significant opportunity for private participation in the country’s rail, port and logistics sectors. Opportunities for investment include those in port modernisation and efficiency. For example, the Durban Port Master Plan aims to attract R100 billion in private investments over the next ten years. Further opportunities exist in the rail network and rolling stock, large container development, and supply chain management.

Private sector participation is also being sought for the development of logistics corridors to enhance regional connectivity across Africa.

In both Kenya and Zambia, private participation in the public sectors is being pursued through legislative frameworks such as the Public

Private Partnerships (PPP) Act 2021, in Kenya and the Public-Private Partnership Act, 2023 in Zambia, to progress and develop complex infrastructure projects by addressing the enforcement of legal compliance and swifter project implementation.

There are growing numbers of infrastructure funds that are playing a significant role in driving the growth and development of infrastructure across Africa. These funds include African Infrastructure Investment Managers (AIIM), Helios Investment Partners, and Afri Fund Capital.

In South Africa, government-procured water projects, as well as private sector solutions to water infrastructure needs, are emerging. At the forefront are new bulk water projects, including the construction of infrastructure such as pipelines, and privately procured water treatment facilities. The potential for private investment in this space is significant, offering investors the chance to contribute to the development and management of critical infrastructure.

Across Africa, governments are implementing measures to facilitate private investment in the water sector through the PPPs model. For example, Kenya recently introduced the Water (Amendment) Bill, 2023, and Zambia published the National Water Policy in 2024, with both outlining plans to harness private investment to finance water sector projects.

Amid challenging market conditions, private investors are stepping up to bridge critical funding gaps, channelling much-needed capital into initiatives that fuel growth and deliver significant social and economic benefits for the continent.

Angela Simpson and Alexandra Clüver are Partners | Bowmans

This article first appeared in Catalyst, DealMakers’ quarterly private equity publication.

Ghost Bites (Alphamin | Anglo American | Ethos Capital – Optasia | FirstRand)

A much better quarter at Alphamin (JSE: APH)

Key metrics are up and so is guidance for the full year

Alphamin has released numbers for the third quarter of 2025, reflecting contained tin production that was 26% higher than the previous quarter. Best of all, guidance for the full year is up from 17,500 tonnes to between 18,000 and 18,500 tonnes.

Contained tin sales came in 12% higher than the prior period. The average tin price achieved was up 4% and all-in sustaining costs (AISC) per tonne was 3% lower. When you consider all these metrics, it won’t surprise you that EBITDA was up by a juicy 28% vs. the preceding quarter.

These are quarter-on-quarter numbers, not year-on-year. Before you get too excited though, the important context is that there were security issues early in the preceding quarter that made it a soft base for comparison. The security risks are never zero when you’re operating in regions like the DRC. The company has noted a recent increase in security events on a key border line that is about 200kms away from the mine. At this stage there are no disruptions to operations, but the risk is clearly there.

On the exploration side, the company has continued with drilling at Mpama North and Mpama South to increase the resource base and life of mine. They also plan to discover the next tin deposit near the Bisie mine, as well as any remote tin deposits on the land package. Those are long-term plans, with the focus right now on the drilling results at Mpama North and Mpama South.


Anglo American’s Teck Resources era isn’t off to a great start (JSE: AGL)

Teck has cut production guidance at two of its copper assets

The trouble with large corporate deals is that when you assure the market that a particular mega-merger is a great idea (despite a zillion historical examples of dicey shareholder value outcomes in these types of deals), you really can’t afford for any bad news to come through. Anglo American’s reputation for deal timing just won’t leave them alone, with now-demerged Valterra Platinum (JSE: VAL) rallying like crazy and future dance partner Teck Resources releasing a tough announcement.

If you would like to read the detailed Teck announcement, you’ll find it here. The TL;DR is that due to project challenges at Quebrada Blanca, they now have an expectation of increased downtime in both 2025 and 2026. Mining projects are incredibly complicated and dangerous things, so it’s critical to do them properly and make the tough decisions when required. But this doesn’t mean that shareholders are happy to see this stuff, particularly Anglo American shareholders who need to believe that the Teck merger is the right decision for the group.

Guidance for 2025 copper production at Teck has been cut by over 11% if you use the midpoint of guidance. That’s particularly frustrating for the company at a time when copper prices are strong. Teck’s guidance for zinc is unchanged at least.

Unfortunately, as is always the case when production comes in lower than expected, the unit cost of the commodity has increased significantly. They expect a 20% increase in the net cash costs per pound at problematic Quebrada Blanca for 2025.

Of course, if this is just a temporary wobbly, then it isn’t the end of the world. The problem is that if you read Teck’s 2026 – 2028 outlook, the issues just get worse as time goes on. The mid-point of copper production guidance at Quebrada Blanca for 2027 and 2028 has dropped by approximately 13% and 17% respectively. At Highland Valley Copper, they expect some pressure on 2026 production and then a significant improvement in 2027 ahead of prior guidance. At Red Dog zinc, guidance for 2027 and 2028 is below previous guidance.

You get the idea. These numbers are fluid and will be updated as time goes on, but the theme is clearly one of a disappointing production outlook vs. previous guidance. Anglo American’s response is that their independent due diligence led to an expectation that is “broadly consistent” with Teck’s latest numbers. This suggests that Anglo did a better job of understanding these assets through the due diligence process than Teck management did by living with them every day. You’ll forgive my skepticism here.

Investors tend to be nervous of large deals as a default setting. Deals that involve a deterioration in expectations at the target asset are even scarier.


Exciting news for Ethos Capital and the market: Optasia intends to float (JSE: EPE)

New listings are always fun

When a company announces an intention to float, this has nothing to do with their December holiday plans. Instead, it means that they will be coming to market through a listing process, with Optasia (a name you’ll recognise as being the most important investment in the Ethos Capital stable) looking to do exactly that on the JSE.

New listings are the lifeblood of the market, so they always lead to excitement, particularly when it’s a proper listing with a company that has put in the work. Check out the Optasia IPO website and you’ll see what I mean.

What does Optasia do? Well, you have to look through a lot of buzzwords (including AI) to arrive at the understanding that this fintech focuses on providing access to credit and airtime in underbanked markets. In other words, this is a classic African fintech story, although they have a presence in Asia, the Middle East and even some parts of Europe!

Optasia has been around since 2012 and has 350 employees across 15 offices, so they are a scale player. There are 121 million monthly active customers. Revenue for the first half of 2025 was up more than 90% year-on-year, so this is a beautiful example of the J-curve in action. They are very profitable at adjusted EBITDA level with a margin of 46%, although the adjustments always need to be treated with caution. The company is certainly profitable though, with a substantial jump in net profit from $7.6 million to $23.3 million in the six months to June 2025.

The width of the moat comes from the extent to which Optasia has managed to build an ecosystem with multiple touchpoints. It’s a complex marketplace, with financial institutions on one side and distribution partners in the middle, all before reaching consumers on the other side who become more familiar with the offering over time. That’s a very hard thing to build, especially across multiple geographies.

As for the listing, they are looking to raise R1.3 billion, so this is decently sized raise in the local market. It looks like it will be done through institutional investors only (rather than an offer to the public). Certain existing shareholders are also going to sell R5 billion in shares to institutional investors.

As for Ethos Capital, they haven’t specifically said whether they are one of the selling shareholders. Given their stated approach of returning value to investors, it seems like that they intend to either fully or at least partially exit the Optasia stake.


FirstRand’s battle in the UK motor finance industry isn’t over (JSE: FSR)

The company is unhappy with the proposed redress scheme

FirstRand (along with other financial services companies operating in the UK vehicle finance market) is dealing with a difficult regulatory situation related to commission practices around vehicle finance. It looked as though the worst of the uncertainty was behind them after the UK Supreme Court ruling that gave legal clarity to the situation, but that joy was short-lived.

The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has proposed a redress scheme that FirstRand describes as being “beyond expectations of what can be considered proportionate or reasonable” – and that’s not good for FirstRand shareholders. They haven’t indicated what the amounts would be at this stage, but FirstRand wouldn’t have released an announcement with that wording if they felt that their existing provision was adequate to cover it.

As part of pushing back against this, they’ve flagged their disagreement with the lack of application of the recent UK Supreme Court ruling to the redress scheme.

There will now be a period of six weeks of consultation with the UK FCA. FirstRand has undertaken to keep the market informed of any developments that might happen before the end of that period as they consult with the regulator.


Nibbles:

  • Director dealings:
    • A director of Woolworths (JSE: WHL) sold shares worth R23.2 million and a director of a major subsidiary sold shares worth R7.2 million. With the share price down 16% year-to-date, that’s not exactly a bullish signal about the chances of a near-term recovery.
    • A non-executive director of Mondi (JSE: MNP) bought around R508k worth of shares. The price was R203.30, so the purchase must have been after the initial drop in response to earnings. The price has subsequently kept sliding, now at R195.
  • City Lodge Hotels (JSE: CLH) announced that they’ve repurchased R170 million worth of shares since March 2025 at an average price of below R4.00. The share price is currently R4.20. This represents 7.14% of shares that were in issue as at the date of the AGM last year, so this should be a very helpful boost to HEPS going forwards.
  • Wesizwe Platinum (JSE: WEZ) announced that the ramp-up of underground operations is ahead of schedule. They are negotiating key development contracts and will keep investors informed of further milestones.
  • Kibo Energy (JSE: KBO) is suddenly back on our screens, with news of a potential acquisition of a decarbonisation and renewable energy company called Carbon Resilience. I’ve gotta tell you, carbon resilience is the kind of resilience that investors needed to get to this point, as Kibo has been a story of one corporate disappointment after the next. Perhaps the new chapter will be different, with Kibo looking to acquire the asset for $135 million, settled through the issuance of shares after a planned 1600:1 share consolidation. Just to add to the dilution of value of current shareholders, the company has also issued a convertible note to an institutional investors to provide funding of up to £150k. As part of lifting the suspension of the listing on AIM, the company needs to get the accounts for the year ended December 2024 out the door.

Ghost Bites (Accelerate Property Fund | Afrimat | Datatec | Finbond | Newpark REIT | SA Corporate Real Estate)

Accelerate Property Fund has finally released the Portside disposal circular (JSE: APF)

Turning the Portside stake into cold, hard cash is crucial for the fund

If you’re familiar with the Cape Town CBD skyline, then you already know the Portside building. It’s the gigantic glass building in town that towers above everything else. When Accelerate originally bought it from Old Mutual Life Insurance Company in 2016, they paid R755 million for it. That was then and this is now, with the latest valuation being R610 million and Accelerate achieving a selling price of R580 million.

Before you get out the torches and pitchforks, I must tell you that many property deals done around 2014 – 2016 in South Africa were concluded at ridiculously high prices. Property certainly isn’t immune to bubble risks, with the level of equity capital raising activity among listed property funds as a great indication of whether things are overcooked or not. During those years, the pot was boiling over with capital being thrown at every property company in the market.

The relevance of this deal isn’t the return (or lack thereof) over the past decade, but rather the critical importance of this disposal to the recovery of Accelerate. With a bruised and broken balance sheet (and share price), Accelerate simply cannot afford any further missteps. They are dealing with very tough related party risks, as well as the difficulty in transforming Fourways Mall from a white elephant into a cash cow. There are also other assets that need to be disposed of, including several that aren’t nearly as impressive as the Portside silhouette.

This disposal reduces Accelerate’s total debt from R3.85 billion to R3.27 billion. The total asset value after the disposal will be just over R7 billion. The net asset value (NAV) of the company is barely impacted vs. the March 2025 level, as they’ve sold the property at the carrying value as at that date. In other words, one type of asset is being turned into another. That’s not the point though – you see, when a share is trading at a vast discount to NAV, it creates a lot of value for investors (punters?) if that NAV evolves from illiquid fixed assets to liquid cash.

The net asset value per share as at March 2025 was R2.03. The dilutive rights offer took that down to R1.83. The pro forma number after this deal is R1.82. And the share price? Just R0.39 per share, reflecting a discount to NAV of 79%!

This is why existing shareholders should feel very good about every single example of Accelerate turning an asset into cash at or near the carrying value.

Accelerate shareholders will vote on this deal on 6th November. The other remaining condition for the disposal is a Competition Commission approval without any onerous conditions attached to it. I can’t see why that would be a problem in a property deal like this.


Is Afrimat primed for a big positive swing? (JSE: AFT)

The latest update shows a remarkable turnaround in the business

Afrimat has released a trading statement for the six months to August. With the share price having lost well over 40% of its value year-to-date, they desperately needed to show some positive momentum in the group.

The good news is that they’ve done exactly that, with an expectation for HEPS of between 100.7 cents and 103.4 cents. That’s an increase of between 90% and 95% vs. the comparable period! When you see moves like these, it’s very useful to go back a bit further and example the multi-year performance. In the six months to August 2023, HEPS was 263.4 cents. In fact, if you go back to the results presentation for the six months to August 2024, you’ll find this excellent chart:

The key point here is that HEPS was incredibly depressed in 2024, so the year-on-year move of between 90% and 95% doesn’t mean much. The guided range is still way off the pandemic levels and even the pre-pandemic levels.

It therefore makes sense that the share price is also still miles off those levels:

Of course, the real question is whether this will be enough to stop the slide and perhaps drive a rally back up to the R50 level. Afrimat closed 10.7% higher in response to this announcement, so that’s a sharp improvement in momentum.

The fundamental drivers of the improved performance in this period look good overall, although there’s still a long way to go.

In Construction Materials for example, there was a slow start to the first quarter and then a much better second quarter. The fly ash business had its best ever month in July in terms of volumes. But the cement business remains loss-making overall for the first half, showing just how difficult it is to make that business work.

The Bulk Commodities business enjoyed a massive increase in iron ore sales, with local volumes more than doubling vs. the comparable period. International volumes posted a more modest increase of 13.5%. Don’t get too excited though, as planned maintenance shutdowns of the Saldanha export line during the second half should lead to a situation where full year volumes are flat vs. the prior year. Another concern is the anthracite mining operation, which is suffering with decreased demand from ferrochrome smelters that have been forced to temporarily shut down in South Africa due to harsh economic realities in that sector. Afrimat is exporting anthracite via Mozambique to try and mitigate this lack of demand.

The Industrial Minerals business is a small part of the group, but had a weak half due to delayed demand from the agricultural sector based on the timing of rainfall.

The Future Materials and Minerals business is an early-stage business, with the economics expected to be three years away. Thankfully, no additional capital investment is expected to get them there. The Glenover project is selling phosphate material and is decreasing its operating losses.

Detailed interim results are expected to be released on 23 October.


Datatec has taken some inspiration from how global tech companies report numbers (JSE: DTC)

The good news is that they are firmly in the green either way

Datatec has released a trading statement for the six months ended 31 August 2025. The underlying story is great, with Westcon achieving stronger margins and both Logicalis International and Logicalis Latin America achieving much better numbers than before.

This has driven a juicy increase in HEPS of more than 100%, with expected earnings of between 21 and 23 US cents for the period.

Datatec has decided to present underlying earnings excluding share-based payments (and with various other adjustments). This will sound familiar to anyone who regularly reads the reports of global technology companies. I’m not a fan of this approach, as US companies use it as a great excuse to ramp up share-based payments and then conveniently adjust earnings accordingly. I’m hoping that Datatec won’t behave in that way and that they are rather doing this to improve comparability of their earnings to global peers.

On this adjusted basis, underlying earnings will be between 18 and 20 US cents, or between 33.3% and 48.1% higher than the prior year. This seems to be a decent indication of the year-on-year growth that the company achieved.

Either way, it’s excellent.


Finbond is back in the green (JSE: FGL)

The share price has been strong this year

Finbond is one of those companies that always seems to be bubbling under the surface. They have some interesting elements to their business model, yet it rarely seems to all come together for them in a way that rewards investors. But in the latest period, they’ve at least swung back into profitability.

A trading statement for the six months to August 2025 suggests HEPS of between 0.88 cents and 1.28 cents, which is much better than a loss of 2 cents in the comparable period. But it’s also nowhere near high enough to justify the current price of R1.05 per share, so the market is clearly pricing in much more upside in earnings. The share price is up more than 65% year-to-date.


Newpark REIT has released updated earnings guidance (JSE: NRL)

The large negative reversion at the JSE has hurt the year-on-year performance

Newpark is a particularly unusual property fund on the JSE. They have a very focused portfolio with literally only a handful of buildings. This means that any negative changes to the leases have a significant impact on the numbers.

Exhibit A: the large negative reversion in the lease for the JSE building. Much as I’m sure the JSE really wants to be where they are, the truth will always be that it’s easier to move a business than a building. In a market with oversupply, like in Sandton offices, this creates a recipe for negative reversions i.e. the renewed lease being at a lower rate than the old lease.

This is why Newpark guided for a nasty year-on-year decrease in earnings this year of between 38.1% and 47.1%. This is actually updated guidance that is slightly better than before, with Newpark trying to mitigate the negative impact through strategies like decreasing the operating costs at the properties. They also have escalations at the other properties to offset some of the impact of the JSE building.

For the six months to August, they expect funds from operations per share to decrease by 24.5%. The dividend for the period is expected to be 13.3% lower. It looks like they are front-loading the interim dividend when you compare it to the guidance for the full year.


SA Corporate Real Estate to sell Bluff Towers (JSE: SAC)

The fund is reducing its retail exposure to KZN

SA Corporate Real Estate announced the disposal of Bluff Towers Shopping Centre for R544.6 million. The price is very similar to the June 2025 independent valuation of R545.1 million. With net property income of R44.7 million for the year ended December 2024, that’s a trailing yield of 8.2%. The recent income would hopefully be higher due to the benefit of inflation, but it gives you an idea of the yields at which large retail properties are changing hands.

SA Corporate Real Estate has disclosed that the net asset value attributable to the property was R358 million as at the end of December 2024. I assume that this is net of debt, as that’s way below both the recent valuation and the selling price.

This deal is effectively a disposal of an asset that has been redeveloped to maturity, something that is reflected in the attractive price that SA Corporate Real Estate has achieved here. The fund will probably look to reallocate the capital to opportunities with higher potential returns. This is a Category 2 transaction, so shareholders won’t be asked to vote on the deal.


Nibbles:

  • Director dealings:
    • The CEO of Fortress Real Estate (JSE: FFB) increased the number of shares pledged for a loan facility, as the facility limit has increased from R26 million to R34 million. This is nothing unusual in the property sector, with many executives entering into leveraged trades to acquire shares in the funds that they run.
  • MAS (JSE: MSP) recently announced a tender offer to reduce its debt in the market. That’s a big deal if you’ve followed the fund over the past few years, as full focus has been on trying to prepare the balance sheet for debt redemptions. The tender offer was made to holders of €300 million in notes due 2026. Almost €120 million was tendered under the offer, with holders of the remaining notes clearly keen to keep them until expiration.
  • Barloworld (JSE: BAW) announced that the standby offer closing date has been extended from 15 October to 7 November. They are obviously trying to get as many acceptances as possible.
  • Salungano Group (JSE: SLG) is catching up on its financial reporting. They’ve now released financials for the year ended March 2024, with the auditors flagging a material uncertainty about the group as a going concern. The headline loss per share increased from 58.65 cents to 111.91 cents. It’s a mess.
  • Southern Palladium (JSE: SDL) has lodged the environment guarantee in relation to the Bengwenyama PGM project, which is an important milestone related to the mining right application with the Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources. The mine development plan for the Definitive Feasibility Study is on schedule. In junior mining, it’s all about ticking the milestones off the list.
  • The Saltzman family continues to reduce their influence on the group that they founded, with Saul Saltzman (son of the founders) resigning as an executive director of Dis-Chem (JSE: DCP). He will stay on the board as a non-independent, non-executive director. Dis-Chem has been an incredible example of founders creating a legacy business and then trusting professional managers with it.

Ghost Bites (Altron | Blu Label | Gemfields | Jubilee Metals | Mondi | Sirius | Tharisa | Vunani)

Altron flags solid growth in earnings (JSE: AEL)

Traders might find the share price chart rather interesting

Altron has been in turnaround mode for a while now, with the share price more than doubling over the past three years. Recent trade has been choppy though. I’m no technical expert, but there’s been quite the double top this year in this share price, a pattern made more obvious by drawing a 5-year chart:

With that kind of volatility, traders may want to take a closer look at the chart. For investors with a longer-term lens, the latest update reflects an expected increase in HEPS from continuing operations of between 16% and 24%. If you look at total group operations instead, the expected move is 12% to 19%. The difference between the two is Altron Nexus, which seems to make a difference of roughly 10 cents per share in the latest period vs. 5 cents per share in the comparable period.

Full details will be released with the interim results on 3 November.


Blu Label gives a summary of Cell C’s financial outlook (JSE: BLU)

Margin expansion is key to the story

Blu Label Unlimited (the new name for Blue Label Telecoms) has released an updated financial outlook for Cell C ahead of the planned listing of that asset.

For net revenue growth, they expect the typical mid-single digits outcome that we see in many companies in South Africa. This feels like an achievable target, as top-line growth above these levels is hard to find in our country.

EBITDA margin is expected to expand thanks to a change in mix and ongoing efficiencies, increasing from the low twenties to the mid twenties in coming years. Targets like these are often deliberately vague. The same direction of travel can be found in the EBIT margin.

Free cash flow is boosted by a decreasing capex requirement, with the capex-light operating model as a key feature of the business. The group has guided for dividend payouts of 30% to 50% of free cash flow. That isn’t quite the cash cow that you might have expected, with Cell C needing to run at a sustainable level of leverage.

These are decent targets, but are by no means earth-shattering or quite as exciting as one might expect to see based on all the bullishness in the market around this name. Having had an incredible run in price this year, the share price recently corrected and is now trying to consolidate:


Gemfields just cannot catch a break (JSE: GML)

Illegal miners are now impacting the Mozambican operations and even the latest auction wasn’t great

Earlier this year, Gemfields was at serious risk of being a corporate failure. They had run the balance sheet too hot for too long, with a vast capital investment programme and dividends to shareholders at a time when the core business was facing almost existential risks. Luckily, major investors were happy to support a rights offer and give the management team another chance to run a more conservative financial strategy.

The problem is that Gemfields still faces significant risks throughout the business, ranging from the realities of operating in difficult African countries through to the impact of fluid supply and demand dynamics in the gemstones market. Both of these issues are on full display in the latest announcement.

Let’s start with the really bad news, which is that the all-important second processing plant at MRM in Mozambique has been significantly impacted by illegal mining activity in the past week. Plant supply infrastructure is being sabotaged and illegally mined rubies are being removed from the area. Although final commissioning of the plant is expected in October, Gemfields has had to defer the November / December ruby auction to January / February next year. This is a very good example of the kind of thing that investors do not want to see.

We now move on to the mixed news, being the latest auction results that achieved revenue of $11 million. Only 62% of the carats on offer were sold at a realised price of $59.43 per carat. The pricing itself doesn’t tell us much unfortunately, as the grade of rubies varies at every auction. It seems as though the smallest and lowest grade material didn’t sell, with Gemfields taking a gamble here on what they actually brought to market. They will “leverage the market feedback received to refine future offerings” – in other words, the gamble didn’t really work.

I was quite surprised that the share price fell by only 6% on the day!


Jubilee Metals is getting closer to being a focused Zambian copper business (JSE: JBL)

The disposal of South African operations is expected to be completed this year

Over at Jubilee Metals, their sights are set on one thing and one thing only: copper in Zambia. To give themselves as much flexibility on the balance sheet as possible, they are selling off the South African chrome and PGM operations. The first tranche of the sale of $15 million has been received and they are busy with remaining conditions for the deal, including Competition Commission approval. They reckon that the deal can be completed by the end of 2026.

It’s important for Jubilee to keep the market informed about the plans for Zambia, where they have three distinct business units.

The Roan Concentrator is a tailings business that purchases and processes run-of-mine material. Production was in line with guidance in the first quarter, with the upcoming rainy season making it more difficult to forecast how production in the next quarter might be affected. They have experience with the seasonality of course, so perhaps their predictions won’t be far off.

The Sable Refinery is currently being expanded to allow for increased production from nearby mines and near-surface assets, with the expansion expected to be completed in the third quarter this year. They need another $5.5 million in capital at Sable, which they expect to fund from existing cash resources and the proceeds from the sale of South African assets. Importantly, the Molefe Mine (previously called Munkoyo) is delivering run-of-mine to Sable, with improving copper grades. They are busy negotiating with potential joint venture partners regarding this business, including for further mine development.

Finally, there’s the Large Waste Project, which is much earlier in its journey. Final designs for the project are expected by the end of the third quarter and they are in talks with a potential funding partner.

As these assets are all located in Zambia, they aren’t entirely independent of each other in terms of future plans. There are various integration opportunities that the company can look at.

The market has been less than thrilled with the timing of the PGM and chrome disposal though, as that sector is rallying like crazy at the moment. While the big PGM names are registering huge positive share price moves, Jubilee is down 18% year-to-date.


Ugly momentum at Mondi – and not just in the share price (JSE: MNP)

The share price is back where it was 10 years ago

There are certain sectors that I simply don’t invest in. Anything related to paper is one of them, even if there’s a packaging business to try and smooth things out. Cyclical industries scare me on a good day. This chart of Mondi shows you exactly why:

If you have great memories from 2014 that you want to keep alive, then owning Mondi shares will help you think of that year whenever you look at your portfolio. Who needs music and photos when you can just own stocks in the paper industry?

The reason for the 16.5% price drop in response to the latest quarterly update is that Mondi’s numbers are heading firmly in the wrong direction. Underlying EBITDA was €223 million in Q3, down sharply from €274 million in Q2 and €290 million in Q1.

Volumes were impacted by weak demand and paper selling prices declined in the quarter, so that’s a nasty combination. It’s never good when the best thing a company can do is focus on maintenance shuts during a subdued market.

It seems to be getting worse before it gets better, with oversupply in key markets and current selling prices that are even worse than what we just saw in the third quarter!

The only silver lining is that the group has completed its current investment cycle. In other words, they’ve spent a fortune on capital expenditure and they now have to suffer through a poor market for the improved assets. This is exactly why I tend to avoid cyclicals, as the chances of the investment cycle working out beautifully with the market cycle are slim.

This is deep inside the “too hard” bucket for me.


Sirius reports on a seasonally slower period, with ongoing growth in the rent roll (JSE: SRE)

The focus is now on bedding down the recent acquisitions

Sirius Real Estate has released a trading update for the six months to September 2025. Although the rent roll is up 15.2%, around two-thirds of this is thanks to the recent acquisition activity. Sirius has been raising capital and deploying it into assets in Germany and the UK, a strategy that Sirius investors are highly familiar with.

On a like-for-like basis, the rent roll increased by 5.2%. Germany and the UK produced very similar growth rates in this regard. This growth is based on lease escalations and renewal rates, as the asset management focus is on the newly acquired buildings that are excluded from this number.

There are some interesting growth drivers within the group, including in verticals like self storage and defence. The latter is a particularly strong opportunity in Europe, with Sirius appointing a retired Major General and now specialist supply chain consultant to help them optimise the opportunity.

They expect to announce further acquisitions in the next quarter, primarily in Germany. This will add to the almost €300 million in acquisitions across Germany and the UK this year. They have recently raised a significant amount of debt in the form of a revolving credit facility and a bond tap issue, so there’s no shortage of cash available for further deals.

Results for the six months will be released on 17 November.


Tharisa wins against SARS (JSE: THA)

It looks like a significant positive adjustment to earnings is coming

Tharisa has achieved a favourable ruling in the Tax Court against SARS. This relates to mining royalties and the approach that SARS took for the 2015 and 2017 years of assessment, although it has a much bigger impact on the approach that SARS is able to take towards mining companies.

I’m certainly no expert in this space and this is very technical stuff. It sounds like SARS had a difference of opinion to Tharisa regarding the application of an average PGM grade and the incremental cash costs to beneficiate the PGMs to the required standard. This approach effectively assumes a certain income level for a particular grade of mined materials, which is prejudicial to miners with lower-grade ore bodies.

Tharisa previously raised a provision of $56.8 million for this matter and will now recalculate it based on the ruling, with a “materially favourable” impact on earnings per share expected. They will announce more details once the calculation is finalised.


Vunani Fund Managers to merge with Sentio Capital Management (JSE: VUN)

This is why Vunani has been trading under cautionary

Vunani has announced the creation of Vunani Sentio Fund Managers, a merger of businesses that will lead to a combined R60 billion in funds in management. Consolidation of these Black-Owned fund managers makes sense, as scale is key to success in this particular industry.

The deal is structured as an acquisition of Sentio by Vunani. The end result will be that Vunani holds 63% in the merged entity, while current management of Vunani Fund Managers will have 15% and current management of Sentio will have 22%. Notably, Investment Managers Group (part of Momentum JSE: MTM) currently has a 30.05% stake in Sentio and will be exiting the stake entirely, as being diluted to a small stake isn’t part of its strategy.

Vunani Fund Managers is paying for the deal in cash and shares. If I understand the announcement correctly, shares in Vunani Fund Managers will be issued, not new shares in Vunani as the listed company.

The deal isn’t categorisable under JSE rules, so we won’t be getting any further details on it at this stage.


Nibbles:

  • Director dealings:
    • Discovery (JSE: DSY) directors and prescribed officers received quite the payday, especially Hylton Kallner as the CEO of Discovery Bank. I’m sure that his KPIs had big green ticks next to them after the bank recently turned profitable! He only sold the taxable portion of his shares, but the same can’t be said for all the execs. Other than sales purely to cover tax, over R40 million worth of shares in aggregate were sold by multiple directors and prescribed officers.
    • The chair of Mondi (JSE: MNP) bought shares worth over R1 million. He took advantage of a massive negative move in the price in response to results.
    • A director of Standard Bank (JSE: SBK) sold shares worth R338k.
  • eMedia Holdings (JSE: EMH | JSE: EMN) is getting value investors hot under the collar at the moment, even if the company seems to have paid a meaty price for the offshore investment in a visual effects business. This is balanced by a significant recent share repurchase programme, with 3.44% of N ordinary shares in issue having been repurchased since 30 September 2025. I suspect that the unbundling by Remgro (JSE: REM) led to plenty of shares being offered in the market, with eMedia only too happy to sit on the bid. The average price for the repurchases is around R1.81 per share, with the N shares currently trading at R2.05. Of course, the downside to repurchases of this magnitude is that they hurt liquidity in the stock, something that smaller companies always need to keep in mind.
  • In good news for Barloworld (JSE: BAW) shareholders who want to accept the offer from the consortium, the TRP has issued a binding ruling that the final consideration per share must be R120 per share, not the R118.80 that the consortium tried to get through as an adjustment to the price for a recent dividend. The offer is open for acceptance until Wednesday, 15 October.
  • MultiChoice (JSE: MCG) announced that Canal+ is up to a 72.46% stake in the company. There are further acceptances in place that will take them to 76.52%.
  • Visual International Holdings (JSE: VIS) is raising R2 million (for context, the market cap is only R55 million) through an accelerated bookbuild process. As the capital raise has been timed in such a way that they aren’t in a closed period, it looks likely that directors will participate in the raise. The way it works is that related parties have to buy shares at the price at which the book closes. The question will of course be whether the market is particularly interested in this raise. It would probably help if the company actually had a working website…
  • Assura (JSE: AHR) is going through the motions for the cancellation of its listing. The shares are suspended from trading on the JSE and will be delisted on 23 October. In case you missed all the news related to this company this year, Assura was acquired by Primary Health Properties (JSE: PHP), which remains listed on the JSE.
  • MTN Zakhele Futhi (JSE: MTNZF) has renewed its cautionary announcement regarding the final unwind of the scheme and the calculation of the residual value. They haven’t given an updated view on the timing of when this might happen.
  • With Jan Potgieter deciding not to stand for re-election to the board of Italtile (JSE: ITE), his long journey with the company (including 5 years as CEO) comes to an end. Notably, the ex-CEO of Pepkor (JSE: PPH), Leon Lourens, has been appointed as a non-executive director. No shortage of retail experience there!
  • Shareholders in Marshall Monteagle (JSE: MMP) almost unanimously approved the resolutions required to execute the equity capital raising activities of the company.

GHOST WRAP – Earnings season brings out the bulls and the bears

With the August / September earnings season behind us, it’s helpful to look at share price moves over the past 30 days on the JSE to see how sentiment has shifted.

The winner over this period is clear: PGMs. The winds of change aren’t just blowing in that space, they are positively gusting! There have been other positive standout performances, like Caxton and CTP Publishers and Printers, as well as Purple Group.

On the negative side, a couple of insurance names have had a tough month (like Discovery and Santam), while Sun International continues to struggle with casino demand. There’s been plenty of volatility in the local market, but these moves were particularly interesting to me.

The Ghost Wrap podcast is proudly brought to you by Forvis Mazars, a leading international audit, tax and advisory firm with a national footprint within South Africa. Visit the Forvis Mazars website for more information.

Remember, nothing you hear on this podcast is investment advice, nor does it reflect the views of Forvis Mazars in South Africa. Always speak to your financial advisor.

Listen to the podcast here:

Transcript:

With the wild earnings season in September behind us, it’s good to look at the market and see where the ducks have been quacking. The Top 40 is up 8.4% over 30 days, an extremely strong run that you definitely shouldn’t just annualise and extrapolate, or we would all be very wealthy. Having said that, the year-to-date increase is 36%, which means that the JSE has put in an exceptional performance this year. These are returns on ETFs, so this is an investable return, not just what the index has done!

There’s one sector that has provided more ducks than anywhere else: mining. The Resources index is up almost 20% in the past month. Again, you can buy the index via ETFs by the way, which means you can have it in your tax-free savings account. Or, you can do some stock picking, with names like Sibanye Stillwater, Northam Platinum, Impala Platinum and Valterra Platinum all featuring strongly. The winds of change are blowing in PGMs at last. This also means that poor Anglo American has kept its unenviable reputation for unbundling companies that go on to rally strongly. Perhaps it’s time to separately list De Beers and unbundle it, as that might be the last hope for mined diamonds!

Jokes aside, there have been some notable moves among mid-caps on the JSE as well. The market responded positively to STADIO’s strong results, but that was nothing compared to the rally enjoyed by Caxton and CTP Publishers and Printers in recent weeks:

Caxton released results in mid-September that reflected 12% growth in normalised HEPS and 16.7% growth in the dividend. They managed this with revenue growth of less than 1%, so this was a story of incredible efficiencies with operating costs up by just 0.1%. It’s rare to see operating leverage coming through for a company with such a tepid growth rate!

The share price is up 17.5% in the past month, a good example of a typical value play, which means a really cheap stock (in terms of the valuation multiple) that is doing better than the market expected. This isn’t to say that things are easy at Caxton, or even that they are going particularly well overall. The company finds itself on a difficult growth treadmill, so this is a particularly commendable performance that was enough to get value investors excited. It’s all about finding stocks with low expectations that then do better than the market thinks they will.

I don’t have a position in Caxton unfortunately, but I do have one in Purple Group. It seems like a rather appropriate thing to check my return on the EasyEquities app, which is of course the key business inside Purple. The price is up 38% in the past month, which means I’m now sitting on a 122% increase in my position. Lovely!

Being patient on this one definitely paid off as I waited for the valuation to come back down to earth. Along with the excellent strides they’ve made in the business and particularly the extent of annuitised income vs. reliance on brokerage fees, Purple eventually got to a point where I was ready to jump in. I’m glad I did!

Why the jump in the past month? It’s certainly not been driven by news, with Purple’s last SENS announcement being in April this year. Based on the absolute cracker of an interim period that they had in the six months to February 2025, I wouldn’t be surprised if we see a trading statement in coming weeks dealing with the full year to September 2025. The market isn’t blind to this either, with EasyEquities rallying at a time when the broader market is rocketing in value as well.

I’m in this one for the long haul, as it feels like a company that has plenty of growth runway.

And as always, the market has winners and losers. Among the companies that had a far less inspiring start to spring, we find some financial services names featuring prominently, like Discovery down 9.6% and Santam down 8.9%.

Santam released results right at the beginning of September and the numbers were actually really good, with a big jump in net underwriting margin from 6.5% to 11.3%. The interim dividend was up 10.3%. Discovery also released an update in September and their earnings were excellent, with HEPS up 30% for the year to June. So, why the bearishness in the market?

I’ve heard theories around a cooling off of growth in certain products and a concern around the sustainability of the current margins. But even then, it’s pretty weird that Santam has suffered such a negative move, with a year-to-date return of -2.9% vs. Discovery up 4% and OUTsurance up 12%. For traders looking for interesting volatility in the local market and perhaps some pairs trading opportunities, that sector is dishing up some pretty big short-term moves.

Here’s another one that really caught my eye: Sun International, down 8.5% in the past month. The casinos are struggling, with income headed in the wrong direction. The Resorts and Hotels part of the group isn’t exactly a rocketship either, but at least it was in the green. Still, this is a company that reported dividend growth of 6.8%, yet the share price took a knock even after you adjust for the dividend that was paid in September.

Yes, there are some adjustments that would typically be made for stocks trading ex-dividend after results, but those adjustments don’t fully explain these recent moves. We’ve seen some major shifts in sentiment, which is a timely reminder that markets are always forward looking. That’s certainly the only good explanation for the recent rally in PGMs, as they released mostly crummy results in their recent financial periods.

What will the end of the year hold and can the Top 40 continue its march to the top-right-hand corner of the page, with the South African market showing a spectacular performance thus far this year? Heading into the final quarter of 2025, there’s all to play for.

Ghost Bites (Old Mutual | Orion Minerals | Tharisa)

Old Mutual will repurchase up to R3 billion in shares (JSE: OMU)

For context, the market cap is over R61 billion

A quieter day of news gave me the opportunity to dedicate space to digging into share repurchases and why listed companies do them. Old Mutual is the latest example, but by no means the only example or even the best example.

The “why’ of repurchases goes like this: if a company believes that its shares are undervalued in the market, then it makes sense to buy those shares back with excess capital rather than pay special cash dividends to shareholders (or worse, feel compelled to do sub-par projects / acquisitions). This boosts HEPS growth over time, as the number of shares in issue reduces each year.

That’s the theory, at least. In practice, we regularly see situations where companies repurchase their shares even when they aren’t undervalued. Companies in the American market (particularly in tech) are by far the worst, using share buybacks to offset the dilutionary impact of share-based compensation to staff. As the icing on the cake, they then disclose adjusted EBITDA that ignores the expense of share-based compensation, even though there’s a cash outflow from the company to repurchase enough shares in the market to offset the issuances. Be thankful for the use of IFRS accounting in South Africa and especially our local concept of HEPS, as it removes much of the scope for nonsense in corporate reporting teams.

Onwards to the mechanics of how this actually works. Most companies ask shareholders at the AGM for authority to repurchase shares, with Old Mutual having been granted a mandate to repurchase up to 10% of shares in issue (this is normal). The words “up to” are critical here, as it gives the company flexibility. Old Mutual received the authority back in May and is finally getting on with it, kicking off a share repurchase programme of up to R3 billion. This is just under 5% of the current market cap, or approximately half of the authority granted at the AGM.

The way this works is that the company appoints brokers (usually large banks) to sit on the bid and buy shares in the market, with the goal being to avoid doing it in such a way that it artificially pushes the price higher and makes the repurchase less attractive for the company. This is why on-market share repurchases are mainly viable for companies with significant liquidity in the stock. Companies with tightly held share registers are more likely to make specific repurchases in negotiated transactions with shareholders. There are far more regulatory requirements for specific repurchases, as you might imagine.

Old Mutual’s share price is flat over 12 months and is trading on a dividend yield of 6.8%, so it’s probably a good candidate for share buybacks. This isn’t exactly a demanding valuation.


Orion Minerals has increased the size of its capital raise once more (JSE: ORN)

Sentiment has swung sharply in their favour recently

For junior mining companies, access to capital is the difference between life and death. Projects require substantial investment to develop them from dreams in the ground to commodity producing assets. Sentiment can also shift quickly in this space, as it takes just one or two major milestones for a company to go from basket case to junior mining darling – and vice versa.

Orion Minerals was in serious danger of slipping into the “too hard” bucket for the market, which is a dark place that few companies emerge from. After a change of management and a subsequent funding deal with Glencore (JSE: GLN), Orion suddenly finds itself in a position where they’ve upsized their current equity capital raising activities for the second time!

Having originally planned to raise R57 million, they increased it to R89 million based on market demand and now they’ve upped it further to R99 million.

This is the share price chart for the past year and it’s quite a thing, with important further context being that the current capital raise is at a price of 17 cents per share (i.e. below where it is currently trading):


Tharisa to transition the Tharisa Mine to underground mining (JSE: THA)

The increase in life of mine doesn’t come cheap of course

Tharisa has announced that they will transition the Tharisa Mine from a large-scale open pit mine to underground mining. The current life of mine shows that open pit operations will be depleted by FY35, so they need to take action to ensure that the mine has a future beyond that date.

They expect total capital expenditure for this project of $547 million, with a peak funding requirement of $173 million. The project internal rate of return (IRR) according to the accompanying presentation is more than 25%.

The investment is spread out over several years, with Tharisa noting that they will need to use internal cash and external funding lines. At the very least this suggests the use of debt, which is no surprise. There’s no indication at the moment that they would need to raise any additional equity capital.

One of the hardest things about mining comes through in this announcement: the company needs to plan a decade ahead, despite great uncertainty over how commodity prices will move.


Nibbles:

  • Director dealings:
    • A number of directors of Truworths (JSE: TRU) sold shares worth R11.3 million to “rebalance their investment portfolios” – if I worked at Truworths, I would also sell every single one of my shares to rebalance away from that business.
    • A director of Thungela (JSE: TGA) sold shares worth R6.5 million.
    • A director of Sabvest (JSE: SBP) bought shares worth R587k.
  • Not exactly director dealings in the traditional sense, but a good reminder of the sheer size of the balance sheets of the likes of Christo Wiese: Titan Fincap has bought shares in Shoprite (JSE: SHP) worth R1.05 billion to settle scrip loans. The same Titan entity also entered into a total return swap for the same value.
  • Labat Africa (JSE: LAB) has new auditors in place and is finalising the financials for the year ended May 2025. They are planning to release them by 15 October.
  • Globe Trade Centre (JSE: GTC) only has trade in its name, not in its listed shares on the JSE. Still, the company has given us an interesting data point for debt pricing, with senior secured notes due October 2030 priced at a meaty 6.5%. This is by no means investment grade debt, but it shows you how much funding pressure there is for lower quality European companies with speculative credit ratings. Globe Trade Centre has recently suffered credit downgrades by rating agencies.

The money of colour

Pantene, or panettone? When the name of your business makes people think of shampoo brands and Italian fruit cakes, you need to work hard to carve out a space for yourself in the consumer consciousness. Fortunately, a little Y2K panic helped Pantone do exactly that. 

When the clock struck midnight on New Year’s Eve in 1999, the world braced for catastrophe. Y2K, also known as the millennium bug, had been on everyone’s mind for months. Since many year dates on computer systems were stored using only two digits (like “98” for 1998), there was fear that the dawning of the year 2000 would cause the computer systems that controlled everything from banking to flights to misinterpret “00” and cause a critical error.

Planes were predicted to fall out of the sky, computers were supposed to implode, and ATMs were expected to become unusable. Caught up in the panic, many people worldwide withdrew as much cash as they could and stocked up on canned goods, toilet paper and water like the apocalypse was coming. It was a tense time to be alive.

At Pantone’s New Jersey office, a group of executives sat around a table and tried to answer a question that would go on to change the outcome of their company. That question was: if there was one colour that could calm the whole world at once, what would it be?

Back to where it started

The Pantone story starts in the 1950s, with a modest little printing business named M & J Levine Advertising, run by two brothers. In 1956, the brothers hired a young Hofstra University graduate named Lawrence Herbert. He was hired for his chemistry degree, but it was his unexpected obsession with tidiness that created real value. Herbert was dismayed by the chaos that ruled the shop’s ink stocks. Colours were messy, inconsistent, and difficult to reproduce. He set to work creating order and streamlining the colour mixing process, and quickly turned the company’s ink division profitable. In 1962 – just 6 years after starting his job – he bought the company’s technological assets for $50,000 and gave them a catchy new name: Pantone.

From there, Herbert set his order-craving sights on the world. He created the Pantone Matching System (also called PMS) to fulfil his vision of a universal colour dictionary. Herbert’s categorisation of colours would allow designers and manufacturers to ensure consistency, whether they were printing a logo in Tokyo, dyeing cotton in Milan, or molding plastic in Detroit.

But wait – why did we need a dictionary of colour?

Before PMS, colour was completely subjective. A colour described as “sunset orange” in one factory could look like “muddy terracotta” in another. For brands, that was disastrous. Just imagine Coca-Cola’s red appearing as cherry pink on cans printed in the US and maroon on cans printed in the East. Pantone’s guides, which take the form of compact “fan decks” of swatches, solved that problem. The idea behind the PMS is to allow designers to colour match specific colours when a design enters production stage, regardless of the equipment used to produce the colour. Today, this system has been widely adopted by graphic designers and reproduction and printing houses.

By 2019, the catalogue had ballooned to over 2,100 colours. Brands got behind this idea in a big way, and soon, many approached Pantone to create signature “trademarked” colours for them. Just how trademarkable a colour really is somewhat of a murky question (and one that Pantone has skated around for years), but that hasn’t stopped the business from creating the signature blue for Tiffany’s (Pantone 1837), a golden yellow for McDonalds (Pantone 123c), deep purple for Cadbury’s (Pantone 2685c) and of course, a vivid pink for Barbie herself (Pantone 219c).

Enter Ms Eiseman

Herbert may have been a whizz at the science of colour, but he felt that he lacked the understanding of the psychology of colour that his clients – which soon included some of the biggest brands in the world – required. 

In 1983, Leatrice Eiseman published her first book, Alive with Color, which was a mix of colour psychology, theory, and her own personal passion. Eiseman had been raised by a mother who was both an artist and an interior decorator, and grew up surrounded by colour; her understanding of the link between emotion and colour was therefore practically instinctive. The book caught Herbert’s eye, and he promptly phoned Eiseman and offered her a job at Pantone. 

Eiseman was appointed as a colour consultant but quickly moved into the role of executive director for the Pantone Color Institute – a role she has held for 37 years. Eiseman’s magic touch came in the form of giving the colours names in addition to their numbers. Instead of Pantone 17-1463, designers could now refer to Tangerine Tango. She gave us Marsala (Pantone 19-1557) and Radiant Orchid (Pantone 18-3224). These names weren’t accidental – they were little emotional hooks, pulling buyers and designers into the narrative. With Eiseman’s input, Pantone transformed from simply cataloguing colours to shaping the desire to use them.

The birth of “Colour of the Year”

This brings me back to where I started this article – at the anxious turn of the millennium. One of the people seated at that table I described, wondering if a single colour had the power to calm the entire world, was Leatrice Eiseman. 

She chose a pretty, optimistic shade of cerulean blue which reminded her of a clear sky. The Pantone team ran with it and announced Pantone 15-4020, or Cerulean Blue, as their first ever Colour of the Year. For Eiseman, cerulean wasn’t just paint on a swatch; it was hope, bottled and sold in a pigment code. The announcement soon caught fire. Newspapers ran with it, designers referenced it, and consumers latched on.

The millennium experiment proved such a runaway success that Pantone turned it into an annual tradition. These days, a big part of Eiseman’s job involves a kind of global treasure hunt, travelling the world to meet a network of elite “colour whisperers”: designers, trend forecasters, and cultural sleuths who have an uncanny sense of what the world will crave next.

Forecasting the future of colour, it turns out, is part science, part sociology, and part detective work. The Pantone team dissects everything from fashion week runways to museum exhibitions, film studios’ animation palettes, upcoming sporting events, and even viral TikTok aesthetics, tracing the shifting hues of global mood and desire, one colour trend at a time.

Sometimes, Eiseman and her trendy team nail it. Sometimes they spark outrage – like in 2019, when they announced the shade Living Coral (Pantone 16-1546) in a year that saw massive coral deaths across the Great Barrier Reef. Oops. Either way, they got attention. The genius of Colour of the Year is not the prediction itself, but in the positioning. Pantone has moved from being a niche brand to a global influencer. Designers, artists, advertisers, even tech companies began shaping products around the annual pick. In the span of 25 years, a once-obscure printer’s tool became the arbiter of global taste.

Beyond the swatch

If you want real evidence that the Pantone brand has become a household name, you only have to look at the success of Pantone Lifestyle, which was launched to capitalise on the brand’s cultural cachet. Imagine swatch-inspired umbrellas, chairs, notebooks, even flasks. The company has found a way to monetise the very thing it used to sell B2B: colour as an object of desire.

It’s a neat trick, if you think about it. Pantone doesn’t make the paint, fabric, or plastic itself. It sells the language of colour in the form of the system, and then it sells the story of colour back to us through lifestyle products and cultural moments.

Whether the world at large feels that Pantone gets its pick right or not, the fact remains that colour provokes. It reflects what’s happening socially, politically, and environmentally, even when Pantone misjudges the mood. The backlash, in its own way, reinforces Pantone’s central role in global discourse

The business of forecasting

Today, Pantone competes in a booming industry of trend forecasting. Alongside firms like WGSN, it publishes reports predicting which colours will dominate retail two, three, or four years in advance. 

It’s a high-stakes game. Entire product lines – from Zara’s seasonal collections to Apple’s iPhone case options – may be shaped by these predictions. Get it right, and Pantone steers billions in consumer spending. Get it wrong, and you might end up with a warehouse full of coral-coloured sofas nobody wants.

On the surface, Pantone’s story is about swatches and pigments. But underneath, it’s about control – control of perception, of branding, and even of cultural mood. Pantone turned something ephemeral into something measurable. And in doing so, it built an empire.

About the author: Dominique Olivier

Dominique Olivier is the founder of human.writer, where she uses her love of storytelling and ideation to help brands solve problems.

She is a weekly columnist in Ghost Mail and collaborates with The Finance Ghost on Ghost Mail Weekender, a Sunday publication designed to help you be more interesting. She now also writes a regular column for Daily Maverick.

Dominique can be reached on LinkedIn here.

Verified by MonsterInsights