Boeing, Boeing, gone!
Unlock the Stock: Afrimat and Spear REIT
Afrimat’s track record is spectacular. Spear REIT is a highly respected property fund. On Unlock the Stock, you can learn about both companies.
RCL is far more than just a chicken business
RCL is far more than just a chicken business these days, which isn’t a bad thing.
Bidvest: strong trading profit growth in every division
Bidvest closed 3.8% higher after releasing results for the six months to December 2021.
Liberty Two Degrees: reversions continue to bite
Liberty Two Degrees holds stakes in some of the most iconic properties in the country
Alviva: 20% revenue growth excl. Tarsus
After teasing the market with a trading statement, Alviva has now released all the details of the interim results for the six months ended December 2021.
PSG Group and the Great Value Unlock
This is one of the biggest news stories on the JSE that we’ve seen in a while
JSE Limited: a cash cow in a shrinking field
You may not be aware of this, but the JSE Limited is listed on the JSE. You’re right in thinking that this sounds like the financial version of the movie Inception
Capital Appreciation on the deal train
The company has announced the acquisitions of three technology companies in South Africa and a 20% stake in a company in the Netherlands.
Woolworths won’t miss 2021
as released results for the 26 weeks to 26 December 2021. The share price rallied 6% despite a fair share of negative commentary on Twitter.
Cashbuild’s negative sales momentum continues
Cashbuild released its interim results for the six months ended 26 December 2021
Comments (8)
Leon Joffe
15 Jan 2024Good article.
“For starters, would it have made a difference to Boeing’s reputation if they had admitted that there was a problem with the 737 Max and grounded it themselves instead of waiting for a grounding order from the FAA (and therefore allowing a second crash to happen”
Here lies the crux of the problem. A company run by first class engineers would not have hesitated to ground the fleet immediately. In fact they would never have allowed the plane, with it’s obviously fatal flaw, to take to the air in the first place. The design would have been checked, rechecked, rechecked again, subject to every design then manufacturing quality control concept in the book. The lack of critical redundancy and the potential poor quality of the faulty component would have been obvious. So what happened at Boeing was systemic: the entire system failed. Those of us who have been in engineering environments like this know how vital it is that management support these quality control systems, both during design and production. And now it has happened again. Boeing’s entire engineering system has failed. And that means it will happen again…
Dominique
15 Jan 2024I agree with you Leon – it’s truly tragic to see a once-trusted giant of industry dragging itself down like this in the name of profit. While there will always be a place for them in the market (which has been locked in a duopoly for decades now), I doubt they will ever be able to clear their reputation.
Tim Anderson
15 Jan 2024Your article highlights one of the fundamental problems facing businesses today – an excessive focus on short term profits and share price.
A company can grow its share price in the short term (typically 1-3 years) by maximising short term profits. This is often achieved by cutting costs in easily controllable areas such as maintenance, training, quality checks and R&D. If done to excess, this can negatively impact longer term performance and the sustainability of the business as a whole.
Businesses with a longer term (5 years and longer) perspective also focus on longer payback initiatives such as innovation, quality, employee engagement, customer satisfaction, environmental impact, ethics and reputation. Success in these areas can enhance the share price over the longer term but may depress it in the shorter term.
Why the excessive focus on the short term? One reason is that this is what shareholders want. Many shareholders will choose more certain short term gains over less certain longer term gains, even if these are greater. It takes a strong executive and board to resist these pressures.
The other reason is linked to the tenure and pay structures of executives. If an executive is appointed for a relatively short term and his or her pay is structured accordingly, then this will determine his performance horizon. Executives tend to do what you pay them to do.
There are pressures around the world to reduce this focus on the short term. One idea gaining momentum is to get businesses to clearly define their purpose and then to link executive pay to the achievement of this purpose. One thing is clear – a short term focus benefits nobody but short term investors and executives whose pay is linked to short term performance. Everyone else suffers, including longer term investors, customers, employees and, in Boeing’s case, the flying public.
Dominique
15 Jan 2024Thanks for the great comment Tim!
You’re absolutely right of course, there is a culture of short-term decision making that has unfortunately taken root in many businesses. I guess we just continue to hope that the businesses that make things that could directly impact on our safety (like planes, cars and medicine) will do the right thing and put consumers before profit. It is quite a jarring wake-up call when we learn of instances where they don’t. Who pays the price? Not the management team, that’s for sure.
Boeing’s erstwhile CEO was “gracious” enough to not take his end-of-year bonus in the year of the first crash. But he didn’t turn down that $62 million payout when he got fired.
Graham Briggs
15 Jan 2024Shows that corporate culture is everything, not just something a company does once a year at a strategy session but all the time.
Dominique
15 Jan 2024Absolutely right Graham! The question is really simple when you get down to it: is a company in business for consumers, or for shareholders?
Ricus Reeders
16 Jan 2024I am forever grateful for the first thing I was taught when I did Investment Management at my alma mater three decades ago. It was a very new field then and our prinicpal, literally, wrote the book on the subject. It was neither shareholder return nor consumer satisfaction, but something called ‘rentabiliteit’ I.e., maximising investment for the long term benefit to all parties, including labour, ensuring the company’s survival long term. ‘Old’ Boeing was a prime example of that.
Dominique
16 Jan 2024Thanks so much for teaching me that term Ricus! I agree with you that it sounds like an apt description of “Old Boeing”‘s ethos.